Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-353-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The global climate response to High-Latitude Low-Altitude Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (HiLLA-SAI)
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 16 Apr 2026)
- Preprint (discussion started on 12 Nov 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5356', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Nov 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alistair Duffey, 06 Mar 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5356', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Feb 2026
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alistair Duffey, 06 Mar 2026
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (23 Mar 2026) by Claudia Pasquero
AR by Alistair Duffey on behalf of the Authors (02 Apr 2026)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (07 Apr 2026) by Claudia Pasquero
AR by Alistair Duffey on behalf of the Authors (07 Apr 2026)
Summary:
The authors examine a specific SAI strategy that departs from the standard tropical, high-altitude injection approach. Instead, they focus on high-latitude, low-altitude injections (HiLLA-SAI), where SO₂ is released near 60° N/S at 13–15 km. The motivation is that these lower-altitude, high-latitude injections could be carried out with existing large aircraft, making them a potentially more practical option for an early-stage deployment. Using simulations from three Earth system models (UKESM1, CESM2-WACCM, and E3SMv3), the authors evaluate how variations in injection altitude, latitude, season, and longitude influence the climate response. They find that HiLLA-SAI is less efficient per unit SO₂ than traditional tropical high-altitude SAI, but it still produces notable global cooling and strong high-latitude impacts, including changes in sea ice, polar precipitation, and the seasonal cycle. Although the forcing is concentrated at high latitudes, the authors show that HiLLA-SAI nonetheless drives global-scale responses—affecting tropical temperatures, precipitation patterns, and sulfur deposition—and therefore should not be viewed as a purely regional intervention. They conclude by emphasizing the need for continued study of such strategies, particularly given their potential relevance for near-term or limited-capacity deployment scenarios.
Minor Comments:
Line 12 – “For 13 km inject,” -> “For the 13 km injection,”
Line 12-13 – This sentence reads awkward to me. I’m not sure I completely follow what is meant by “tropical cooling per unit global cooling” under a GHG warming scenario. Why is there cooling in a warming scenario – perhaps I just don’t understand this metric.
Line 22 - The phrase “well above … quantities of SO2” could use a citation (Smith et al., 2024?)
Line 45 – Exchange the “;” for a “.”
Line 48 – Change “68N, 10-15 km” to “68N at 10-15 km”?
Line 100 – citation for CAM
In Section 2.2, note somewhere that there is only 1 ensemble member for each HiLLA experiment and that they branch from the SSP2-4.5 r1. … I see “r1” written in some figures and figure captions, but I don’t believe this term is explained in the text.
Figure 3 caption – last sentence: How is the ‘Antarctic’ defined?
Line 192 – remove “,” after the word cooling
Line 223-224 – Could you explain the purpose of this decomposition, I’m not sure I follow the goal of this analysis
Line 309 – Specify which relationship is “weaker”
Figure 14 Caption – last sentence, CESM_WACCM should be CESM-WACCM