Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/esdd-4-451-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/esdd-4-451-2013

  03 May 2013

03 May 2013

Review status: this preprint was under review for the journal ESD but the revision was not accepted.

Agnotology: learning from mistakes

R. E. Benestad1, H. O. Hygen1, R. van Dorland2, J. Cook3, and D. Nuccitelli4 R. E. Benestad et al.
  • 1The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Norway
  • 2The Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, The Netherlands
  • 3Global Change Institute, the University of Queensland, Australia
  • 4Tetra Tech, Inc., McClellan, California, USA

Abstract. Replication is an important part of science, and by repeating past analyses, we show that a number of papers in the scientific literature contain severe methodological flaws which can easily be identified through simple tests and demonstrations. In many cases, shortcomings are related to a lack of robustness, leading to results that are not universally valid but rather an artifact of a particular experimental set-up. Some examples presented here have ignored data that do not fit the conclusions, and in several other cases, inappropriate statistical methods have been adopted or conclusions have been based on misconceived physics. These papers may serve as educational case studies for why certain analytical approaches sometimes are unsuitable in providing reliable answers. They also highlight the merit of replication. A lack of common replication has repercussions for the quality of the scientific literature, and may be a reason why some controversial questions remain unanswered even when ignorance could be reduced. Agnotology is the study of such ignorance. A free and open-source software is provided for demonstration purposes.

R. E. Benestad et al.

 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

R. E. Benestad et al.

R. E. Benestad et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 17,651 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
14,029 3,064 558 17,651 138 115
  • HTML: 14,029
  • PDF: 3,064
  • XML: 558
  • Total: 17,651
  • BibTeX: 138
  • EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 May 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 May 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 07 Mar 2021
Download
Altmetrics