Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-301-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-301-2013
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
02 Sep 2013
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 02 Sep 2013

Climate response to imposed solar radiation reductions in high latitudes

M. C. MacCracken, H.-J. Shin, K. Caldeira, and G. A. Ban-Weiss

Related authors

IAMAS: a century of international cooperation in atmospheric sciences
Michael C. MacCracken and Hans Volkert
Hist. Geo Space. Sci., 10, 119–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-10-119-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-10-119-2019, 2019
Short summary
The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results
B. Kravitz, A. Robock, S. Tilmes, O. Boucher, J. M. English, P. J. Irvine, A. Jones, M. G. Lawrence, M. MacCracken, H. Muri, J. C. Moore, U. Niemeier, S. J. Phipps, J. Sillmann, T. Storelvmo, H. Wang, and S. Watanabe
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3379–3392, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015, 2015

Related subject area

Management of the Earth system: engineering responses to climate change
The deployment length of solar radiation modification: an interplay of mitigation, net-negative emissions and climate uncertainty
Susanne Baur, Alexander Nauels, Zebedee Nicholls, Benjamin M. Sanderson, and Carl-Friedrich Schleussner
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 367–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-367-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-367-2023, 2023
Short summary
Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios
Yangxin Chen, Duoying Ji, Qian Zhang, John C. Moore, Olivier Boucher, Andy Jones, Thibaut Lurton, Michael J. Mills, Ulrike Niemeier, Roland Séférian, and Simone Tilmes
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 55–79, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-55-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-55-2023, 2023
Short summary
Exploration of a novel geoengineering solution: lighting up tropical forests at night
Xueyuan Gao, Shunlin Liang, Dongdong Wang, Yan Li, Bin He, and Aolin Jia
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 219–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-219-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-219-2022, 2022
Short summary
How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering?
Yan Zhang, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, and Ben Kravitz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 201–217, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-201-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-201-2022, 2022
Short summary
The response of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling under different aerosol-based radiation management geoengineering
Hanna Lee, Helene Muri, Altug Ekici, Jerry Tjiputra, and Jörg Schwinger
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 313–326, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-313-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-313-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

ACIA – Arctic Climate Impact Assessment: Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, Cambridge University Press, 140 pp., 2004.
AMAP – Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA): Climate Change and the Cryosphere, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, 538 pp., 2011.
Asilomar Scientific Organizing Committee (MacCracken, M. (chair), Barrett, S., Barry, R., Crutzen, P., Hamburg, S., Lampitt, R., Liverman, D., Lovejoy, T., McBean, G., Parson, E., Seidel, S., Shepherd, J., Somerville, R., and Wigley, T. M. L.): The Asilomar Conference Recommendations on Principles for Research into Climate Engineering Technologies: Conference Report, Climate Institute, Washington, D.C., 37 pp., 2010.
Bala, G., Duffy, P. B., and Taylor, K. E.: Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle, P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 105, 7664–7669, 2008.
Ban-Weiss, G. A. and Caldeira, K.: Geoengineering as an optimization problem, Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 034009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034009, 2010.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint