Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-779-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-779-2022
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
13 Apr 2022
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 13 Apr 2022

Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate–carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios

Irina Melnikova, Olivier Boucher, Patricia Cadule, Katsumasa Tanaka, Thomas Gasser, Tomohiro Hajima, Yann Quilcaille, Hideo Shiogama, Roland Séférian, Kaoru Tachiiri, Nicolas Vuichard, Tokuta Yokohata, and Philippe Ciais

Related authors

Carbon cycle and climate feedback under CO2 and non-CO2 overshoot pathways
Irina Melnikova, Philippe Ciais, Katsumasa Tanaka, Hideo Shiogama, Kaoru Tachiiri, Tokuta Yokohata, and Olivier Boucher
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1553,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1553, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Earth system interactions with the biosphere: biogeochemical cycles
How does the phytoplankton–light feedback affect the marine N2O inventory?
Sarah Berthet, Julien Jouanno, Roland Séférian, Marion Gehlen, and William Llovel
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 399–412, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-399-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-399-2023, 2023
Short summary
Time-varying changes and uncertainties in the CMIP6 ocean carbon sink from global to local scale
Parsa Gooya, Neil C. Swart, and Roberta C. Hamme
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 383–398, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-383-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-383-2023, 2023
Short summary
Interannual global carbon cycle variations linked to atmospheric circulation variability
Na Li, Sebastian Sippel, Alexander J. Winkler, Miguel D. Mahecha, Markus Reichstein, and Ana Bastos
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1505–1533, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1505-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1505-2022, 2022
Short summary
Contrasting projections of the ENSO-driven CO2 flux variability in the equatorial Pacific under high-warming scenario
Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Laurent Bopp, Jim R. Christian, Tatiana Ilyina, John P. Krasting, Roland Séférian, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Michio Watanabe, Andrew Yool, and Jerry Tjiputra
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1097–1118, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1097-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1097-2022, 2022
Short summary
Divergent historical GPP trends among state-of-the-art multi-model simulations and satellite-based products
Ruqi Yang, Jun Wang, Ning Zeng, Stephen Sitch, Wenhan Tang, Matthew Joseph McGrath, Qixiang Cai, Di Liu, Danica Lombardozzi, Hanqin Tian, Atul K. Jain, and Pengfei Han
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 833–849, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-833-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-833-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, K. and Peters, G.: The trouble with negative emissions, Science, 354, 182, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4567, 2016. 
Babin, A., Vaneeckhaute, C., and Iliuta, M. C.: Potential and challenges of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage as a carbon-negative energy source: A review, Biomass Bioenerg., 146, 105968, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.105968, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
The deployment of bioenergy crops for capturing carbon from the atmosphere facilitates global warming mitigation via generating negative CO2 emissions. Here, we explored the consequences of large-scale energy crops deployment on the land carbon cycle. The land-use change for energy crops leads to carbon emissions and loss of future potential increase in carbon uptake by natural ecosystems. This impact should be taken into account by the modeling teams and accounted for in mitigation policies.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint