147 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Substantially Greater Carbon Emissions Estimated Based on Annual Land-Use Transition Data J. Diao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071126
2. Global rules for translating land-use change (LUH2) to land-cover change for CMIP6 using GLM2 L. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3203-2020
3. Towards an integrated impact assessment of cropland redistribution in China L. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-026-2519-4
4. Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate–carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios I. Melnikova et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-779-2022
5. Land-use and land-cover change carbon emissions between 1901 and 2012 constrained by biomass observations W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5053-2017
6. Biogeophysical and biogeochemical impacts of land-use change simulated by MIROC-ES2L A. Ito & T. Hajima https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00372-w
7. Net carbon flux from cropland changes in the Central Asian Aral Sea Basin Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115078
8. Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives S. Piao et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14884
9. A consistent budgeting of terrestrial carbon fluxes L. Dorgeist et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51126-x
10. A segmentation algorithm for characterizing rise and fall segments in seasonal cycles: an application to XCO2 to estimate benchmarks and assess model bias L. Calle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2611-2019
11. Constraining the strength of the terrestrial CO2 fertilization effect in the Canadian Earth system model version 4.2 (CanESM4.2) V. Arora & J. Scinocca https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2357-2016
12. C4MIP – The Coupled Climate–Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project: experimental protocol for CMIP6 C. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2853-2016
13. Ambiguity in the Land Use Component of Mitigation Contributions Toward the Paris Agreement Goals C. Fyson & M. Jeffery https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001190
14. The consolidated European synthesis of CO2 emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2020 M. McGrath et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023
15. Perspective has a strong effect on the calculation of historical contributions to global warming R. Skeie et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5b0a
16. Increased influence of nitrogen limitation on CO2 emissions from future land use and land use change P. Meiyappan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005086
17. Global Carbon Budget 2017 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018
18. Contrasting influences of biogeophysical and biogeochemical impacts of historical land use on global economic inequality S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30145-6
19. Global carbon budget 2014 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-47-2015
20. Ecosystem age-class dynamics and distribution in the LPJ-wsl v2.0 global ecosystem model L. Calle & B. Poulter https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2575-2021
21. Harmonizing direct and indirect anthropogenic land carbon fluxes indicates a substantial missing sink in the global carbon budget since the early 20th century A. Walker et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10619
22. Biogeochemical versus biogeophysical temperature effects of historical land-use change in CMIP6 A. Amali et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-803-2025
23. Regional carbon fluxes from land use and land cover change in Asia, 1980–2009 L. Calle et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074011
24. Soil organic carbon across scales S. O'Rourke et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12959
25. Contrasting effects of CO2 fertilization, land-use change and warming on seasonal amplitude of Northern Hemisphere CO2 exchange A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12361-2019
26. Potential strong contribution of future anthropogenic land-use and land-cover change to the terrestrial carbon cycle B. Quesada et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4c3
27. Quantifying and attributing land use-induced carbon emissions to biomass consumption: A critical assessment of existing approaches M. Bhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112228
28. Uncertainties in the land-use flux resulting from land-use change reconstructions and gross land transitions A. Bayer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-91-2017
29. Sensitivity of land use change emission estimates to historical land use and land cover mapping S. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005360
30. Negative emissions from stopping deforestation and forest degradation, globally R. Houghton & A. Nassikas https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13876
31. Effective radiative forcing from historical land use change T. Andrews et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3280-7
32. Pantropical CO2 emissions and removals for the AFOLU sector in the period 1990–2018 S. Nyawira et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10096-z
33. The Community Land Model underestimates land-use CO2 emissions by neglecting soil disturbance from cultivation S. Levis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-613-2014
34. Future bioenergy expansion could alter carbon sequestration potential and exacerbate water stress in the United States Y. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm8237
35. Re-evaluating the 1940s CO2 plateau A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4877-2016
36. Emerging reporting and verification needs under the Paris Agreement: How can the research community effectively contribute? L. Perugini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.012
37. The land footprint of the global food trade: Perspectives from a case study of soybeans X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105764
38. Land cover change instead of solar radiation change dominates the forest GPP increase during the recent phase of the Shelterbelt Program for Pearl River X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108664
39. County land use carbon emission and scenario prediction in Mianyang Science and Technology City New District, Sichuan Province, China T. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60036-3
40. Potential climate forcing of land use and land cover change D. Ward et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12701-2014
41. Quantifying the relative importance of land cover change from climate and land use in the representative concentration pathways T. Davies‐Barnard et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004949
42. A review of land-based greenhouse gas flux estimates in Indonesia K. Austin et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab531
43. The consolidated European synthesis of CO2 emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2018 A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021
44. A model based investigation of the relative importance of CO2-fertilization, climate warming, nitrogen deposition and land use change on the global terrestrial carbon uptake in the historical period N. Devaraju et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2830-8
45. On the use of Earth Observation to support estimates of national greenhouse gas emissions and sinks for the Global stocktake process: lessons learned from ESA-CCI RECCAP2 A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-022-00214-w
46. Global Carbon Budget 2025 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3211-2026
47. Comparison of uncertainties in land-use change fluxes from bookkeeping model parameterisation A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-745-2021
48. Reconstructions and predictions of the global carbon budget with an emission-driven Earth system model H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-101-2023
49. Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes E. Hansis et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004997
50. Global Carbon Budget 2015 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015
51. Country-level estimates of gross and net carbon fluxes from land use, land-use change and forestry W. Obermeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-605-2024
52. Global Carbon Budget 2021 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
53. Current challenges of implementing anthropogenic land-use and land-cover change in models contributing to climate change assessments R. Prestele et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-369-2017
54. Terrestrial fluxes of carbon in GCP carbon budgets R. Houghton https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15050
55. Differences and uncertainties in land-use CO2 flux estimates W. Obermeier et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-025-00730-6
56. Land cover change-induced decline in terrestrial gross primary production over the conterminous United States from 2001 to 2016 Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108609
57. REDD + research: Reviewing the literature, limitations and ways forward R. Mbatu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.09.010
58. The influence of non-CO 2 forcings on cumulative carbon emissions budgets K. Tokarska et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd
59. Driving model of land use change on the evolution of carbon stock: a case study of Chongqing, China L. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31335-5
60. Global carbon budget 2013 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-235-2014
61. Past and future carbon fluxes from land use change, shifting cultivation and wood harvest B. Stocker et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23188
62. Modelled land use and land cover change emissions – a spatio-temporal comparison of different approaches W. Obermeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-635-2021
63. The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: rationale and experimental design D. Lawrence et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2973-2016
64. Decadal variability in land carbon sink efficiency L. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00178-3
65. National contributions to climate change due to historical emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide since 1850 M. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02041-1
66. Exploring the application of Earth Observation datasets for SEEA carbon accounting and its comparison with national GHG reporting to the UNFCCC A. Araza et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.181189
67. Humans have depleted global terrestrial carbon stocks by a quarter R. Ganzenmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101392
68. Contrasting policy shifts influence the pattern of vegetation production and C sequestration over pasture systems: A regional-scale comparison in Temperate Eurasian Steppe Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102679
69. Carbon budget from forest land use and management in Central Asia during 1961–2010 Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.02.011
70. Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty A. Ballantyne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2565-2015
71. Synergetic roadmap of carbon neutrality and clean air for China Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100280
72. Land Management Contributes significantly to observed Vegetation Browning in Syria during 2001–2018 T. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1515-2022
73. A bioenergy-focused versus a reforestation-focused mitigation pathway yields disparate carbon storage and climate responses Y. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2306775121
