Articles | Volume 12, issue 2
Research article
30 Jun 2021
Research article |  | 30 Jun 2021

Comparison of uncertainties in land-use change fluxes from bookkeeping model parameterisation

Ana Bastos, Kerstin Hartung, Tobias B. Nützel, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Richard A. Houghton, and Julia Pongratz


Total article views: 3,530 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,699 777 54 3,530 108 35 47
  • HTML: 2,699
  • PDF: 777
  • XML: 54
  • Total: 3,530
  • Supplement: 108
  • BibTeX: 35
  • EndNote: 47
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,530 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,177 with geography defined and 353 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1


Latest update: 31 May 2023

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Fluxes from land-use change and management (FLUC) are a large source of uncertainty in global and regional carbon budgets. Here, we evaluate the impact of different model parameterisations on FLUC. We show that carbon stock densities and allocation of carbon following transitions contribute more to uncertainty in FLUC than response-curve time constants. Uncertainty in FLUC could thus, in principle, be reduced by available Earth-observation data on carbon densities at a global scale.
Final-revised paper