Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 789–807, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-789-2019
Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 789–807, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-789-2019

Research article 28 Nov 2019

Research article | 28 Nov 2019

Improving weather and climate predictions by training of supermodels

Francine Schevenhoven et al.

Related authors

An efficient training scheme for supermodels
Francine J. Schevenhoven and Frank M. Selten
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 429–438, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-429-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-429-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Dynamics of the Earth system: models
First assessment of the earth heat inventory within CMIP5 historical simulations
Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Almudena García-García, Hugo Beltrami, and Joel Finnis
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 581–600, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-581-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-581-2021, 2021
Short summary
The thermal response of small and shallow lakes to climate change: new insights from 3D hindcast modelling
Francesco Piccioni, Céline Casenave, Bruno Jacques Lemaire, Patrick Le Moigne, Philippe Dubois, and Brigitte Vinçon-Leite
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 439–456, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-439-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-439-2021, 2021
Short summary
Labrador Sea subsurface density as a precursor of multidecadal variability in the North Atlantic: a multi-model study
Pablo Ortega, Jon I. Robson, Matthew Menary, Rowan T. Sutton, Adam Blaker, Agathe Germe, Jöel J.-M. Hirschi, Bablu Sinha, Leon Hermanson, and Stephen Yeager
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 419–438, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-419-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-419-2021, 2021
Short summary
How modelling paradigms affect simulated future land use change
Calum Brown, Ian Holman, and Mark Rounsevell
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 211–231, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-211-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-211-2021, 2021
Short summary
Space-time dependence of compound hot-dry events in the United States: assessment using a multi-site multi-variable weather generator
Manuela I. Brunner, Eric Gilleland, and Andrew W. Wood
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-5,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-5, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for ESD
Short summary

Cited articles

Asch, M., Bocquet, M., and Nodet, M.: Data Assimilation: Methods, Algorithms, and Applications, Fundamentals of Algorithms, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974546, 2016. a
Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., and Brunet, G.: The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction, Nature, 525, 47–55, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14956, 2015. a
Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L., and Evensen, G.: Data assimilation in the geosciences: An overview of methods, issues, and perspectives, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev.: Clim. Change, 9, e535, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.535, 2018. a, b
Challinor, A. and Wheeler, T.: Crop yield reduction in the tropics under climate change: processes and uncertainties, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 148, 343–356, 2008. a
Collins, M. and Allen, M. R.: Assessing the Relative Roles of Initial and Boundary Conditions in Interannual to Decadal Climate Predictability, J. Climate, 15, 3104–3109, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3104:ATRROI>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Download
Short summary
Weather and climate predictions potentially improve by dynamically combining different models into a supermodel. A crucial step is to train the supermodel on the basis of observations. Here, we apply two different training methods to the global atmosphere–ocean–land model SPEEDO. We demonstrate that both training methods yield climate and weather predictions of superior quality compared to the individual models. Supermodel predictions can also outperform the commonly used multi-model mean.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint