Articles | Volume 12, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-763-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-763-2021
Research article
 | 
30 Jun 2021
Research article |  | 30 Jun 2021

Bookkeeping estimates of the net land-use change flux – a sensitivity study with the CMIP6 land-use dataset

Kerstin Hartung, Ana Bastos, Louise Chini, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Felix Havermann, George C. Hurtt, Tammas Loughran, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Tobias Nützel, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, and Julia Pongratz

Viewed

Total article views: 4,257 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,180 1,015 62 4,257 185 59 65
  • HTML: 3,180
  • PDF: 1,015
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 4,257
  • Supplement: 185
  • BibTeX: 59
  • EndNote: 65
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,257 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,915 with geography defined and 342 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Jun 2024
Short summary
In this study, we model the relative importance of several contributors to the land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) flux based on a LULCC dataset including uncertainty estimates. The uncertainty of LULCC is as relevant as applying wood harvest and gross transitions for the cumulative LULCC flux over the industrial period. However, LULCC uncertainty matters less than the other two factors for the LULCC flux in 2014; historical LULCC uncertainty is negligible for estimates of future scenarios.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint