Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-537-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-537-2020
Research article
 | 
15 Jun 2020
Research article |  | 15 Jun 2020

Multivariate bias corrections of climate simulations: which benefits for which losses?

Bastien François, Mathieu Vrac, Alex J. Cannon, Yoann Robin, and Denis Allard

Viewed

Total article views: 5,816 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
4,019 1,706 91 5,816 392 106 95
  • HTML: 4,019
  • PDF: 1,706
  • XML: 91
  • Total: 5,816
  • Supplement: 392
  • BibTeX: 106
  • EndNote: 95
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,816 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,144 with geography defined and 672 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Recently, multivariate bias correction (MBC) methods designed to adjust climate simulations have been proposed. However, they use different approaches, leading potentially to different results. Therefore, this study intends to intercompare four existing MBC methods to provide end users with aid in choosing such methods for their applications. To do so, a wide range of evaluation criteria have been used to assess the ability of MBC methods to correct statistical properties of climate models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint