Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1013-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1013-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A quantitative approach to evaluating the GWP timescale through implicit discount rates
Climate Change Division, US Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC 20001, USA
Michael R. Giordano
AAAS S&T Policy Fellow Hosted by the EPA Office of Atmospheric
Programs, Washington, DC 20001, USA
Related authors
Corinne Hartin, Erin E. McDuffie, Karen Noiva, Marcus Sarofim, Bryan Parthum, Jeremy Martinich, Sarah Barr, Jim Neumann, Jacqueline Willwerth, and Allen Fawcett
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1015–1037, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1015-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1015-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study utilizes a reduced-complexity model, Framework for Evaluating Damages and Impacts (FrEDI), to assess the impacts from climate change in the United States across 10 000 future probabilistic emission and socioeconomic projections. Climate-driven damages are largest for the health category, with the majority of damages in this category coming from the valuation estimates of premature mortality attributable to climate-driven changes in extreme temperature and air quality scenarios.
Corinne Hartin, Erin E. McDuffie, Karen Noiva, Marcus Sarofim, Bryan Parthum, Jeremy Martinich, Sarah Barr, Jim Neumann, Jacqueline Willwerth, and Allen Fawcett
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1015–1037, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1015-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1015-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study utilizes a reduced-complexity model, Framework for Evaluating Damages and Impacts (FrEDI), to assess the impacts from climate change in the United States across 10 000 future probabilistic emission and socioeconomic projections. Climate-driven damages are largest for the health category, with the majority of damages in this category coming from the valuation estimates of premature mortality attributable to climate-driven changes in extreme temperature and air quality scenarios.
Michael R. Giordano, Lars E. Kalnajs, J. Douglas Goetz, Anita M. Avery, Erin Katz, Nathaniel W. May, Anna Leemon, Claire Mattson, Kerri A. Pratt, and Peter F. DeCarlo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16689–16711, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16689-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16689-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The 2ODIAC field campaign was the first deployment of a high-resolution, real-time mass spectrometer to continental Antarctica. Using the real-time aerosol measurements, we investigate how the composition of Antarctic submicron aerosol changes as a function of meteorological parameters such as wind speed. We observe blowing snow and increasing aerosol concentration and changing composition, in particular halogens, as the wind increases beyond 8 m s−1.
J. Douglas Goetz, Michael R. Giordano, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Ted J. Christian, Rashmi Maharjan, Sagar Adhikari, Prakash V. Bhave, Puppala S. Praveen, Arnico K. Panday, Thilina Jayarathne, Elizabeth A. Stone, Robert J. Yokelson, and Peter F. DeCarlo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14653–14679, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14653-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14653-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Size distributions and emission factors of submicron aerosol were quantified using online techniques for a variety of common but under-sampled combustion sources in South Asia: wood and dung cooking fires, groundwater pumps, brick kilns, trash burning, and open burning of crop residues. Optical properties (brown carbon light absorption and the absorption Ångström exponent, AAE) of the emissions were also investigated. Contextual comparisons to the literature and other NAMaSTE results were made.
Michael R. Giordano, Lars E. Kalnajs, Anita Avery, J. Douglas Goetz, Sean M. Davis, and Peter F. DeCarlo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper summarizes two field measurements of particles and gases made in coastal Antarctica and represents the first real-time composition measurements of particles in this understudied area of the world. Using the combined data from both field measurements, we find that there is a constant background of particles in coastal Antarctica and that they are mostly sulfate. Seasonal transitions from winter to spring add additional particles, and that from spring to summer adds additional sulfate.
M. Giordano, C. Espinoza, and A. Asa-Awuku
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1807–1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1807-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1807-2015, 2015
Related subject area
Management of the Earth system: integrated assessment
How can solar geoengineering and mitigation be combined under climate targets?
On the future role of the most parsimonious climate module in integrated assessment
The impact of uncertainty on optimal emission policies
Future supply and demand of net primary production in the Sahel
Impacts of climate mitigation strategies in the energy sector on global land use and carbon balance
Hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) within multi-hazard methodologies
Climate model emulation in an integrated assessment framework: a case study for mitigation policies in the electricity sector
Uncertainty in temperature response of current consumption-based emissions estimates
Variation in emission metrics due to variation in CO2 and temperature impulse response functions
Simple emission metrics for climate impacts
Climate change impact on available water resources obtained using multiple global climate and hydrology models
The support of multidimensional approaches in integrate monitoring for SEA: a case of study
On the relationship between metrics to compare greenhouse gases – the case of IGTP, GWP and SGTP
Comparison of physically- and economically-based CO2-equivalences for methane
Mohammad M. Khabbazan, Marius Stankoweit, Elnaz Roshan, Hauke Schmidt, and Hermann Held
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1529–1542, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1529-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1529-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We ask for an optimal amount of solar radiation management (SRM) in conjunction with mitigation if global warming is limited to 2 °C and regional precipitation anomalies are confined to an amount ethically compatible with the 2 °C target. Then, compared to a scenario without regional targets, most of the SRM usage is eliminated from the portfolio even if transgressing regional targets are tolerated in terms of 1/10 of the standard deviation of natural variability.
Mohammad M. Khabbazan and Hermann Held
Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 135–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-135-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-135-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We find that for mitigation scenarios, prescribing atmosphere–ocean general circulation models' (AOGCMs') respective equilibrium climate sensitivities (ECSs) and transient climate responses (TCRs) to the one-box model results in too high global mean temperature projections due to the information loss resulting from the reduction of complexity. The one-box model offers a good emulator of these AOGCMs, provided the AOGCM's ECS and TCR values are mapped onto effective one-box counterparts.
Nicola Botta, Patrik Jansson, and Cezar Ionescu
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 525–542, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-525-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-525-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We study the impact of uncertainty on optimal greenhouse gas (GHG) emission policies for a stylized emission problem. The results suggest that uncertainties about the implementability of decisions on emission reductions (or increases) call for more precautionary policies. In contrast, uncertainties about the implications of exceeding critical cumulated emission thresholds tend to make early emission reductions less rewarding.
Florian Sallaba, Stefan Olin, Kerstin Engström, Abdulhakim M. Abdi, Niklas Boke-Olén, Veiko Lehsten, Jonas Ardö, and Jonathan W. Seaquist
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 1191–1221, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-1191-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-1191-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The UN sustainable development goals for eradicating hunger are at high risk for failure in the Sahel. We show that the demand for food and feed biomass will begin to outstrip its supply in the 2040s if current trends continue. Though supply continues to increase it is outpaced by a greater increase in demand due to a combination of population growth and a shift to diets rich in animal proteins. This underscores the importance of policy interventions that would act to mitigate such developments.
Kerstin Engström, Mats Lindeskog, Stefan Olin, John Hassler, and Benjamin Smith
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 773–799, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-773-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-773-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Applying a global carbon tax on fossil was shown to lead to increased bioenergy production in four out of five scenarios. Increased bioenergy production led to global cropland changes that were up to 50 % larger by 2100 compared to the reference case (without global carbon tax). For scenarios with strong cropland expansion due to high population growth coupled with low technological change or bioenergy production, the biosphere was simulated to switch from a carbon sink into a carbon source.
Joel C. Gill and Bruce D. Malamud
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 659–679, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-659-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-659-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding interactions between hazards and other processes can help us to better understand the complex environment in which disasters occur. This enhanced understanding may help us to better manage hazards and reduce the risk of disasters occurring. Interactions (e.g. one hazard triggering another hazard) are noted between (i) natural hazards, such as earthquakes; (ii) human activity, such as groundwater abstraction; and (iii) technological hazards/disasters, such as building collapse.
A. M. Foley, P. B. Holden, N. R. Edwards, J.-F. Mercure, P. Salas, H. Pollitt, and U. Chewpreecha
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 119–132, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-119-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-119-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce GENIEem-PLASIM-ENTSem (GPem), a climate-carbon cycle emulator, showing how model emulation can be used in integrated assessment modelling to resolve regional climate impacts and systematically capture uncertainty. In a case study, we couple GPem to FTT:Power-E3MG, a non-equilibrium economic model with technology diffusion. We find that when the electricity sector is decarbonised by 90 %, further emissions reductions must be achieved in other sectors to avoid dangerous climate change.
J. Karstensen, G. P. Peters, and R. M. Andrew
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 287–309, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-287-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-287-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We quantify uncertainties in estimates of global temperature change from regional and sectoral territorial- and consumption-based emissions. We find that the uncertainties are sensitive to the emission allocations, mix of pollutants, the metric used and its time horizon, and the level of aggregation of the results. Uncertainties in the final results are dominated by metric parameters and emission uncertainties, while the economic data appear to have small uncertainties at the national level.
D. J. L. Olivié and G. P. Peters
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 267–286, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-267-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-267-2013, 2013
B. Aamaas, G. P. Peters, and J. S. Fuglestvedt
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 145–170, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-145-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-145-2013, 2013
S. Hagemann, C. Chen, D. B. Clark, S. Folwell, S. N. Gosling, I. Haddeland, N. Hanasaki, J. Heinke, F. Ludwig, F. Voss, and A. J. Wiltshire
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 129–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-129-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-129-2013, 2013
C. M. Torre and M. Selicato
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 51–61, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-51-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-51-2013, 2013
C. Azar and D. J. A. Johansson
Earth Syst. Dynam., 3, 139–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-139-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-139-2012, 2012
O. Boucher
Earth Syst. Dynam., 3, 49–61, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-49-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-49-2012, 2012
Cited articles
Allen, M. R., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Shine, K. P., Reisinger, A., Pierrehumbert, R. T., and Forster, P. M.: New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 773–776, 2016.
Alvarez, R. A., Pacala, S. W., Winebrake, J. J., Chameides, W. L., and Hamburg, S. P.: Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 6435–6440, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202407109, 2012.
Azar, C. and Johansson, D. J. A.: On the relationship between metrics to compare greenhouse gases – the case of IGTP, GWP and SGTP, Earth Syst. Dynam., 3, 139–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-139-2012, 2012.
Böhringer, C., Löschel, A., and Rutherford, T. F.: Efficiency gains from “what”-flexibility in climate policy an integrated CGE assessment, Energ. J., 0, 405–424, 2006.
Boucher, O.: Comparison of physically- and economically-based CO2-equivalences for methane, Earth Syst. Dynam., 3, 49–61, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-49-2012, 2012
Bowerman, N. H., Frame, D. J., Huntingford, C., Lowe, J. A., Smith, S. M., and Allen, M. R.: The role of short-lived climate pollutants in meeting temperature goals, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 1021–1024, 2013.
Brazil INDC: Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution: Federative Republic of Brazil, available at: http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC (last access: 14 August 2018), 2015.
Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M., and Miguel, E.: Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production, Nature, 527, 235–239, 2015.
Chang-Ke, W., Xin-Zheng, L., and Hua, Z.: Shares Differences of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculated with GTP and GWP for Major Countries, Advances in Climate Change Research, 4, 127–132, 2013.
Christensen, P., Gillingham, K., and Nordhaus, W.: Uncertainty in forecasts of long-run economic growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 5409–5414, 2018.
Cropper, M. L., Freeman, M. C., Groom, B., and Pizer, W. A.: Declining discount rates, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 104, 538–543, 2014.
Daniel, J. S., Solomon, S., Sanford, T. J., McFarland, M., Fuglestvedt, J. S., and Friedlingstein, P.: Limitations of single-basket trading: lessons from the Montreal Protocol for climate policy, Climatic Change, 111, 241–248, 2012.
De Cara, S., Debove, E., and Jayet, P. A.: Global Warming Potentials: Imperfect but second-best metric for climate change, unpublished, available at: http://stephane.decara.free.fr/mypdf/DeboDeCaJaye05b.pdf (last access: 14 August 2018), 2005.
Dell, M., Jones, B. F., and Olken, B. A.: Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century, Am. Econ. J.-Marcoecon., 4, 66–95, 2012.
Deuber, O., Luderer, G., and Edenhofer, O.: Physico-economic evaluation of climate metrics: A conceptual framework, Environ. Sci. Policy, 29, 37–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.018, 2013.
Edwards, M. R. and Trancik, J. E.: Climate impacts of energy technologies depend on emissions timing, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 347–352, 2014.
Edwards, M. R., McNerney, J., and Trancik, J. E.: Testing emissions equivalency metrics against climate policy goals, Environ. Sci. Policy, 66, 191–198, 2016.
Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J., and Shine, K. P.: Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 12614–12623, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071930, 2016.
Fuglestvedt, J. S., Berntsen, T. K., Godal, O., Sausen, R., Shine, K. P., and Skodvin, T.: Metrics of climate change: Assessing radiative forcing and emission indices, Climatic Change, 58, 267–331, 2003.
Gasser, T., Peters, G. P., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Collins, W. J., Shindell, D. T., and Ciais, P.: Accounting for the climate-carbon feedback in emission metrics, Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 235–253, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-235-2017, 2017.
GISTEMP team: GISS Surface temperature analysis (GISTEMP), NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, available at: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt (last access: 4 August 2017), 2017.
Gollier, C., Koundouri, P., and Pantelidis, T.: Declining discount rates: Economic justifications and implications for long-run policy, Econ. Policy, 23, 758–795, 2008.
Howarth, R. W., Santoro, R., and Ingraffea, A.: Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations, Climatic Change, 106, 679–690, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5, 2011.
Howarth, R., Santoro, R., and Ingraffea, A.: Venting and leaking of methane from shale gas development: response to Cathles et al., Climatic Change, 113, 537–549, 2012.
Hsiang, S., Kopp, R., Jina, A., Rising, J., Delgado, M., Mohan, S., Rasmussen, D. J., Muir-Wood, R., Wilson, P., Oppenheimer, M., Larsen, K., and Houser, T.: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States, Science, 356, 1362–1369, 2017.
Jackson, S. C.: Parallel pursuit of near-term and long-term climate mitigation, Science, 326, 526–527, 2009.
Johansson, D. J.: Economics-and physical-based metrics for comparing greenhouse gases, Climatic Change, 110, 123–141, 2012.
Jørgensen, S. V., Hauschild, M. Z., and Nielsen, P. H.: Assessment of urgent impacts of greenhouse gas emissions – the climate tipping potential (CTP), Int. J. Life Cycle Ass., 19, 919–930, 2014.
Lashof, D. A. and Ahuja, D. R.: Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming, Nature, 344, 529–531, 1990.
Mallapragada, D. and Mignone, B. K.: A consistent conceptual framework for applying climate metrics in technology life cycle assessment, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7397, 2017.
Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G.: An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases, Nature, 410, 675–677, 2001.
Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G.: The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases and carbon sinks in meeting climate objectives, Energ. J., Special Issue, 393–404, 2006.
Medhaug, I., Stolpe, M. B., Fischer, E. M., and Knutti, R.: Reconciling controversies about the “global warming hiatus”, Nature, 545, 41–47, 2017.
Modak A., Bala, G., Caldeira, K., and Cao, L.: Does shortwave absorption by methane influence its effectiveness?, Clim. Dynam., 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4102-x, 2018.
Moore, F. and Diaz, D. B.: Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 127–131, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2481, 2015.
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 659–740, https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781107415324.018, 2013.
NAS: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Valuing Climate Damages: Updating Estimation of the Social Cost of Carbon Dioxide, available at: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24651/valuing-climate-damages-updating-estimation-of-the-social-cost-of (last access: 14 August 2018), 2017.
Newell, R. G. and Pizer, W. A.: Discounting the distant future: how much do uncertain rates increase valuations?, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 46, 52–71, 2003.
Nordhaus, W. D.: Evolution of Assessments of the Economics of Global Warming: Changes in the DICE model, 1992–2017, No. w23319, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017.
Ocko, I. B., Hamburg, S. P., Jacob, D. J., Keith, D. W., Keohane, N. O., Oppenheimer, M., Roy-Mayhew, J. D., Schrag, D. P., and Pacala, S. W.: Unmask temporal trade-offs in climate policy debates, Science, 356, 492–493, 2017.
OMB: Office of Management and Budget: Circular A-4, available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/circulars/A4/a-4.pdf (last access: 14 August 2018), 2003.
Reisinger, A., Meinshausen, M., and Manning, M.: Future changes in global warming potentials under representative concentration pathways, Environ. Res. Lett, 6, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024020, 2011.
Reisinger, A., Havlik, P., Riahi, K., van Vliet, O., Obersteiner, M., and Herrero, M.: Implications of alternative metrics for global mitigation costs and greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, Climatic Change, 117, 677–690, 2013.
Rodhe, H.: A comparison of the contribution of various gases to the greenhouse effect, Science, 248, 1217–1219, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.248.4960.1217, 1990.
Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Schaeffer, M., Knutti, R., and Riahi, K.: Impact of short-lived non-CO2 mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 1–10, 075001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001, 2015.
Sarofim, M., Forest, C., Reiner, D., and Reilly, J.: Stabilization and global climate change, Global Planet. Change, 47, 266–272, 2005.
Sarofim, M. C.: The GTP of methane: modeling analysis of temperature impacts of methane and carbon dioxide reductions, Environ. Model. Assess., 17, 231–239, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9287-x, 2012.
Sarofim, M. C.: Interactive comment on “Accounting for the climate-carbon feedback in emissions metrics” by Thomas Gasser et al., Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2016-55-SC1, 2016.
Sarofim, M. C., Waldhoff, S. T., and Anenberg, S. C.: Valuing the Ozone-Related Health Benefits of Methane Emission Controls, Environ. Resour. Econ., 66, 45–63, 2017.
Saunois, M., Jackson, R. B., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., and Canadell, J. G.: The growing role of methane in anthropogenic climate change, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 120207, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/120207, 2016.
Schmalensee, R.: Comparing Greenhouse Gases for Policy Purposes, Energ. J., 14, 245–255, 1993.
Shindell, D. T.: The social cost of atmospheric release, Climatic Change, 130, 313–326, 2015.
Shindell, D., Borgford-Parnell, N., Brauer, M., Haines, A., Kuylenstierna, J. C., Leonard, S. A., Ramanathan, V., Ravishankara, A., Amann, M., and Srivastava, L.: A climate policy pathway for near-and long-term benefits, Science, 356, 493–494, 2017.
Shine, K. P., Fuglestvedt, J., Hailemariam, K., and Stuber, N.: Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases, Climatic Change, 68, 281–302, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-1146-9, 2005.
Shoemaker, J. K. and Schrag, D. P.: The danger of overvaluing methane's influence on future climate change, Climatic Change, 120, 903–914, 2013.
Smith, S. M., Lowe, J. A., Bowerman, N. H. A., Gohar, L. K., Huntingford, C., and Allen, M. R.: Equivalence of greenhouse gas emissions for peak temperature limits, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 535–538, https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1496, 2012.
Smith, S. J., Karas, J., Edmonds, J., Eom, J., and Mizrahi, A.: Sensitivity of multi-gas climate policy to emission metrics, Climatic change, 117, 663–675, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0861-x, 2013.
Sterner, E. O. and Johansson, D. J. A.: The effect of climate–carbon cycle feedbacks on emission metrics, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 1–10, 034019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa61dc, 2017.
Tol, R. J., Berntsen, T. K., O'Neill, B. C., Fuglestvedt, J. S., and Shine, K. P.: A unifying framework for metrics for aggregating the climate effect of different emissions, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 044006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044006, 2012.
UN-FCCC: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change: Report of the Conference of the Parties on its First Session CP/1995/7/Add.1, available at: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop1/07a01.pdf (last access: 14 August 2018), 1995.
van den Berg, M., Hof, A. F., van Vliet, J., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Impact of the choice of emission metric on greenhouse gas abatement and costs, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 024001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024001, 2015.
Weitzman, M. L.: Gamma Discounting, Am. Econ. Rev., 91, 260–271, 2001.
Weitzman, M. L.: What Is The “Damages Function” For Global Warming – And What Difference Might It Make?, Climate Change Economics, 1, 57–69, 2010.
Wigley, T. M. L.: The Kyoto Protocol: CO2 CH4 and climate implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2285–2288, 1998.
WMO: World Meteorological Organization Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1991, Report 37, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, 1992.
Wuebbles, D. J., Jain, A. K., Patten, K. O., and Grant, K. E.: Sensitivity of direct global warming potentials to key uncertainties, Climatic Change, 29, 265–297, 1995.
Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., Matthews, H. D., and Weaver, A. J.: Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 16129–16134, 2009.
Zickfeld, K., Solomon, S., and Gilford, D. M.: Centuries of thermal sea-level rise due to anthropogenic emissions of short-lived greenhouse gases, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 657–662, 2017.
Short summary
The 100-year GWP is the most widely used metric for comparing the climate impact of different gases such as methane and carbon dioxide. However, there have been recent arguments for the use of different timescales. This paper uses straightforward estimates of future damages to quantitatively determine the appropriate timescale as a function of how society discounts the future and finds that the 100-year timescale is consistent with commonly used discount rates.
The 100-year GWP is the most widely used metric for comparing the climate impact of different...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint