Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2017-93
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2017-93

  06 Nov 2017

06 Nov 2017

Review status: this preprint was under review for the journal ESD but the revision was not accepted.

Can Limits to Growth in the Renewable Energy Sector be Inferred by Curve Fitting to Historical Data?

Kristoffer Rypdal Kristoffer Rypdal
  • Department of Mathematics and Statistics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway

Abstract. The paper examines the assertion that limits to growth in the renewable energy sector can be inferred statistically from global historical data for installed capacity of solar and wind power. This claim has been made in the peer reviewed scientific literature and has been subject to considerable media coverage. If true, the harsh implication is that the substitution of fossil fuels by renewables is impossible due to Earth System constraints. It is demonstrated here that rational selection between an exponential and a logistic growth model cannot be made from existing data for the historical evolution of global installed capacity. For global power consumption, the growth limit for a fitted logistic model is so high that the growth is indistinguishable from exponential growth for any practical purpose. It is observed that some regional data show polynomial, rather than exponential, growth. But there are no signs of levelling off to a finite limit, and it is suggested that the difference between global and regional growth patterns may be that increasing technology transfer to undeveloped areas gives an extra impetus to the global growth. If this is the case we may see slower than exponential growth in the future without a definite growth limit. These overall negative results regarding drawing definite conclusion from statistical considerations lead to the conclusion that, even though statistical methods are indispensable in energy planning, they are not a substitute for physical and economic modelling.

Kristoffer Rypdal

 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Kristoffer Rypdal

Kristoffer Rypdal

Viewed

Total article views: 895 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
615 219 61 895 68 81
  • HTML: 615
  • PDF: 219
  • XML: 61
  • Total: 895
  • BibTeX: 68
  • EndNote: 81
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 894 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 891 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Jul 2021
Download
Short summary
The paper examines the assertion that limits to growth in the renewable energy sector can be inferred statistically from historical data for installed capacity of solar and wind power. This claim has been made in the peer reviewed scientific literature and has been subject to considerable media coverage. It is demonstrated here that rational selection between an exponential and a logistic growth model cannot be made from existing data for the historical evolution of global installed capacity.
Altmetrics