Articles | Volume 11, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
23 Nov 2020
Research article |
| 23 Nov 2020
| 23 Nov 2020
Expanding the design space of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering to include precipitation-based objectives and explore trade-offs
Sibley School for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Douglas MacMartin
Sibley School for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Daniele Visioni
Sibley School for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Ben Kravitz
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 3,738 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Aug 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,920 | 731 | 87 | 3,738 | 92 | 90 |
- HTML: 2,920
- PDF: 731
- XML: 87
- Total: 3,738
- BibTeX: 92
- EndNote: 90
Total article views: 2,850 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Nov 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,270 | 499 | 81 | 2,850 | 78 | 80 |
- HTML: 2,270
- PDF: 499
- XML: 81
- Total: 2,850
- BibTeX: 78
- EndNote: 80
Total article views: 888 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Aug 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 650 | 232 | 6 | 888 | 14 | 10 |
- HTML: 650
- PDF: 232
- XML: 6
- Total: 888
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,738 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,263 with geography defined
and 475 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,850 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,570 with geography defined
and 280 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 888 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 693 with geography defined
and 195 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk A. Tang & L. Kemp 10.3389/fclim.2021.720312
- Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Quantify “Climate Distinguishability” After Stratospheric Aerosol Injection A. Mamalakis et al. 10.1029/2023GL106137
- High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Injection to Preserve the Arctic W. Lee et al. 10.1029/2022EF003052
- How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering? Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-13-201-2022
- Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification D. MacMartin et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202230119
- Our Two Climate Crises Challenge: Short-Run Emergency Direct Climate Cooling and Long-Run GHG Removal and Ecological Regeneration R. Baiman 10.1177/04866134221123626
- Quantifying the Efficiency of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering at Different Altitudes W. Lee et al. 10.1029/2023GL104417
- Addressing the urgent need for direct climate cooling: Rationale and options R. Baiman et al. 10.1093/oxfclm/kgae014
- Potential impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection on drought risk managements over major river basins in Africa B. Abiodun et al. 10.1007/s10584-021-03268-w
- Assessing Outcomes in Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Scenarios Shortly After Deployment D. Hueholt et al. 10.1029/2023EF003488
- Indices of extremes: geographic patterns of change in extremes and associated vegetation impacts under climate intervention M. Tye et al. 10.5194/esd-13-1233-2022
- Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-15-191-2024
- Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6 W. Tang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5467-2023
- A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deployment scenario W. Smith et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac8cd3
- How does the latitude of stratospheric aerosol injection affect the climate in UKESM1? M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-24-13253-2024
- Different types of drought under climate change or geoengineering: Systematic review of societal implications E. Coughlan de Perez et al. 10.3389/fclim.2022.959519
- Public attitude toward solar radiation modification: results of a two-scenario online survey on perception in four Asia–Pacific countries M. Sugiyama et al. 10.1007/s11625-024-01520-7
- Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
- The Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on Extreme Fire Weather Risk D. Touma et al. 10.1029/2023EF003626
- Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols M. Zhao et al. 10.1029/2021JD035379
- Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
- Assessing Responses and Impacts of Solar climate intervention on the Earth system with stratospheric aerosol injection (ARISE-SAI): protocol and initial results from the first simulations J. Richter et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8221-2022
- Stratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis H. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00664-8
- High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be More Effective if Injection Is Limited to Spring W. Lee et al. 10.1029/2021GL092696
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Projected global sulfur deposition with climate intervention H. Rubin et al. 10.1016/j.gecadv.2024.100011
- How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering? Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-13-201-2022
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk A. Tang & L. Kemp 10.3389/fclim.2021.720312
- Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Quantify “Climate Distinguishability” After Stratospheric Aerosol Injection A. Mamalakis et al. 10.1029/2023GL106137
- High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Injection to Preserve the Arctic W. Lee et al. 10.1029/2022EF003052
- How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering? Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-13-201-2022
- Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification D. MacMartin et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202230119
- Our Two Climate Crises Challenge: Short-Run Emergency Direct Climate Cooling and Long-Run GHG Removal and Ecological Regeneration R. Baiman 10.1177/04866134221123626
- Quantifying the Efficiency of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering at Different Altitudes W. Lee et al. 10.1029/2023GL104417
- Addressing the urgent need for direct climate cooling: Rationale and options R. Baiman et al. 10.1093/oxfclm/kgae014
- Potential impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection on drought risk managements over major river basins in Africa B. Abiodun et al. 10.1007/s10584-021-03268-w
- Assessing Outcomes in Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Scenarios Shortly After Deployment D. Hueholt et al. 10.1029/2023EF003488
- Indices of extremes: geographic patterns of change in extremes and associated vegetation impacts under climate intervention M. Tye et al. 10.5194/esd-13-1233-2022
- Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-15-191-2024
- Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6 W. Tang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5467-2023
- A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deployment scenario W. Smith et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac8cd3
- How does the latitude of stratospheric aerosol injection affect the climate in UKESM1? M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-24-13253-2024
- Different types of drought under climate change or geoengineering: Systematic review of societal implications E. Coughlan de Perez et al. 10.3389/fclim.2022.959519
- Public attitude toward solar radiation modification: results of a two-scenario online survey on perception in four Asia–Pacific countries M. Sugiyama et al. 10.1007/s11625-024-01520-7
- Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
- The Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on Extreme Fire Weather Risk D. Touma et al. 10.1029/2023EF003626
- Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols M. Zhao et al. 10.1029/2021JD035379
- Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
- Assessing Responses and Impacts of Solar climate intervention on the Earth system with stratospheric aerosol injection (ARISE-SAI): protocol and initial results from the first simulations J. Richter et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8221-2022
- Stratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis H. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00664-8
- High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be More Effective if Injection Is Limited to Spring W. Lee et al. 10.1029/2021GL092696
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Short summary
The injection of aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight could reduce global warming, but this type of
geoengineeringwould also impact other variables like precipitation and sea ice. In this study, we model various climate impacts of geoengineering on a 3-D graph to show how trying to meet one climate goal will affect other variables. We also present two computer simulations which validate our model and show that geoengineering could regulate precipitation as well as temperature.
The injection of aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight could reduce global warming,...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint