Articles | Volume 10, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-453-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-453-2019
Research article
 | 
15 Jul 2019
Research article |  | 15 Jul 2019

Complementing CO2 emission reduction by solar radiation management might strongly enhance future welfare

Koen G. Helwegen, Claudia E. Wieners, Jason E. Frank, and Henk A. Dijkstra

Related authors

Potential effect of the marine carbon cycle on the multiple equilibria window of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
Amber A. Boot, Anna S. von der Heydt, and Henk A. Dijkstra
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1567–1590, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1567-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1567-2024, 2024
Short summary
Explaining the high skill of Reservoir Computing methods in El Niño prediction
Francesco Guardamagna, Claudia Wieners, and Henk Dijkstra
Nonlin. Processes Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2024-24,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2024-24, 2024
Preprint under review for NPG
Short summary
“More poison than words can describe”: what did people die of after the 1783 Laki eruption in Iceland?
Claudia Elisabeth Wieners and Guðmundur Hálfdanarson
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2971–2994, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2971-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2971-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dynamics of salt intrusion in complex estuarine networks; an idealised model applied to the Rhine-Meuse Delta
Bouke Biemond, Wouter Kranenburg, Ymkje Huismans, Huib E. de Swart, and Henk A. Dijkstra
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2322,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2322, 2024
Short summary
Similar North Pacific variability despite suppressed El Niño variability in the warm mid-Pliocene climate
Arthur Merlijn Oldeman, Michiel L. J. Baatsen, Anna S. von der Heydt, Frank M. Selten, and Henk A. Dijkstra
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1037–1054, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1037-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1037-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Management of the Earth system: engineering responses to climate change
The deployment length of solar radiation modification: an interplay of mitigation, net-negative emissions and climate uncertainty
Susanne Baur, Alexander Nauels, Zebedee Nicholls, Benjamin M. Sanderson, and Carl-Friedrich Schleussner
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 367–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-367-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-367-2023, 2023
Short summary
Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios
Yangxin Chen, Duoying Ji, Qian Zhang, John C. Moore, Olivier Boucher, Andy Jones, Thibaut Lurton, Michael J. Mills, Ulrike Niemeier, Roland Séférian, and Simone Tilmes
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 55–79, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-55-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-55-2023, 2023
Short summary
Exploration of a novel geoengineering solution: lighting up tropical forests at night
Xueyuan Gao, Shunlin Liang, Dongdong Wang, Yan Li, Bin He, and Aolin Jia
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 219–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-219-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-219-2022, 2022
Short summary
How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering?
Yan Zhang, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, and Ben Kravitz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 201–217, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-201-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-201-2022, 2022
Short summary
The response of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling under different aerosol-based radiation management geoengineering
Hanna Lee, Helene Muri, Altug Ekici, Jerry Tjiputra, and Jörg Schwinger
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 313–326, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-313-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-313-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, F.: Debating Climate Economics: The Stern Review vs. Its Critics, Report to Friends of the Earth-UK, 1–25, 2007. a
Aengenheyster, M., Feng, Q. Y., van der Ploeg, F., and Dijkstra, H. A.: The point of no return for climate action: effects of climate uncertainty and risk tolerance, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1085–1095, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1085-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Ahlm, L., Jones, A., Stjern, C. W., Muri, H., Kravitz, B., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: Marine cloud brightening – as effective without clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13071–13087, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13071-2017, 2017. a
Andrews, T., Forster, P. M., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., and Jones A.: Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L14701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043991, 2010. a, b
Auffhammer, M.: Quantifying Economic Damages from Climate Change, J. Econ. Persp., 32, 33–52, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.4.33, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
We use the climate-economy model DICE to perform a cost–benefit analysis of sulfate geoengineering, i.e. producing a thin artificial sulfate haze in the higher atmosphere to reflect some sunlight and cool the Earth. We find that geoengineering can increase future welfare by reducing global warming, and should be taken seriously as a policy option, but it can only complement, not replace, carbon emission reduction. The best policy is to combine CO2 emission reduction with modest geoengineering.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint