Articles | Volume 12, issue 4
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1139–1167, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1139-2021
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1139–1167, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1139-2021

Research article 15 Nov 2021

Research article | 15 Nov 2021

Trivial improvements in predictive skill due to direct reconstruction of the global carbon cycle

Aaron Spring et al.

Related authors

Process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability
István Dunkl, Aaron Spring, Pierre Friedlingstein, and Victor Brovkin
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-38,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-38, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for ESD
Short summary

Related subject area

Earth system change: climate prediction
Is time a variable like the others in multivariate statistical downscaling and bias correction?
Yoann Robin and Mathieu Vrac
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1253–1273, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1253-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1253-2021, 2021
Short summary
Abrupt climate change as a rate-dependent cascading tipping point
Johannes Lohmann, Daniele Castellana, Peter D. Ditlevsen, and Henk A. Dijkstra
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 819–835, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-819-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-819-2021, 2021
Short summary
Extreme Metrics and Large Ensembles
Claudia Tebaldi, Kalyn Dorheim, Michael Wehner, and Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-53,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-53, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for ESD
Short summary
Bayesian estimation of Earth's climate sensitivity and transient climate response from observational warming and heat content datasets
Philip Goodwin and B. B. Cael
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 709–723, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-709-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-709-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comparison of CMIP6 historical climate simulations and future projected warming to an empirical model of global climate
Laura A. McBride, Austin P. Hope, Timothy P. Canty, Brian F. Bennett, Walter R. Tribett, and Ross J. Salawitch
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 545–579, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-545-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-545-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Balmaseda, M. A., Dee, D., Vidard, A., and Anderson, D. L. T.: A Multivariate Treatment of Bias for Sequential Data Assimilation: Application to the Tropical Oceans, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 167–179, https://doi.org/10/czgj3m, 2007. a, b, c
Brady, R., Spring, A., Huang, A., Banihirwe, A., and Bell, R.: pangeo-data/climpred: Release v2.1.4 (2.1.4), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5347774, 2021. a
Brady, R. X. and Spring, A.: Climpred: Verification of Weather and Climate Forecasts, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 2781, https://doi.org/10/gh9646, 2021. a
Brune, S. and Baehr, J.: Preserving the Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean Feedback in Initializations of Decadal Climate Predictions, WIREs Clim. Change, 11, e637, https://doi.org/10/ghtnt8, 2020. a
Dunkl, I., Spring, A., Friedlingstein, P., and Brovkin, V.: Process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability, Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-38, in review, 2021. a, b
Download
Short summary
Numerical carbon cycle prediction models usually do not start from observed carbon states due to sparse observations. Instead, only physical climate is reconstructed, assuming that the carbon cycle follows indirectly. Here, we test in an idealized framework how well this indirect and direct reconstruction with perfect observations works. We find that indirect reconstruction works quite well and that improvements from the direct method are limited, strengthening the current indirect use.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint