Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-683-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-683-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
06 May 2025
Research article |
| 06 May 2025
| 06 May 2025
Ensemble design for seasonal climate predictions: studying extreme Arctic sea ice lows with a rare event algorithm
Jerome Sauer
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Earth and Climate Research Center, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
François Massonnet
Earth and Climate Research Center, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Giuseppe Zappa
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Bologna, Italy
Francesco Ragone
School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Related authors
No articles found.
Annelies Sticker, Francois Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Alexandra Jahn, David A. Bailey, and Benjamin Richaud
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4173, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4173, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic sea ice has been shrinking for decades, and climate projections suggest this decline will continue, punctuated by episodes of rapid and abrupt sea ice loss. Using a climate model ensemble, our results show that thermodynamic processes, particularly melting at the base of the ice, are the dominant driver of these events. Dynamic processes contribute only a minor fraction. These findings lay the groundwork for developing early warning indicators of rapid Arctic sea ice loss.
Benjamin Richaud, Dániel Topál, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Hugues Goosse, and Antoine Barthélemy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3552, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3552, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
How does increased horizontal resolution impact the skills of an ice-ocean numerical model to simulate sea ice in the Arctic and Antarctic? We address this question using the NEMO-SI3 model at three different resolutions. While some regional improvements are noticeable in winter in both Arctic and Antarctic, particularly where the ocean is known to influence sea ice, the overall added benefits of using a higher resolution are not systematic.
Anton Korosov, Jonathan Rheinlænder, Richard Davy, François Massonnet, and David Babb
State Planet Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2026-5, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2026-5, 2026
Preprint under review for SP
Short summary
Short summary
The Arctic sea ice cover has changed dramatically over the last few decades. Thick, old ice that has survived several years is being replaced by thinner ice that forms each winter and melts easily. We examined Arctic sea ice age from 1991 to 2025 using satellite observations and found that during the rapid transition from 2003 to 2008, the area covered by multi-year ice decreased sharply, likely due to altered sea ice dynamics. Then, the Arctic has remained in a new state with much less old ice.
Baylor Fox-Kemper, Patricia DeRepentigny, Anne Marie Treguier, Christian Stepanek, Eleanor O'Rourke, Chloe Mackallah, Alberto Meucci, Yevgeny Aksenov, Paul J. Durack, Nicole Feldl, Oluwayemi Garuba, Vanessa Hernaman, Céline Heuzé, Doroteaciro Iovino, Gaurav Madan, André L. Marquez, François Massonnet, Jenny Mecking, Dhrubajyoti Samanta, Patrick C. Taylor, Wan-Ling Tseng, and Martin Vancoppenolle
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 6043–6078, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6043-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6043-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The ocean and sea ice are central to Earth's climate system, influencing global heat and carbon cycles, weather patterns, and sea level rise. Here the earth system model variables needed for studies of the ocean and sea ice are prioritized and requested. These requested variables were developed through an international, community-based process.
Jinfei Wang, Maike Sonnewald, Noé Pirlet, François Massonnet, Hugues Goosse, Dake Chen, and Qinghua Yang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1301, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1301, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Antarctic sea ice has shifted from expansion to rapid decline since 2016. Using model outputs and data mining, we identified six sea ice regimes, shaped by different dynamic and thermodynamic conditions. A coastal regime, featured by sea ice transport and new ice formation, has shown area loss since 1979, accelerating after 2016. This coastal regime and a pack ice regime together control overall sea ice variability. Our work offers a new framework for understanding Antarctic sea ice changes.
Benjamin Richaud, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Dániel Topál, Antoine Barthélemy, and David Docquier
The Cryosphere, 20, 791–810, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-791-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-791-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice covers in the Arctic and Antarctic experienced intense reduction during specific recent years. Using an ocean-sea ice model, we found similarities between hemispheres and years to explain the ice reduction, such as ice melt (or lack of growth) at the ice-ocean interface. Differences between years and regions are also evident, such as increased ice transport or snow precipitation. Our analysis highlights the importance of the ice-ocean interface to understand the sea ice mass budget.
Annelies Sticker, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Patricia DeRepentigny, Alexandra Jahn, David Docquier, Christopher Wyburn-Powell, Daphne Quint, Erica Shivers, and Makayla Ortiz
The Cryosphere, 19, 3259–3277, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3259-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3259-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study analyzes rapid ice loss events (RILEs) in the Arctic, which are significant reductions in sea ice extent. RILEs are expected throughout the year, varying in frequency and duration with the seasons. Our research gives a year-round analysis of their characteristics in climate models and suggests that summer RILEs could begin before the middle of the century. Understanding these events is crucial as they can have profound impacts on the Arctic environment.
Cécile Osy, Sophie Opfergelt, Arsène Druel, and François Massonnet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3680, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3680, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The refreezing period of the active layer (the layer on top of the permafrost that freezes and thaws each year) is changing, with a delay of about five days over a large area in Siberia from 1950 to 2020 in the ERA5-Land reanalysis data. We investigate the drivers of this delay, and find that 2 m air temperature is the main driver of these changes at the large scale, which contrasts with field results in which snow cover is the main driver of changes in refreezing dynamics.
Florian Sauerland, Pierre-Vincent Huot, Sylvain Marchi, Thierry Fichefet, Hugues Goosse, Konstanze Haubner, François Klein, François Massonnet, Bianca Mezzina, Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Pablo Ortega, Frank Pattyn, Charles Pelletier, Deborah Verfaillie, Lars Zipf, and Nicole van Lipzig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2889, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2889, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We simulated the Antarctic climate from 1985 to 2014. Our model is driven using the ERA-5 reanalysis for one simulation and the EC-Earth global climate model for three others. Most of the simulated trends, such as sea ice extent and precipitation over land, have opposite signs for the two drivers, but agree between the three EC-Earth driven simulations. We conclude that these opposing trends must be due to the different drivers, and that the climate over land is less predictable than over sea.
Sofia Allende, Anne Marie Treguier, Camille Lique, Clément de Boyer Montégut, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, and Antoine Barthélemy
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7445–7466, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7445-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7445-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We study the parameters of the turbulent-kinetic-energy mixed-layer-penetration scheme in the NEMO model with regard to sea-ice-covered regions of the Arctic Ocean. This evaluation reveals the impact of these parameters on mixed-layer depth, sea surface temperature and salinity, and ocean stratification. Our findings demonstrate significant impacts on sea ice thickness and sea ice concentration, emphasizing the need for accurately representing ocean mixing to understand Arctic climate dynamics.
Bianca Mezzina, Hugues Goosse, François Klein, Antoine Barthélemy, and François Massonnet
The Cryosphere, 18, 3825–3839, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3825-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3825-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We analyze years with extraordinarily low sea ice extent in Antarctica during summer, until the striking record in 2022. We highlight common aspects among these events, such as the fact that the exceptional melting usually occurs in two key regions and that it is related to winds with a similar direction. We also investigate whether the summer conditions are preceded by an unusual state of the sea ice during the previous winter, as well as the physical processes involved.
Federico Fabiano, Paolo Davini, Virna L. Meccia, Giuseppe Zappa, Alessio Bellucci, Valerio Lembo, Katinka Bellomo, and Susanna Corti
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 527–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-527-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-527-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Even after the concentration of greenhouse gases is stabilized, the climate will continue to adapt, seeking a new equilibrium. We study this long-term stabilization through a set of 1000-year simulations, obtained by suddenly "freezing" the atmospheric composition at different levels. If frozen at the current state, global warming surpasses 3° in the long term with our model. We then study how climate impacts will change after various centuries and how the deep ocean will warm.
Steve Delhaye, Rym Msadek, Thierry Fichefet, François Massonnet, and Laurent Terray
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1748, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1748, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The climate impact of Arctic sea ice loss may depend on the region of sea ice loss and the methodology used to study this impact. This study uses two approaches across seven climate models to investigate the winter atmospheric circulation response to regional sea ice loss. Our findings indicate a consistent atmospheric circulation response to pan-Arctic sea ice loss in most models and across both approaches. In contrast, more uncertainty emerges in the responses linked to regional sea ice loss.
Mukesh Gupta, Leandro Ponsoni, Jean Sterlin, François Massonnet, and Thierry Fichefet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1560, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1560, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We explored the relationship of Arctic September minimum sea ice extent with mid-summer melt pond area fraction, under the present-day climate. We confirm through the advanced numerical modelling, with an explicit melt pond scheme in the global climate model, EC-EARTH3, that melt pond fraction in mid-summer (June–July, not May) shows a strong relationship with the Arctic September sea ice extent. Satellite-based inferences validated our findings of this association.
Xia Lin, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, and Martin Vancoppenolle
The Cryosphere, 17, 1935–1965, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1935-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1935-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides clues on how improved atmospheric reanalysis products influence sea ice simulations in ocean–sea ice models. The summer ice concentration simulation in both hemispheres can be improved with changed surface heat fluxes. The winter Antarctic ice concentration and the Arctic drift speed near the ice edge and the ice velocity direction simulations are improved with changed wind stress. The radiation fluxes and winds in atmospheric reanalyses are crucial for sea ice simulations.
Hugues Goosse, Sofia Allende Contador, Cecilia M. Bitz, Edward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, Clare Eayrs, Thierry Fichefet, Kenza Himmich, Pierre-Vincent Huot, François Klein, Sylvain Marchi, François Massonnet, Bianca Mezzina, Charles Pelletier, Lettie Roach, Martin Vancoppenolle, and Nicole P. M. van Lipzig
The Cryosphere, 17, 407–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-407-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-407-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Using idealized sensitivity experiments with a regional atmosphere–ocean–sea ice model, we show that sea ice advance is constrained by initial conditions in March and the retreat season is influenced by the magnitude of several physical processes, in particular by the ice–albedo feedback and ice transport. Atmospheric feedbacks amplify the response of the winter ice extent to perturbations, while some negative feedbacks related to heat conduction fluxes act on the ice volume.
Steve Delhaye, Thierry Fichefet, François Massonnet, David Docquier, Rym Msadek, Svenya Chripko, Christopher Roberts, Sarah Keeley, and Retish Senan
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 555–573, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-555-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-555-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It is unclear how the atmosphere will respond to a retreat of summer Arctic sea ice. Much attention has been paid so far to weather extremes at mid-latitude and in winter. Here we focus on the changes in extremes in surface air temperature and precipitation over the Arctic regions in summer during and following abrupt sea ice retreats. We find that Arctic sea ice loss clearly shifts the extremes in surface air temperature and precipitation over terrestrial regions surrounding the Arctic Ocean.
Ralf Döscher, Mario Acosta, Andrea Alessandri, Peter Anthoni, Thomas Arsouze, Tommi Bergman, Raffaele Bernardello, Souhail Boussetta, Louis-Philippe Caron, Glenn Carver, Miguel Castrillo, Franco Catalano, Ivana Cvijanovic, Paolo Davini, Evelien Dekker, Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, David Docquier, Pablo Echevarria, Uwe Fladrich, Ramon Fuentes-Franco, Matthias Gröger, Jost v. Hardenberg, Jenny Hieronymus, M. Pasha Karami, Jukka-Pekka Keskinen, Torben Koenigk, Risto Makkonen, François Massonnet, Martin Ménégoz, Paul A. Miller, Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Lars Nieradzik, Twan van Noije, Paul Nolan, Declan O'Donnell, Pirkka Ollinaho, Gijs van den Oord, Pablo Ortega, Oriol Tintó Prims, Arthur Ramos, Thomas Reerink, Clement Rousset, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Philippe Le Sager, Torben Schmith, Roland Schrödner, Federico Serva, Valentina Sicardi, Marianne Sloth Madsen, Benjamin Smith, Tian Tian, Etienne Tourigny, Petteri Uotila, Martin Vancoppenolle, Shiyu Wang, David Wårlind, Ulrika Willén, Klaus Wyser, Shuting Yang, Xavier Yepes-Arbós, and Qiong Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2973–3020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2973-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2973-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth system model EC-Earth3 is documented here. Key performance metrics show physical behavior and biases well within the frame known from recent models. With improved physical and dynamic features, new ESM components, community tools, and largely improved physical performance compared to the CMIP5 version, EC-Earth3 represents a clear step forward for the only European community ESM. We demonstrate here that EC-Earth3 is suited for a range of tasks in CMIP6 and beyond.
Charles Pelletier, Thierry Fichefet, Hugues Goosse, Konstanze Haubner, Samuel Helsen, Pierre-Vincent Huot, Christoph Kittel, François Klein, Sébastien Le clec'h, Nicole P. M. van Lipzig, Sylvain Marchi, François Massonnet, Pierre Mathiot, Ehsan Moravveji, Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Pablo Ortega, Frank Pattyn, Niels Souverijns, Guillian Van Achter, Sam Vanden Broucke, Alexander Vanhulle, Deborah Verfaillie, and Lars Zipf
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 553–594, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-553-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-553-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present PARASO, a circumpolar model for simulating the Antarctic climate. PARASO features five distinct models, each covering different Earth system subcomponents (ice sheet, atmosphere, land, sea ice, ocean). In this technical article, we describe how this tool has been developed, with a focus on the
coupling interfacesrepresenting the feedbacks between the distinct models used for contribution. PARASO is stable and ready to use but is still characterized by significant biases.
Xia Lin, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, and Martin Vancoppenolle
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6331–6354, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6331-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6331-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a new Sea Ice Evaluation Tool (SITool) to evaluate the model skills on the bipolar sea ice simulations by providing performance metrics and diagnostics. SITool is applied to evaluate the CMIP6 OMIP simulations. By changing the atmospheric forcing from CORE-II to JRA55-do data, many aspects of sea ice simulations are improved. SITool will be useful for helping teams managing various versions of a sea ice model or tracking the time evolution of model performance.
Cited articles
Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational design of the basic dynamical process of the UCLA general circulation model, Meth. Comp. Phys., 17, 173–265, 1977. a
Årthun, M., Eldevik, T., Smedsrud, L. H., Skagseth, Ø., and Ingvaldsen, R. B.: Quantifying the influence of Atlantic heat on Barents Sea ice variability and retreat, J. Climate, 25, 4736–4743, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00466.1, 2012. a
Baldwin, M. P., Stephenson, D. B., Thompson, D. W. J., Dunkerton, T. J., Charlton, A. J., and O'Neill, A.: Stratospheric memory and skill of extended-range weather forecasts, Science, 301, 636–640, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1087143, 2003. a
Baxter, I., Ding, Q., Schweiger, A., L'Heureux, M., Baxter, S., Wang, T., Zhang, Q., Harnos, K., Markle, B., Topal, D., and Lu, J.: How tropical Pacific surface cooling contributed to accelerated sea ice melt from 2007 to 2012 as ice is thinned by anthropogenic forcing, J. Climate, 32, 8583–8602, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0783.1, 2019. a, b
Bouchet, F., Marston, J. B., and Tangarife, T.: Fluctuations and large deviations of Reynolds stresses in zonal jet dynamics, Phys. Fluids, 30, 015110, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4990509, 2018. a
Chevallier, M., Massonnet, F., Goessling, H., Guémas, V., and Thomas, J.: The role of sea ice in sub-seasonal predictability, in: Sub-Seasonal to Seasonal Prediction: The Gap Between Weather and Climate Forecasting, edited by: Robertson, A. W. and Vitart, F., 201–221, Elsevier Inc., https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811714-9.00010-3, 2019. a, b, c, d
Cini, M., Zappa, G., Ragone, F., and Corti, S.: Simulating AMOC tipping driven by internal climate variability with a rare event algorithm, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 7, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00568-7, 2023. a
Coles, S.: An Introduction to Statistical Modelling of Extreme Values, Springer-Verlag, London, ISBN 978-1-85233-459-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0, 2001. a
Day, J. J., Tietsche, S., and Hawkins, E.: Pan-Arctic and regional sea ice predictability: initialization month dependence, J. Climate, 27, 4371–4390, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00614.1, 2014. a, b, c
Del Moral, P.: Feynman-kac Formulae Genealogical and Interacting Particle Systems with Applications, Springer New York, ISBN 978-0-387-20268-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9393-1, 2004. a
Del Moral, P. and Garnier, J.: Genealogical particle analysis of rare events, Ann. Appl. Probab., 15, 2496–2534, https://doi.org/10.1214/105051605000000566, 2005. a
Ding, Q., Schweiger, A., L'Heureux, M., Battisti, D. S., P.-Chedley, S., Johnson, N. C., Blanchard Wrigglesworth, E., Harnos, K., Zhang, Q., Eastman, R., and Steig, E. J.: Influence of high-latitude atmospheric circulation changes on summertime Arctic sea ice, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 289–295, https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE3241, 2017. a, b, c
Docquier, D., Grist, J. P., Roberts, M. J., Roberts, C. D., Semmler, T., Ponsoni, L., Massonnet, F., Sidorenko, D., Sein, D. V., Iovino, D., Bellucci, A., and Fichefet, T.: Impact of model resolution on Arctic sea ice and North Atlantic Ocean heat transport, Clim. Dynam., 53, 4989–5017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04840-y, 2019. a
Drijfhout, S. S., Maier Reimer, E., and Mikolajewicz, U.: Tracing the conveyor belt in the Hamburg large-scale geostrophic ocean general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 101, 22563–22575, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC02162, 1996. a
England, M., Alexandra, J., and Polvani, L.: Nonuniform contribution of internal variability to recent Arctic sea ice loss, J. Climate, 32, 4039–4053, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0864.1, 2019. a, b
Fetterer, F., Knowles, K., Meier, W. N., Savoie, M., and Windnagel, A. K.: Sea Ice Index, Version 3. National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, digital media, https://doi.org/10.7265/N5K072F8, 2017. a
Fraedrich, K., Jansen, H., Kirk, E., Luksch, U., and Lunkeit, F.: The planet simulator: towards a user friendly model, Meteorol. Z., 14, 299–304, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0043, 2005. a
Francis, J. A. and Wu, B.: Why has no new record-minimum Arctic sea-ice extent occurred since September 2012?, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 114034, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc047, 2020. a, b
Giardina, C., Kurchan, J., Lecomte, V., and Tailleur, J.: Simulating rare events in dynamical processes, J. Stat. Phys., 145, 787–811, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-011-0350-4, 2011. a, b, c
Grafke, T. and Vanden-Eijnden, E.: Numerical compuation of rare events via large deviation theory, Chaos, 29, 063118, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5084025, 2019. a
Grafke, T., Grauer, R., and Schäfer, T.: The instanton method and its numerical implementation in fluid mechanics, J. Phys. A-Math. Theor., 48, 333001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/48/33/333001, 2015. a
Gregory, J. M., Stott, P. A., Cresswell, D. J., Rayner, N. A., Gordon, C., and Sexton, D. M. H.: Recent and future changes in Arctic sea ice simulated by the HadCM3 AOGCM, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2175, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014575, 2002. a
Guemas, V., Doblas Reyes, F., Germe, A., Chevallier, M., and y Mélia, D. S.: September 2012 Arctic sea ice minimum: discriminating between sea ice memory, the August 2012 extreme storm, and prevailing warm conditions, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, S20–S22, 2013. a
Hoven, V. D. I.: Power spectrum of horizontal wind speed in the frequency range from 0.0007 to 900 cycles per hour, J. Atmos. Sci., 14, 160–164, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1957)014<0160:PSOHWS>2.0.CO;2, 1957. a
Kahn, H. and Harris, T. E.: Estimation of particle transmission by random sampling, Natl. Bur. Stand. Appl. Math. Ser., 12, 27–30, 1951. a
Kapsch, M.-L., Graversen, R. G., and Tjernström, M.: Springtime atmospheric energy transport and the control of Arctic summer sea-ice extent, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 744–748, https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1884, 2013. a, b
Kapsch, M.-L., Skific, N., Graversen, R. G., Tjernström, M., and Francis, J. A.: Summers with low Arctic sea ice linked to persistence of spring atmospheric circulation patterns, Clim. Dynam., 52, 2497–2512, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4279-z, 2019. a, b, c
Kauker, F., Kaminski, T., Karcher, M., Giering, R., Gerdes, R., and Voßbeck, M.: Adjoint analysis of the 2007 all time Arctic sea-ice minimum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L03707, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036323, 2009. a, b
Kirchmeier-Young, M., Zwiers, F. W., and Gillet, N. P.: Attribution of extreme events in Arctic sea ice extent, J. Climate, 30, 553–571, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0412.s1, 2017. a, b, c
Lestang, T., Ragone, F., Bréhier, C.-E., Herbert, C., and Bouchet, F.: Computing return times or return periods with rare event algorithms, J. Stat. Mech.-Theory E., 2018, 043213, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/aab856, 2018. a
Lestang, T., Bouchet, F., and Lévêque, E.: Numerical study of extreme mechanical force exerted by a turbulent flow on a bluff body by direct and rare-event sampling techniques, J. Fluid Mech., 895, A19, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.293, 2020. a
Lindsay, R. W., Zhang, J., Schweiger, A. J., and Steele, M. A.: Seasonal predictions of ice extent in the Arctic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004259, 2008. a, b, c
Lindsay, R. W., Zhang, J., Schweiger, A., Steele, M., and Stern, H.: Arctic sea ice retreat in 2007 follows thinning trend, J. Climate, 22, 165–176, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2521.1, 2009. a, b
Maier-Reimer, E., Mikolajewicz, U., and Hasselmann, K.: Mean circulation of the Hamburg LSG OGCM and its sensitivity to the thermohaline surface forcing, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 23, 731–757, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1993)023<0731:MCOTHL>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a
Meinshausen, M., Vogel, E., Nauels, A., Lorbacher, K., Meinshausen, N., Etheridge, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Montzka, S. A., Rayner, P. J., Trudinger, C. M., Krummel, P. B., Beyerle, U., Canadell, J. G., Daniel, J. S., Enting, I. G., Law, R. M., Lunder, C. R., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Reimann, S., Rubino, M., Velders, G. J. M., Vollmer, M. K., Wang, R. H. J., and Weiss, R.: Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2057–2116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2057-2017, 2017. a
Notz, D. and Marotzke, J.: Observations reveal external driver for Arctic sea-ice retreat, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051094, 2012. a
Notz, D. and SIMIP Community: Arctic sea ice in CMIP6, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086749, 2020. a
Ogi, M., Rysgaard, S., and Barber, D. G.: Importance of combined winter and summer Arctic Oscillation (AO) on September sea ice extent, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 034019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034019, 2016. a, b, c
Ono, J., Tatebe, H., and Komuro, Y.: Mechanisms for and predictability of a drastic reduction in the Arctic sea ice: APPOSITE data with climate model MIROC, J. Climate, 32, 1361–1380, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0195.1, 2019. a, b
Overland, J. E., Francis, J. A., Hanna, E., and Wang, M.: The recent shift in early summer Arctic atmospheric circulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L19804, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053268, 2012. a
Parkinson, C. L. and Comiso, J.: On the 2012 record low Arctic sea ice cover: combined impact of preconditioning and an August storm, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1356–1361, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50349, 2013. a
Plotkin, D. A., Webber, R. J., O'Neill, M. E., Waere, J., and Abbot, D. S.: Maximizing simulated tropical cyclone intensity with action minimization, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 863–891, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ms001419, 2019. a, b
Rigor, I. G., Wallace, J. M., and Colony, R. L.: Response of sea ice to the Arctic oscillation, J. Climate, 15, 2648–2663, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<2648:ROSITT>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Sauer, J., Massonnet, F., Zappa, G., and Ragone, F.: Supplementary Materials for “Ensemble design for seasonal climate predictions: Studying extreme Arctic sea ice lows with a rare event algorithm”, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14858944, 2024b. a
Schweiger, A. J., Zhang, J., Lindsay, R. W., and Steele, M.: Did unusually sunny skies help drive the record sea ice minimum of 2007?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L10503, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033463, 2008. a
Semtner, A. J.: A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in numerical investigations of climate, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 6, 379–389, 1976. a
Serreze, M. C. and Barry, R. G.: The Arctic climate system, in: Cambridge Atmospheric and Space Science Series, edited by: Houghton, J. T., Rycroft, M. J., and Dessler, A. J., Cambridge University Press, 1–385, ISBN 9780521814188, 2014. a
Stroeve, J. and Notz, D.: Changing state of Arctic sea ice across all seasons, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aade56, 2018. a
Tietsche, S., Notz, D., Jungclaus, J. H., and Marotzke, J.: Recovery mechanisms of Arctic summer sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045698, 2011. a
Tietsche, S., Day, J. J., Guemas, V., W. J. Hurlin, S. P. E. K., Matei, D., Msadek, R., Collins, M., and Hawkins, E.: Seasonal to interannual Arctic sea ice predictability in current global climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1035–1043, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058755, 2014. a, b, c
Wang, J., Zhang, J., Watanabe, E., Ikeda, M., Mizobata, K., Walsh, J. E., Bai, X., and Wu, B.: Is the Dipole Anomaly a major driver to record lows in Arctic summer sea ice extent?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L05706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036706, 2009. a, b, c
Webber, R. J., Plotkin, D. A., O'Neill, M. E., Abbot, D. S., and Waere, J.: Practical rare event smapling for extreme mesoscale weather, Chaos, 29, 053109, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5081461, 2019. a
Woodgate, R. A., Weingartner, T., and Lindsay, R.: The 2007 Bering Strait oceanic heat flux and anomalous Arctic sea-ice retreat, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L01602, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041621, 2010. a, b
Wouters, J., Schiemann, R. K. H., and Shaffrey, L. C.: Rare event simulation of extreme European winter rainfall in an intermediate complexity climate model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 15, e2022MS003537, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003537, 2023. a
Zhang, J., Lindsay, R., Steele, M., and Schweiger, A.: What drove the dramatic retreat of arctic sea ice during summer 2007?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L11505, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034005, 2008. a
Zhang, J., Lindsay, R., Schweiger, A., and Steele, M.: The impact of an intense summer cyclone on 2012 Arctic sea ice retreat, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 720–726, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50190, 2013. a, b, c
Short summary
An obstacle in studying climate extremes is the lack of robust statistics. We use a rare event algorithm to gather robust statistics on extreme Arctic sea ice lows with probabilities below 0.1 % and to study drivers of events with amplitudes larger than observed in 2012. The work highlights that the most extreme sea ice reductions result from the combined effects of preconditioning and weather variability, emphasizing the need for thoughtful ensemble design when turning to real applications.
An obstacle in studying climate extremes is the lack of robust statistics. We use a rare event...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint