Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-393-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-393-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Exploring the biogeophysical limits of global food production under different climate change scenarios
Philipp de Vrese
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, The Land in the Earth System, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Tobias Stacke
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, The Land in the Earth System, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Stefan Hagemann
Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute of Coastal Research, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany
Related authors
Félix García-Pereira, Jesús Fidel González-Rouco, Camilo Melo-Aguilar, Norman Julius Steinert, Elena García-Bustamante, Philip de Vrese, Johann Jungclaus, Stephan Lorenz, Stefan Hagemann, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Almudena García-García, and Hugo Beltrami
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 547–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-547-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-547-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
According to climate model estimates, the land stored 2 % of the system's heat excess in the last decades, while observational studies show it was around 6 %. This difference stems from these models using land components that are too shallow to constrain land heat uptake. Deepening the land component does not affect the surface temperature. This result can be used to derive land heat uptake estimates from different sources, which are much closer to previous observational reports.
Félix García-Pereira, Jesús Fidel González-Rouco, Thomas Schmid, Camilo Melo-Aguilar, Cristina Vegas-Cañas, Norman Julius Steinert, Pedro José Roldán-Gómez, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Almudena García-García, Hugo Beltrami, and Philipp de Vrese
SOIL, 10, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work addresses air–ground temperature coupling and propagation into the subsurface in a mountainous area in central Spain using surface and subsurface data from six meteorological stations. Heat transfer of temperature changes at the ground surface occurs mainly by conduction controlled by thermal diffusivity of the subsurface, which varies with depth and time. A new methodology shows that near-surface diffusivity and soil moisture content changes with time are closely related.
Philipp de Vrese, Goran Georgievski, Jesus Fidel Gonzalez Rouco, Dirk Notz, Tobias Stacke, Norman Julius Steinert, Stiig Wilkenskjeld, and Victor Brovkin
The Cryosphere, 17, 2095–2118, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The current generation of Earth system models exhibits large inter-model differences in the simulated climate of the Arctic and subarctic zone. We used an adapted version of the Max Planck Institute (MPI) Earth System Model to show that differences in the representation of the soil hydrology in permafrost-affected regions could help explain a large part of this inter-model spread and have pronounced impacts on important elements of Earth systems as far to the south as the tropics.
Philipp de Vrese, Tobias Stacke, Thomas Kleinen, and Victor Brovkin
The Cryosphere, 15, 1097–1130, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1097-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1097-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
With large amounts of carbon stored in frozen soils and a highly energy-limited vegetation the Arctic is very sensitive to changes in climate. Here our simulations with the land surface model JSBACH reveal a number of offsetting factors moderating the Arctic's net response to global warming. More importantly we find that the effects of climate change may not be fully reversible on decadal timescales, leading to substantially different CH4 emissions depending on whether the Arctic warms or cools.
Marvin Heidkamp, Felix Ament, Philipp de Vrese, and Andreas Chlond
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-75, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-75, 2020
Publication in ESD not foreseen
Short summary
Short summary
This study deals with leaf thermoregulation, a process that describes the ability of leaves to buffer against ambient temperatures. In the past, this effect has been investigated at the leaf scale, but not on the canopy or global scale. Here we try to close this scientific gap by studying the large-scale effect of leaf thermoregulation using the Max Planck Institute's Earth system model. We believe that our study provides valuable insights for modelers and observers.
Stefan Hagemann, Thao Thi Nguyen, and Ha Thi Minh Ho-Hagemann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1774, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1774, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a methodology for the bias correction of simulated river runoff to force ocean models in which low, medium and high discharges are corrected separately at the coast. We show that the bias correction generally leads to an improved representation of river runoff in Europe. The methodology is suitable for model regions with a sufficiently high coverage of discharge observations, and it can be applied to river runoff based on climate hindcasts or climate change simulations.
Hannes Müller Schmied, Simon Newland Gosling, Marlo Garnsworthy, Laura Müller, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Atiq Kainan Ahmed, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Julien Boulange, Peter Burek, Jinfeng Chang, He Chen, Manolis Grillakis, Luca Guillaumot, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Rohini Kumar, Guoyong Leng, Junguo Liu, Xingcai Liu, Inga Menke, Vimal Mishra, Yadu Pokhrel, Oldrich Rakovec, Luis Samaniego, Yusuke Satoh, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Mikhail Smilovic, Tobias Stacke, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Wim Thiery, Athanasios Tsilimigkras, Yoshihide Wada, Niko Wanders, and Tokuta Yokohata
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1303, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1303, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Global water models contribute to the evaluation of important natural and societal issues but are – as all models – simplified representation of the reality. So, there are many ways to calculate the water fluxes and storages. This paper presents a visualization of 16 global water models using a standardized visualization and the pathway towards this common understanding. Next to academic education purposes, we envisage that these diagrams will help researchers, model developers and data users.
Félix García-Pereira, Jesús Fidel González-Rouco, Camilo Melo-Aguilar, Norman Julius Steinert, Elena García-Bustamante, Philip de Vrese, Johann Jungclaus, Stephan Lorenz, Stefan Hagemann, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Almudena García-García, and Hugo Beltrami
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 547–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-547-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-547-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
According to climate model estimates, the land stored 2 % of the system's heat excess in the last decades, while observational studies show it was around 6 %. This difference stems from these models using land components that are too shallow to constrain land heat uptake. Deepening the land component does not affect the surface temperature. This result can be used to derive land heat uptake estimates from different sources, which are much closer to previous observational reports.
Félix García-Pereira, Jesús Fidel González-Rouco, Thomas Schmid, Camilo Melo-Aguilar, Cristina Vegas-Cañas, Norman Julius Steinert, Pedro José Roldán-Gómez, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Almudena García-García, Hugo Beltrami, and Philipp de Vrese
SOIL, 10, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work addresses air–ground temperature coupling and propagation into the subsurface in a mountainous area in central Spain using surface and subsurface data from six meteorological stations. Heat transfer of temperature changes at the ground surface occurs mainly by conduction controlled by thermal diffusivity of the subsurface, which varies with depth and time. A new methodology shows that near-surface diffusivity and soil moisture content changes with time are closely related.
Philipp Heinrich, Stefan Hagemann, Ralf Weisse, Corinna Schrum, Ute Daewel, and Lidia Gaslikova
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1967–1985, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1967-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1967-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
High seawater levels co-occurring with high river discharges have the potential to cause destructive flooding. For the past decades, the number of such compound events was larger than expected by pure chance for most of the west-facing coasts in Europe. Additionally rivers with smaller catchments showed higher numbers. In most cases, such events were associated with a large-scale weather pattern characterized by westerly winds and strong rainfall.
Philipp de Vrese, Goran Georgievski, Jesus Fidel Gonzalez Rouco, Dirk Notz, Tobias Stacke, Norman Julius Steinert, Stiig Wilkenskjeld, and Victor Brovkin
The Cryosphere, 17, 2095–2118, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The current generation of Earth system models exhibits large inter-model differences in the simulated climate of the Arctic and subarctic zone. We used an adapted version of the Max Planck Institute (MPI) Earth System Model to show that differences in the representation of the soil hydrology in permafrost-affected regions could help explain a large part of this inter-model spread and have pronounced impacts on important elements of Earth systems as far to the south as the tropics.
Manuel Schlund, Birgit Hassler, Axel Lauer, Bouwe Andela, Patrick Jöckel, Rémi Kazeroni, Saskia Loosveldt Tomas, Brian Medeiros, Valeriu Predoi, Stéphane Sénési, Jérôme Servonnat, Tobias Stacke, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Klaus Zimmermann, and Veronika Eyring
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 315–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-315-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-315-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models. Originally, ESMValTool was designed to process reformatted output provided by large model intercomparison projects like the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). Here, we describe a new extension of ESMValTool that allows for reading and processing native climate model output, i.e., data that have not been reformatted before.
Tobias Stacke and Stefan Hagemann
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7795–7816, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7795-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7795-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
HydroPy is a new version of an established global hydrology model. It was rewritten from scratch and adapted to a modern object-oriented infrastructure to facilitate its future development and application. With this study, we provide a thorough documentation and evaluation of our new model. At the same time, we open our code base and publish the model's source code in a public software repository. In this way, we aim to contribute to increasing transparency and reproducibility in science.
Matthias Gröger, Christian Dieterich, Jari Haapala, Ha Thi Minh Ho-Hagemann, Stefan Hagemann, Jaromir Jakacki, Wilhelm May, H. E. Markus Meier, Paul A. Miller, Anna Rutgersson, and Lichuan Wu
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 939–973, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-939-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-939-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Regional climate studies are typically pursued by single Earth system component models (e.g., ocean models and atmosphere models). These models are driven by prescribed data which hamper the simulation of feedbacks between Earth system components. To overcome this, models were developed that interactively couple model components and allow an adequate simulation of Earth system interactions important for climate. This article reviews recent developments of such models for the Baltic Sea region.
Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Hannes Müller Schmied, Wim Thiery, Guoyong Leng, Peter Burek, Xingcai Liu, Julien Eric Stanislas Boulange, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Manolis Grillakis, Simon Newland Gosling, Yusuke Satoh, Oldrich Rakovec, Tobias Stacke, Jinfeng Chang, Niko Wanders, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Tim Trautmann, Ganquan Mao, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Yadu Pokhrel, Luis Samaniego, Yoshihide Wada, Vimal Mishra, Junguo Liu, Petra Döll, Fang Zhao, Anne Gädeke, Sam S. Rabin, and Florian Herz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3843–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We analyse water storage compartments, water flows, and human water use sectors included in 16 global water models that provide simulations for the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b. We develop a standard writing style for the model equations. We conclude that even though hydrologic processes are often based on similar equations, in the end these equations have been adjusted, or the models have used different values for specific parameters or specific variables.
Philipp de Vrese, Tobias Stacke, Thomas Kleinen, and Victor Brovkin
The Cryosphere, 15, 1097–1130, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1097-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1097-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
With large amounts of carbon stored in frozen soils and a highly energy-limited vegetation the Arctic is very sensitive to changes in climate. Here our simulations with the land surface model JSBACH reveal a number of offsetting factors moderating the Arctic's net response to global warming. More importantly we find that the effects of climate change may not be fully reversible on decadal timescales, leading to substantially different CH4 emissions depending on whether the Arctic warms or cools.
Richard Essery, Hyungjun Kim, Libo Wang, Paul Bartlett, Aaron Boone, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, Eleanor Burke, Matthias Cuntz, Bertrand Decharme, Emanuel Dutra, Xing Fang, Yeugeniy Gusev, Stefan Hagemann, Vanessa Haverd, Anna Kontu, Gerhard Krinner, Matthieu Lafaysse, Yves Lejeune, Thomas Marke, Danny Marks, Christoph Marty, Cecile B. Menard, Olga Nasonova, Tomoko Nitta, John Pomeroy, Gerd Schädler, Vladimir Semenov, Tatiana Smirnova, Sean Swenson, Dmitry Turkov, Nander Wever, and Hua Yuan
The Cryosphere, 14, 4687–4698, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4687-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4687-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models are uncertain in predicting how warming changes snow cover. This paper compares 22 snow models with the same meteorological inputs. Predicted trends agree with observations at four snow research sites: winter snow cover does not start later, but snow now melts earlier in spring than in the 1980s at two of the sites. Cold regions where snow can last until late summer are predicted to be particularly sensitive to warming because the snow then melts faster at warmer times of year.
Marvin Heidkamp, Felix Ament, Philipp de Vrese, and Andreas Chlond
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-75, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-75, 2020
Publication in ESD not foreseen
Short summary
Short summary
This study deals with leaf thermoregulation, a process that describes the ability of leaves to buffer against ambient temperatures. In the past, this effect has been investigated at the leaf scale, but not on the canopy or global scale. Here we try to close this scientific gap by studying the large-scale effect of leaf thermoregulation using the Max Planck Institute's Earth system model. We believe that our study provides valuable insights for modelers and observers.
Veronika Eyring, Lisa Bock, Axel Lauer, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Bouwe Andela, Enrico Arnone, Omar Bellprat, Björn Brötz, Louis-Philippe Caron, Nuno Carvalhais, Irene Cionni, Nicola Cortesi, Bas Crezee, Edouard L. Davin, Paolo Davini, Kevin Debeire, Lee de Mora, Clara Deser, David Docquier, Paul Earnshaw, Carsten Ehbrecht, Bettina K. Gier, Nube Gonzalez-Reviriego, Paul Goodman, Stefan Hagemann, Steven Hardiman, Birgit Hassler, Alasdair Hunter, Christopher Kadow, Stephan Kindermann, Sujan Koirala, Nikolay Koldunov, Quentin Lejeune, Valerio Lembo, Tomas Lovato, Valerio Lucarini, François Massonnet, Benjamin Müller, Amarjiit Pandde, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Adam Phillips, Valeriu Predoi, Joellen Russell, Alistair Sellar, Federico Serva, Tobias Stacke, Ranjini Swaminathan, Verónica Torralba, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Jost von Hardenberg, Katja Weigel, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3383–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool designed to improve comprehensive and routine evaluation of earth system models (ESMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). It has undergone rapid development since the first release in 2016 and is now a well-tested tool that provides end-to-end provenance tracking to ensure reproducibility.
Hong Xuan Do, Fang Zhao, Seth Westra, Michael Leonard, Lukas Gudmundsson, Julien Eric Stanislas Boulange, Jinfeng Chang, Philippe Ciais, Dieter Gerten, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Tobias Stacke, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, and Yoshihide Wada
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1543–1564, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1543-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1543-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We presented a global comparison between observed and simulated trends in a flood index over the 1971–2005 period using the Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata archive and six global hydrological models available through The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. Streamflow simulations over 2006–2099 period robustly project high flood hazard in several regions. These high-flood-risk areas, however, are under-sampled by the current global streamflow databases.
Gerhard Krinner, Chris Derksen, Richard Essery, Mark Flanner, Stefan Hagemann, Martyn Clark, Alex Hall, Helmut Rott, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, Hyungjun Kim, Cécile B. Ménard, Lawrence Mudryk, Chad Thackeray, Libo Wang, Gabriele Arduini, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Paul Bartlett, Julia Boike, Aaron Boone, Frédérique Chéruy, Jeanne Colin, Matthias Cuntz, Yongjiu Dai, Bertrand Decharme, Jeff Derry, Agnès Ducharne, Emanuel Dutra, Xing Fang, Charles Fierz, Josephine Ghattas, Yeugeniy Gusev, Vanessa Haverd, Anna Kontu, Matthieu Lafaysse, Rachel Law, Dave Lawrence, Weiping Li, Thomas Marke, Danny Marks, Martin Ménégoz, Olga Nasonova, Tomoko Nitta, Masashi Niwano, John Pomeroy, Mark S. Raleigh, Gerd Schaedler, Vladimir Semenov, Tanya G. Smirnova, Tobias Stacke, Ulrich Strasser, Sean Svenson, Dmitry Turkov, Tao Wang, Nander Wever, Hua Yuan, Wenyan Zhou, and Dan Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5027–5049, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5027-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5027-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides an overview of a coordinated international experiment to determine the strengths and weaknesses in how climate models treat snow. The models will be assessed at point locations using high-quality reference measurements and globally using satellite-derived datasets. How well climate models simulate snow-related processes is important because changing snow cover is an important part of the global climate system and provides an important freshwater resource for human use.
Thomas Riddick, Victor Brovkin, Stefan Hagemann, and Uwe Mikolajewicz
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4291–4316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4291-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4291-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
During the Last Glacial Maximum, many rivers were blocked by the presence of large ice sheets and thus found new routes to the sea. This resulted in changes in the pattern of freshwater discharge into the oceans and thus would have significantly affected ocean circulation. Also, rivers found routes across the vast exposed continental shelves to the lower coastlines of that time. We propose a model for such changes in river routing suitable for use in wider models of the last glacial cycle.
Axel Lauer, Colin Jones, Veronika Eyring, Martin Evaldsson, Stefan Hagemann, Jarmo Mäkelä, Gill Martin, Romain Roehrig, and Shiyu Wang
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 33–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-33-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-33-2018, 2018
Liangjing Zhang, Henryk Dobslaw, Tobias Stacke, Andreas Güntner, Robert Dill, and Maik Thomas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 821–837, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-821-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-821-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Global numerical models perform differently, as has been found in some model intercomparison studies, which mainly focused on components like evapotranspiration, soil moisture or runoff. We have applied terrestrial water storage that is estimated from a GRACE-based state-of-art post-processing method to validate four global numerical models and try to identify the advantages and deficiencies of a certain model. GRACE-based TWS demonstrates its additional benefits to improve the models in future.
Jarmo Mäkelä, Jouni Susiluoto, Tiina Markkanen, Mika Aurela, Heikki Järvinen, Ivan Mammarella, Stefan Hagemann, and Tuula Aalto
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 23, 447–465, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-23-447-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-23-447-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The land-based hydrological cycle is one of the key processes controlling the growth and wilting of plants and the amount of carbon vegetation can assimilate. Recent studies have shown that many land surface models have biases in this area. We optimized parameters in one such model (JSBACH) and were able to enhance the model performance in many respects, but the response to drought remained unaffected. Further studies into this aspect should include alternative stomatal conductance formulations.
Bart van den Hurk, Hyungjun Kim, Gerhard Krinner, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Chris Derksen, Taikan Oki, Hervé Douville, Jeanne Colin, Agnès Ducharne, Frederique Cheruy, Nicholas Viovy, Michael J. Puma, Yoshihide Wada, Weiping Li, Binghao Jia, Andrea Alessandri, Dave M. Lawrence, Graham P. Weedon, Richard Ellis, Stefan Hagemann, Jiafu Mao, Mark G. Flanner, Matteo Zampieri, Stefano Materia, Rachel M. Law, and Justin Sheffield
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2809–2832, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2809-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2809-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This manuscript describes the setup of the CMIP6 project Land Surface, Snow and Soil Moisture Model Intercomparison Project (LS3MIP).
Stefan Hagemann, Tanja Blome, Altug Ekici, and Christian Beer
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 611–625, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-611-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-611-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The present study analyses how cold-region physical soil processes, especially freezing of soil water, impact large-scale hydrology and climate over Northern Hemisphere high-latitude land areas. For this analysis, an atmosphere–land global climate model was used. It is shown that including these processes in the model leads to improved discharge in spring and a positive land–atmosphere feedback to precipitation over the high latitudes that has previously not been noted for the high latitudes.
Veronika Eyring, Mattia Righi, Axel Lauer, Martin Evaldsson, Sabrina Wenzel, Colin Jones, Alessandro Anav, Oliver Andrews, Irene Cionni, Edouard L. Davin, Clara Deser, Carsten Ehbrecht, Pierre Friedlingstein, Peter Gleckler, Klaus-Dirk Gottschaldt, Stefan Hagemann, Martin Juckes, Stephan Kindermann, John Krasting, Dominik Kunert, Richard Levine, Alexander Loew, Jarmo Mäkelä, Gill Martin, Erik Mason, Adam S. Phillips, Simon Read, Catherine Rio, Romain Roehrig, Daniel Senftleben, Andreas Sterl, Lambertus H. van Ulft, Jeremy Walton, Shiyu Wang, and Keith D. Williams
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1747–1802, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
A community diagnostics and performance metrics tool for the evaluation of Earth system models (ESMs) in CMIP has been developed that allows for routine comparison of single or multiple models, either against predecessor versions or against observations.
Y. Gao, T. Markkanen, T. Thum, M. Aurela, A. Lohila, I. Mammarella, M. Kämäräinen, S. Hagemann, and T. Aalto
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 175–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-175-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-175-2016, 2016
T. Stacke and S. Hagemann
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-1-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-1-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates the lifetime of soil moisture perturbations using an atmosphere-land GCM. We find memory of up to 9 months for root zone soil moisture. Interactions with other surface states result in significant but short-lived anomalies in surface temperature and more stable anomalies in leaf carbon content. As these anomalies can recur repeatedly, e.g. due to interactions with a deep-soil moisture reservoir, we conclude that soil moisture initialization may impact climate predictions.
B. Poulter, N. MacBean, A. Hartley, I. Khlystova, O. Arino, R. Betts, S. Bontemps, M. Boettcher, C. Brockmann, P. Defourny, S. Hagemann, M. Herold, G. Kirches, C. Lamarche, D. Lederer, C. Ottlé, M. Peters, and P. Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2315–2328, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Land cover is an essential variable in earth system models and determines conditions driving biogeochemical, energy and water exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere. A methodology is presented for mapping plant functional types used in global vegetation models from a updated land cover classification system and open-source conversion tool, resulting from a consultative process among map producers and modelers engaged in the European Space Agency’s Land Cover Climate Change Initiative.
B. Mayer, T. Stacke, I. Stottmeister, and T. Pohlmann
Ocean Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/osd-12-863-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/osd-12-863-2015, 2015
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The Indonesian Sunda Shelf (average depth 48 m) is subject to many physical and biogeochemical processes with a strong impact from human activities. For investigation of marine environmental water properties, it is important to know characteristic water exchange rates. With realistic computer model results, analytical flushing rates and tracer residence times were compared for different shelf regions. Only the latter give detailed 3D pictures with times of less than 30 days to more than 2 years.
A. Ekici, C. Beer, S. Hagemann, J. Boike, M. Langer, and C. Hauck
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 631–647, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-631-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-631-2014, 2014
J. C. S. Davie, P. D. Falloon, R. Kahana, R. Dankers, R. Betts, F. T. Portmann, D. Wisser, D. B. Clark, A. Ito, Y. Masaki, K. Nishina, B. Fekete, Z. Tessler, Y. Wada, X. Liu, Q. Tang, S. Hagemann, T. Stacke, R. Pavlick, S. Schaphoff, S. N. Gosling, W. Franssen, and N. Arnell
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 359–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-359-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-359-2013, 2013
A. Loew, T. Stacke, W. Dorigo, R. de Jeu, and S. Hagemann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3523–3542, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3523-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3523-2013, 2013
S. Hagemann, C. Chen, D. B. Clark, S. Folwell, S. N. Gosling, I. Haddeland, N. Hanasaki, J. Heinke, F. Ludwig, F. Voss, and A. J. Wiltshire
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 129–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-129-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-129-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Management of the Earth system: sustainability science
Governing change: a dynamical systems approach to understanding the stability of environmental governance
Disentangling the climate divide with emotional patterns: a network-based mindset reconstruction approach
Lotka's wheel and the long arm of history: how does the distant past determine today's global rate of energy consumption?
Coupling human and natural systems for sustainability: experience from China's Loess Plateau
Groundwater storage dynamics in the world's large aquifer systems from GRACE: uncertainty and role of extreme precipitation
Linking resilience and robustness and uncovering their trade-offs in coupled infrastructure systems
A framework for modelling the complexities of food and water security under globalisation
Ship emissions and the use of current air cleaning technology: contributions to air pollution and acidification in the Baltic Sea
Sustainable use of renewable resources in a stylized social–ecological network model under heterogeneous resource distribution
Weather and resource information as tools for dealing with farmer–pastoralist conflicts in the Sahel
Revolutions in energy input and material cycling in Earth history and human history
Topology of sustainable management of dynamical systems with desirable states: from defining planetary boundaries to safe operating spaces in the Earth system
Socio-environmental cooperation and conflict? A discursive understanding and its application to the case of Israel and Palestine
Gender and climate change in the Indian Himalayas: global threats, local vulnerabilities, and livelihood diversification at the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve
Policies, economic incentives and the adoption of modern irrigation technology in China
Migration and global environmental change: methodological lessons from mountain areas of the global South
Farmers' perceptions of and adaptation strategies to climate change and their determinants: the case of Punjab province, Pakistan
Climate impacts on human livelihoods: where uncertainty matters in projections of water availability
Applying the concept of "energy return on investment" to desert greening of the Sahara/Sahel using a global climate model
Nusrat Molla, John DeIonno, Thilo Gross, and Jonathan Herman
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1677–1688, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1677-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1677-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
How the structure of resource governance systems affects how they respond to change is not yet well understood. We model the stability of thousands of different governance systems, revealing that greater diversity and interdependence among actors are destabilizing, while venue shopping and advocacy organizations are stabilizing. This study suggests that complexity in governance corresponds to responsiveness to change, while providing insight into managing them to balance adaptivity and stability
Roger Cremades and Massimo Stella
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1473–1489, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1473-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1473-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We analyse the speeches of prominent climate activism and climate disinformation figures, finding that the emotional patterns behind the words reveal more than the words themselves and showing the emerging revolutionary characteristics of climate activism and some strange emotional connections on the side of disinformation, where there is surprisingly no worry about change at all.
Timothy J. Garrett, Matheus R. Grasselli, and Stephen Keen
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1021–1028, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1021-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1021-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Current world economic production is rising relative to energy consumption. This increase in
production efficiencysuggests that carbon dioxide emissions can be decoupled from economic activity through technological change. We show instead a nearly fixed relationship between energy consumption and a new economic quantity, historically cumulative economic production. The strong link to the past implies inertia may play a more dominant role in societal evolution than is generally assumed.
Bojie Fu, Xutong Wu, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Xilin Wu, and Shuai Wang
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 795–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-795-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-795-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To understand the dynamics of a coupled human and natural system (CHANS) and promote its sustainability, we propose a conceptual
pattern–process–service–sustainabilitycascade framework. The use of this framework is systematically illustrated by a review of CHANS research experience in China's Loess Plateau in terms of coupling landscape patterns and ecological processes, linking ecological processes to ecosystem services, and promoting social–ecological sustainability.
Mohammad Shamsudduha and Richard G. Taylor
Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 755–774, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-755-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-755-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Recent assessments of the sustainability of global groundwater resources using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites assume that the underlying trends are linear. Here, we assess recent changes in groundwater storage (ΔGWS) in the world’s large aquifer systems using an ensemble of GRACE datasets and show that trends are mostly non-linear. Non-linearity in ΔGWS derives, in part, from the episodic nature of groundwater replenishment associated with extreme precipitation.
Mehran Homayounfar, Rachata Muneepeerakul, John M. Anderies, and Chitsomanus P. Muneepeerakul
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1159–1168, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1159-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1159-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
For many complex social-ecological systems, robustness and resilience are difficult to quantify and the connections and trade-offs between them difficult to study. In this study, we present an analytical framework to address the linkage between robustness and resilience more systematically. The results reveal the trade-offs between robustness and resilience. They also show how the nature of such trade-offs varies with the choices of certain policies, internal stresses, and external disturbances.
Brian J. Dermody, Murugesu Sivapalan, Elke Stehfest, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Martin J. Wassen, Marc F. P. Bierkens, and Stefan C. Dekker
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 103–118, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-103-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-103-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Ensuring sustainable food and water security is an urgent and complex challenge. As the world becomes increasingly globalised and interdependent, food and water management policies may have unintended consequences across regions, sectors and scales. Current decision-making tools do not capture these complexities and thus miss important dynamics. We present a modelling framework to capture regional and sectoral interdependence and cross-scale feedbacks within the global food system.
Björn Claremar, Karin Haglund, and Anna Rutgersson
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 901–919, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-901-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-901-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Shipping is the most cost-effective option for the global transport of goods, and over 90 % of world trade is carried by sea. The shipping sector, however, contributes to emissions of pollutants into the air and water. Estimates of deposition and near-surface concentrations of sulfur, nitrogen, and particulate matter originating from shipping in the Baltic Sea region have been developed for present conditions concerning traffic intensity and fuel as well as for future scenarios until 2050.
Wolfram Barfuss, Jonathan F. Donges, Marc Wiedermann, and Wolfgang Lucht
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 255–264, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-255-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-255-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Human societies depend on the resources ecosystems provide. We study this coevolutionary relationship by utilizing a stylized model of resource users on a social network. This model demonstrates that social–cultural processes can have a profound influence on the environmental state, such as determining whether the resources collapse from overuse or not. This suggests that social–cultural processes should receive more attention in the modeling of sustainability transitions and the Earth system.
Ole Mertz, Kjeld Rasmussen, and Laura Vang Rasmussen
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 969–976, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-969-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-969-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Conflicts over land and water resources between livestock herders and farmers are common in the Sahelian region of Africa. In this paper we show that improved information on weather, grazing areas, and water resources may reduce the level of conflict if communicated in such a way so that not too many livestock herds go to the same areas. However, if this information is not accompanied by information on herd crowding and potential conflict areas, it may lead to more conflict.
Timothy M. Lenton, Peter-Paul Pichler, and Helga Weisz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 353–370, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-353-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-353-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We identify six past revolutions in energy input and material cycling in Earth and human history. We find that human energy use has now reached a magnitude comparable to the biosphere, and conclude that a prospective sustainability revolution will require scaling up new solar energy technologies and the development of much more efficient material recycling systems. Our work was inspired by recognising the connections between Earth system science and industrial ecology at the "LOOPS" workshop.
J. Heitzig, T. Kittel, J. F. Donges, and N. Molkenthin
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 21–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-21-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-21-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The debate about a safe and just operating space for humanity and the possible pathways towards and within it requires an analysis of the inherent dynamics of the Earth system and of the options for influencing its evolution. We present and illustrate with examples a conceptual framework for performing such an analysis not in a quantitative, optimizing mode, but in a qualitative way that emphasizes the main decision dilemmas that one may face in the sustainable management of the Earth system.
T. Ide and C. Fröhlich
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 659–671, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-659-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-659-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate why some social groups engage in conflicts over shared natural resources while other groups cooperate over the same issue. Drawing on evidence from the particularly puzzling case of water conflict and cooperation in Israel and Palestine, we show that the discursive construction of identities and situation assessments is a crucial explanatory factor. This finding highlights the relevance of bottom-up discursive conflict transformation.
M. V. Ogra and R. Badola
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 505–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-505-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-505-2015, 2015
R. Cremades, J. Wang, and J. Morris
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 399–410, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-399-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-399-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Econometric analyses results revealed that policy support via subsidies and extension services have played an important role in promoting the adoption of irrigation technology. Strikingly, the present irrigation pricing policy has played significant but contradictory roles in promoting the adoption of different types of irrigation technology. Irrigation pricing showed a positive impact on household-based irrigation technology, and a negative impact on community-based irrigation technology.
A. Milan, G. Gioli, and T. Afifi
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 375–388, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-375-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-375-2015, 2015
M. Abid, J. Scheffran, U. A. Schneider, and M. Ashfaq
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 225–243, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-225-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-225-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Based on a farm household survey of 450 farmers, this study examined the adaptation to climate change and factors affecting the adoption of various adaptation measures at the farm level in Pakistan. The study demonstrates that awareness of climate change is widespread in the area, and farmers are adapting their crops to climate variability. However the adaptation process is constrained due to several factors such as lack of information, lack of money, lack of resources and shortage of water.
T. K. Lissner, D. E. Reusser, J. Schewe, T. Lakes, and J. P. Kropp
Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 355–373, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-355-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-355-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change will have impacts on many different sectors of society, but a systematic method to quantify human well-being and livelihoods across sectors is so far unavailable. This paper presents the AHEAD approach, which allows for relating impacts of climate change to 16 dimensions of livelihoods and well-being. Using the example of changes in water availability, the results show how climate change impacts AHEAD. The approach also provides a tool to frame uncertainties from climate models.
