112 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Albedo control as an effective strategy to tackle Global Warming: A case study F. Cotana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.065
2. Malaria transmission dynamics under climate change and solar geoengineering in South Asia: a GLENS-based assessment A. Hussain et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05666-2
3. Multiscale hydrogeologic evolution and sedimentary responses during the Late Paleozoic Ice Age Z. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2026.105675
4. Sensitivity of the regional climate in the Middle East and North Africa to volcanic perturbations M. Dogar et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026783
5. Climate system response to stratospheric sulfate aerosols: sensitivity to altitude of aerosol layer K. Krishnamohan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-885-2019
6. Quantifying the temperature-independent effect of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering on global-mean precipitation in a multi-model ensemble A. Ferraro & H. Griffiths https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034012
7. Energy transport, polar amplification, and ITCZ shifts in the GeoMIP G1 ensemble R. Russotto & T. Ackerman https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2287-2018
8. Thermodynamic and dynamic responses of the hydrological cycle to solar dimming J. Smyth et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6439-2017
9. Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall J. Haywood et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1857
10. Towards a comprehensive climate impacts assessment of solar geoengineering P. Irvine et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000389
11. Tectonic–astronomical interactions in shaping late Paleozoic climate and organic carbon burial R. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63896-z
12. Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 2: How changes in the hydrological cycle depend on the injection rate and model used A. Laakso et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-405-2024
13. What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO2? U. Niemeier & C. Timmreck https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9129-2015
14. Metrological challenges for measurements of key climatological observables. Part 4: atmospheric relative humidity J. Lovell-Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/1/R40
15. Indicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineering A. Oschlies et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000449
16. Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-55-2023
17. How can solar geoengineering and mitigation be combined under climate targets? M. Khabbazan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1529-2021
18. Radiative and climate effects of stratospheric sulfur geoengineering using seasonally varying injection areas A. Laakso et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6957-2017
19. Early growth dynamical implications for the steerability of stratospheric solar radiation management via sulfur aerosol particles F. Benduhn et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070701
20. CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project S. Tilmes et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0267.1
21. Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation S. Bony et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1799
22. Robust Enough? Exploring Temperature-Constrained Energy Transition Pathways under Climate Uncertainty C. Nicolas et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248595
23. Changes in clouds and thermodynamics under solar geoengineering and implications for required solar reduction R. Russotto & T. Ackerman https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11905-2018
24. Slow and fast responses of mean and extreme precipitation to different forcing in CMIP5 simulations J. Sillmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073229
25. Energetic constraints on tropical precipitation changes under stratospheric aerosol geoengineering: a topical review A. Xavier et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae6714
26. Stratospheric Response in the First Geoengineering Simulation Meeting Multiple Surface Climate Objectives J. Richter et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028285
27. Optimal Control for the Process of Using Artificial Sulfate Aerosols for Mitigating Global Warming S. Soldatenko & R. Yusupov https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856019010172
28. Sea‐salt injections into the low‐latitude marine boundary layer: The transient response in three Earth system models K. Alterskjær et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020432
29. Advancing the framework for considering the effects of climate change on worker safety and health P. Schulte et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2016.1179388
30. Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering on Extreme Precipitation and Temperature Indices in West Africa Using GLENS Simulations E. Alamou et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035855
31. Modeling of solar radiation management: a comparison of simulations using reduced solar constant and stratospheric sulphate aerosols S. Kalidindi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2240-3
32. Enhanced Rates of Regional Warming and Ocean Acidification After Termination of Large‐Scale Ocean Alkalinization M. González et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077847
33. Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering D. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
34. The climate effects of increasing ocean albedo: an idealized representation of solar geoengineering B. Kravitz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13097-2018
35. Impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention geoengineering on surface air temperature in China: a surface energy budget perspective Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7667-2022
36. The climatic significance of Late Ordovician‐early Silurian black shales A. Pohl et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003064
37. Research for assessment, not deployment, of Climate Engineering: The German Research Foundation's Priority Program SPP 1689 A. Oschlies & G. Klepper https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000446
38. Solar radiation management and ecosystem functional responses A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1930-3
39. Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and wind speed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1625-2022
40. A review of the effects of solar radiation management on hydrological extremes Y. Tew et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1238/1/012030
41. The asymmetry of the climate system's response to solar forcing changes and its implications for geoengineering scenarios N. Schaller et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021258
42. Changing transport processes in the stratosphere by radiative heating of sulfate aerosols U. Niemeier & H. Schmidt https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14871-2017
43. Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
44. Enhanced chemical weathering as a geoengineering strategy to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, supply nutrients, and mitigate ocean acidification J. Hartmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rog.20004
45. Geoengineering: Impact of Marine Cloud Brightening Control on the Extreme Temperature Change over East Asia D. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11121345
46. The hydrological cycle response to cirrus cloud thinning J. Kristjánsson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066795
47. Relevant climate response tests for stratospheric aerosol injection: A combined ethical and scientific analysis G. Lenferna et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000504
48. The Regional Hydroclimate Response to Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering and the Role of Stratospheric Heating I. Simpson et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031093
49. The impact of geoengineering on vegetation in experiment G1 of the GeoMIP S. Glienke et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024202
50. Halving warming with stratospheric aerosol geoengineering moderates policy-relevant climate hazards P. Irvine & D. Keith https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab76de
51. Converged ensemble simulations of climate: possible trends in total solar irradiance cannot explain global warming alone G. Drótos et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1240784
52. Precipitation and circulation changes in the Indian summer monsoon region under stratospheric aerosol intervention in the GLENS simulations S. Wilson & G. Bala https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ae7599
53. Key factors governing uncertainty in the response to sunshade geoengineering from a comparison of the GeoMIP ensemble and a perturbed parameter ensemble P. Irvine et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020716
54. The weakening of the tropical circulation is caused by the lifting of the tropopause height C. Fan & D. Dommenget https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06909-1
55. Global Warming: Is It (Im)Possible to Stop It? The Systems Thinking Approach P. Mella https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030705
56. Will Geoengineering With Solar Radiation Management Ever Be Used? A. Robock https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2012.685573
57. On solar geoengineering and climate uncertainty D. MacMartin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065391
58. Impacts of sea spray geoengineering on ocean biogeochemistry A. Partanen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070111
59. Shortwave radiative forcing, rapid adjustment, and feedback to the surface by sulfate geoengineering: analysis of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario H. Kashimura et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3339-2017
60. Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
61. How effective is albedo modification (solar radiation management geoengineering) in preventing sea-level rise from the Greenland Ice Sheet? P. Applegate & K. Keller https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084018
62. Influence of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering on temperature mean and precipitation extremes indices in Africa S. Obahoundje et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2021-0028
63. Climate Engineering in an Interconnected World: The Role of Tariffs M. Eigruber & F. Wirl https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-018-0261-y
64. Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering V. Aswathy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015
65. Reduction of Climate Sensitivity to Solar Forcing due to Stratospheric Ozone Feedback G. Chiodo & L. Polvani https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0721.1
66. Stratospheric ozone changes under solar geoengineering: implications for UV exposure and air quality P. Nowack et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4191-2016
67. Economic Shock in a Climate Scenario and Its Impact on Surface Temperatures Q. Ran et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002061
68. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals M. Lawrence et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3
69. Cost-Risk Trade-Off of Mitigation and Solar Geoengineering: Considering Regional Disparities Under Probabilistic Climate Sensitivity E. Roshan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0261-9
70. Biogeochemical carbon coupling influences global precipitation in geoengineering experiments J. Fyfe et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50166
71. Sensitivity of the global hydrological cycle to the altitude of stratospheric sulphate aerosol layer U. K H et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5e9d
72. Adjustments in the Forcing-Feedback Framework for Understanding Climate Change S. Sherwood et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00167.1
73. Sensitivity of tropical monsoon precipitation to the latitude of stratospheric aerosol injections K. Krishnamohan & G. Bala https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-06121-z
74. CO2-equivalence metrics for surface albedo change based on the radiative forcing concept: a critical review R. Bright & M. Lund https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9887-2021
75. A Scheme for Jointly Trading off Costs and Risks of Solar Radiation Management and Mitigation Under Long-Tailed Climate Sensitivity Probability Density Distributions E. Roshan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-021-09778-2
76. Adjustments to an abrupt solar forcing in the CMIP6 abrupt-solm4p experiment C. Lange & J. Quaas https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-10337-2025
77. Climate Response to Aerosol Geoengineering: A Multimethod Comparison H. Muri et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0620.1
78. Effects of Arctic geoengineering on precipitation in the tropical monsoon regions A. Nalam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3810-y
79. Wave Forcing of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model T. Krismer & M. Giorgetta https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0310.1
80. Global streamflow and flood response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16033-2018
81. CAS-ESM2.0 Dataset for the G1ext Experiment of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) M. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-024-4177-8
82. Gender and Geoengineering H. Buck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12083
83. Whose climate and whose ethics? Conceptions of justice in solar geoengineering modelling D. McLaren https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.021
84. Clouds dissipate quickly during solar eclipses as the land surface cools V. Trees et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01213-0
85. Comparison of the Fast and Slow Climate Response to Three Radiation Management Geoengineering Schemes L. Duan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029034
86. An investigation of the relationship between tropical monsoon precipitation changes and stratospheric sulfate aerosol optical depth A. Xavier et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgae016
87. Climate Engineering: Economic Considerations and Research Challenges G. Klepper & W. Rickels https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reu010
88. Quantifying and Comparing Effects of Climate Engineering Methods on the Earth System S. Sonntag et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000620
89. Holistic Assessment of SO2 Injections Using CESM1(WACCM): Introduction to the Special Issue B. Kravitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029293
90. Was breaking the taboo on research on climate engineering via albedo modification a moral hazard, or a moral imperative? M. Lawrence & P. Crutzen https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000463
91. Retrieving XCO2 from GOSAT FTS over East Asia Using Simultaneous Aerosol Information from CAI W. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8120994
92. Unanticipated Side Effects of Stratospheric Albedo Modification Proposals Due to Aerosol Composition and Phase D. Cziczo et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53595-3
93. Can we have it Both Ways? On Potential Trade-Offs between Mitigation and Solar Radiation Management C. Baatz https://doi.org/10.3197/096327115X14497392134847
94. Exploring the Effects of Solar Radiation Management on Water Cycling in a Coupled Land–Atmosphere Model* K. Dagon & D. Schrag https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0472.1
95. Quantifying the effects of solar geoengineering on vegetation K. Dagon & D. Schrag https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02387-9
96. Weakened tropical circulation and reduced precipitation in response to geoengineering A. Ferraro et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/014001
97. An economic evaluation of solar radiation management A. Aaheim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.106
98. Climate impacts of geoengineering in a delayed mitigation scenario S. Tilmes et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070122
99. GEOSENGINEERING AEROSOLS R. Oliynyk https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2022.82.2
100. Impacts, effectiveness and regional inequalities of the GeoMIP G1 to G4 solar radiation management scenarios X. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.02.010
101. Quasi‐Additivity of the Radiative Effects of Marine Cloud Brightening and Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Injection O. Boucher et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074647
102. Why geoengineering is not a ‘global public good’, and why it is ethically misleading to frame it as one S. Gardiner https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0764-x
103. Visions of Climate Control T. Wiertz https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915606524
104. The sensitivity of the modeled energy budget and hydrological cycle to CO2 and solar forcing N. Schaller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-253-2013
105. Solar geoengineering could substantially reduce climate risks—A research hypothesis for the next decade D. Keith & P. Irvine https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000465
106. Robustness reasoning in climate model comparisons R. O’Loughlin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.12.005
107. Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario D. Keller et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4304
108. A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models S. Tilmes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-43-2015
109. Estimation of available global solar radiation using sunshine duration over South Korea A. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.09.001
110. Tropical Pacific climate variability under solar geoengineering: impacts on ENSO extremes A. Malik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15461-2020
111. Reflecting upon 10 years of geoengineering research: Introduction to the Crutzen + 10 special issue M. Boettcher & S. Schäfer https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000521
112. Estimating the Impact of Artificially Injected Stratospheric Aerosols on the Global Mean Surface Temperature in the 21th Century S. Soldatenko https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6040085