Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2024-44
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2024-44
03 Feb 2025
 | 03 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ESD.

Evaluating Dynamic Global Vegetation Models in China: Challenges in capturing trends in Leaf Area and Gross Primary Productivity, but effective seasonal variation representation

Anzhou Zhao, Ziyang Li, Lidong Zou, Jianshen Wu, Kayla Stan, and Arturo Sanchez-Azofeif

Abstract. Terrestrial ecosystems are crucial in mitigating global climate change, and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) have become essential tools for simulating these ecosystems. However, uncertainties remain in DGVM simulations for China, highlighting the need to systematic evaluations of their dynamics across various time scales to enhance model performance. As such, we utilize reprocessed monthly MODIS Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Contiguous Solar-induced Fluorescence (CSIF) data as observational references to assess the long-term trends and seasonal variations of LAI and Gross Primary Production (GPP) simulated by 14 models (CABLE-POP, CLASSIC, CLM5.0, DLEM, IBIS, ISAM, ISBA-CTRIP, JULES, LPJ-GUESS, LPX, OCN, ORCHIDEEv3, SDGVM, and VISIT) in China from 2003 to 2019. Additionally, we evaluate the trends and seasonal variations of simulated LAI and GPP in response to environmental and climatic factors. Our findings indicate that: (1) While the overall trend of simulated LAI is captured, the spatial performance of simulated LAI and GPP is poor, with underestimation in forested areas, overestimation in grasslands, and misestimation in croplands; (2) The models misestimate the simulated LAI and GPP responses to changes in environmental factors, and their inaccuracy in capturing anthropogenic impacts on vegetation dynamics. We indicate that the main reason for the model's misestimation is that the model's understanding of the CO2 fertilization effect is inadequate, and thus fails to simulate the vegetation response to CO2 concentration. (3) Despite these issues, the models can effectively capture the seasonality of LAI and GPP in China, largely due to their robust representation of seasonal responses to climate factors.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Anzhou Zhao, Ziyang Li, Lidong Zou, Jianshen Wu, Kayla Stan, and Arturo Sanchez-Azofeif

Status: open (until 17 Mar 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Anzhou Zhao, Ziyang Li, Lidong Zou, Jianshen Wu, Kayla Stan, and Arturo Sanchez-Azofeif
Anzhou Zhao, Ziyang Li, Lidong Zou, Jianshen Wu, Kayla Stan, and Arturo Sanchez-Azofeif

Viewed

Total article views: 9 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
9 0 0 9 0 0 0
  • HTML: 9
  • PDF: 0
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 9
  • Supplement: 0
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 9 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 9 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Feb 2025
Download
Short summary
In this context, our study uses reprocessed monthly remote sensing data as observational references to assess the long-term trends and seasonal variations of simulated data by models in China from 2003 to 2019. Our findings reveal that while the DGVMs generally capture the seasonality of LAI and GPP, there are notable discrepancies in their spatial accuracy. Specifically, our results indicate a tendency to underestimate forested areas, overestimate grasslands, and misrepresent cropland dynamics.
Altmetrics