S. P. K. Bowring, L. M. Miller, L. Ganzeveld, and A. Kleidon
Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 43–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-43-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-43-2014, 2014
Cited articles
Ainsworth, E. A. and McGrath, J. M.:
Direct Effects of Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Ozone on Crop Yields,
Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 109–130, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2953-9_7, 2010. a
Ainsworth, E. A. and Rogers, A.:
The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions,
Plant Cell Environ.,
30, 258–270, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x, 2007. a
Ainsworth, E. A., Leakey, A. D. B., Ort, D. R., and Long, S. P.:
FACE-ing the facts: inconsistencies and interdependence among field, chamber and modeling studies of elevated [CO2] impacts on crop yield and food supply,
New Phytol.,
179, 5–9, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02500.x, 2008. a
Alkama, R. and Cescatti, A.:
Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover,
Science,
351, 600–604, 2016. a
Amthor, J. S.:
Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration on wheat yield: review of results from experiments using various approaches to control CO2 concentration,
Field Crop. Res.,
73, 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4290(01)00179-4, 2001. a, b
Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J. W., Hatfield, J. L., Ruane, A. C., Boote, K. J., Thorburn, P. J., Rötter, R. P., Cammarano, D.,
Brisson, N., Basso, B., Martre, P., Aggarwal, P. K., Angulo, C., Bertuzzi, P., Biernath, C., Challinor, A. J., Doltra, J., Gayler, S., Goldberg, R.,
Grant, R., Heng, L., Hooker, J., Hunt, L. A., Ingwersen, J., Izaurralde, R. C., Kersebaum, K. C., Müller, C., Kumar, S. N., Nendel, C., O'Leary, G.,
Olesen, J. E., Osborne, T. M., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Ripoche, D., Semenov, M. A., Shcherbak, I., Steduto, P., Stöckle, C., Stratonovitch, P.,
Streck, T., Supit, I., Tao, F., Travasso, M., Waha, K., Wallach, D., White, J. W., Williams, J. R., and Wolf, J.:
Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change,
Nat. Clim. Change,
3, 827–832, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1916, 2013. a
Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Martre, P., Rötter, R. P., Lobell, D. B., Cammarano, D., Kimball, B. A., Ottman, M. J., Wall, G. W.,
White, J. W., Reynolds, M. P., Alderman, P. D., Prasad, P. V. V., Aggarwal, P. K., Anothai, J., Basso, B., Biernath, C., Challinor, A. J.,
Sanctis, G. D., Doltra, J., Fereres, E., Garcia-Vila, M., Gayler, S., Hoogenboom, G., Hunt, L. A., Izaurralde, R. C., Jabloun, M., Jones, C. D.,
Kersebaum, K. C., Koehler, A.-K., Müller, C., Kumar, S. N., Nendel, C., O'Leary, G., Olesen, J. E., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Rezaei, E. E.,
Ruane, A. C., Semenov, M. A., Shcherbak, I., Stöckle, C., Stratonovitch, P., Streck, T., Supit, I., Tao, F., Thorburn, P. J., Waha, K., Wang, E., Wallach, D., Wolf, J., Zhao, Z., and Zhu, Y.:
Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production,
Nat. Clim. Change,
5, 143–147, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2470, 2014. a
Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M., and van den Broek, R.:
The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies,
Biomass Bioenerg.,
25, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00185-x, 2003. a
Best, M. J., Beljaars, A., Polcher, J., and Viterbo, P.:
A proposed structure for coupling tiled surfaces with the Planetary Boundary Layer,
J. Hydrometeorol.,
5, 1271–1278, 2004. a
Brovkin, V., Raddatz, T., Reick, C. H., Claussen, M., and Gayler, V.:
Global biogeophysical interactions between forest and climate,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
36, 1–5, 2009. a
Challinor, A. J., Watson, J., Lobell, D. B., Howden, S. M., Smith, D. R., and Chhetri, N.:
A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation,
Nat. Clim. Change,
4, 287–291, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2153, 2014. a
Cohen, J. E.:
How many people can the earth support?,
Sciences,
35, 18–23, 1995b. a
Cook, B. I., Puma, M. J., and Krakauer, N. Y.:
Irrigation induced surface cooling in the context of modern and increased greenhouse gas forcing,
Clim. Dynam.,
37, 1587–1600, 2011. a
de Vrese, P. and Hagemann, S.:
Explicit representation of spatial subgrid-scale heterogeneity in an ESM,
J. Hydrometeorol.,
17, 1357–1371, 2016. a
de Vrese, P., Hagemann, S., and Claussen, M.:
Asian irrigation, African rain: remote impacts of irrigation,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 3737–3745, 2016. a
Devaraju, N., Bala, G., and Modak, A.:
Effects of large-scale deforestation on precipitation in the monsoon regions: remote versus local effects,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
112, 3257–3262, 2015. a
Düllmenil, L. and Tondini, E.:
A rainfall–runoff scheme for use in the Hamburg climate model,
in:
Advances in Theoretical Hydrology, A Tribune to James Dooge,
edited by: O'Kane, J. P.,
Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 129–157, 1992. a
Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Müller, C., Frieler, K., Konzmann, M., Gerten, D., Glotter, M., Flörke, M., Wada, Y., Best, N., Eisner, S., Fekete, B. M.,
Folberth, C., Foster, I., Gosling, S. N., Haddeland, I., Khabarov, N., Ludwig, F.,
Masaki, Y., Olin, S., Rosenzweig, C., Ruane, A. C., Satoh, Y., Schmid, E., Stacke,
T., Tang, Q., and Wisser, D.:
Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 3239–3244, 2013. a
Elser, J. and Bennett, E.:
Phosphorus cycle: a broken biogeochemical cycle,
Nature,
478, 29–31, 2011. a
Falkenmark, M. and Lannerstad, M.:
Consumptive water use to feed humanity – curing a blind spot,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,
9, 15–28, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-15-2005, 2005. a, b
FAO:
Food Balance Sheets,
available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS (last access: 7 January 2017), 2016a. a
FAO:
Suite of Food Security Indicators,
available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FS (last access: 7 January 2017), 2016b. a
FAO, IFAD and WFP:
The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015, Meeting the 2015 International Hunger Targets: Taking Stock of Uneven Progress,
FAO, Rome, 2015. a
Fischer, G., Shah, M., Tubiello, F. N., and van Velhuizen, H.:
Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990–2080,
Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B,
360, 2067–2083, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1744, 2005. a
Folberth, C., Skalský, R., Moltchanova, E., Balkovič, J., Azevedo, L. B., Obersteiner, M., and van der Velde, M.:
Uncertainty in soil data can outweigh climate impact signals in global crop yield simulations,
Nat. Commun.,
7, 11872, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11872, 2016. a
Franck, S., von Bloh, W., Müller, C., Bondeau, A., and Sakschewski, B.:
Harvesting the sun: new estimations of the maximum population of planet Earth,
Ecol. Model.,
222, 2019–2026, 2011. a
Gerten, D., Hoff, H., Rockström, J., Jägermeyr, J., Kummu, M., and Pastor, A. V.:
Towards a revised planetary boundary for consumptive freshwater use: role of environmental flow requirements,
Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.,
5, 551–558, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.001, 2013. a
Grassini, P., van Bussel, L. G., Wart, J. V., Wolf, J., Claessens, L., Yang, H., Boogaard, H., de Groot, H., van Ittersum, M. K., and Cassman, K. G.:
How good is good enough? Data requirements for reliable crop yield simulations and yield-gap analysis,
Field Crop. Res.,
177, 49–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.004, 2015. a
Guoju, X., Weixiang, L., Qiang, X., Zhaojun, S., and Jing, W.:
Effects of temperature increase and elevated CO2 concentration, with supplemental irrigation, on the yield of rain-fed spring wheat in a semiarid region of China,
Agr. Water Manage.,
74, 243–255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.11.006, 2005. a
Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Van Otterdijk, R., and Meybeck, A.:
Global Food Losses and Food Waste,
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rom, 2011. a
Haddeland, I., Heinke, J., Biemans, H., Eisner, S., Flörke, M., Hanasaki, N., Konzmann, M., Ludwig, F., Masaki, Y., Schewe, J., Stacke, T., Tessler,
Z. D., Wada, Y., and Wisser, D.:
Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 3251–3256, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222475110, 2013. a
Hagemann, S. and Stacke, T.:
Impact of the soil hydrology scheme on simulated soil moisture memory,
Clim. Dynam.,
44, 1731–1750, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2221-6, 2015. a
Hagemann, S., Loew, A., and Andersson, A.:
Combined evaluation of MPI-ESM land surface water and energy fluxes,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.,
5, 259–286, 2013. a
Harvey, M. and Pilgrim, S.:
The new competition for land: food, energy, and climate change,
Food Policy,
36, S40–S51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.009, 2011. a
Heaton, E. A., Flavell, R. B., Mascia, P. N., Thomas, S. R., Dohleman, F. G., and Long, S. P.:
Herbaceous energy crop development: recent progress and future prospects,
Curr. Opin. Biotech.,
19, 202–209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.001, 2008. a
Hoffmann, H., Zhao, G., Asseng, S., Bindi, M., Biernath, C., Constantin, J., Coucheney, E., Dechow, R., Doro, L., Eckersten, H., Gaiser, T., Grosz, B., Heinlein, F.,
Kassie, B. T., Kersebaum, K.-C., Klein, C., Kuhnert, M., Lewan, E., Moriondo, M., Nendel, C., Priesack, E., Raynal, H., Roggero, P. P., Rötter, R. P., Siebert, S.,
Specka, X., Tao, F., Teixeira, E., Trombi, G., Wallach, D., Weihermüller, L., Yeluripati, J., and Ewert, F.:
Impact of spatial soil and climate input data aggregation on regional yield simulations,
PLOS ONE,
11, e0151782, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151782, 2016. a
Hurtt, G. C., Chini, L. P., Frolking, S., Betts, R. A., Feddema, J., Fischer, G., Fisk, J. P., Hibbard, K., Houghton, R. A., Janetos, A., Jones, C. D.,
Kindermann, G., Kinoshita T., Klein Goldewijk, K., Riahi, K., Shevliakova, E., Smith, S., Stehfest, E., Thomson, A., Thornton, P., van Vuuren, D. P., and Wang, Y. P.:
Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands,
Climatic Change,
109, 117–161, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2, 2011. a, b, c, d
IIASA and FAO:
Global-AgroEcological Zones, Version 1.0, CD-ROM,
available at: http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/GAEZ/index.htm (last access: 7 January 2017), 2000. a
Johansson, D. J. A. and Azar, C.:
A scenario based analysis of land competition between food and bioenergy production in the US,
Climatic Change,
82, 267–291, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9208-1, 2007. a
Jones, P. and Thornton, P.:
The potential impacts of climate change on maize production in Africa and Latin America in 2055,
Global Environ. Change,
13, 51–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-3780(02)00090-0, 2003. a
Juffe-Bignoli, D., Burgess, N. D., Bingham, H., Belle, E., de Lima, M., Deguignet, M., Bertzky, B., Milam, A., Martinez-Lopez, J., Lewis, E., Eassom, A.,
Wicander, S., Geldmann, J., van Soesbergen, A., Arnell, A., O'Connor, B., Park, S., Shi, Y., Danks, F., and MacSharry, B., and Kingston, N.:
Protected Planet Report 2014, Tech. rep.,
United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK, 2014. a, b, c
Jungclaus, J. H., Fischer, N., Haak, H., Lohmann, K., Marotzke, J., Matei, D., Mikolajewicz, U., Notz, D., and von Storch, J. S.:
Characteristics of the ocean simulations in the Max Planck Institute Ocean Model (MPIOM) the ocean component of the MPI-Earth system model,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.,
5, 422–446, 2013. a
Konzmann, M., Gerten, D., and Heinke, J.:
Climate impacts on global irrigation requirements under 19 GCMs, simulated with a vegetation and hydrology model,
Hydrolog. Sci. J.,
58, 88–105, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.746495, 2013. a
Lawrence, D. and Vandecar, K.:
Effects of tropical deforestation on climate and agriculture,
Nat. Clim. Change,
5, 27–36, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2430, 2014. a
Lawrence, D. M., Hurtt, G. C., Arneth, A., Brovkin, V., Calvin, K. V., Jones, A. D., Jones, C. D., Lawrence, P. J., de Noblet-Ducoudrè, N., Pongratz, J., Seneviratne, S. I., and Shevliakova, E.:
The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: rationale and experimental design,
Geosci. Model Dev.,
9, 2973–2998, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2973-2016, 2016. a
Lejeune, Q., Seneviratne, S. I., and Davin, E. L.:
Historical land-cover change impacts on climate: comparative assessment of LUCID and CMIP5 multimodel experiments,
J. Climate,
30, 1439–1459, https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0213.1, 2017. a
Li, Z., Liu, S., Tan, Z., Bliss, N. B., Young, C. J., West, T. O., and Ogle, S. M.:
Comparing cropland net primary production estimates from inventory, a satellite-based model, and a process-based model in the Midwest of the United States,
Ecol. Model.,
277, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.012, 2014. a
Lipinski, B., Hanson, C., Lomax, J., Kitinoja, L., Waite, R., and Searchinger, T.:
Reducing Food Loss and Waste,
World Resources Institute Working Paper, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA, June 2013. a
Lobell, D., Bala, G., and Duffy, P.:
Biogeophysical impacts of cropland management changes on climate,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
33, L06708, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025492, 2006. a
Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W., and Costa-Roberts, J.:
Climate trends and global crop production since 1980,
Science,
333, 616–620, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531, 2011. a
Marotzke, J., Jakob, C., Bony, S., Dirmeyer, P. A., O'Gorman, P. A., Hawkins, E., Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S., Quéré, C. L., Nowicki, S., Paulavets, K.,
Seneviratne, S. I., Stevens, B., and Tuma, M.:
Climatic research must sharpen its view,
Nat. Clim. Change,
7.2, 89, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3206, 2017. a
McGrath, J. M. and Lobell, D. B.:
Regional disparities in the CO2 fertilization effect and implications for crop yields,
Environ. Res. Lett.,
8, 014054, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014054, 2013. a
Meinshausen, M., Smith, S. J., Calvin, K., Daniel, J. S., Kainuma, M. L. T., Lamarque, J.-F., Matsumoto, K., Montzka, S. A., Raper, S. C. B., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Velders, G. J. M., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300,
Climatic Change,
109, 213–241, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z, 2011. a, b, c
Montzka, C., Herbst, M., Weihermüller, L., Verhoef, A., and Vereecken, H.:
A global data set of soil hydraulic properties and sub-grid variability of soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves,
Earth Syst. Sci. Data,
9, 529–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-529-2017, 2017. a
Obermeier, W. A., Lehnert, L. W., Kammann, C. I., Müller, C., Grünhage, L., Luterbacher, J., Erbs, M., Moser, G., Seibert, R., Yuan, N., and Bendix, J.:
Reduced CO2 fertilization effect in temperate C3 grasslands under more extreme weather conditions,
Nat. Clim. Change,
7, 137–141, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3191, 2016. a
Orth, R., Dutra, E., and Pappenberger, F.:
Improving weather predictability by including land surface model parameter uncertainty,
Mon. Weather Rev.,
144, 1551–1569, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-15-0283.1, 2016. a
Parry, M., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Livermore, M., and Fischer, G.:
Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios,
Global Environ. Change,
14, 53–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.008, 2004. a
Parry, M. L.:
Climate Change and World Agriculture,
Earthscan/James & James, London, UK, 1990. a
Pastor, A. V., Ludwig, F., Biemans, H., Hoff, H., and Kabat, P.:
Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,
18, 5041–5059, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5041-2014, 2014. a, b
Polcher, J., McAvaney, B., Viterbo, P., Gaertner, M.-A., Hahmann, A., Mahfouf, J.-F., Noilhan, J., Phillips, T., Pitman, A., Schlosser, C., Schulz, J.-P., Timbal, B., Verseghy, D., and Xue, Y.:
A proposal for a general interface between land surface schemes and general circulation models,
Global Planet. Change,
19, 261–276, 1998. a
Pugh, T., Müller, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Folberth, C., Olin, S., Schmid, E., and Arneth, A.:
Climate analogues suggest limited potential for intensification of production on current croplands under climate change,
Nat. Commun.,
7, 12608, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12608, 2016. a
Raddatz, T., Reick, C., Knorr, W., Kattge, J., Roeckner, E., Schnur, R., Schnitzler, K.-G., Wetzel, P., and Jungclaus, J.:
Will the tropical land biosphere dominate the climate–carbon cycle feedback during the twenty-first century?,
Clim. Dynam.,
29, 565–574, 2007. a
Rathmann, R., Szklo, A., and Schaeffer, R.:
Land use competition for production of food and liquid biofuels: an analysis of the arguments in the current debate,
Renew. Energ.,
35, 14–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.02.025, 2010. a
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J.,
Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K.,
Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J.,
Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., and Foley, J. A.:
A safe operating space for humanity,
Nature,
461, 472–475, https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a, 2009. a, b, c
Rosenzweig, C. and Parry, M. L.:
Potential impact of climate change on world food supply,
Nature,
367, 133–138, https://doi.org/10.1038/367133a0, 1994. a
Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Ruane, A. C., Müller, C., Arneth, A., Boote, K. J., Folberth, C., Glotter, M., Khabarov, N.,
Neumann, K., Piontek, F., Pugh, T. A. M., Schmid, E., Stehfest, E., Yang, H., and Jones, J. W.:
Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 3268–3273, 2014. a, b, c, d
Sacks, W. J., Cook, B. I., Buenning, N., Levis, S., and Helkowski, J. H.:
Effects of global irrigation on the near-surface climate,
Clim. Dynam.,
33, 159–175, 2009. a
Sakschewski, B., von Bloh, W., Huber, V., Müller, C., and Bondeau, A.:
Feeding 10 billion people under climate change: how large is the production gap of current agricultural systems?,
Ecol. Model.,
288, 103–111, 2014. a
Siebert, S., Döll, P., Hoogeveen, J., Faures, J.-M., Frenken, K., and Feick, S.:
Development and validation of the global map of irrigation areas,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,
9, 535–547, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-535-2005, 2005. a, b
Sims, R. E. H., Hastings, A., Schlamadinger, B., Taylor, G., and Smith, P.:
Energy crops: current status and future prospects,
Global Change Biol.,
12, 2054–2076, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01163.x, 2006. a
Smakhtin, V., Revenga, C., and Döll, P.:
A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity,
Water Int.,
29, 307–317, 2004. a
Smith, V. H.:
Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems a global problem,
Environ. Sci. Pollut. R.,
10, 126–139, https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2002.12.142, 2003. a
Smith, W. K., Reed, S. C., Cleveland, C. C., Ballantyne, A. P., Anderegg, W. R. L., Wieder, W. R., Liu, Y. Y., and Running, S. W.:
Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization,
Nat. Clim. Change,
6, 306–310, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2879, 2015. a
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstrom, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A.,
Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., and Sörlin, S.:
Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet,
Science,
347, 1259855, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855, 2015. a
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., and de Haan, C.:
Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options,
Food & Agriculture Org., Rome, Italy, 2006. a
Stevens, B., Giorgetta, M., Esch, M., Mauritsen, T., Crueger, T., Rast, S., Salzmann, M., Schmidt, H., Bader, J., Block, K., Brokopf, R.,
Fast, I., Kinne, S., Kornblueh, L., Lohmann, U., Pincus, R., Reichler, T., and Roeckner, E.:
Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.,
5, 146–172, 2013. a
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., and Befort, B. L.:
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
108, 20260–20264, 2011. a
Tubiello, F. N., Soussana, J.-F., and Howden, S. M.:
Crop and pasture response to climate change,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
104, 19686–19690, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701728104, 2007. a, b, c
UN:
World Population to 2300, Tech. rep.,
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, New York, USA, 2004. a
UN:
World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, DVD,
available at: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/ (last access: 7 January 2017), 2015b. a
van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J.-F.,
Masui, T., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Smith, S. J., and Rose, S. K.:
The representative concentration pathways: an overview,
Climatic Change,
109, 5–31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 2011. a, b, c
Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W., Likens, G. E., Matson, P. A., Schindler, D. W., Schlesinger, W. H., and Tilman, D. G.:
Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences,
Ecol. Appl.,
7, 737–750, https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0737:haotgn]2.0.co;2, 1997. a
Yoshikawa, S., Cho, J., Yamada, H. G., Hanasaki, N., and Kanae, S.:
An assessment of global net irrigation water requirements from various water supply sources to sustain irrigation: rivers and reservoirs (1960–2050),
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,
18, 4289-4310, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4289-2014, 2014.
a
Zhu, Z., Piao, S., Myneni, R. B., Huang, M., Zeng, Z., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Sitch, S., Friedlingstein, P., Arneth, A., Cao, C., Cheng, L., Kato, E.,
Koven, C., Li, Y., Lian, X., Liu, Y., Liu, R., Mao, J., Pan, Y., Peng, S., Peñuelas, J., Poulter, B., Pugh, T. A. M., Stocker, B. D., Viovy, N., Wang, X.,
Wang, Y., Xiao, Z., Yang, H., Zaehle, S., and Zeng, N.:
Greening of the Earth and its drivers,
Nat. Clim. Change,
6, 791–795, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3004, 2016. a
Short summary
The potential food supply depends strongly on climatic conditions, while agricultural activity has substantial impacts on climate. Using an Earth system model, we investigate the climate–agriculture interactions resulting from a maximization of the global cropland area during the 21st century. We find that the potential food supply can be increased substantially, but guaranteeing food security in dry areas in Northern Africa, the Middle East and South Asia will become increasingly difficult.
The potential food supply depends strongly on climatic conditions, while agricultural activity...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint