Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-201-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-201-2022
Research article
 | 
25 Jan 2022
Research article |  | 25 Jan 2022

How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering?

Yan Zhang, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, and Ben Kravitz

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on Zhang et al', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Sep 2021
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yan Zhang, 01 Dec 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on esd-2021-70', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Oct 2021
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Yan Zhang, 01 Dec 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish as is (09 Dec 2021) by Roland Séférian
AR by Yan Zhang on behalf of the Authors (13 Dec 2021)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Adding SO2 to the stratosphere could temporarily cool the planet by reflecting more sunlight back to space. However, adding SO2 at different latitude(s) and season(s) leads to significant differences in regional surface climate. This study shows that, to cool the planet by 1–1.5 °C, there are likely six to eight choices of injection latitude(s) and season(s) that lead to meaningfully different distributions of climate impacts.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint