Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1153-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1153-2024
Perspective
 | Highlight paper
 | 
26 Aug 2024
Perspective | Highlight paper |  | 26 Aug 2024

Cautionary remarks on the planetary boundary visualisation

Miguel D. Mahecha, Guido Kraemer, and Fabio Crameri

Viewed

Total article views: 2,223 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,539 630 54 2,223 39 37
  • HTML: 1,539
  • PDF: 630
  • XML: 54
  • Total: 2,223
  • BibTeX: 39
  • EndNote: 37
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Dec 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Dec 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,223 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,531 with geography defined and -308 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Chief editor
This paper makes an important criticism about the visualisation of the planetary boundary concept. Hopefully, future publications will take up on the suggestions being made in this paper to communicate the concept more objectively in a scientific manner.
Short summary
Our paper examines the visual representation of the planetary boundary concept, which helps convey Earth's capacity to sustain human life. We identify three issues: exaggerated impact sizes, confusing color patterns, and inaccessibility for colour-vision deficiency. These flaws can lead to overstating risks. We suggest improving these visual elements for more accurate and accessible information for decision-makers.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint