Articles | Volume 7, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-649-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-649-2016
Research article
 | 
29 Jul 2016
Research article |  | 29 Jul 2016

Divergent predictions of carbon storage between two global land models: attribution of the causes through traceability analysis

Rashid Rafique, Jianyang Xia, Oleksandra Hararuk, Ghassem R. Asrar, Guoyong Leng, Yingping Wang, and Yiqi Luo

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Rashad Rafique on behalf of the Authors (01 Feb 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (19 Feb 2016) by Richard Betts
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (07 Mar 2016)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by Editor) (29 Mar 2016) by Richard Betts
AR by Rashad Rafique on behalf of the Authors (06 Apr 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (09 Jul 2016) by Richard Betts
AR by Rashad Rafique on behalf of the Authors (12 Jul 2016)
Download
Short summary
Traceability analysis was used to diagnose the causes of differences in simulating ecosystem carbon storage capacity between two land models: CLMA-CASA and CABLE. Results showed that the simulated ecosystem carbon storage capacity is largely influenced by the photosynthesis parameterization, residence time and organic matter decomposition.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint