Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-103-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-103-2016
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
11 Feb 2016
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 11 Feb 2016

Comment on: "Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: a critique" by Edixhoven et al. (2014) – clarifying comments and thoughts on key conceptions, conclusions and interpretation to allow for sustainable action

R. W. Scholz and F.-W. Wellmer

Viewed

Total article views: 4,105 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,238 1,517 350 4,105 337 168 177
  • HTML: 2,238
  • PDF: 1,517
  • XML: 350
  • Total: 4,105
  • Supplement: 337
  • BibTeX: 168
  • EndNote: 177
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jan 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jan 2015)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The 2014 USGS data could decrease from 67 Gt phosphate rock (PR) reserves to 58.5 Gt marketable PR (PR-M) if data on PR-ore are transferred to PR-M. The 50 Gt PR-M estimate for Moroccan reserves is reasonable. Geoeconomics suggests that large parts of resources and geopotential become future reserves. As phosphate is essential for food production and reserve data alone are unsufficient for assessing long-run supply security, an international standing committee may assess future PR accessibility.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint