Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1153-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1153-2024
Perspective
 | Highlight paper
 | 
26 Aug 2024
Perspective | Highlight paper |  | 26 Aug 2024

Cautionary remarks on the planetary boundary visualisation

Miguel D. Mahecha, Guido Kraemer, and Fabio Crameri

Related authors

Interactive physical data cubes: A novel perspective for exploring Earth system dynamics
Maximilian Söchting and Miguel D. Mahecha
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5632,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5632, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Dheed: an ERA5 based global database of compound dry and hot extreme events from 1950 to 2023
Mélanie Weynants, Chaonan Ji, Nora Linscheid, Ulrich Weber, Miguel D. Mahecha, and Fabian Gans
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 6621–6645, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6621-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6621-2025, 2025
Short summary
Constraining the time of emergence of anthropogenic signal in the global land carbon sink
Na Li, Sebastian Sippel, Nora Linscheid, Miguel D. Mahecha, Markus Reichstein, and Ana Bastos
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1924,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1924, 2025
Short summary
Learning extreme vegetation response to climate drivers with recurrent neural networks
Francesco Martinuzzi, Miguel D. Mahecha, Gustau Camps-Valls, David Montero, Tristan Williams, and Karin Mora
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 535–557, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-535-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-535-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deep Earth System Data Laboratory (DeepESDL)
Anca Anghelea, Ewelina Dobrowolska, Gunnar Brandt, Martin Reinhardt, Miguel Mahecha, Tejas Morbagal Harish, and Stephan Meissl
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-2024, 13–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-2024-13-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-2024-13-2024, 2024

Cited articles

Bachmann, M., Zibunas, C., Hartmann, J., Tulus, V., Suh, S., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., and Bardow, A.: Towards circular plastics within planetary boundaries, Nat. Sustain., 6, 599–610, 2023. a
Biermann, F. and Kim, R. E.: The boundaries of the planetary boundary framework: a critical appraisal of approaches to define a “safe operating space” for humanity, Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 45, 497–521, 2020. a
Brasseur, L.: Florence Nightingale's Visual Rhetoric in the Rose Diagrams, Technical Communication Quarterly, 14, 161–182, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1402_3, 2005. a
Brettel, H., Viénot, F., and Mollon, J. D.: Computerized simulation of color appearance for dichromats, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 14, 2647–2655, https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.14.002647, 1997. a, b
Cohen, I. B.: Florence Nightingale, Sci. Am., 250, 128–137, 1984. a, b
Download
Chief editor
This paper makes an important criticism about the visualisation of the planetary boundary concept. Hopefully, future publications will take up on the suggestions being made in this paper to communicate the concept more objectively in a scientific manner.
Short summary
Our paper examines the visual representation of the planetary boundary concept, which helps convey Earth's capacity to sustain human life. We identify three issues: exaggerated impact sizes, confusing color patterns, and inaccessibility for colour-vision deficiency. These flaws can lead to overstating risks. We suggest improving these visual elements for more accurate and accessible information for decision-makers.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint