Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-513-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-513-2025
Research article
 | 
03 Apr 2025
Research article |  | 03 Apr 2025

An evaluation of multi-fidelity methods for quantifying uncertainty in projections of ice-sheet mass change

John D. Jakeman, Mauro Perego, D. Thomas Seidl, Tucker A. Hartland, Trevor R. Hillebrand, Matthew J. Hoffman, and Stephen F. Price

Viewed

Total article views: 891 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
581 187 123 891 30 29
  • HTML: 581
  • PDF: 187
  • XML: 123
  • Total: 891
  • BibTeX: 30
  • EndNote: 29
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jul 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jul 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 891 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 891 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
This study investigated the computational benefits of using multiple models of varying cost and accuracy to quantify uncertainty in the mass change of Humboldt Glacier, Greenland, between 2007 and 2100 using a single climate change scenario. Despite some models being incapable of capturing the local features of the ice-flow fields, using multiple models reduced the error in the estimated statistics by over an order of magnitude when compared to an approach that only used a single accurate model.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint