Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1053-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1053-2025
Review
 | 
22 Jul 2025
Review |  | 22 Jul 2025

The state of global catastrophic risk research: a bibliometric review

Florian Ulrich Jehn, John-Oliver Engler, Constantin W. Arnscheidt, Magdalena Wache, Ekaterina Ilin, Laura Cook, Lalitha S. Sundaram, Frederic Hanusch, and Luke Kemp

Viewed

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 1,629 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,550 57 22 1,629 11 10 14
  • HTML: 1,550
  • PDF: 57
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 1,629
  • Supplement: 11
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Dec 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Dec 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 1,629 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,629 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 15 Aug 2025
Download
Short summary
This study presents the first systematic analysis of the global catastrophic risk and existential risk literature, examining 3437 documents from OpenAlex. Using bibliographic coupling, we identify and describe 10 research clusters aligned with major risks. The field shows geographic concentration in the US/UK, gender imbalance, and a small number of prolific authors. We recommend improving diversity, fostering cross-cluster collaboration, and building connections with adjacent disciplines.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint