Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-267-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-267-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Horses for courses: analytical tools to explore planetary boundaries
Detlef P. van Vuuren
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
PBL Netherland Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Department of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Paul L. Lucas
PBL Netherland Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
Tiina Häyhä
PBL Netherland Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Sarah E. Cornell
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Mark Stafford-Smith
CSIRO, Canberra, Australia
Viewed
Total article views: 4,336 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 08 Sep 2015)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,436 | 1,629 | 271 | 4,336 | 158 | 196 |
- HTML: 2,436
- PDF: 1,629
- XML: 271
- Total: 4,336
- BibTeX: 158
- EndNote: 196
Total article views: 3,393 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Mar 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,907 | 1,244 | 242 | 3,393 | 141 | 179 |
- HTML: 1,907
- PDF: 1,244
- XML: 242
- Total: 3,393
- BibTeX: 141
- EndNote: 179
Total article views: 943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 08 Sep 2015)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
529 | 385 | 29 | 943 | 17 | 17 |
- HTML: 529
- PDF: 385
- XML: 29
- Total: 943
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 17
Cited
26 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Matching scope, purpose and uses of planetary boundaries science A. Downing et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab22c9
- Towards integration? Considering social aspects with large-scale computational models for nature-based solutions I. Schulte et al. 10.1017/sus.2023.26
- Towards meaningful consumption-based planetary boundary indicators: The phosphorus exceedance footprint M. Li et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.12.005
- Integrated human-earth system modeling—state of the science and future directions K. Calvin & B. Bond-Lamberty 10.1088/1748-9326/aac642
- Framework to define environmental sustainability boundaries and a review of current approaches E. Vea et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abac77
- Taxonomies for structuring models for World–Earth systems analysis of the Anthropocene: subsystems, their interactions and social–ecological feedback loops J. Donges et al. 10.5194/esd-12-1115-2021
- A modeling framework for World-Earth system resilience: exploring social inequality and Earth system tipping points J. Anderies et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ace91d
- Challenges and opportunities towards improved application of the planetary boundary for land-system change in life cycle assessment of products A. Bjørn et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133964
- Testing the integrated risk and sustainability assessment (RSA) framework for ‘water scarcity – water reuse’ situations: The case of Cerrillos de Tamaya, Chile A. Müller et al. 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100203
- Planetary boundaries for a blue planet K. Nash et al. 10.1038/s41559-017-0319-z
- Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: Distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness P. Lucas et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102017
- Methodological framework for identifying sustainability intervention priority areas on coastal landscapes and its application in China W. Yafei et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142603
- Essential Variables help to focus Sustainable Development Goals monitoring B. Reyers et al. 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.003
- A framework for modelling the complexities of food and water security under globalisation B. Dermody et al. 10.5194/esd-9-103-2018
- Sustainable use of renewable resources in a stylized social–ecological network model under heterogeneous resource distribution W. Barfuss et al. 10.5194/esd-8-255-2017
- Achieving the 17 Sustainable Development Goals within 9 planetary boundaries J. Randers et al. 10.1017/sus.2019.22
- A Thought Experiment on Sustainable Management of the Earth System J. Heitzig et al. 10.3390/su10061947
- The Boundaries of the Planetary Boundary Framework: A Critical Appraisal of Approaches to Define a “Safe Operating Space” for Humanity F. Biermann & R. Kim 10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-080337
- Collateral transgression of planetary boundaries due to climate engineering by terrestrial carbon dioxide removal V. Heck et al. 10.5194/esd-7-783-2016
- Earth system modeling with endogenous and dynamic human societies: the copan:CORE open World–Earth modeling framework J. Donges et al. 10.5194/esd-11-395-2020
- National Limits of Sustainability: The Czech Republic’s CO2 Emissions in the Perspective of Planetary Boundaries A. Parsonsova & I. Machar 10.3390/su13042164
- Co-designing global target-seeking scenarios: A cross-scale participatory process for capturing multiple perspectives on pathways to sustainability A. Aguiar et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102198
- Translating the ‘water scarcity – water reuse’ situation into an information system for decision-making A. Müller et al. 10.1007/s11625-021-01077-9
- Towards representing human behavior and decision making in Earth system models – an overview of techniques and approaches F. Müller-Hansen et al. 10.5194/esd-8-977-2017
- The role of planetary boundaries in assessing absolute environmental sustainability across scales M. Li et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106475
- Sustainability, collapse and oscillations in a simple World-Earth model J. Nitzbon et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7581
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Matching scope, purpose and uses of planetary boundaries science A. Downing et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab22c9
- Towards integration? Considering social aspects with large-scale computational models for nature-based solutions I. Schulte et al. 10.1017/sus.2023.26
- Towards meaningful consumption-based planetary boundary indicators: The phosphorus exceedance footprint M. Li et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.12.005
- Integrated human-earth system modeling—state of the science and future directions K. Calvin & B. Bond-Lamberty 10.1088/1748-9326/aac642
- Framework to define environmental sustainability boundaries and a review of current approaches E. Vea et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abac77
- Taxonomies for structuring models for World–Earth systems analysis of the Anthropocene: subsystems, their interactions and social–ecological feedback loops J. Donges et al. 10.5194/esd-12-1115-2021
- A modeling framework for World-Earth system resilience: exploring social inequality and Earth system tipping points J. Anderies et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ace91d
- Challenges and opportunities towards improved application of the planetary boundary for land-system change in life cycle assessment of products A. Bjørn et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133964
- Testing the integrated risk and sustainability assessment (RSA) framework for ‘water scarcity – water reuse’ situations: The case of Cerrillos de Tamaya, Chile A. Müller et al. 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100203
- Planetary boundaries for a blue planet K. Nash et al. 10.1038/s41559-017-0319-z
- Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: Distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness P. Lucas et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102017
- Methodological framework for identifying sustainability intervention priority areas on coastal landscapes and its application in China W. Yafei et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142603
- Essential Variables help to focus Sustainable Development Goals monitoring B. Reyers et al. 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.003
- A framework for modelling the complexities of food and water security under globalisation B. Dermody et al. 10.5194/esd-9-103-2018
- Sustainable use of renewable resources in a stylized social–ecological network model under heterogeneous resource distribution W. Barfuss et al. 10.5194/esd-8-255-2017
- Achieving the 17 Sustainable Development Goals within 9 planetary boundaries J. Randers et al. 10.1017/sus.2019.22
- A Thought Experiment on Sustainable Management of the Earth System J. Heitzig et al. 10.3390/su10061947
- The Boundaries of the Planetary Boundary Framework: A Critical Appraisal of Approaches to Define a “Safe Operating Space” for Humanity F. Biermann & R. Kim 10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-080337
- Collateral transgression of planetary boundaries due to climate engineering by terrestrial carbon dioxide removal V. Heck et al. 10.5194/esd-7-783-2016
- Earth system modeling with endogenous and dynamic human societies: the copan:CORE open World–Earth modeling framework J. Donges et al. 10.5194/esd-11-395-2020
- National Limits of Sustainability: The Czech Republic’s CO2 Emissions in the Perspective of Planetary Boundaries A. Parsonsova & I. Machar 10.3390/su13042164
- Co-designing global target-seeking scenarios: A cross-scale participatory process for capturing multiple perspectives on pathways to sustainability A. Aguiar et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102198
- Translating the ‘water scarcity – water reuse’ situation into an information system for decision-making A. Müller et al. 10.1007/s11625-021-01077-9
- Towards representing human behavior and decision making in Earth system models – an overview of techniques and approaches F. Müller-Hansen et al. 10.5194/esd-8-977-2017
- The role of planetary boundaries in assessing absolute environmental sustainability across scales M. Li et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106475
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Saved (preprint)
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
There is a need for further integrated research on developing a set of sustainable development objectives, based on the proposed framework of planetary boundary indicators. This paper organises the research questions in four key categories. It subsequently discusses how different categories of scientific disciplines and in particular models can contribute to the necessary analysis.
There is a need for further integrated research on developing a set of sustainable development...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint