12 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
2. Kicking the can down the road: understanding the effects of delaying the deployment of stratospheric aerosol injection E. Brody et al. 10.1088/2752-5295/ad53f3
3. Identifying Climate Impacts From Different Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Strategies in UKESM1 A. Wells et al. 10.1029/2023EF004358
4. A mathematical modelling for solar irradiance reduction of sunshades and some near-future albedo modification approaches for mitigation of global warming B. Alagoz et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106337
5. Potential Non‐Linearities in the High Latitude Circulation and Ozone Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Injection E. Bednarz et al. 10.1029/2023GL104726
6. Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-15-191-2024
7. Quantifying the Efficiency of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering at Different Altitudes W. Lee et al. 10.1029/2023GL104417
8. An assessment of the infrastructural and temporal barriers constraining a near-term implementation of a global stratospheric aerosol injection program W. Smith 10.1088/2515-7620/ad4f5c
9. Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023
10. Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Can Reduce Risks to Antarctic Ice Loss Depending on Injection Location and Amount P. Goddard et al. 10.1029/2023JD039434
11. Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
12. The Choice of Baseline Period Influences the Assessments of the Outcomes of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2023EF003851