12 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Impact of straw return combined with different fertilizations on soil organic carbon stock in upland wheat and maize croplands in China: A meta-analysis M. Islam et al. 10.1016/j.crope.2023.10.003
2. Connecting competitor, stress-tolerator and ruderal (CSR) theory and Lund Potsdam Jena managed Land 5 (LPJmL 5) to assess the role of environmental conditions, management and functional diversity for grassland ecosystem functions S. Wirth et al. 10.5194/bg-21-381-2024
3. Reversion of Perennial Biomass Crops to Conserve C and N: A Meta-Analysis E. Martani et al. 10.3390/agronomy12020232
4. Quantitative assessment of different straw management practices on soil organic carbon and crop yield in the Chinese upland soils: A data-driven approach based on simulation and prediction model M. Islam et al. 10.1016/j.eja.2024.127092
5. Modelling adaptation and transformative adaptation in cropping systems: recent advances and future directions A. Farrell et al. 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101265
6. Soil organic carbon and its' stock potential in different land-use types along slope position in Coka watershed, Southern Ethiopia T. Buraka et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10261
7. The role of cover crops for cropland soil carbon, nitrogen leaching, and agricultural yields – a global simulation study with LPJmL (V. 5.0-tillage-cc) V. Porwollik et al. 10.5194/bg-19-957-2022
8. A global dataset for the production and usage of cereal residues in the period 1997–2021 A. Smerald et al. 10.1038/s41597-023-02587-0
9. Overcoming global inequality is critical for land-based mitigation in line with the Paris Agreement F. Humpenöder et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-35114-7
10. Assessing the impacts of agricultural managements on soil carbon stocks, nitrogen loss, and crop production – a modelling study in eastern Africa J. Ma et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2145-2022
11. Management-induced changes in soil organic carbon on global croplands K. Karstens et al. 10.5194/bg-19-5125-2022
12. Food matters: Dietary shifts increase the feasibility of 1.5°C pathways in line with the Paris Agreement F. Humpenöder et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adj3832