71 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate–carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios I. Melnikova et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-779-2022
2. Land-use and land-cover change carbon emissions between 1901 and 2012 constrained by biomass observations W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5053-2017
3. Global spatially explicit carbon emissions from land-use change over the past six decades (1961–2020) Z. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.04.002
4. The compact Earth system model OSCAR v2.2: description and first results T. Gasser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-271-2017
5. Review of climate simulation by Simple Climate Models A. Romero-Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-115-2026
6. On linking an Earth system model to the equilibrium carbon representation of an economically optimizing land use model B. Bond-Lamberty et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2545-2014
7. Attributing the Carbon Cycle Impacts of CMIP5 Historical and Future Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) P. Lawrence et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JG004348
8. Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions M. Raupach et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2384
9. Greenhouse Gas Concentration and Volcanic Eruptions Controlled the Variability of Terrestrial Carbon Uptake Over the Last Millennium X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001566
10. Study on land-use change (LUC)-induced carbon emissions L. Luo & J. Lv https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-026-01000-y
11. People and sustainable land management: assessment of stakeholders knowledge of the nature of landuse/cover change in Abuja, Nigeria S. Mashi & H. Shuaibu https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-017-9782-y
12. Pathfinder v1.0.1: a Bayesian-inferred simple carbon–climate model to explore climate change scenarios T. Bossy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8831-2022
13. Global Carbon Budget 2020 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
14. Humans have depleted global terrestrial carbon stocks by a quarter R. Ganzenmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101392
15. Interactions Between Land-Use Change and Climate-Carbon Cycle Feedbacks R. Houghton https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0099-9
16. Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty A. Ballantyne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2565-2015
17. Aligning climate scenarios to emissions inventories shifts global benchmarks M. Gidden et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06724-y
18. Sensitivity of land use change emission estimates to historical land use and land cover mapping S. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005360
19. Amplified warming from physiological responses to carbon dioxide reduces the potential of vegetation for climate change mitigation M. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00489-4
20. Nitrogen limitation reduces CO₂ emissions from land use change primarily by decreasing CO₂ and climate interactions X. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110940
21. Investigating carbon and nitrogen conservation in reported CMIP6 Earth system model data G. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2111-2025
22. The contribution of China’s emissions to global climate forcing B. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17165
23. Neighbouring effect of land use changes and fire emissions on atmospheric CO2 and CH4 over suburban region of India (Shadnagar) M. Pathakoti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171226
24. Synthesizing global carbon–nitrogen coupling effects – the MAGICC coupled carbon–nitrogen cycle model v1.0 G. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2193-2025
25. Modelled land use and land cover change emissions – a spatio-temporal comparison of different approaches W. Obermeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-635-2021
26. Quantifying differences in land use emission estimates implied by definition discrepancies B. Stocker & F. Joos https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-731-2015
27. Emerging climate impact on carbon sinks in a consolidated carbon budget P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09802-5
28. Future land carbon removals in China consistent with national inventory Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54846-2
29. Global carbon budget 2013 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-235-2014
30. Drivers and patterns of land biosphere carbon balance reversal C. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/044002
31. Global Carbon Budget 2016 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016
32. Country-level estimates of gross and net carbon fluxes from land use, land-use change and forestry W. Obermeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-605-2024
33. The carbon dioxide removal gap W. Lamb et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01984-6
34. Smaller global and regional carbon emissions from gross land use change when considering sub-grid secondary land cohorts in a global dynamic vegetation model C. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1185-2018
35. Emerging reporting and verification needs under the Paris Agreement: How can the research community effectively contribute? L. Perugini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.012
36. Harmonising the land-use flux estimates of global models and national inventories for 2000–2020 G. Grassi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1093-2023
37. Historical carbon dioxide emissions caused by land-use changes are possibly larger than assumed A. Arneth et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2882
38. The consolidated European synthesis of CO2 emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2018 A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021
39. Relative benefits of allocating land to bioenergy crops and forests vary by region I. Melnikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00866-7
40. Narrowed uncertainty in future global temperature and remaining carbon budget I. Melnikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101526
41. Influence of Land Use on the C and N Status of a C4 Invasive Grass in a Semi-Arid Region: Implications for Biomonitoring E. Díaz-Álvarez & E. de la Barrera https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050942
42. The declining uptake rate of atmospheric CO2 by land and ocean sinks M. Raupach et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3453-2014
43. The Community Land Model underestimates land-use CO2 emissions by neglecting soil disturbance from cultivation S. Levis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-613-2014
44. Re-evaluating the 1940s CO2 plateau A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4877-2016
45. How have past fire disturbances contributed to the current carbon balance of boreal ecosystems? C. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-675-2016
46. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide S. Sitch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-653-2015
47. Decadal variability in land carbon sink efficiency L. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00178-3
48. National pathways of land-use CO₂ emissions in the 21st century D. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-74836-w
49. National contributions to climate change due to historical emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide since 1850 M. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02041-1
50. Historical and future losses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon stocks induced by urbanization in China from 1990 to 2100 under SSP scenarios K. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.101023
51. Increased Global Land Carbon Sink Due to Aerosol‐Induced Cooling Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006051
52. Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C T. Gasser et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8958
53. Gross changes in forest area shape the future carbon balance of tropical forests W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-91-2018
54. Process-oriented analysis of dominant sources of uncertainty in the land carbon sink M. O’Sullivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32416-8
55. Progress and Hotspots of Research on Land-Use Carbon Emissions: A Global Perspective M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097245
56. Negative emissions from stopping deforestation and forest degradation, globally R. Houghton & A. Nassikas https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13876
57. Uncertainties in the land-use flux resulting from land-use change reconstructions and gross land transitions A. Bayer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-91-2017
58. Global Carbon Budget 2022 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
59. Historical CO2 emissions from land use and land cover change and their uncertainty T. Gasser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4075-2020
60. Global Carbon Budget 2021 P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
61. Terminology as a key uncertainty in net land use and land cover change carbon flux estimates J. Pongratz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-177-2014
62. CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1 Y. Quilcaille et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023
63. Global carbon budget 2014 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-47-2015
64. The consolidated European synthesis of CO2 emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2020 M. McGrath et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023
65. European anthropogenic AFOLU greenhouse gas emissions: a review and benchmark data A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-961-2020
66. Comparison of uncertainties in land-use change fluxes from bookkeeping model parameterisation A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-745-2021
67. Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes E. Hansis et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004997
68. Global Carbon Budget 2015 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015
69. Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models I. Melnikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001967
70. On the use of Earth Observation to support estimates of national greenhouse gas emissions and sinks for the Global stocktake process: lessons learned from ESA-CCI RECCAP2 A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-022-00214-w
71. Terrestrial fluxes of carbon in GCP carbon budgets R. Houghton https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15050