Articles | Volume 8, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-719-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-719-2017
Research article
 | 
21 Aug 2017
Research article |  | 21 Aug 2017

Comparison of land surface humidity between observations and CMIP5 models

Robert J. H. Dunn, Kate M. Willett, Andrew Ciavarella, and Peter A. Stott

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (08 Jun 2017) by Sagnik Dey
AR by Robert Dunn on behalf of the Authors (14 Jun 2017)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (02 Jul 2017) by Sagnik Dey
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (16 Jul 2017)
ED: Publish as is (16 Jul 2017) by Sagnik Dey
AR by Robert Dunn on behalf of the Authors (18 Jul 2017)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
We compare the latest observations of relative and specific humidity with those from climate models. The climate models do not accurately reproduce the observed humidity behaviour for the last 15–20 years. We use the temporal, spatial and trend information to contrast the patterns exhibited by the observations and models. The temporal behaviour of the observations has previously been documented and is consistent with faster warming rates over land compared to oceans.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint