Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-939-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-939-2021
Review
 | 
16 Sep 2021
Review |  | 16 Sep 2021

Coupled regional Earth system modeling in the Baltic Sea region

Matthias Gröger, Christian Dieterich, Jari Haapala, Ha Thi Minh Ho-Hagemann, Stefan Hagemann, Jaromir Jakacki, Wilhelm May, H. E. Markus Meier, Paul A. Miller, Anna Rutgersson, and Lichuan Wu

Related authors

Net primary production annual maxima in the North Atlantic projected to shift in the 21st century
Jenny Hieronymus, Magnus Hieronymus, Matthias Gröger, Jörg Schwinger, Raffaele Bernadello, Etienne Tourigny, Valentina Sicardi, Itzel Ruvalcaba Baroni, and Klaus Wyser
Biogeosciences, 21, 2189–2206, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2189-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2189-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation of the coupled physical–biogeochemical ocean model NEMO–SCOBI for the North Sea–Baltic Sea system
Itzel Ruvalcaba Baroni, Elin Almroth-Rosell, Lars Axell, Sam T. Fredriksson, Jenny Hieronymus, Magnus Hieronymus, Sandra-Esther Brunnabend, Matthias Gröger, Ivan Kuznetsov, Filippa Fransner, Robinson Hordoir, Saeed Falahat, and Lars Arneborg
Biogeosciences, 21, 2087–2132, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2087-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2087-2024, 2024
Short summary
Flux coupling approach on an exchange grid for the IOW Earth System Model (version 1.04.00) of the Baltic Sea region
Sven Karsten, Hagen Radtke, Matthias Gröger, Ha T. M. Ho-Hagemann, Hossein Mashayekh, Thomas Neumann, and H. E. Markus Meier
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1689–1708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1689-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1689-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Baltic Sea Model Intercomparison Project (BMIP) – a platform for model development, evaluation, and uncertainty assessment
Matthias Gröger, Manja Placke, H. E. Markus Meier, Florian Börgel, Sandra-Esther Brunnabend, Cyril Dutheil, Ulf Gräwe, Magnus Hieronymus, Thomas Neumann, Hagen Radtke, Semjon Schimanke, Jian Su, and Germo Väli
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8613–8638, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8613-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8613-2022, 2022
Short summary
Indian Ocean marine biogeochemical variability and its feedback on simulated South Asia climate
Dmitry V. Sein, Anton Y. Dvornikov, Stanislav D. Martyanov, William Cabos, Vladimir A. Ryabchenko, Matthias Gröger, Daniela Jacob, Alok Kumar Mishra, and Pankaj Kumar
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 809–831, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-809-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-809-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Dynamics of the Earth system: models
Stable stadial and interstadial states of the last glacial's climate identified in a combined stable water isotope and dust record from Greenland
Keno Riechers, Leonardo Rydin Gorjão, Forough Hassanibesheli, Pedro G. Lind, Dirk Witthaut, and Niklas Boers
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 593–607, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-593-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-593-2023, 2023
Short summary
The modelled climatic response to the 18.6-year lunar nodal cycle and its role in decadal temperature trends
Manoj Joshi, Robert A. Hall, David P. Stevens, and Ed Hawkins
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 443–455, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-443-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-443-2023, 2023
Short summary
The future of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation: using large ensembles to illuminate time-varying responses and inter-model differences
Nicola Maher, Robert C. Jnglin Wills, Pedro DiNezio, Jeremy Klavans, Sebastian Milinski, Sara C. Sanchez, Samantha Stevenson, Malte F. Stuecker, and Xian Wu
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 413–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-413-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-413-2023, 2023
Short summary
Regime-oriented causal model evaluation of Atlantic–Pacific teleconnections in CMIP6
Soufiane Karmouche, Evgenia Galytska, Jakob Runge, Gerald A. Meehl, Adam S. Phillips, Katja Weigel, and Veronika Eyring
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 309–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-309-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-309-2023, 2023
Short summary
Seasonal forecasting skill for the High Mountain Asia region in the Goddard Earth Observing System
Elias C. Massoud, Lauren Andrews, Rolf Reichle, Andrea Molod, Jongmin Park, Sophie Ruehr, and Manuela Girotto
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 147–171, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-147-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-147-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Akhtar, N., Brauch, J., Dobler, A., Béranger, K., and Ahrens, B.: Medicanes in an ocean–atmosphere coupled regional climate model, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2189–2201, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2189-2014, 2014. 
Akhtar, N., Krug, A., Brauch, J., A., T., D., and Christian, A., B.: European Marginal Seas in a regional atmosphere–ocean coupled model and their impact on Vb-cyclones and associated precipitation, Clim. Dynam., 53, 5967–5984, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04906-x, 2019. 
Alari, V., Staneva, J., Breivik, Ø., Bidlot, J. R., Mogensen, K., and Janssen, P.,: Surface wave effects on water temperature in the baltic sea: simulations with the coupled nemo–wam model, Ocean Dynam., 66, 917–930, 2016. 
Ali, A., Christensen, K. H., Breivik, Ø., Malila, M., Raj, R. P., Bertino, L., Chassignet, E. P., and Bakhoday-Paskyabi, M.: A comparison of langmuir turbulence parameterizations and key wave effects in a numerical model of the north atlantic and arctic oceans, Ocean Model., 137, 76–97, 2019. 
Download
Short summary
Regional climate studies are typically pursued by single Earth system component models (e.g., ocean models and atmosphere models). These models are driven by prescribed data which hamper the simulation of feedbacks between Earth system components. To overcome this, models were developed that interactively couple model components and allow an adequate simulation of Earth system interactions important for climate. This article reviews recent developments of such models for the Baltic Sea region.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint