Articles | Volume 10, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-453-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-453-2019
Research article
 | 
15 Jul 2019
Research article |  | 15 Jul 2019

Complementing CO2 emission reduction by solar radiation management might strongly enhance future welfare

Koen G. Helwegen, Claudia E. Wieners, Jason E. Frank, and Henk A. Dijkstra

Related authors

Causal Mechanisms of Subpolar Gyre Variability in CMIP6 Models
Swinda K. J. Falkena, Henk A. Dijkstra, and Anna S. von der Heydt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16541,https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16541, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Physics of AMOC multistable regime shifts due to freshwater biases in an EMIC
Amber A. Boot and Henk A. Dijkstra
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-758,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-758, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
An idealized model for the spatial structure of the eddy-driven Ferrel cell in mid-latitudes
Woosok Moon, Seung Pyo Lee, Elian Vanderborght, Georgy Manucharyan, and Henk Dijkstra
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1004,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1004, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Dynamics of salt intrusion in complex estuarine networks: an idealised model applied to the Rhine–Meuse Delta
Bouke Biemond, Wouter M. Kranenburg, Ymkje Huismans, Huib E. de Swart, and Henk A. Dijkstra
Ocean Sci., 21, 261–281, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-261-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-261-2025, 2025
Short summary
A Saddle-Node Bifurcation is Causing the AMOC Collapse in the Community Earth System Model
René M. van Westen, Elian Vanderborght, and Henk A. Dijkstra
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-14,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-14, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary

Related subject area

Management of the Earth system: engineering responses to climate change
The deployment length of solar radiation modification: an interplay of mitigation, net-negative emissions and climate uncertainty
Susanne Baur, Alexander Nauels, Zebedee Nicholls, Benjamin M. Sanderson, and Carl-Friedrich Schleussner
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 367–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-367-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-367-2023, 2023
Short summary
Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios
Yangxin Chen, Duoying Ji, Qian Zhang, John C. Moore, Olivier Boucher, Andy Jones, Thibaut Lurton, Michael J. Mills, Ulrike Niemeier, Roland Séférian, and Simone Tilmes
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 55–79, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-55-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-55-2023, 2023
Short summary
Exploration of a novel geoengineering solution: lighting up tropical forests at night
Xueyuan Gao, Shunlin Liang, Dongdong Wang, Yan Li, Bin He, and Aolin Jia
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 219–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-219-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-219-2022, 2022
Short summary
How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering?
Yan Zhang, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, and Ben Kravitz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 201–217, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-201-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-201-2022, 2022
Short summary
The response of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling under different aerosol-based radiation management geoengineering
Hanna Lee, Helene Muri, Altug Ekici, Jerry Tjiputra, and Jörg Schwinger
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 313–326, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-313-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-313-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, F.: Debating Climate Economics: The Stern Review vs. Its Critics, Report to Friends of the Earth-UK, 1–25, 2007. a
Aengenheyster, M., Feng, Q. Y., van der Ploeg, F., and Dijkstra, H. A.: The point of no return for climate action: effects of climate uncertainty and risk tolerance, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1085–1095, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1085-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Ahlm, L., Jones, A., Stjern, C. W., Muri, H., Kravitz, B., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: Marine cloud brightening – as effective without clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13071–13087, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13071-2017, 2017. a
Andrews, T., Forster, P. M., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., and Jones A.: Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L14701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043991, 2010. a, b
Auffhammer, M.: Quantifying Economic Damages from Climate Change, J. Econ. Persp., 32, 33–52, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.4.33, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
We use the climate-economy model DICE to perform a cost–benefit analysis of sulfate geoengineering, i.e. producing a thin artificial sulfate haze in the higher atmosphere to reflect some sunlight and cool the Earth. We find that geoengineering can increase future welfare by reducing global warming, and should be taken seriously as a policy option, but it can only complement, not replace, carbon emission reduction. The best policy is to combine CO2 emission reduction with modest geoengineering.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint