Articles | Volume 5, issue 2
Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 399–408, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-399-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue: Intersectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP)
Review
13 Nov 2014
Review
| 13 Nov 2014
Climate impact research: beyond patchwork
V. Huber et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 4,565 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Jun 2014)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,521 | 1,613 | 431 | 4,565 | 151 | 152 |
- HTML: 2,521
- PDF: 1,613
- XML: 431
- Total: 4,565
- BibTeX: 151
- EndNote: 152
Total article views: 3,640 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Nov 2014)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,029 | 1,220 | 391 | 3,640 | 138 | 140 |
- HTML: 2,029
- PDF: 1,220
- XML: 391
- Total: 3,640
- BibTeX: 138
- EndNote: 140
Total article views: 925 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Jun 2014)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
492 | 393 | 40 | 925 | 13 | 12 |
- HTML: 492
- PDF: 393
- XML: 40
- Total: 925
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 12
Cited
22 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Quantifying the economic risks of climate change D. Diaz & F. Moore 10.1038/nclimate3411
- Relating agriculture, energy, and water decisions to farm incomes and climate projections using two freeware programs, FEWCalc and DSSAT J. Phetheet et al. 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103222
- Climate change impact modelling needs to include cross-sectoral interactions P. Harrison et al. 10.1038/nclimate3039
- Evaluating cross-sectoral impacts of climate change and adaptations on the energy-water nexus: a framework and California case study J. Szinai et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abc378
- Statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models underestimate the adverse effects of extreme heat on U.S. maize yields D. Lafferty et al. 10.1038/s43247-021-00266-9
- Approximate calculations of the net economic impact of global warming mitigation targets under heightened damage estimates P. Brown et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0239520
- Climate change and marine vertebrates W. Sydeman et al. 10.1126/science.aac9874
- Taking globally consistent health impact projections to the next level J. Rocklöv et al. 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00171-6
- Propagation of biases in humidity in the estimation of global irrigation water Y. Masaki et al. 10.5194/esd-6-461-2015
- A protocol for the intercomparison of marine fishery and ecosystem models: Fish-MIP v1.0 D. Tittensor et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-1421-2018
- Intercomparison of global river discharge simulations focusing on dam operation—multiple models analysis in two case-study river basins, Missouri–Mississippi and Green–Colorado Y. Masaki et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aa57a8
- A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment V. Gallina et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011
- Bioenergy cropland expansion may offset positive effects of climate change mitigation for global vertebrate diversity C. Hof et al. 10.1073/pnas.1807745115
- Assessment of climate change impact and difference on the river runoff in four basins in China under 1.5 and 2.0 °C global warming H. Xu et al. 10.5194/hess-23-4219-2019
- Future hydrological extremes: the uncertainty from multiple global climate and global hydrological models I. Giuntoli et al. 10.5194/esd-6-267-2015
- Climate damages and adaptation potential across diverse sectors of the United States J. Martinich & A. Crimmins 10.1038/s41558-019-0444-6
- Extending the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for sub-national impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability studies S. Absar & B. Preston 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.004
- An introduction to the special issue on the Benefits of Reduced Anthropogenic Climate changE (BRACE) B. O’Neill & A. Gettelman 10.1007/s10584-017-2136-4
- The economically optimal warming limit of the planet F. Ueckerdt et al. 10.5194/esd-10-741-2019
- Assessing inter-sectoral climate change risks: the role of ISIMIP C. Rosenzweig et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/12/1/010301
- One simulation, different conclusions—the baseline period makes the difference! S. Liersch et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aba3d7
- Future hydrological extremes: the uncertainty from multiple global climate and global hydrological models I. Giuntoli et al. 10.5194/esdd-6-1-2015
21 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Quantifying the economic risks of climate change D. Diaz & F. Moore 10.1038/nclimate3411
- Relating agriculture, energy, and water decisions to farm incomes and climate projections using two freeware programs, FEWCalc and DSSAT J. Phetheet et al. 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103222
- Climate change impact modelling needs to include cross-sectoral interactions P. Harrison et al. 10.1038/nclimate3039
- Evaluating cross-sectoral impacts of climate change and adaptations on the energy-water nexus: a framework and California case study J. Szinai et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abc378
- Statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models underestimate the adverse effects of extreme heat on U.S. maize yields D. Lafferty et al. 10.1038/s43247-021-00266-9
- Approximate calculations of the net economic impact of global warming mitigation targets under heightened damage estimates P. Brown et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0239520
- Climate change and marine vertebrates W. Sydeman et al. 10.1126/science.aac9874
- Taking globally consistent health impact projections to the next level J. Rocklöv et al. 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00171-6
- Propagation of biases in humidity in the estimation of global irrigation water Y. Masaki et al. 10.5194/esd-6-461-2015
- A protocol for the intercomparison of marine fishery and ecosystem models: Fish-MIP v1.0 D. Tittensor et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-1421-2018
- Intercomparison of global river discharge simulations focusing on dam operation—multiple models analysis in two case-study river basins, Missouri–Mississippi and Green–Colorado Y. Masaki et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aa57a8
- A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment V. Gallina et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011
- Bioenergy cropland expansion may offset positive effects of climate change mitigation for global vertebrate diversity C. Hof et al. 10.1073/pnas.1807745115
- Assessment of climate change impact and difference on the river runoff in four basins in China under 1.5 and 2.0 °C global warming H. Xu et al. 10.5194/hess-23-4219-2019
- Future hydrological extremes: the uncertainty from multiple global climate and global hydrological models I. Giuntoli et al. 10.5194/esd-6-267-2015
- Climate damages and adaptation potential across diverse sectors of the United States J. Martinich & A. Crimmins 10.1038/s41558-019-0444-6
- Extending the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for sub-national impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability studies S. Absar & B. Preston 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.004
- An introduction to the special issue on the Benefits of Reduced Anthropogenic Climate changE (BRACE) B. O’Neill & A. Gettelman 10.1007/s10584-017-2136-4
- The economically optimal warming limit of the planet F. Ueckerdt et al. 10.5194/esd-10-741-2019
- Assessing inter-sectoral climate change risks: the role of ISIMIP C. Rosenzweig et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/12/1/010301
- One simulation, different conclusions—the baseline period makes the difference! S. Liersch et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aba3d7
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Saved (final revised paper)
Saved (final revised paper)
Saved (preprint)
Latest update: 29 Jun 2022
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint