Articles | Volume 12, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1529-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1529-2021
Research article
 | 
08 Dec 2021
Research article |  | 08 Dec 2021

How can solar geoengineering and mitigation be combined under climate targets?

Mohammad M. Khabbazan, Marius Stankoweit, Elnaz Roshan, Hauke Schmidt, and Hermann Held

Related authors

On the future role of the most parsimonious climate module in integrated assessment
Mohammad M. Khabbazan and Hermann Held
Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 135–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-135-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-135-2019, 2019
Short summary
The Role of Bioenergy and Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in the Case of Delayed Climate Policy – Insights from Cost-Risk Analysis
Jana Mintenig, Mohammad M. Khabbazan, and Hermann Held
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2017-117,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2017-117, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted

Related subject area

Management of the Earth system: integrated assessment
On the future role of the most parsimonious climate module in integrated assessment
Mohammad M. Khabbazan and Hermann Held
Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 135–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-135-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-135-2019, 2019
Short summary
A quantitative approach to evaluating the GWP timescale through implicit discount rates
Marcus C. Sarofim and Michael R. Giordano
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1013–1024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1013-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1013-2018, 2018
Short summary
The impact of uncertainty on optimal emission policies
Nicola Botta, Patrik Jansson, and Cezar Ionescu
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 525–542, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-525-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-525-2018, 2018
Short summary
Future supply and demand of net primary production in the Sahel
Florian Sallaba, Stefan Olin, Kerstin Engström, Abdulhakim M. Abdi, Niklas Boke-Olén, Veiko Lehsten, Jonas Ardö, and Jonathan W. Seaquist
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 1191–1221, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-1191-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-1191-2017, 2017
Short summary
Impacts of climate mitigation strategies in the energy sector on global land use and carbon balance
Kerstin Engström, Mats Lindeskog, Stefan Olin, John Hassler, and Benjamin Smith
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 773–799, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-773-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-773-2017, 2017
Short summary

Cited articles

Anthoff, D. and Tol, R. S. J.: The Impact of Climate Change on the Balanced Growth Equivalent: An Application of FUND, Environ. Resour. Econ., 43, 351–367, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9269-5, 2009. a
Arino, Y., Akimoto, K., Sano, F., Homma, T., Oda, J., and Tomoda, T.: Estimating option values of solar radiation management assuming that climate sensitivity is uncertain, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5886–5891, 2016. a
Asseng, S., Foster, I., and Turner, N. C.: The impact of temperature variability on wheat yields, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 997–1012, 2011. a
Bahn, O., Chesney, M., Gheyssens, J., Knutti, R., and Pana, A. C.: Is there room for geoengineering in the optimal climate policy mix?, Environ. Sci. Policy, 48, 67–76, 2015. a
Bala, G., Duffy, P., and Taylor, K.: Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 7664–7669, 2008. a, b
Download
Short summary
We ask for an optimal amount of solar radiation management (SRM) in conjunction with mitigation if global warming is limited to 2 °C and regional precipitation anomalies are confined to an amount ethically compatible with the 2 °C target. Then, compared to a scenario without regional targets, most of the SRM usage is eliminated from the portfolio even if transgressing regional targets are tolerated in terms of 1/10 of the standard deviation of natural variability.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint