Articles | Volume 12, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-745-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-745-2021
Research article
 | 
30 Jun 2021
Research article |  | 30 Jun 2021

Comparison of uncertainties in land-use change fluxes from bookkeeping model parameterisation

Ana Bastos, Kerstin Hartung, Tobias B. Nützel, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Richard A. Houghton, and Julia Pongratz

Viewed

Total article views: 4,779 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,698 998 83 4,779 162 61 77
  • HTML: 3,698
  • PDF: 998
  • XML: 83
  • Total: 4,779
  • Supplement: 162
  • BibTeX: 61
  • EndNote: 77
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,779 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,411 with geography defined and 368 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 16 Jun 2024
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Fluxes from land-use change and management (FLUC) are a large source of uncertainty in global and regional carbon budgets. Here, we evaluate the impact of different model parameterisations on FLUC. We show that carbon stock densities and allocation of carbon following transitions contribute more to uncertainty in FLUC than response-curve time constants. Uncertainty in FLUC could thus, in principle, be reduced by available Earth-observation data on carbon densities at a global scale.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint