Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-55
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-55
03 Aug 2020
 | 03 Aug 2020
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ESD but the revision was not accepted.

ESD Reviews: Evidence of multiple inconsistencies between representations of terrestrial and marine ecosystems in Earth System Models

Félix Pellerin, Philipp Porada, and Inga Hense

Abstract. Terrestrial and marine ecosystems interact with other Earth system components through different biosphere-climate feedbacks that are very similar among ecosystem types. Despite these similarities, terrestrial and marine systems are often treated relatively separately in Earth System Models (ESM). In these ESM, the ecosystems are represented by a set of biological processes that are able to influence the climate system by affecting the chemical and physical properties of the environment. While most of the climate-relevant processes are shared between ecosystem types, model representations of terrestrial and marine ecosystems often differ. This raises the question whether inconsistencies between terrestrial and marine ecosystem models exist and potentially skew our perception of the relative influence of each ecosystem on climate. Here we compared the terrestrial and marine modules of 17 Earth System Models in order to identify inconsistencies between the two ecosystem types. We sorted out the biological processes included in ESM regarding their influence on climate into three types of biosphere-climate feedbacks (i.e. the biogeochemical pumps, the biogeophysical mechanisms and the gas and particle shuttles), and critically compare their representation in the different ecosystem modules. Overall, we found multiple evidences of unjustified differences in process representations between terrestrial and marine ecosystem models within ESM. These inconsistencies may lead to wrong predictions about the role of biosphere in the climate system. We believe that the present comparison can be used by the Earth system modeling community to increase consistency between ecosystem models. We further call for the development of a common framework allowing the uniform representation of climate-relevant processes in ecosystem modules of ESM.

Félix Pellerin, Philipp Porada, and Inga Hense
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Félix Pellerin, Philipp Porada, and Inga Hense
Félix Pellerin, Philipp Porada, and Inga Hense

Viewed

Total article views: 1,141 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
767 341 33 1,141 46 38
  • HTML: 767
  • PDF: 341
  • XML: 33
  • Total: 1,141
  • BibTeX: 46
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Aug 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Aug 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,000 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,000 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
While several biological processes are similar among terrestrial and marine ecosystems, their representation in Earth System Models may differ. By comparing the terrestrial and marine modules of 17 Earth System Models, we found multiple evidences of unjustified differences in processes representation. These inconsistencies may lead to wrong predictions about the role of biosphere in the climate system and skew our perception of the relative influence of each ecosystem on climate.
Altmetrics