Articles | Volume 17, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1609-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1609-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global-scale meteorological-to-groundwater drought propagation and the drivers and patterns of multi-year groundwater drought
Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Sandra Hauswirth
Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Denise Ruijsch
Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Barry van Jaarsveld
Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Jonna van Mourik
Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Niko Wanders
Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Related authors
Gemma Coxon, Yanchen Zheng, Rafael Barbedo, Hollie Cooper, Felipe Fileni, Hayley J. Fowler, Matt Fry, Amy Green, Tom Gribbin, Helen Harfoot, Elizabeth Lewis, Germano Gondim Ribeiro Neto, Xiaobin Qiu, Saskia Salwey, and Doris E. Wendt
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 4345–4371, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-4345-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-4345-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We present the second version of a large-sample catchment hydrology dataset for Great Britain. The dataset collates (1) climate, river flow and groundwater timeseries at hourly to monthly timescales, (2) catchment attributes characterising topography, climate, streamflow, land cover, soils, hydrogeology and human influences, and (3) catchment boundaries for 671 catchments across Great Britain. The dataset is publicly available to use in a wide range of environmental and modelling analyses.
Yanchen Zheng, Gemma Coxon, Mostaquimur Rahman, Ross Woods, Saskia Salwey, Youtong Rong, and Doris E. Wendt
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4247–4271, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4247-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4247-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater is vital for people and ecosystems, but most physical models lack the representation of surface–groundwater interactions, leading to inaccurate streamflow predictions in groundwater-rich areas. This study presents DECIPHeR-GW v1, which links surface and groundwater systems to improve predictions of streamflow and groundwater levels. Tested across England and Wales, DECIPHeR-GW shows high accuracy, especially in southeast England, making it a valuable tool for large-scale water management.
Saskia Salwey, Gemma Coxon, Francesca Pianosi, Rosanna Lane, Chris Hutton, Michael Bliss Singer, Hilary McMillan, and Jim Freer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4203–4218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs are essential for water resource management and can significantly impact downstream flow. However, representing reservoirs in hydrological models can be challenging, particularly across large scales. We design a new and simple method for simulating river flow downstream of water supply reservoirs using only open-access data. We demonstrate the approach in 264 reservoir catchments across Great Britain, where we can significantly improve the simulation of reservoir-impacted flow.
Denise Ruijsch, Sandra Margrit Hauswirth, Maik Billing, Werner von Bloh, Hester Biemans, and Niko Wanders
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5664, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5664, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Droughts are becoming an increasing threat to forests, but it remains difficult to predict how trees will respond and recover. We improved a forest model by introducing a new way to represent tree death during drought and tested it against observations of tree mortality and plant growth. The new approach better captured tree losses and reduced unrealistic recovery after drought, providing a more realistic picture of how forests may respond to future climate change.
Barry van Jaarsveld, Niko Wanders, Nicole Gyakowah Otoo, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Jarno Verkaik, Daniel Zamrsky, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 1201–1236, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1201-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1201-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We simulated how global groundwater levels have changed in the past and how they might change in the future. By improving model accuracy and using hyper-resolution data, we can now see where water tables are falling or rising across the world at 1km resolution. These results help communities and decision-makers plan for more sustainable water use in a changing climate.
Xueying Li, Yan Sun, Xihui Gu, Niko Wanders, Bridget R. Scanlon, and Louise J. Slater
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-282, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-282, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Existing datasets of terrestrial water storage anomalies are too coarse to capture sub-regional variations, limiting understanding of fine-scale water processes. Here we use physically guided deep learning to produce a higher-resolution dataset across China for 2002–2023, increasing spatial detail from 3° to 0.1° resolution. The dataset preserves large-scale satellite observations and shows good consistency in process-based evaluations, supporting sub-regional hydrologic analysis.
Gemma Coxon, Yanchen Zheng, Rafael Barbedo, Hollie Cooper, Felipe Fileni, Hayley J. Fowler, Matt Fry, Amy Green, Tom Gribbin, Helen Harfoot, Elizabeth Lewis, Germano Gondim Ribeiro Neto, Xiaobin Qiu, Saskia Salwey, and Doris E. Wendt
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 4345–4371, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-4345-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-4345-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We present the second version of a large-sample catchment hydrology dataset for Great Britain. The dataset collates (1) climate, river flow and groundwater timeseries at hourly to monthly timescales, (2) catchment attributes characterising topography, climate, streamflow, land cover, soils, hydrogeology and human influences, and (3) catchment boundaries for 671 catchments across Great Britain. The dataset is publicly available to use in a wide range of environmental and modelling analyses.
Denise Ruijsch, Sandra Margrit Hauswirth, Hester Biemans, and Niko Wanders
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 607–630, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-607-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-607-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how plants respond to long droughts using model simulations and satellite data. The model reproduces drought impacts fairly well but tends to show plants recovering too quickly. Improving how the model represents plant stress and recovery will help predict how ecosystems respond to more frequent and severe droughts in the future.
Ehsan Modiri, Oldrich Rakovec, Pallav Kumar Shrestha, Almudena García-García, Leandro Avila, Katie Blackford, Elizabeth Cooper, Bram Droppers, Paolo Filippucci, Milan Fischer, Matěj Orság, Pietro Stradiotti, Luca Brocca, Douglas B. Clark, Wouter Dorigo, Stefan Kollet, Jian Peng, Niko Wanders, and Luis Samaniego
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1012, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Drought impacts water supply, agriculture, and ecosystems, yet hydrological models often disagree on when and where drought occurs. This study tested whether satellite observations can improve how models represent soil moisture drought in the Rhine River basin. Using several models and major drought events, we show that satellite data improve spatial realism and reveal important differences among models, helping to better understand uncertainty in drought monitoring and early warning.
Joren Janzing, Niko Wanders, Marit van Tiel, Barry van Jaarsveld, Dirk N. Karger, and Manuela I. Brunner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 7041–7071, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-7041-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-7041-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Process representation in hyper-resolution large-scale hydrological models (LHMs) limits model performance, particularly in mountain regions. Here, we update mountain process representation in an LHM and compare different meteorological forcing products. Structural and parametric changes in snow, glacier, and soil processes improve discharge simulations, while meteorological forcing remains a major control on model performance. Our work can guide future development of LHMs.
Jennie C. Steyaert, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Marc Bierkens, and Niko Wanders
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 6499–6527, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6499-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6499-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using machine learning techniques and remotely sensed reservoir data, we develop a workflow to derive reservoir storage bounds. We put these bounds in a global hydrologic model, PCR-GLOBWB 2, and evaluate the difference between generalized operations (the schemes typically in global models) and this data derived method. We find that modelled storage is more accurate in the data derived operations. We also find that generalized operations over estimate storage and can underestimate water gaps.
Riccardo Biella, Anastasiya Shyrokaya, Monica Ionita, Raffaele Vignola, Samuel J. Sutanto, Andrijana Todorovic, Claudia Teutschbein, Daniela Cid, Maria Carmen Llasat, Pedro Alencar, Alessia Matanó, Elena Ridolfi, Benedetta Moccia, Ilias Pechlivanidis, Anne van Loon, Doris E. Wendt, Elin Stenfors, Fabio Russo, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Lucy Barker, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Marleen Lam, Monika Bláhová, Patricia Trambauer, Raed Hamed, Scott J. McGrane, Serena Ceola, Sigrid J. Bakke, Svitlana Krakovska, Viorica Nagavciuc, Faranak Tootoonchi, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Sandra Hauswirth, Shreedhar Maskey, Svitlana Zubkovych, Marthe Wens, and Lena M. Tallaksen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4475–4501, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4475-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4475-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The DitA (Drought in the Anthropocene) network's study on the 2022 European drought reveals growing risks, varied impacts, and fragmented, short-term management. Based on a survey of water managers, it explores risk, impacts, strategies, and their evolution. While challenges persist, signs of improvement show readiness for change. The authors call for a European Drought Directive to unify and guide future drought risk management.
Yanchen Zheng, Gemma Coxon, Mostaquimur Rahman, Ross Woods, Saskia Salwey, Youtong Rong, and Doris E. Wendt
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4247–4271, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4247-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4247-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater is vital for people and ecosystems, but most physical models lack the representation of surface–groundwater interactions, leading to inaccurate streamflow predictions in groundwater-rich areas. This study presents DECIPHeR-GW v1, which links surface and groundwater systems to improve predictions of streamflow and groundwater levels. Tested across England and Wales, DECIPHeR-GW shows high accuracy, especially in southeast England, making it a valuable tool for large-scale water management.
Hannes Müller Schmied, Simon Newland Gosling, Marlo Garnsworthy, Laura Müller, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Atiq Kainan Ahmed, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Julien Boulange, Peter Burek, Jinfeng Chang, He Chen, Lukas Gudmundsson, Manolis Grillakis, Luca Guillaumot, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Rohini Kumar, Guoyong Leng, Junguo Liu, Xingcai Liu, Inga Menke, Vimal Mishra, Yadu Pokhrel, Oldrich Rakovec, Luis Samaniego, Yusuke Satoh, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Mikhail Smilovic, Tobias Stacke, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Wim Thiery, Athanasios Tsilimigkras, Yoshihide Wada, Niko Wanders, and Tokuta Yokohata
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2409–2425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global water models contribute to the evaluation of important natural and societal issues but are – as all models – simplified representation of reality. So, there are many ways to calculate the water fluxes and storages. This paper presents a visualization of 16 global water models using a standardized visualization and the pathway towards this common understanding. Next to academic education purposes, we envisage that these diagrams will help researchers, model developers, and data users.
Jonna van Mourik, Hylke de Vries, and Michiel Baatsen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 413–429, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-413-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-413-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric blocking events are quasi-stationary high-pressure areas with large influences on our weather. In this study, we show the wide variety of zonal velocities possible for atmospheric blocking under the most used blocking indices. These include not only stationary blocks, but also eastward- and westward-moving blocks. These respective moving blocks are found to have different characteristics in size and location and have different impacts on our surface temperatures.
Barry van Jaarsveld, Niko Wanders, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Jannis Hoch, Bram Droppers, Joren Janzing, Rens L. P. H. van Beek, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 29–54, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-29-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-29-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Policy makers use global hydrological models to develop water management strategies and policies. However, it would be better if these models provided information at higher resolution. We present a first-of-its-kind, truly global hyper-resolution model and show that hyper-resolution brings about better estimates of river discharge, and this is especially true for smaller catchments. Our results also suggest that future hyper-resolution models need to include more detailed land cover information.
Saskia Salwey, Gemma Coxon, Francesca Pianosi, Rosanna Lane, Chris Hutton, Michael Bliss Singer, Hilary McMillan, and Jim Freer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4203–4218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs are essential for water resource management and can significantly impact downstream flow. However, representing reservoirs in hydrological models can be challenging, particularly across large scales. We design a new and simple method for simulating river flow downstream of water supply reservoirs using only open-access data. We demonstrate the approach in 264 reservoir catchments across Great Britain, where we can significantly improve the simulation of reservoir-impacted flow.
Barry van Jaarsveld, Sandra M. Hauswirth, and Niko Wanders
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2357–2374, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2357-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2357-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Drought often manifests itself in vegetation; however, obtaining high-resolution remote-sensing products that are spatially and temporally consistent is difficult. In this study, we show that machine learning (ML) can fill data gaps in existing products. We also demonstrate that ML can be used as a downscaling tool. By relying on ML for gap filling and downscaling, we can obtain a more holistic view of the impacts of drought on vegetation.
Edward R. Jones, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Niko Wanders, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Ludovicus P. H. van Beek, and Michelle T. H. van Vliet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4481–4500, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
DynQual is a new high-resolution global water quality model for simulating total dissolved solids, biological oxygen demand and fecal coliform as indicators of salinity, organic pollution and pathogen pollution, respectively. Output data from DynQual can supplement the observational record of water quality data, which is highly fragmented across space and time, and has the potential to inform assessments in a broad range of fields including ecological, human health and water scarcity studies.
Jannis M. Hoch, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Niko Wanders, Rens L. P. H. van Beek, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1383–1401, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1383-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1383-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To facilitate locally relevant simulations over large areas, global hydrological models (GHMs) have moved towards ever finer spatial resolutions. After a decade-long quest for hyper-resolution (i.e. equal to or smaller than 1 km), the presented work is a first application of a GHM at 1 km resolution over Europe. This not only shows that hyper-resolution can be achieved but also allows for a thorough evaluation of model results at unprecedented detail and the formulation of future research.
Sandra M. Hauswirth, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Vincent Beijk, and Niko Wanders
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 501–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-501-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-501-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts on water availability are important for water managers. We test a hybrid framework based on machine learning models and global input data for generating seasonal forecasts. Our evaluation shows that our discharge and surface water level predictions are able to create reliable forecasts up to 2 months ahead. We show that a hybrid framework, developed for local purposes and combined and rerun with global data, can create valuable information similar to large-scale forecasting models.
Sigrid Jørgensen Bakke, Niko Wanders, Karin van der Wiel, and Lena Merete Tallaksen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 65–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-65-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-65-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we developed a machine learning model to identify dominant controls of wildfire in Fennoscandia and produce monthly fire danger probability maps. The dominant control was shallow-soil water anomaly, followed by air temperature and deep soil water. The model proved skilful with a similar performance as the existing Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI). We highlight the benefit of using data-driven models jointly with other fire models to improve fire monitoring and prediction.
Vili Virkki, Elina Alanärä, Miina Porkka, Lauri Ahopelto, Tom Gleeson, Chinchu Mohan, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Martina Flörke, Dieter Gerten, Simon N. Gosling, Naota Hanasaki, Hannes Müller Schmied, Niko Wanders, and Matti Kummu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3315–3336, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3315-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Direct and indirect human actions have altered streamflow across the world since pre-industrial times. Here, we apply a method of environmental flow envelopes (EFEs) that develops the existing global environmental flow assessments by methodological advances and better consideration of uncertainty. By assessing the violations of the EFE, we comprehensively quantify the frequency, severity, and trends of flow alteration during the past decades, illustrating anthropogenic effects on streamflow.
Veit Blauhut, Michael Stoelzle, Lauri Ahopelto, Manuela I. Brunner, Claudia Teutschbein, Doris E. Wendt, Vytautas Akstinas, Sigrid J. Bakke, Lucy J. Barker, Lenka Bartošová, Agrita Briede, Carmelo Cammalleri, Ksenija Cindrić Kalin, Lucia De Stefano, Miriam Fendeková, David C. Finger, Marijke Huysmans, Mirjana Ivanov, Jaak Jaagus, Jiří Jakubínský, Svitlana Krakovska, Gregor Laaha, Monika Lakatos, Kiril Manevski, Mathias Neumann Andersen, Nina Nikolova, Marzena Osuch, Pieter van Oel, Kalina Radeva, Renata J. Romanowicz, Elena Toth, Mirek Trnka, Marko Urošev, Julia Urquijo Reguera, Eric Sauquet, Aleksandra Stevkov, Lena M. Tallaksen, Iryna Trofimova, Anne F. Van Loon, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Niko Wanders, Micha Werner, Patrick Willems, and Nenad Živković
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2201–2217, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2201-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2201-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Recent drought events caused enormous damage in Europe. We therefore questioned the existence and effect of current drought management strategies on the actual impacts and how drought is perceived by relevant stakeholders. Over 700 participants from 28 European countries provided insights into drought hazard and impact perception and current management strategies. The study concludes with an urgent need to collectively combat drought risk via a European macro-level drought governance approach.
Marc F. P. Bierkens, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, and Niko Wanders
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5859–5878, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5859-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5859-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a simple analytical framework that allows us to estimate to what extent large-scale groundwater withdrawal affects groundwater levels and streamflow. It also calculates which part of the groundwater withdrawal comes out of groundwater storage and which part from a reduction in streamflow. Global depletion rates obtained with the framework are compared with estimates from satellites, from global- and continental-scale groundwater models, and from in situ datasets.
Cited articles
Akl, M., Thomas, B. F., and Clarke, P. J.: Global Groundwater Drought Assessment Revisited: A Holistic Re-Evaluation of the GRACE-Groundwater Drought Index Across Major Aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 61, e2025WR040389, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025WR040389, 2025. a, b, c
Apurv, T. and Cai, X.: Impact of Droughts on Water Supply in U.S. Watersheds: The Role of Renewable Surface and Groundwater Resources, Earth's Future, 8, e2020EF001648, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001648, 2020. a
Ashraf, S., Nazemi, A., and AghaKouchak, A.: Anthropogenic drought dominates groundwater depletion in Iran, Sci. Rep., 11, 9135, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88522-y, 2021. a
Athukoralalage, D., Brookes, J., McDowell, R. W., and Mosley, L. M.: Impact of hydrological drought occurrence, duration, and severity on Murray-Darling basin water quality, Water Res., 252, 121201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121201, 2024. a
Bäthge, A., Ruz Vargas, C., Lischeid, G., Collenteur, R., Cuthbert, M., Fleckenstein, J., Flörke, M., De Graaf, I., Gnann, S., Hartmann, A., Huggins, X., Moosdorf, N., Wada, Y., Wagener, T., and Reinecke, R.: A Global-Scale Time Series Dataset for Groundwater Studies within the Earth System, Sci. Data, 13, 401, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06966-1, 2026. a
Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., and Wood, E. F.: Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1 km resolution, Sci. Data, 5, 180–214, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214, 2018. a
Berghuijs, W. R., Collenteur, R. A., Jasechko, S., Jaramillo, F., Luijendijk, E., Moeck, C., Van Der Velde, Y., and Allen, S. T.: Groundwater recharge is sensitive to changing long-term aridity, Nat. Clim. Change, 14, 357–363, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01953-z, 2024. a
Bierkens, M. F. P. and Wada, Y.: Non-renewable groundwater use and groundwater depletion: a review, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 063002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1a5f, 2019. a, b
Bourgault, P., Huard, D., Smith, T. J., Logan, T., Aoun, A., Lavoie, J., Dupuis, É., Rondeau-Genesse, G., Alegre, R., Barnes, C., Laperrière, A. B., Biner, S., Caron, D., Ehbrecht, C., Fyke, J., Keel, T., Labonté, M.-P., Lierhammer, L., Low, J.-F., Quinn, J., Roy, P., Squire, D., Stephens, A., Tanguy, M., and Whelan, C.: xclim: xarray-based climate data analytics, J. Open Source Softw., 8, 5415, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05415, 2023. a
Brauns, B., Cuba, D., Bloomfield, J. P., Hannah, D. M., Jackson, C., Marchant, B. P., Heudorfer, B., Van Loon, A. F., Bessière, H., Thunholm, B., and Schubert, G.: The Groundwater Drought Initiative (GDI): Analysing and understanding groundwater drought across Europe, Proc. IAHS, 383, 297–305, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-297-2020, 2020. a, b
Büchner, M. and Reyer, C.: ISIMIP3a atmospheric composition input data, ISIMIP Repository [data set], https://doi.org/10.48364/ISIMIP.664235.1, 2022. a
Cai, W., Purich, A., Cowan, T., Van Rensch, P., and Weller, E.: Did Climate Change–Induced Rainfall Trends Contribute to the Australian Millennium Drought?, J. Climate, 27, 3145–3168, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00322.1, 2014. a
Cárdenas Belleza, G. A., Bierkens, M. F. P., and Van Vliet, M. T. H.: Sectoral water use responses to droughts and heatwaves: analyses from local to global scales for 1990–2019, Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 104008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf82e, 2023. a
Castle, S. L., Thomas, B. F., Reager, J. T., Rodell, M., Swenson, S. C., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Groundwater depletion during drought threatens future water security of the Colorado River Basin, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 5904–5911, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061055, 2014. a
Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Tian, J., Nourani, V., Ma, N., Zhang, X., Xu, Z., Huang, Q., Tang, Z., Wei, H., and Yang, X.: Groundwater exhibits spatially opposing trends during the Australian Millennium Drought, Environ. Res. Lett., 19, 074016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad521d, 2024. a, b
Condon, L. E., Kollet, S., Bierkens, M. F. P., Fogg, G. E., Maxwell, R. M., Hill, M. C., Fransen, H. H., Verhoef, A., Van Loon, A. F., Sulis, M., and Abesser, C.: Global Groundwater Modeling and Monitoring: Opportunities and Challenges, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029500, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029500, 2021. a, b
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Marvel, K., Williams, A. P., Smerdon, J. E., and Anchukaitis, K. J.: Twenty-First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6 Forcing Scenarios, Earth's Future, 8, e2019EF001461, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001461, 2020. a
Famiglietti, J. S., Lo, M., Ho, S. L., Bethune, J., Anderson, K. J., Syed, T. H., Swenson, S. C., De Linage, C. R., and Rodell, M.: Satellites measure recent rates of groundwater depletion in California's Central Valley, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 2010GL046442, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046442, 2011. a
Fowler, K., Peel, M., Saft, M., Peterson, T. J., Western, A., Band, L., Petheram, C., Dharmadi, S., Tan, K. S., Zhang, L., Lane, P., Kiem, A., Marshall, L., Griebel, A., Medlyn, B. E., Ryu, D., Bonotto, G., Wasko, C., Ukkola, A., Stephens, C., Frost, A., Gardiya Weligamage, H., Saco, P., Zheng, H., Chiew, F., Daly, E., Walker, G., Vervoort, R. W., Hughes, J., Trotter, L., Neal, B., Cartwright, I., and Nathan, R.: Explaining changes in rainfall–runoff relationships during and after Australia's Millennium Drought: a community perspective, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6073–6120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, 2022. a
Fuentes, I., Padarian, J., and Vervoort, R. W.: Spatial and Temporal Global Patterns of Drought Propagation, Front. Environ. Sci., 10, 788248, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.788248, 2022. a
GRACE-FO, D. N. W.: JPL GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Ocean, Ice, and Hydrology Equivalent Water Height CRI Filtered RL06.3Mv04, EarthData [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/TEMSC-3JC634, 2024. a
Han, Z., Huang, S., Huang, Q., Leng, G., Wang, H., Bai, Q., Zhao, J., Ma, L., Wang, L., and Du, M.: Propagation dynamics from meteorological to groundwater drought and their possible influence factors, J. Hydrol., 578, 124102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124102, 2019. a, b, c
Hauswirth, S. M., Van Jaarsveld, B., Salwey, S. A. B., and Wanders, N.: Patterns and drivers of global groundwater drought recovery, Environ. Res.-Water, 2, 045002, https://doi.org/10.1088/3033-4942/aea63d, 2026. a
Heberger, M.: Australia's Millennium Drought: Impacts and Responses, in: The World's Water, edited by: Gleick, P. H., 97–125, Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, Washington, DC, ISBN 978-1-61091-048-4, https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-59726-228-6_5, 2012. a
Hellwig, J., Liu, Y., Stahl, K., and Hartmann, A.: Drought propagation in space and time: the role of groundwater flows, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 094008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac8693, 2022. a, b
Herbert, C. and Döll, P.: Assessing Groundwater Drought Hazard in Groundwater Depletion Regions: Recommendations for Large-Scale Drought Early Warning Systems, Water Resour. Res., 61, e2024WR038684, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR038684, 2025. a
Hohensinn, R., Gou, J., Meyer, U., Humphrey, V., Dorigo, W., Boergens, E., Soja, B., Gruber, A., Jensen, L., Eicker, A., Rast, M., and Güntner, A.: Water storage trends derived from the GRACE/-FO global gravity-based groundwater product (G3P), EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-975, 2026. a
Huggins, X., Gleeson, T., Castilla-Rho, J., Holley, C., Re, V., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Groundwater Connections and Sustainability in Social-Ecological Systems, Groundwater, 61, 463–478, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13305, 2023. a
IGRAC: The Global Groundwater Monitoring Network (GGMN), https://doi.org/10.58154/6Z0Y-DA34, 2024. a, b
Jasechko, S., Seybold, H., Perrone, D., Fan, Y., Shamsudduha, M., Taylor, R. G., Fallatah, O., and Kirchner, J. W.: Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally, Nature, 625, 715–721, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06879-8, 2024. a, b, c
Konapala, G., Mishra, A. K., Wada, Y., and Mann, M. E.: Climate change will affect global water availability through compounding changes in seasonal precipitation and evaporation, Nat. Commun., 11, 3044, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16757-w, 2020. a
Kumar, R., Musuuza, J. L., Van Loon, A. F., Teuling, A. J., Barthel, R., Ten Broek, J., Mai, J., Samaniego, L., and Attinger, S.: Multiscale evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index as a groundwater drought indicator, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1117–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1117-2016, 2016. a
Leblanc, M., Tweed, S., Van Dijk, A., and Timbal, B.: A review of historic and future hydrological changes in the Murray-Darling Basin, Glob. Planet. Change, 80–81, 226–246, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.10.012, 2012. a
Le Brocque, A. F., Kath, J., and Reardon-Smith, K.: Chronic groundwater decline: A multi-decadal analysis of groundwater trends under extreme climate cycles, J. Hydrol., 561, 976–986, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.059, 2018. a
Leijnse, M., F P Bierkens, M., H M Gommans, K., Lin, D., Tait, A., and Wanders, N.: Key drivers and pressures of global water scarcity hotspots, Environ. Res. Lett., 19, 054035, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad3c54, 2024. a, b
Liu, P.-W., Famiglietti, J. S., Purdy, A. J., Adams, K. H., McEvoy, A. L., Reager, J. T., Bindlish, R., Wiese, D. N., David, C. H., and Rodell, M.: Groundwater depletion in California's Central Valley accelerates during megadrought, Nat. Commun., 13, 7825, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35582-x, 2022. a
Liu, Y., Shan, F., Yue, H., Wang, X., and Fan, Y.: Global analysis of the correlation and propagation among meteorological, agricultural, surface water, and groundwater droughts, J. Environ. Manage., 333, 117460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117460, 2023. a, b, c, d
Long, D., Scanlon, B. R., Longuevergne, L., Sun, A. Y., Fernando, D. N., and Save, H.: GRACE satellite monitoring of large depletion in water storage in response to the 2011 drought in Texas, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3395–3401, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50655, 2013. a
Minea, I. and Albulescu, A.-C.: Drought Over Time: an Investigation of the Impact of Meteorological Drought on Groundwater and Surface Water in the East of Romania, Earth Syst. Environ., 9, 1959–1981, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00725-9, 2025. a, b, c
Mishra, V., Dangar, S., Tiwari, V. M., Lall, U., and Wada, Y.: Summer Monsoon Drying Accelerates India's Groundwater Depletion Under Climate Change, Earth's Future, 12, e2024EF004516, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004516, 2024. a
Mu, M., De Kauwe, M. G., Ukkola, A. M., Pitman, A. J., Guo, W., Hobeichi, S., and Briggs, P. R.: Exploring how groundwater buffers the influence of heatwaves on vegetation function during multi-year droughts, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 919–938, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-919-2021, 2021. a
Nazari, S., Reinecke, R., and Moosdorf, N.: Global estimates of groundwater withdrawal trends and uncertainties, Environ. Res. Lett., 20, 094043, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adf6ca, 2025. a, b
Ndehedehe, C. E., Ferreira, V. G., Adeyeri, O. E., Correa, F. M., Usman, M., Oussou, F. E., Kalu, I., Okwuashi, O., Onojeghuo, A. O., Getirana, A., and Dewan, A.: Global assessment of drought characteristics in the Anthropocene, Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 12, 100105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100105, 2023. a
Parry, S., Wilby, R., Prudhomme, C., Wood, P., and McKenzie, A.: Demonstrating the utility of a drought termination framework: prospects for groundwater level recovery in England and Wales in 2018 or beyond, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 064040, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac78c, 2018. a
Pascale, S. and Ragone, F.: Widespread Multi-Year Droughts in Italy: Identification and Causes of Development, Int. J. Climatol., 45, e8827, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8827, 2025. a
Pascale, S., Kapnick, S. B., Delworth, T. L., and Cooke, W. F.: Increasing risk of another Cape Town “Day Zero” drought in the 21st century, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 29495–29503, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009144117, 2020. a
Pascale, S., Kapnick, S. B., Delworth, T. L., Hidalgo, H. G., and Cooke, W. F.: Natural variability vs forced signal in the 2015–2019 Central American drought, Clim. Change, 168, 16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03228-4, 2021. a
Pauloo, R. A., Escriva-Bou, A., Dahlke, H., Fencl, A., Guillon, H., and Fogg, G. E.: Domestic well vulnerability to drought duration and unsustainable groundwater management in California's Central Valley, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 044010, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6f10, 2020. a
Pokhrel, Y., Felfelani, F., Satoh, Y., Boulange, J., Burek, P., Gädeke, A., Gerten, D., Gosling, S. N., Grillakis, M., Gudmundsson, L., Hanasaki, N., Kim, H., Koutroulis, A., Liu, J., Papadimitriou, L., Schewe, J., Müller Schmied, H., Stacke, T., Telteu, C.-E., Thiery, W., Veldkamp, T., Zhao, F., and Wada, Y.: Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 226–233, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00972-w, 2021. a
Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., and Döll, P.: MIRCA2000–Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, 2008GB003435, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003435, 2010. a
Rakovec, O., Samaniego, L., Hari, V., Markonis, Y., Moravec, V., Thober, S., Hanel, M., and Kumar, R.: The 2018–2020 Multi-Year Drought Sets a New Benchmark in Europe, Earth's Future, 10, e2021EF002394, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002394, 2022. a, b
Richey, A. S., Thomas, B. F., Lo, M., Reager, J. T., Famiglietti, J. S., Voss, K., Swenson, S., and Rodell, M.: Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5217–5238, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017349, 2015. a
Rodell, M., Famiglietti, J. S., Wiese, D. N., Reager, J. T., Beaudoing, H. K., Landerer, F. W., and Lo, M.-H.: Emerging trends in global freshwater availability, Nature, 557, 651–659, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0123-1, 2018. a
Rohde, M. M., Albano, C. M., Huggins, X., Klausmeyer, K. R., Morton, C., Sharman, A., Zaveri, E., Saito, L., Freed, Z., Howard, J. K., Job, N., Richter, H., Toderich, K., Rodella, A.-S., Gleeson, T., Huntington, J., Chandanpurkar, H. A., Purdy, A. J., Famiglietti, J. S., Singer, M. B., Roberts, D. A., Caylor, K., and Stella, J. C.: Groundwater-dependent ecosystem map exposes global dryland protection needs, Nature, 632, 101–107, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07702-8, 2024. a
Ruijsch, D., Van Mourik, J., Biemans, H., Hauswirth, S. M., and Wanders, N.: Thrive or Wither: Exploring the Impacts of Multiyear Droughts on Vegetation, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 130, e2025JG008992, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JG008992, 2025. a, b, c
Rusli, S. R., Bense, V. F., Mustafa, S. M. T., and Weerts, A. H.: The impact of future changes in climate variables and groundwater abstraction on basin-scale groundwater availability, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5107–5131, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5107-2024, 2024. a
Rust, W., Holman, I., Bloomfield, J., Cuthbert, M., and Corstanje, R.: Understanding the potential of climate teleconnections to project future groundwater drought, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3233–3245, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3233-2019, 2019. a
Saccò, M., Mammola, S., Altermatt, F., Alther, R., Bolpagni, R., Brancelj, A., Brankovits, D., Fišer, C., Gerovasileiou, V., Griebler, C., Guareschi, S., Hose, G. C., Korbel, K., Lictevout, E., Malard, F., Martínez, A., Niemiller, M. L., Robertson, A., Tanalgo, K. C., Bichuette, M. E., Borko, Å., Brad, T., Campbell, M. A., Cardoso, P., Celico, F., Cooper, S. J. B., Culver, D., Di Lorenzo, T., Galassi, D. M. P., Guzik, M. T., Hartland, A., Humphreys, W. F., Ferreira, R. L., Lunghi, E., Nizzoli, D., Perina, G., Raghavan, R., Richards, Z., Reboleira, A. S. P. S., Rohde, M. M., Fernández, D. S., Schmidt, S. I., Van Der Heyde, M., Weaver, L., White, N. E., Zagmajster, M., Hogg, I., Ruhi, A., Gagnon, M. M., Allentoft, M. E., and Reinecke, R.: Groundwater is a hidden global keystone ecosystem, Glob. Change Biol., 30, e17066, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17066, 2024. a
Scanlon, B. R., Fakhreddine, S., Rateb, A., De Graaf, I., Famiglietti, J., Gleeson, T., Grafton, R. Q., Jobbagy, E., Kebede, S., Kolusu, S. R., Konikow, L. F., Long, D., Mekonnen, M., Schmied, H. M., Mukherjee, A., MacDonald, A., Reedy, R. C., Shamsudduha, M., Simmons, C. T., Sun, A., Taylor, R. G., Villholth, K. G., Vörösmarty, C. J., and Zheng, C.: Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 4, 87–101, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00378-6, 2023. a
Schreiner-McGraw, A. P. and Ajami, H.: Delayed response of groundwater to multi-year meteorological droughts in the absence of anthropogenic management, J. Hydrol., 603, 126917, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126917, 2021. a, b, c
Siebert, S. and Döll, P.: Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses without irrigation, J. Hydrol., 384, 198–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.031, 2010. a
Sousa, P. M., Blamey, R. C., Reason, C. J. C., Ramos, A. M., and Trigo, R. M.: The “˜Day Zero” Cape Town drought and the poleward migration of moisture corridors, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 124025, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaebc7, 2018. a
Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, R., Wanders, N., Wada, Y., Bosmans, J. H. C., Drost, N., van der Ent, R. J., de Graaf, I. E. M., Hoch, J. M., de Jong, K., Karssenberg, D., López López, P., Peßenteiner, S., Schmitz, O., Straatsma, M. W., Vannametee, E., Wisser, D., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: PCR-GLOBWB 2: a 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2429–2453, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2429-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Taylor, R. G., Scanlon, B., Döll, P., Rodell, M., Van Beek, R., Wada, Y., Longuevergne, L., Leblanc, M., Famiglietti, J. S., Edmunds, M., Konikow, L., Green, T. R., Chen, J., Taniguchi, M., Bierkens, M. F. P., MacDonald, A., Fan, Y., Maxwell, R. M., Yechieli, Y., Gurdak, J. J., Allen, D. M., Shamsudduha, M., Hiscock, K., Yeh, P. J.-F., Holman, I., and Treidel, H.: Ground water and climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 322–329, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1744, 2013. a, b
United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Mena Benavides, M., Eberle, C., United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Narvaez, L., and United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS): Technical Report: Groundwater depletion, Tech. rep., United Nations University - Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), https://doi.org/10.53324/CUAA8911, 2023. a
Van Der Wiel, K., Batelaan, T. J., and Wanders, N.: Large increases of multi-year droughts in north-western Europe in a warmer climate, Clim. Dynam., 60, 1781–1800, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06373-3, 2023. a, b, c
Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Beck, H. E., Crosbie, R. S., De Jeu, R. A. M., Liu, Y. Y., Podger, G. M., Timbal, B., and Viney, N. R.: The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): Natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society, Water Resour. Res., 49, 1040–1057, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20123, 2013. a, b
van Jaarsveld, B.: GLOBGM_CMIP6: A Global Hyper-Resolution Groundwater Dataset for Assessing Historical and Future Groundwater Dynamics Under Climate and Socioeconomic Change – [globgm_historical_reference_gswp3-w5e5], Utrecht University [data set], https://doi.org/10.24416/UU01-AKSHOX, 2025. a
van Jaarsveld, B., Wanders, N., Otoo, N. G., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Verkaik, J., Zamrsky, D., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Global hyper-resolution modeling of historical and future groundwater dynamics, Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 1201–1236, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1201-2026, 2026. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Van Lanen, H. A. J., Wanders, N., Tallaksen, L. M., and Van Loon, A. F.: Hydrological drought across the world: impact of climate and physical catchment structure, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1715–1732, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1715-2013, 2013. a, b
Van Loon, A. F.: Hydrological drought explained, WIREs Water, 2, 359–392, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1085, 2015. a
Van Loon, A. F., Kumar, R., and Mishra, V.: Testing the use of standardised indices and GRACE satellite data to estimate the European 2015 groundwater drought in near-real time, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1947–1971, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1947-2017, 2017. a
Van Mourik, J., Ruijsch, D., Van Der Wiel, K., Hazeleger, W., and Wanders, N.: Regional drivers and characteristics of multi-year droughts, Weather and Climate Extremes, 48, 100748, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2025.100748, 2025. a, b, c, d
Verkaik, J., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Oude Essink, G. H. P., Lin, H. X., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: GLOBGM v1.0: a parallel implementation of a 30 arcsec PCR-GLOBWB-MODFLOW global-scale groundwater model, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 275–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-275-2024, 2024. a, b, c
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S., and López-Moreno, J. I.: A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, J. Climate, 23, 1696–1718, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1, 2010. a
Wada, Y. and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Sustainability of global water use: past reconstruction and future projections, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 104003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/104003, 2014. a
Wada, Y., Van Beek, L. P. H., Wanders, N., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Human water consumption intensifies hydrological drought worldwide, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 034036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034036, 2013. a
Wanders, N., Wada, Y., and Van Lanen, H. A. J.: Global hydrological droughts in the 21st century under a changing hydrological regime, Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-1-2015, 2015. a, b
Wang, S., Huang, S., Wang, C., Zhang, X., Wu, J., Gulakhmadov, A., Niyogi, D., and Chen, N.: Global anthropogenic effects on meteorological–hydrological–soil moisture drought propagation: Historical analysis and future projection, J. Hydrol., 653, 132755, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132755, 2025. a
Watkins, M. M., Wiese, D. N., Yuan, D., Boening, C., and Landerer, F. W.: Improved methods for observing Earth's time variable mass distribution with GRACE using spherical cap mascons, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 2648–2671, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011547, 2015. a
Wunsch, A., Liesch, T., and Broda, S.: Deep learning shows declining groundwater levels in Germany until 2100 due to climate change, Nat. Commun., 13, 1221, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28770-2, 2022. a, b
Xie, Z., Huete, A., Restrepo-Coupe, N., Ma, X., Devadas, R., and Caprarelli, G.: Spatial partitioning and temporal evolution of Australia's total water storage under extreme hydroclimatic impacts, Remote Sens. Environ., 183, 43–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.017, 2016. a
Short summary
This paper investigates how weather conditions influence droughts in groundwater. We focus on understanding why some groundwater droughts last for several years, since these long events can be difficult to manage and have particularly bad impacts. We find that some features of the groundwater system can worsen the effects of dry weather, making long groundwater droughts more likely. We categorize global groundwater data into three groups to describe how it is impacted by the weather.
This paper investigates how weather conditions influence droughts in groundwater. We focus on...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint