Editor(s): Hailong Wang, Anja Schmidt, and Ben Kravitz
Special issue jointly organized between Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics and Earth System Dynamics
29 Jan 2024
| Highlight paper
Future water storage changes over the Mediterranean, Middle East, and North Africa in response to global warming and stratospheric aerosol intervention
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 91–108,
2024 03 Nov 2023
Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13665–13684,
2023 20 Dec 2023
| Highlight paper
The Indonesian Throughflow circulation under solar geoengineering
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1317–1332,
2023 13 Mar 2024
| Highlight paper
Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 191–213,
2024 15 Jun 2023
Comment on “An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide” by Quaglia et al. (2022)
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6591–6598,
2023 31 Mar 2023
The Holton–Tan mechanism under stratospheric aerosol intervention
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3799–3818,
2023 26 Sep 2023
Changes in apparent temperature and PM2.5 around the Beijing–Tianjin megalopolis under greenhouse gas and stratospheric aerosol intervention scenarios
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 989–1013,
2023 24 Jan 2023
PInc-PanTher estimates of Arctic permafrost soil carbon under the GeoMIP G6solar and G6sulfur experiments
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 39–53,
2023 05 Jan 2023
| Highlight paper
Dependence of strategic solar climate intervention on background scenario and model physics
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 163–182,
2023 18 Nov 2022
Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and wind speed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1625–1640,
2022 25 Jan 2023
Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 55–79,
2023 16 Jan 2023
Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 687–709,
2023 16 Jan 2023
Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 663–685,
2023 26 Aug 2022
Indices of extremes: geographic patterns of change in extremes and associated vegetation impacts under climate intervention
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1233–1257,
2022 10 May 2022
| Highlight paper
Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6135–6150,
2022 08 Apr 2022
Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4557–4579,
2022 08 Apr 2022
Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4581–4597,
2022 07 Mar 2022
| Highlight paper
The impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention on the North Atlantic and Quasi-Biennial Oscillations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G6sulfur experiment
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2999–3016,
2022 03 May 2022
An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5757–5773,
2022 25 Jan 2022
How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering?
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 201–217,
2022 04 Feb 2022
Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species: a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1739–1756,
2022 04 Jan 2022
| Highlight paper
Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 93–118,
2022 01 Oct 2021
Assessing the potential efficacy of marine cloud brightening for cooling Earth using a simple heuristic model
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14507–14533,
2021 06 Jul 2021
Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10039–10063,
2021 07 May 2021
Robust winter warming over Eurasia under stratospheric sulfate geoengineering – the role of stratospheric dynamics
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6985–6997,
2021 08 Jun 2021
Differences in the quasi-biennial oscillation response to stratospheric aerosol modification depending on injection strategy and species
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8615–8635,
2021 19 Mar 2021
Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4231–4247,
2021 29 Jan 2021
North Atlantic Oscillation response in GeoMIP experiments G6solar and G6sulfur: why detailed modelling is needed for understanding regional implications of solar radiation management
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1287–1304,
2021 31 Jul 2020
Climate engineering to mitigate the projected 21st-century terrestrial drying of the Americas: a direct comparison of carbon capture and sulfur injection
Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 673–695,
2020