Journal cover Journal topic
Earth System Dynamics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 3.866
IF3.866
IF 5-year value: 4.135
IF 5-year
4.135
CiteScore value: 7.0
CiteScore
7.0
SNIP value: 1.182
SNIP1.182
IPP value: 3.86
IPP3.86
SJR value: 1.883
SJR1.883
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 33
Scimago H
index
33
h5-index value: 30
h5-index30
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
Even models relying on physical laws have parameters that need to be measured or estimated. Thermodynamic optimality principles potentially offer a way to reduce the number of estimated parameters by stating that a system evolves to an optimum state. These principles have been applied successfully within the Earth system, but it is often unclear what to optimize and how. In this review paper we identify commonalities between different successful applications as well as some doubtful applications.
Altmetrics
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2019-6
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2019-6

  15 Feb 2019

15 Feb 2019

Review status: this preprint was under review for the journal ESD. A final paper is not foreseen.

ESD Reviews: Thermodynamic optimality in Earth sciences. The missing constraints in modeling Earth system dynamics?

Martijn Westhoff1, Axel Kleidon2, Stan Schymanski3, Benjamin Dewals4, Femke Nijsse5, Maik Renner2, Henk Dijkstra6, Hisashi Ozawa7, Hubert Savenije8, Han Dolman1, Antoon Meesters1, and Erwin Zehe9 Martijn Westhoff et al.
  • 1Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 2Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie, Jena, Germany
  • 3Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
  • 4University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
  • 5University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • 6Center for Complex Systems Studies, Department of Physics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • 7Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • 8Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • 9Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany

Abstract. Thermodynamic optimality principles have been often used in Earth sciences to estimate model parameters or fluxes. Applications range from optimizing atmospheric meridional heat fluxes to sediment transport and from optimizing spatial flow patterns to dispersion coefficients for fresh and salt water mixing. However, it is not always clear what has to be optimized and how. In this paper we aimed to clarify terminology used in the literature and to infer how these principles have been used and when they give proper predictions of observed fluxes and states.

We distinguish roughly four classes of applications: predictions using a flux-gradient feedback, predictions using a constant thermodynamic potential boundary conditions, predictions based on information theoretical approaches and comparative studies quantifying entropy production rates from observations at different sites. Here we mainly focus on the flux-gradient feedback, since it results in clear physical limits of energy conversion rates occurring in the Earth system and its subsystems. We show that within the flux-gradient feedback application, maximum entropy production is in many cases equivalent to maximum power and maximum energy dissipation. We advocate the maximum power principle above the more widely used maximum entropy production principle because entropy can be produced by all kinds of fluxes, but only optimized fluxes performing work coincided with observations. Furthermore, the maximum power principle links to the maximum amount of free energy that can be converted into another form of energy. This clearly separates the well defined physical conversion limit from the hypothesis that a system evolves to that limit of maximum power. Although attempts have been made to fundamentally explain why a system would evolve to such a maximum in power, there is still no consensus. Nevertheless, we think that when the maximum power approach is correctly and consistently used, the positive (or negative) results will speak for themselves.

We end this review with some open research questions that may guide further research in this area.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Martijn Westhoff et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Martijn Westhoff et al.

Martijn Westhoff et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 914 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
611 264 39 914 59 66
  • HTML: 611
  • PDF: 264
  • XML: 39
  • Total: 914
  • BibTeX: 59
  • EndNote: 66
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Feb 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 825 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 824 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 16 Jan 2021
Publications Copernicus
Download
Withdrawal notice

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
Even models relying on physical laws have parameters that need to be measured or estimated. Thermodynamic optimality principles potentially offer a way to reduce the number of estimated parameters by stating that a system evolves to an optimum state. These principles have been applied successfully within the Earth system, but it is often unclear what to optimize and how. In this review paper we identify commonalities between different successful applications as well as some doubtful applications.
Citation
Altmetrics