85 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Dynamic climate emulators for solar geoengineering D. MacMartin & B. Kravitz 10.5194/acp-16-15789-2016
2. The Regional Hydroclimate Response to Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering and the Role of Stratospheric Heating I. Simpson et al. 10.1029/2019JD031093
3. Expanding the design space of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering to include precipitation-based objectives and explore trade-offs W. Lee et al. 10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020
4. The next climate war? Statecraft, security, and weaponization in the geopolitics of a low-carbon future B. Sovacool et al. 10.1016/j.esr.2022.101031
5. Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-15-191-2024
6. CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project S. Tilmes et al. 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0267.1
7. High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be More Effective if Injection Is Limited to Spring W. Lee et al. 10.1029/2021GL092696
8. A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deployment scenario W. Smith et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac8cd3
9. Vatnajökull Mass Loss Under Solar Geoengineering Due to the North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation C. Yue et al. 10.1029/2021EF002052
10. Halving warming with stratospheric aerosol geoengineering moderates policy-relevant climate hazards P. Irvine & D. Keith 10.1088/1748-9326/ab76de
11. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals M. Lawrence et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3
12. Potential of future stratospheric ozone loss in the midlatitudes under global warming and sulfate geoengineering S. Robrecht et al. 10.5194/acp-21-2427-2021
13. Reaching 1.5 and 2.0 °C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering S. Tilmes et al. 10.5194/esd-11-579-2020
14. Is Turning Down the Sun a Good Proxy for Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering? D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2020JD033952
15. Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity J. Moch et al. 10.1029/2023AV000911
16. Solar geoengineering could substantially reduce climate risks—A research hypothesis for the next decade D. Keith & P. Irvine 10.1002/2016EF000465
17. Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
18. Regional Climate Variability Under Model Simulations of Solar Geoengineering K. Dagon & D. Schrag 10.1002/2017JD027110
19. Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate C. Yang et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7
20. First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives B. Kravitz et al. 10.1002/2017JD026874
21. Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) B. Kravitz et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021
22. A continuous latitudinal energy balance model to explore non-uniform climate engineering strategies F. Bonetti & C. McInnes 10.1007/s00382-018-4474-y
23. Timescale for Detecting the Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering D. MacMartin et al. 10.1029/2018JD028906
24. Reflecting upon 10 years of geoengineering research: Introduction to the Crutzen + 10 special issue M. Boettcher & S. Schäfer 10.1002/2016EF000521
25. Technical note: Simultaneous fully dynamic characterization of multiple input–output relationships in climate models B. Kravitz et al. 10.5194/acp-17-2525-2017
26. A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk A. Tang & L. Kemp 10.3389/fclim.2021.720312
27. Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering could lower future risk of ‘Day Zero’ level droughts in Cape Town R. Odoulami et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abbf13
28. Solar radiation management and ecosystem functional responses A. Ito 10.1007/s10584-017-1930-3
29. Energy transport, polar amplification, and ITCZ shifts in the GeoMIP G1 ensemble R. Russotto & T. Ackerman 10.5194/acp-18-2287-2018
30. Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering Z. Dai et al. 10.1002/2017GL076472
31. Elicitation of US and Chinese expert judgments show consistent views on solar geoengineering Z. Dai et al. 10.1057/s41599-020-00694-6
32. Holistic Assessment of SO2 Injections Using CESM1(WACCM): Introduction to the Special Issue B. Kravitz et al. 10.1029/2018JD029293
33. Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering Could Alter the High‐Latitude Seasonal Cycle J. Jiang et al. 10.1029/2019GL085758
34. Climate system response to stratospheric sulfate aerosols: sensitivity to altitude of aerosol layer K. Krishnamohan et al. 10.5194/esd-10-885-2019
35. Thermosteric and dynamic sea level under solar geoengineering C. Yue et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00466-4
36. Radiative and climate effects of stratospheric sulfur geoengineering using seasonally varying injection areas A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-17-6957-2017
37. Relevant climate response tests for stratospheric aerosol injection: A combined ethical and scientific analysis G. Lenferna et al. 10.1002/2016EF000504
38. Indices of extremes: geographic patterns of change in extremes and associated vegetation impacts under climate intervention M. Tye et al. 10.5194/esd-13-1233-2022
39. Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios Y. Chen et al. 10.5194/esd-14-55-2023
40. Next steps in geoengineering scenario research: limited deployment scenarios and beyond M. Sugiyama et al. 10.1080/14693062.2017.1323721
41. Quasi‐Additivity of the Radiative Effects of Marine Cloud Brightening and Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Injection O. Boucher et al. 10.1002/2017GL074647
42. The Engineering of Climate Engineering D. MacMartin & B. Kravitz 10.1146/annurev-control-053018-023725
43. Seasonally Modulated Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Alters the Climate Outcomes D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2020GL088337
44. Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
45. Mission-driven research for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering D. MacMartin & B. Kravitz 10.1073/pnas.1811022116
46. Simulated effect of sunshade solar geoengineering on the global carbon cycle J. Jiang et al. 10.1007/s11430-017-9210-0
47. Human Rights and Precautionary Principle: Limits to Geoengineering, SRM, and IPCC Scenarios J. Wieding et al. 10.3390/su12218858
48. Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
49. How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering? Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-13-201-2022
50. Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
51. The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations D. MacMartin et al. 10.1002/2017JD026868
52. Changes in clouds and thermodynamics under solar geoengineering and implications for required solar reduction R. Russotto & T. Ackerman 10.5194/acp-18-11905-2018
53. Reassessing the relative role of anthropogenic aerosols and natural decadal variability in driving the mid-twentieth century global “cooling”: a focus on the latitudinal gradient of tropospheric temperature C. Diao & Y. Xu 10.1007/s00382-022-06235-y
54. Comparing Surface and Stratospheric Impacts of Geoengineering With Different SO2 Injection Strategies B. Kravitz et al. 10.1029/2019JD030329
55. Hydrological Consequences of Solar Geoengineering K. Ricke et al. 10.1146/annurev-earth-031920-083456
56. Estimating Impacts and Trade‐offs in Solar Geoengineering Scenarios With a Moist Energy Balance Model N. Lutsko et al. 10.1029/2020GL087290
57. Neutral Mode Dominates the Forced Global and Regional Surface Temperature Response in the Past and Future F. Liu et al. 10.1029/2022GL098788
58. Uncertainty and the basis for confidence in solar geoengineering research B. Kravitz & D. MacMartin 10.1038/s43017-019-0004-7
59. Greenland Ice Sheet Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Geoengineering J. Moore et al. 10.1029/2019EF001393
60. Potential impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection on drought risk managements over major river basins in Africa B. Abiodun et al. 10.1007/s10584-021-03268-w
61. Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
62. Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation M. Xie et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022
63. Impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention geoengineering on surface air temperature in China: a surface energy budget perspective Z. Liu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7667-2022
64. G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
65. Can we use linear response theory to assess geoengineering strategies? T. Bódai et al. 10.1063/1.5122255
66. Reduced Poleward Transport Due to Stratospheric Heating Under Stratospheric Aerosols Geoengineering D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2020GL089470
67. Changes in Hadley circulation and intertropical convergence zone under strategic stratospheric aerosol geoengineering W. Cheng et al. 10.1038/s41612-022-00254-6
68. The climate effects of increasing ocean albedo: an idealized representation of solar geoengineering B. Kravitz et al. 10.5194/acp-18-13097-2018
69. Solar geoengineering and carbon removal significantly lower economic climate damages A. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.09.004
70. Changes in West African Summer Monsoon Precipitation Under Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering C. Da‐Allada et al. 10.1029/2020EF001595
71. Technical characteristics of a solar geoengineering deployment and implications for governance D. MacMartin et al. 10.1080/14693062.2019.1668347
72. Multiple input control strategies for robust and adaptive climate engineering in a low-order 3-box model F. Bonetti & C. McInnes 10.1098/rspa.2018.0447
73. Global monsoon response to tropical and Arctic stratospheric aerosol injection W. Sun et al. 10.1007/s00382-020-05371-7
74. Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Can Reduce Risks to Antarctic Ice Loss Depending on Injection Location and Amount P. Goddard et al. 10.1029/2023JD039434
75. Geoengineering with stratospheric aerosols: What do we not know after a decade of research? D. MacMartin et al. 10.1002/2016EF000418
76. An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/wcc.423
77. Closed-loop and congestion control of the global carbon-climate system C. Sierra et al. 10.1007/s10584-021-03040-0
78. The potential environmental and climate impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection: a review H. Huynh & V. McNeill 10.1039/D3EA00134B
79. Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
80. Towards a comprehensive climate impacts assessment of solar geoengineering P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/2016EF000389
81. Effects of Arctic geoengineering on precipitation in the tropical monsoon regions A. Nalam et al. 10.1007/s00382-017-3810-y
82. Stratospheric Response in the First Geoengineering Simulation Meeting Multiple Surface Climate Objectives J. Richter et al. 10.1029/2018JD028285
83. Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target D. MacMartin et al. 10.1098/rsta.2016.0454
84. Strategic logic of unilateral climate intervention C. Bell & P. Keys 10.1088/1748-9326/acf94b
85. Comparison of the Fast and Slow Climate Response to Three Radiation Management Geoengineering Schemes L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2018JD029034