74. Greenhouse gas emissions and their trends over the last 3 decades across Africa M. Mostefaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-245-2024
75. A 29-year time series of annual 300 m resolution plant-functional-type maps for climate models K. Harper et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1465-2023
76. Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2 A. Walker et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16866
77. GlobeLand30 shows little cropland area loss but greater fragmentation in China Q. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.11.002
78. Land Use Effects on Climate: Current State, Recent Progress, and Emerging Topics J. Pongratz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-021-00178-y
79. An improved approach to estimate the natural land carbon sink M. O’Sullivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01302-7
80. Global Carbon Budget 2020 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
81. Comparing the influence of net and gross anthropogenic land-use and land-cover changes on the carbon cycle in the MPI-ESM S. Wilkenskjeld et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4817-2014
82. Postfire recruitment failure in Scots pine forests of southern Siberia K. Barrett et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111539
83. The compact Earth system model OSCAR v2.2: description and first results T. Gasser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-271-2017
84. Lower land-use emissions responsible for increased net land carbon sink during the slow warming period S. Piao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0204-7
85. Large‐Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal to Meet the 1.5°C Limit: Key Governance Gaps, Challenges and Priority Responses M. Mace et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12921
86. Representing anthropogenic gross land use change, wood harvest, and forest age dynamics in a global vegetation model ORCHIDEE-MICT v8.4.2 C. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-409-2018
87. Largely underestimated carbon emission from land use and land cover change in the conterminous United States Z. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14768
88. Global Carbon Budget 2019 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
89. Annual emissions of carbon from land use, land-use change, and forestry from 1850 to 2020 R. Houghton & A. Castanho https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2025-2023
90. Past and Future Climate Variability Uncertainties in the Global Carbon Budget Using the MPI Grand Ensemble T. Loughran et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007019
91. Trends in management of the world’s forests and impacts on carbon stocks R. Birdsey & Y. Pan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.031
92. Simulated carbon emissions from land-use change are substantially enhanced by accounting for agricultural management T. Pugh et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124008
93. CMIP5 Scientific Gaps and Recommendations for CMIP6 R. Stouffer et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00013.1
94. Land-use change emissions based on high-resolution activity data substantially lower than previously estimated R. Ganzenmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac70d8
95. Global spatially explicit carbon emissions from land-use change over the past six decades (1961–2020) Z. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.04.002
96. Global Carbon Budget 2018 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018
97. A comprehensive and synthetic dataset for global, regional, and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2018 with an extension to 2019 J. Minx et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5213-2021
98. Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850–2015 R. Houghton & A. Nassikas https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005546
99. Spatio-temporal analysis of cropland change in the Guanzhong area, China, from 1650 to 2016 X. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1902-4
100. The mutual importance of anthropogenically and climate‐induced changes in global vegetation cover for future land carbon emissions in the MPI‐ESM CMIP5 simulations R. Schneck et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004959
101. Emerging climate impact on carbon sinks in a consolidated carbon budget P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09802-5
102. National pathways of land-use CO₂ emissions in the 21st century D. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-74836-w
103. Process-oriented analysis of dominant sources of uncertainty in the land carbon sink M. O’Sullivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32416-8
104. Global Carbon Budget 2024 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025
105. Limited Mitigation Potential of Forestation Under a High Emissions Scenario: Results From Multi‐Model and Single Model Ensembles T. Loughran et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007605
106. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide S. Sitch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-653-2015
107. Global Carbon Budget 2022 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
108. Land use induced land cover changes and future scenarios in extent of Miombo woodland and Dambo ecosystems in the Copperbelt province of Zambia M. Malunga et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12921
109. Narrowing the Range of Future Climate Projections Using Historical Observations of Atmospheric CO2 B. Booth et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0178.1
110. Toward “optimal” integration of terrestrial biosphere models C. Schwalm et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064002
111. Impacts of land use change and elevated CO2 on the interannual variations and seasonal cycles of gross primary productivity in China B. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-235-2020
112. Soil carbon management in large-scale Earth system modelling: implications for crop yields and nitrogen leaching S. Olin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-745-2015
113. Historical carbon dioxide emissions caused by land-use changes are possibly larger than assumed A. Arneth et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2882
114. Soil carbon response to land-use change: evaluation of a global vegetation model using observational meta-analyses S. Nyawira et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5661-2016
115. Can carbon emissions from tropical deforestation drop by 50% in 5 years? D. Zarin et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13153
116. Representing agriculture in Earth System Models: Approaches and priorities for development S. McDermid et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000749
117. Harmonising the land-use flux estimates of global models and national inventories for 2000–2020 G. Grassi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1093-2023
118. European anthropogenic AFOLU greenhouse gas emissions: a review and benchmark data A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-961-2020
119. Grand Challenges in Understanding the Interplay of Climate and Land Changes S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-16-0012.1
120. Reconciling global-model estimates and country reporting of anthropogenic forest CO2 sinks G. Grassi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0283-x
121. Management-induced changes in soil organic carbon on global croplands K. Karstens et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5125-2022
122. Non-deforestation fire vs. fossil fuel combustion: the source of CO2 emissions affects the global carbon cycle and climate responses J. Landry & H. Matthews https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2137-2016
123. Woody species diversity and aboveground carbon stocks in agroforestry systems in Burkina Faso C. Sanou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00868-9
124. How Well Do We Understand the Land‐Ocean‐Atmosphere Carbon Cycle? D. Crisp et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021RG000736
125. Introduction for special issue: Carbon, water and nutrient cycling in managed forests A. Noormets & Y. Nouvellon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.022
126. Global Carbon Budget 2023 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023
127. A multi-data assessment of land use and land cover emissions from Brazil during 2000–2019 T. Rosan et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac08c3
128. Development and testing scenarios for implementing land use and land cover changes during the Holocene in Earth system model experiments S. Harrison et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-805-2020
129. A Bayesian ensemble data assimilation to constrain model parameters and land-use carbon emissions S. Lienert & F. Joos https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2909-2018
130. Sources of Uncertainty in Regional and Global Terrestrial CO2 Exchange Estimates A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006393
131. Scenario choice impacts carbon allocation projection at global warming levels L. de Mora et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1295-2023
132. Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities D. Ward & N. Mahowald https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-175-2015
133. Future land carbon removals in China consistent with national inventory Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54846-2
134. The Contribution of Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use activities to Global Warming, 1990–2012 F. Tubiello et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12865
135. Nitrogen limitation reduces CO₂ emissions from land use change primarily by decreasing CO₂ and climate interactions X. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110940
136. Historical CO2 emissions from land use and land cover change and their uncertainty T. Gasser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4075-2020
137. Quantifying differences in land use emission estimates implied by definition discrepancies B. Stocker & F. Joos https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-731-2015
138. Bookkeeping estimates of the net land-use change flux – a sensitivity study with the CMIP6 land-use dataset K. Hartung et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-763-2021
139. Uncertainty in carbon budget estimates due to internal climate variability K. Tokarska et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abaf1b
140. Definitions and methods to estimate regional land carbon fluxes for the second phase of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Project (RECCAP-2) P. Ciais et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1289-2022
141. Historical and future losses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon stocks induced by urbanization in China from 1990 to 2100 under SSP scenarios K. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.101023
142. Historical carbon fluxes in the expanding deforestation frontier of Southern Brazilian Amazonia (1985–2012) L. Hissa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1076-2
143. Interactions Between Land-Use Change and Climate-Carbon Cycle Feedbacks R. Houghton https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0099-9
144. Attributing the Carbon Cycle Impacts of CMIP5 Historical and Future Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) P. Lawrence et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JG004348
145. How Are Feedbacks Represented in Land Models? Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land5030029
146. Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress G. Grassi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6
147. Uncertainty in land use obscures global soil organic carbon stock estimates C. Gang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109585