Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-209-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-209-2026
Research article
 | 
04 Mar 2026
Research article |  | 04 Mar 2026

Past, present, and future variability of Atlantic meridional overturning circulation in CMIP6 ensembles

Arthur Coquereau, Florian Sévellec, Thierry Huck, Joël J.-M. Hirschi, and Quentin Jamet

Related authors

Evaluating altimetry-derived surface currents on the south Greenland shelf with surface drifters
Arthur Coquereau and Nicholas P. Foukal
Ocean Sci., 19, 1393–1411, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1393-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1393-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Arguez, A. and Vose, R. S.: The Definition of the Standard WMO Climate Normal: The Key to Deriving Alternative Climate Normals, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 699–704, 2011. a
Armstrong McKay, D. I., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Rockström, J., and Lenton, T. M.: Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points, Science, 377, eabn7950, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950, 2022. a
Baker, J. A., Bell, M. J., Jackson, L. C., Renshaw, R., Vallis, G. K., Watson, A. J., and Wood, R. A.: Overturning Pathways Control AMOC Weakening in CMIP6 Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103381, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103381, 2023. a, b
Berrington de González, A. and Cox, D. R.: Interpretation of interaction: A review, Ann. Appl. Stat., 1, 371–385, https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS124, 2007. a
Böhm, E., Lippold, J., Gutjahr, M., Frank, M., Blaser, P., Antz, B., Fohlmeister, J., Frank, N., Andersen, M. B., and Deininger, M.: Strong and deep Atlantic meridional overturning circulation during the last glacial cycle, Nature, 517, 73–76, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14059, 2015. a
Download
Short summary
Using statistical methods and a set of ensemble climate models, we decompose the sources of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) variance. Three distinct phases of physical variability are identified: from 1850 to 1990, internal variability dominates; from 1990 to 2050, dynamical adjustment related to AMOC decline takes over; after 2050, differences between forcing scenarios become dominant. Beyond these physical factors, model variability remains a major source of uncertainty.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint