Articles | Volume 13, issue 2 
            
                
                    
            
            
            https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-779-2022
                    © Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
                the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-779-2022
                    © Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
                the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate–carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios
Irina Melnikova
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
                                            
                                    
                                            Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Paris, France
                                        
                                    
                                            Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), IPSL, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA/CNRS/UVSQ), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
                                        
                                    Olivier Boucher
                                            Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Paris, France
                                        
                                    Patricia Cadule
                                            Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Paris, France
                                        
                                    Katsumasa Tanaka
                                            Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), IPSL, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA/CNRS/UVSQ), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
                                        
                                    
                                            Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
                                        
                                    Thomas Gasser
                                            International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria
                                        
                                    Tomohiro Hajima
                                            Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology,  Yokohama, Japan
                                        
                                    Yann Quilcaille
                                            Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
                                        
                                    Hideo Shiogama
                                            Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
                                        
                                    Roland Séférian
                                            CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
                                        
                                    Kaoru Tachiiri
                                            Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
                                        
                                    
                                            Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology,  Yokohama, Japan
                                        
                                    Nicolas Vuichard
                                            Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), IPSL, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA/CNRS/UVSQ), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
                                        
                                    Tokuta Yokohata
                                            Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
                                        
                                    Philippe Ciais
                                            Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), IPSL, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA/CNRS/UVSQ), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
                                        
                                    Viewed
                        
                            Total article views: 6,447 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                        
                            
                                
                                
                            
                                
                                
                            
                        
                        
                            Cumulative views and downloads 
                                         (calculated since 21 Sep 2021)
                        
                        
                            
                                
                            
                    
        
                    
                    | HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,233 | 1,095 | 119 | 6,447 | 289 | 132 | 149 | 
- HTML: 5,233
- PDF: 1,095
- XML: 119
- Total: 6,447
- Supplement: 289
- BibTeX: 132
- EndNote: 149
                        
                            Total article views: 5,054 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                        
                            
                                
                                
                            
                                
                                
                            
                        
                        
                            Cumulative views and downloads 
                                         (calculated since 13 Apr 2022)
                        
                        
                            
                                
                            
                    
                    
                    | HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,240 | 724 | 90 | 5,054 | 141 | 115 | 135 | 
- HTML: 4,240
- PDF: 724
- XML: 90
- Total: 5,054
- Supplement: 141
- BibTeX: 115
- EndNote: 135
                        
                            Total article views: 1,393 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                        
                            
                                
                                
                            
                                
                                
                            
                        
                        
                            Cumulative views and downloads 
                                         (calculated since 21 Sep 2021)
                        
                        
                            
                                
                            
                    
        
                
            | HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 993 | 371 | 29 | 1,393 | 148 | 17 | 14 | 
- HTML: 993
- PDF: 371
- XML: 29
- Total: 1,393
- Supplement: 148
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 14
Viewed (geographical distribution)
                                Total article views: 6,447 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                                
                                Thereof 6,124 with geography defined
                                    and 323 with unknown origin. 
                            
        
                            
                                Total article views: 5,054 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                                
                                Thereof 4,812 with geography defined
                                    and 242 with unknown origin. 
                            
        
                            
                                Total article views: 1,393 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                                
                                Thereof 1,312 with geography defined
                                    and 81 with unknown origin. 
                            
                    | Country | # | Views | % | 
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % | 
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % | 
|---|
| Total: | 0 | 
| HTML: | 0 | 
| PDF: | 0 | 
| XML: | 0 | 
- 1
1
                            | Total: | 0 | 
| HTML: | 0 | 
| PDF: | 0 | 
| XML: | 0 | 
- 1
1
                            | Total: | 0 | 
| HTML: | 0 | 
| PDF: | 0 | 
| XML: | 0 | 
- 1
1
                            Cited
17 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Assessing the bioenergy potential of abandoned cropland in China: Toward an optimal distribution of bioenergy crops J. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.esd.2024.101590
- The need for carbon-emissions-driven climate projections in CMIP7 B. Sanderson et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-8141-2024
- Carbon cycle feedbacks in an idealized simulation and a scenario simulation of negative emissions in CMIP6 Earth system models A. Asaadi et al. 10.5194/bg-21-411-2024
- Assessing carbon cycle projections from complex and simple models under SSP scenarios I. Melnikova et al. 10.1007/s10584-023-03639-5
- Physical inconsistencies in the representation of the ocean heat-carbon nexus in simple climate models R. Séférian et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01464-x
- Five-year impacts of biomass crop monoculture on soil enzyme activity, nitrogen pools, and other soil health indicators N. Elhawat et al. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107856
- Sustainable land systems in the Anthropocene: Navigating the global land squeeze K. Erb et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.06.011
- A review of influencing factors for policy interventions in the deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage X. Xing et al. 10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100040
- Emergent constraints on future Amazon climate change-induced carbon loss using past global warming trends I. Melnikova et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-51474-8
- Relative benefits of allocating land to bioenergy crops and forests vary by region I. Melnikova et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00866-7
- Temperature overshoot responses to ambitious forestation in an Earth System Model Y. Moustakis et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-52508-x
- Biogeochemical versus biogeophysical temperature effects of historical land-use change in CMIP6 A. Amali et al. 10.5194/esd-16-803-2025
- CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1 Y. Quilcaille et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Agent-Based Life Cycle Assessment enables joint economic-environmental analysis of policy to support agricultural biomass for biofuels R. López i Losada et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170264
- Seasonal and regional changes in terrestrial carbon uptake under an overshoot scenario W. Cheng et al. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106997
- How to measure the efficiency of bioenergy crops compared to forestation S. Egerer et al. 10.5194/bg-21-5005-2024
17 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Assessing the bioenergy potential of abandoned cropland in China: Toward an optimal distribution of bioenergy crops J. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.esd.2024.101590
- The need for carbon-emissions-driven climate projections in CMIP7 B. Sanderson et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-8141-2024
- Carbon cycle feedbacks in an idealized simulation and a scenario simulation of negative emissions in CMIP6 Earth system models A. Asaadi et al. 10.5194/bg-21-411-2024
- Assessing carbon cycle projections from complex and simple models under SSP scenarios I. Melnikova et al. 10.1007/s10584-023-03639-5
- Physical inconsistencies in the representation of the ocean heat-carbon nexus in simple climate models R. Séférian et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01464-x
- Five-year impacts of biomass crop monoculture on soil enzyme activity, nitrogen pools, and other soil health indicators N. Elhawat et al. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107856
- Sustainable land systems in the Anthropocene: Navigating the global land squeeze K. Erb et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.06.011
- A review of influencing factors for policy interventions in the deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage X. Xing et al. 10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100040
- Emergent constraints on future Amazon climate change-induced carbon loss using past global warming trends I. Melnikova et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-51474-8
- Relative benefits of allocating land to bioenergy crops and forests vary by region I. Melnikova et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00866-7
- Temperature overshoot responses to ambitious forestation in an Earth System Model Y. Moustakis et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-52508-x
- Biogeochemical versus biogeophysical temperature effects of historical land-use change in CMIP6 A. Amali et al. 10.5194/esd-16-803-2025
- CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1 Y. Quilcaille et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Agent-Based Life Cycle Assessment enables joint economic-environmental analysis of policy to support agricultural biomass for biofuels R. López i Losada et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170264
- Seasonal and regional changes in terrestrial carbon uptake under an overshoot scenario W. Cheng et al. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106997
- How to measure the efficiency of bioenergy crops compared to forestation S. Egerer et al. 10.5194/bg-21-5005-2024
Latest update: 30 Oct 2025
Short summary
                    The deployment of bioenergy crops for capturing carbon from the atmosphere facilitates global warming mitigation via generating negative CO2 emissions. Here, we explored the consequences of large-scale energy crops deployment on the land carbon cycle. The land-use change for energy crops leads to carbon emissions and loss of future potential increase in carbon uptake by natural ecosystems. This impact should be taken into account by the modeling teams and accounted for in mitigation policies.
                    The deployment of bioenergy crops for capturing carbon from the atmosphere facilitates global...
                    
                Altmetrics
                
                Final-revised paper
            
            
                    Preprint
                
                     
 
                             
                             
                     
                     
                    