Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-697-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-697-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Incremental improvements of 2030 targets insufficient to achieve the Paris Agreement goals
Andreas Geiges
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Climate Analytics, 10961 Berlin, Germany
Alexander Nauels
Climate Analytics, 10961 Berlin, Germany
Australian–German Climate and Energy College, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Paola Yanguas Parra
Climate Analytics, 10961 Berlin, Germany
Marina Andrijevic
Climate Analytics, 10961 Berlin, Germany
IRI THESys, Humboldt University, 10117 Berlin, Germany
William Hare
Climate Analytics, 10961 Berlin, Germany
Peter Pfleiderer
Climate Analytics, 10961 Berlin, Germany
Australian–German Climate and Energy College, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Michiel Schaeffer
Climate Analytics, 10961 Berlin, Germany
Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands
Carl-Friedrich Schleussner
Climate Analytics, 10961 Berlin, Germany
Australian–German Climate and Energy College, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 7,420 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Sep 2019)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6,052 | 1,235 | 133 | 7,420 | 339 | 155 | 149 |
- HTML: 6,052
- PDF: 1,235
- XML: 133
- Total: 7,420
- Supplement: 339
- BibTeX: 155
- EndNote: 149
Total article views: 5,910 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Aug 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5,095 | 722 | 93 | 5,910 | 149 | 101 | 96 |
- HTML: 5,095
- PDF: 722
- XML: 93
- Total: 5,910
- Supplement: 149
- BibTeX: 101
- EndNote: 96
Total article views: 1,510 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Sep 2019)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
957 | 513 | 40 | 1,510 | 190 | 54 | 53 |
- HTML: 957
- PDF: 513
- XML: 40
- Total: 1,510
- Supplement: 190
- BibTeX: 54
- EndNote: 53
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 7,420 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,709 with geography defined
and 711 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,910 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,282 with geography defined
and 628 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,510 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,427 with geography defined
and 83 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
31 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Limits to Paris compatibility of CO2 capture and utilization K. de Kleijne et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.01.006
- Potential heat-risk avoidance from nationally determined emission reductions targets in the future F. Wang et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac66f4
- Contested net-zero target setting in a transitioning country: The case of South Korea J. Joo et al. 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103114
- complexity of international climate cooperation C. Zepeda 10.5902/2357797574226
- The carbon footprint balance of a real-case wine fermentation CO2 capture and utilization strategy A. Gueddari-Aourir et al. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.112058
- Future changes in extreme precipitation in central Asia with 1.5–4°C global warming based on Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 simulations J. Zhang & F. Wang 10.1002/joc.7740
- Selective in-situ water removal by polybenzoxazole hollow fiber membrane for enhanced CO2 methanation E. Kim et al. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.150206
- Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers’ Emotive Reasoning about an Environmental Issue: Using Well-Defined Environmental Cases in Environmental Education D. Sarıbaş & E. Çetinkaya 10.33418/education.1416579
- An alternative simulation framework to evaluate the sustainability of annual harvest on large forest estates M. Fortin et al. 10.1139/cjfr-2021-0255
- Decarbonising the residential heating sector: A techno-economic assessment of selected technologies D. Huckebrink & V. Bertsch 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124605
- Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach G. Ganti et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb502
- A multi-model analysis of long-term emissions and warming implications of current mitigation efforts I. Sognnaes et al. 10.1038/s41558-021-01206-3
- Rapid climate transformation requires transformative policy and science thinking—An editorial essay J. Byrne et al. 10.1002/wene.428
- Quantifying risks avoided by limiting global warming to 1.5 or 2 °C above pre-industrial levels R. Warren et al. 10.1007/s10584-021-03277-9
- The heterogeneous driving forces behind carbon emissions change in 30 selective emerging economies S. Li et al. 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100760
- Pathways of climate resilience over the 21st century C. Schleussner et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abed79
- Large‐Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal to Meet the 1.5°C Limit: Key Governance Gaps, Challenges and Priority Responses M. Mace et al. 10.1111/1758-5899.12921
- Wave of net zero emission targets opens window to meeting the Paris Agreement N. Höhne et al. 10.1038/s41558-021-01142-2
- Responsibility of major emitters for country-level warming and extreme hot years L. Beusch et al. 10.1038/s43247-021-00320-6
- Comparison of multi-model ensembles of global and regional climate model projections for daily characteristics of precipitation over four major river basins in southern Africa. Part II: Future changes under 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C and 3.0 °C warming levels S. Samuel et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106921
- CO2 removal and 1.5 °C: what, when, where, and how? S. Chiquier et al. 10.1039/D2YA00108J
- A comparative analysis of the efficiency, timing, and permanence of CO2 removal pathways S. Chiquier et al. 10.1039/D2EE01021F
- Potential Climate Change Risks to Meeting Zimbabwe’s NDC Goals and How to Become Resilient M. Howells et al. 10.3390/en14185827
- Analysing the Transformative Changes of Nationally Determined Contributions and Long-Term Targets P. Fragkos et al. 10.3390/cli12060087
- Social tipping points everywhere?—Patterns and risks of overuse M. Milkoreit 10.1002/wcc.813
- The catalytic activity of the Pr2Zr2−xFexO7±δ system for the CO oxidation reaction E. dos Santos Veiga et al. 10.1111/jace.18846
- Challenging conventional wisdom: Experimental evidence on heterogeneity and coordination in avoiding a collective catastrophic event I. Waichman et al. 10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102502
- Writing IR after COVID-19: Reassessing Political Possibilities, Good Faith, and Policy-Relevant Scholarship on Climate Change Mitigation and Nuclear Disarmament B. Pelopidas & S. Verschuren 10.1093/isagsq/ksad006
- Assessing high resolution thermal monitoring of complex intertidal environments from space: The case of ECOSTRESS at Rias Baixas, NW Iberia N. Weidberg et al. 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101055
- Assessing GHG mitigation goals of INDCs (NDCs) considering socio-economic and environmental indicators of the parties S. Modirzadeh et al. 10.1007/s11027-021-09975-0
- Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal R. Brecha et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-31734-1
29 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Limits to Paris compatibility of CO2 capture and utilization K. de Kleijne et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.01.006
- Potential heat-risk avoidance from nationally determined emission reductions targets in the future F. Wang et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac66f4
- Contested net-zero target setting in a transitioning country: The case of South Korea J. Joo et al. 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103114
- complexity of international climate cooperation C. Zepeda 10.5902/2357797574226
- The carbon footprint balance of a real-case wine fermentation CO2 capture and utilization strategy A. Gueddari-Aourir et al. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.112058
- Future changes in extreme precipitation in central Asia with 1.5–4°C global warming based on Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 simulations J. Zhang & F. Wang 10.1002/joc.7740
- Selective in-situ water removal by polybenzoxazole hollow fiber membrane for enhanced CO2 methanation E. Kim et al. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.150206
- Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers’ Emotive Reasoning about an Environmental Issue: Using Well-Defined Environmental Cases in Environmental Education D. Sarıbaş & E. Çetinkaya 10.33418/education.1416579
- An alternative simulation framework to evaluate the sustainability of annual harvest on large forest estates M. Fortin et al. 10.1139/cjfr-2021-0255
- Decarbonising the residential heating sector: A techno-economic assessment of selected technologies D. Huckebrink & V. Bertsch 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124605
- Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach G. Ganti et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb502
- A multi-model analysis of long-term emissions and warming implications of current mitigation efforts I. Sognnaes et al. 10.1038/s41558-021-01206-3
- Rapid climate transformation requires transformative policy and science thinking—An editorial essay J. Byrne et al. 10.1002/wene.428
- Quantifying risks avoided by limiting global warming to 1.5 or 2 °C above pre-industrial levels R. Warren et al. 10.1007/s10584-021-03277-9
- The heterogeneous driving forces behind carbon emissions change in 30 selective emerging economies S. Li et al. 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100760
- Pathways of climate resilience over the 21st century C. Schleussner et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abed79
- Large‐Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal to Meet the 1.5°C Limit: Key Governance Gaps, Challenges and Priority Responses M. Mace et al. 10.1111/1758-5899.12921
- Wave of net zero emission targets opens window to meeting the Paris Agreement N. Höhne et al. 10.1038/s41558-021-01142-2
- Responsibility of major emitters for country-level warming and extreme hot years L. Beusch et al. 10.1038/s43247-021-00320-6
- Comparison of multi-model ensembles of global and regional climate model projections for daily characteristics of precipitation over four major river basins in southern Africa. Part II: Future changes under 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C and 3.0 °C warming levels S. Samuel et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106921
- CO2 removal and 1.5 °C: what, when, where, and how? S. Chiquier et al. 10.1039/D2YA00108J
- A comparative analysis of the efficiency, timing, and permanence of CO2 removal pathways S. Chiquier et al. 10.1039/D2EE01021F
- Potential Climate Change Risks to Meeting Zimbabwe’s NDC Goals and How to Become Resilient M. Howells et al. 10.3390/en14185827
- Analysing the Transformative Changes of Nationally Determined Contributions and Long-Term Targets P. Fragkos et al. 10.3390/cli12060087
- Social tipping points everywhere?—Patterns and risks of overuse M. Milkoreit 10.1002/wcc.813
- The catalytic activity of the Pr2Zr2−xFexO7±δ system for the CO oxidation reaction E. dos Santos Veiga et al. 10.1111/jace.18846
- Challenging conventional wisdom: Experimental evidence on heterogeneity and coordination in avoiding a collective catastrophic event I. Waichman et al. 10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102502
- Writing IR after COVID-19: Reassessing Political Possibilities, Good Faith, and Policy-Relevant Scholarship on Climate Change Mitigation and Nuclear Disarmament B. Pelopidas & S. Verschuren 10.1093/isagsq/ksad006
- Assessing high resolution thermal monitoring of complex intertidal environments from space: The case of ECOSTRESS at Rias Baixas, NW Iberia N. Weidberg et al. 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101055
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 09 Oct 2024
Short summary
Current global mitigation ambition in the National Determined Contributions (NDCs) up to 2030 is insufficient to achieve the 1.5 °C long-term temperature limit. As governments are preparing new and updated NDCs for 2020, we address the question of what level of collective ambition is pivotal regarding the Paris Agreement goals. We provide estimates for global mean temperature increase by 2100 for different incremental NDC update scenarios and illustrate climate impacts under those scenarios.
Current global mitigation ambition in the National Determined Contributions (NDCs) up to 2030 is...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint