Earth System Dynamics
Earth System Dynamics
ESD
Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-673-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-673-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
Research article
 | 
31 Jul 2020
Research article |  | 31 Jul 2020

Climate engineering to mitigate the projected 21st-century terrestrial drying of the Americas: a direct comparison of carbon capture and sulfur injection

Yangyang Xu, Lei Lin, Simone Tilmes, Katherine Dagon, Lili Xia, Chenrui Diao, Wei Cheng, Zhili Wang, Isla Simpson, and Lorna Burnell

Viewed

Total article views: 3,302 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,411 787 104 3,302 108 119
  • HTML: 2,411
  • PDF: 787
  • XML: 104
  • Total: 3,302
  • BibTeX: 108
  • EndNote: 119
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jan 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jan 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,302 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,885 with geography defined and 417 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Two geoengineering schemes to mitigate global warming, (a) capturing atmospheric CO2 and (b) injecting stratospheric sulfur gas, are compared. Based on two sets of large-ensemble model experiments, we show that sulfur injection will effectively mitigate projected terrestrial drying over the Americas, and the mitigation benefit will emerge more quickly than with carbon capture. Innovative means of sulfur injection should continue to be explored as one potential low-cost climate solution.
Read more
Special issue
Resolving uncertainties in solar geoengineering through multi-model...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint