Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-435-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-435-2015
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
13 Jul 2015
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 13 Jul 2015

Decomposing uncertainties in the future terrestrial carbon budget associated with emission scenarios, climate projections, and ecosystem simulations using the ISI-MIP results

K. Nishina, A. Ito, P. Falloon, A. D. Friend, D. J. Beerling, P. Ciais, D. B. Clark, R. Kahana, E. Kato, W. Lucht, M. Lomas, R. Pavlick, S. Schaphoff, L. Warszawaski, and T. Yokohata

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Kazuya Nishina on behalf of the Authors (22 May 2015)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (22 Jun 2015) by David Lapola
AR by Kazuya Nishina on behalf of the Authors (26 Jun 2015)
Download
Short summary
Our study focused on uncertainties in terrestrial C cycling under newly developed scenarios with CMIP5. This study presents first results for examining relative uncertainties of projected terrestrial C cycling in multiple projection components. Only using our new model inter-comparison project data sets enables us to evaluate various uncertainty sources in projection periods. The information on relative uncertainties is useful for climate science and climate change impact evaluation.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint