<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Earth System Dynamics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2190-4987</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/esd-9-285-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Sensitivity of the tropical climate to an interhemispheric thermal gradient: the role of tropical ocean dynamics</article-title><alt-title>Sensitivity of the tropical climate to an interhemispheric
thermal gradient</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Sensitivity of the tropical climate to an interhemispheric
thermal gradient}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~Talento and M.~Barreiro}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Talento</surname><given-names>Stefanie</given-names></name>
          <email>stefanie.talento@geogr.uni-giessen.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Barreiro</surname><given-names>Marcelo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Institute of Physics, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, 11400, Uruguay</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Geography, Climatology, Climate Dynamics and Climate Change, Justus Liebig University <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>of Giessen, 35390  Giessen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Stefanie Talento (stefanie.talento@geogr.uni-giessen.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>285</fpage><lpage>297</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018.html">This article is available from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e97">This study aims to determine the role of the tropical ocean dynamics in the
response of the climate to extratropical thermal forcing. We analyse and
compare the outcomes of coupling an atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) with two ocean models of different complexity. In the first
configuration the AGCM is coupled with a slab ocean model while in the second
a reduced gravity ocean (RGO) model is additionally coupled in the tropical
region. We find that the imposition of extratropical thermal forcing (warming in the Northern Hemisphere and cooling in the Southern Hemisphere
with zero global mean) produces, in terms of annual means, a weaker response
when the RGO is coupled, thus indicating that the tropical ocean dynamics
oppose the incoming remote signal. On the other hand, while the slab ocean
coupling does not produce significant changes to the equatorial Pacific sea
surface temperature (SST) seasonal cycle, the RGO configuration generates
strong warming in the central-eastern basin from April to August
balanced by cooling during the rest of the year, strengthening the seasonal
cycle in the eastern portion of the basin. We hypothesize that such changes
are possible via the dynamical effect that zonal wind stress has on the
thermocline depth. We also find that the imposed extratropical pattern
affects El Niño–Southern Oscillation, weakening its amplitude and
low-frequency behaviour.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e107">Paleoclimatic data (Wang et al., 2004), 20th century observations (Folland et al., 1986) and numerical simulations (Chiang and Bitz,
2005; Broccoli et al., 2006; Kang et al., 2008, 2009; Cvijanovic and Chiang, 2013; Talento and Barreiro, 2016, 2017) have all
suggested the capability of extratropical thermal forcing to affect different features of the tropical climate. While Chiang and
Bitz (2005) and Broccoli et al. (2006) were among the first to propose an atmospheric bridge mechanism connecting extratropical
forcing with a tropical response, by performing experiments with atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) thermodynamically coupled to a motionless ocean, the other
studies deepened the analysis and examined the physical mechanisms involved in the remote linkage.</p>
      <p id="d1e110">The general picture emerging from these studies is that the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) tends to shift toward the warmer
hemisphere at the same time that the atmospheric energy transport is modified to favour the transmission of energy to the colder
hemisphere. For example, if the net energy input into the Northern Hemisphere (NH) is higher than into the Southern Hemisphere (SH) an
interhemispheric thermal contrast is generated.  This interhemispheric thermal gradient (ITG) triggers an atmospheric response through
changes in the Hadley circulation, leading to a partially compensating cross-equatorial southward energy flux and a southward shift of
the ITCZ. Schneider et al. (2014) analyse the ITCZ displacements from an energy flux perspective, and find an anti-correlation between
the latitude of the ITCZ and the cross-equatorial atmospheric energy transport.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e115"><bold>(a, b)</bold> De-meaned SST seasonal cycle from NOAA SST
data (Smith et al., 2008) in the equatorial
Pacific (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 150–270<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and
Atlantic (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 320–345<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) respectively. <bold>(c, d)</bold> De-meaned SST seasonal cycle
for <italic>Control_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> in the equatorial Pacific and Atlantic respectively. Contour interval:
0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e209">First SVD pattern of SST and near-surface winds in the tropical Pacific Ocean (30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
120–300<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) for the <italic>Control_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> experiment <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and NOAA SST and reanalysis
data (<bold>b</bold>, <bold>d</bold>, <bold>g</bold>; Smith et al., 2008; Kalnay et al., 2006). <bold>(a, b)</bold> Spatial pattern; contour interval 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. <bold>(c, d)</bold> Histogram showing phase-locking to the
seasonal cycle. <bold>(e, f)</bold> Spectral analysis; the red line indicates the red-noise spectrum.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e292">Forcing pattern. The sign convention is positive out of sea.  Contour interval 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e320">Annual mean anomalies with respect to the control of NSAT for <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>Forced_slab</italic> and <bold>(b)</bold>
<italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic>. Contour interval 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e363">Annual mean anomalies with respect to the control of precipitation for <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>Forced_slab</italic> and <bold>(b)</bold>
<italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic>. Contour interval 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">month</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e415">Annual mean anomalies with respect to the control of near-surface (950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) wind for <bold>(a)</bold>
<italic>Forced_slab</italic> and <bold>(b)</bold> <italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic>. Contour interval 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e473">Northward atmospheric energy transport for the experiments: <italic>Control_slab</italic>, <italic>Control_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic>,
<italic>Forced_slab</italic> and <italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e517">Seasonal SST and near-surface wind anomalies with respect to the control for <italic>Forced_slab</italic> <bold>(a, c, e, g)</bold> and
<italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> <bold>(b, d, f, h)</bold>. <bold>(a, b)</bold> December–February; <bold>(c, d)</bold> March–May; <bold>(e, f)</bold>
June–August; <bold>(g, h)</bold> September–November. Contour interval 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e572">Equatorial Pacific Ocean (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 150–270<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) de-meaned near-surface (950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) zonal wind anomalies seasonal cycle for <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>Forced_slab</italic> and <bold>(b)</bold>
<italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> experiments. Contour interval: 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p id="d1e658">Equatorial Pacific Ocean (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 150–270<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) de-meaned SST anomalies seasonal cycle
for <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>Forced_slab</italic> and <bold>(b)</bold> <italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> experiments. Contour
interval: 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p id="d1e728">Equatorial Pacific Ocean (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 150–270<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) de-meaned thermocline depth anomalies
seasonal cycle for the <italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> experiment. Contour interval: 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e787">First SVD pattern of SST and near-surface winds in the tropical Pacific Ocean (30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
120–300<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) for the <italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> experiments. <bold>(a)</bold> Spatial pattern; contour
interval 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. <bold>(b)</bold> Histogram showing phase-locking to the seasonal cycle. <bold>(c)</bold> Spectral analysis; the red
line indicates the red-noise spectrum.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/9/285/2018/esd-9-285-2018-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page286?><p id="d1e855">Talento and Barreiro (2016) use an AGCM coupled to a slab ocean model to quantify the relative
roles of the atmosphere, tropical sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and continental surface temperatures in the ITCZ response to
extratropical thermal forcing. They find that if the tropical SSTs are not allowed to change, then the ITCZ response strongly weakens
(although not negligible), particularly over the Atlantic Ocean and Africa. If, in addition, the land surface temperature over
Africa is maintained the ITCZ response completely vanishes, indicating that the ITCZ response to the extratropical forcing is not
possible just through purely atmospheric processes, but rather it needs the involvement of either the tropical SST or the continental surface
temperatures. With the same model configuration, Talento and Barreiro (2017) focus on the South Atlantic convergence zone (SACZ) and
show that, during its peak in austral summer, its response to warming in the NH extratropics and cooling in the SH extratropics
consists of weakening, mostly due to the NH component of the forcing. Both studies showed strong changes in the tropical band where
SST, surface winds and precipitation are strongly coupled. Nevertheless, in these studies important ocean dynamics are missing as the
slab ocean can only simulate the thermodynamic exchange between the atmosphere and the ocean.</p>
      <p id="d1e858">Chiang et al. (2008) explore the impact of an ITG on the tropical Pacific climate through simulations performed with an AGCM coupled to
a medium-complexity ocean model: a reduced gravity ocean (RGO) model. They find that when the NH is warmer than the SH, the annual mean
equatorial zonal SST gradient strengthens, associated with an earlier onset and a later retreat of the seasonal cold tongue together
with an intensification during the peak cold season. They also find that El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) activity is sensitive
to the ITG, with small ITG optimal for the development of ENSO activity.</p>
      <p id="d1e862">Lee et al. (2015) also use an AGCM coupled to an RGO model and analyse the impact of the glacial continental ice sheet topography on the
tropical Pacific climate. They suggest that the thickness of the ice sheets, separate from the ice albedo effect, has a considerable
impact on the tropical climate. They identify two types of responses: a quasi-linear response directly associated with the topographic
changes and a nonlinear response mediated through the tropical thermocline adjustment. They find that increasing the thickness of the
continental ice sheets produces a southward displacement<?pagebreak page287?> of the ITCZ and a weakening of the equatorial zonal SST gradient, caused by
cooling (warming) in the western (eastern) equatorial Pacific, together with the thermocline deepening to the east. They note that the
energy flux approach proposed in Kang et al. (2008, 2009) and Cvijanovic and Chiang (2013) does not appear to explain the ITCZ shifts
in these experiments because even though the northern cross-equatorial energy transport increases with the ice thickness, the
mid-latitude transport decreases.</p>
      <p id="d1e865">Although most of the simulation studies on extratropical to tropical teleconnections focus on just one ocean model at a time, there is
recent literature analysing the subject in a hierarchy of ocean model configurations.</p>
      <p id="d1e868">Kay et al. (2016) study the effect of Southern Ocean cooling on the tropical precipitation, coupling an AGCM either<?pagebreak page288?> to a slab or to
a full oceanic model. They find that with dynamic ocean heat transport the tropical precipitation response is weaker with, in this
case, most of the cross-equatorial heat transport carried out by the ocean and not by the atmosphere. Similar conclusions are obtained
by Hawcroft et al. (2017) and Tomas et al. (2016) with different fully coupled models, suggesting that the results are not model
specific. In the same direction, Green and Marshall (2017) perform a series of idealized simulations in aqua-planet mode with an AGCM
coupled either to a dynamic or to a slab ocean model while an ITG is applied. They find that the oceanic circulation dampens the ITCZ
shift in response to the ITG by a factor of 4 compared to the case when the ocean circulation is not allowed to respond to the
forcing. They find that with a dynamic ocean the mechanical coupling of the tropical atmospheric and oceanic energy transport (through
Ekman balance) ensures that the ocean circulation always transports energy across the Equator in the same direction as the atmosphere
does, therefore helping offset the imposed thermal contrast and not requiring for the atmosphere to transport as much energy as when
the ocean circulation is fixed.</p>
      <p id="d1e871">From a theoretical perspective, Schneider (2017) confirms the simulation results and derives a quantitative framework that shows that
the Ekman coupling of atmospheric and oceanic energy fluxes dampens the response of the ITCZ and calculates that, in the current
climate in the zonal and annual mean, the factor of damping by Ekman coupling is of the order of 3.</p>
      <p id="d1e874">To complement the results of the previously mentioned studies here we propose to analyse the tropical response to extratropical
thermal forcing in a hierarchy of ocean model configurations, but by using an intermediate-complexity ocean model coupled only in the
tropical oceans: an RGO model. These simulations, therefore, represent an additional and intermediate step into understanding the
tropical ocean dynamics' role in the extratropical to tropical communication process.</p>
      <p id="d1e877">The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we describe the models used, with special emphasis on the description of the RGO model
and its validation against observational data. The experiments performed are explained in Sect. 3. The results can be found in Sect. 4,
differentiated regarding changes<?pagebreak page289?> in annual mean, seasonal cycle or ENSO. The summary and conclusions are presented in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e886">The atmospheric model used in this study is the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) AGCM (Molteni, 2003;
Kucharski et al., 2006), which is a full atmospheric model with simplified physics. We use the model version 40 in its eight-layer
configuration and T30 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.75</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.75</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) horizontal resolution. The model includes parameterizations of:
large-scale condensation, shallow and deep convection, shortwave radiation (using two spectral bands), longwave radiation (using
four
spectral bands), surface fluxes of momentum, heat and moisture and vertical diffusion. Present-day boundary surface conditions,
orbital parameters and greenhouse forcing are used.</p>
      <p id="d1e909">We analyse the outcomes of coupling the AGCM with two ocean models of different complexity. In the first configuration the AGCM is
coupled with a slab ocean model; a monthly varying ocean heat flux correction (derived from a previous 30-year model integration with
identical settings but with prescribed observed SSTs) is imposed in order to keep the simulated SST close to present-day conditions. In
the second configuration, and in order to better reproduce the tropical ocean dynamics, an RGO model is coupled in the tropical region (30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), while a slab ocean model is applied elsewhere. In this setup an annual-mean ocean heat flux
correction is imposed in order to keep the simulated SST close to present-day conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e930">We proceed to describe the RGO model and to validate its results by comparison with observational analogous.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>RGO model formulation and validation</title>
      <p id="d1e938">We use an extension of the classical 1.5-layer RGO model, introduced by Cane (1979) to study the ENSO phenomenon. The extension of
the model, as in Chang (1994), includes thermodynamics of the upper ocean and allows for the prediction of the SST.</p>
      <p id="d1e941">The model consists of a 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth upper layer in which mass, heat
and momentum obey the conservation laws and<?pagebreak page290?> a lower layer of infinite depth
in which the velocity must be null so that the kinetic energy is finite. The
approximation is reasonable for the tropical ocean because of the existence
of a sharp thermocline which inhibits the downward propagation of waves
generated in the upper ocean (Zebiak, 1985). To better predict changes of the
SST, a linear and homogeneous frictional layer (assumed to concentrate most
of the induced Ekman transport) is added to the model. The subsurface
temperature is parameterized in terms of the thermocline depth, the observed
annual mean temperature at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth (from Levitus, 1982) and the
annual mean thermocline depth when the model is forced by observed wind
stress.</p>
      <p id="d1e958">The resolution of the RGO model is 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude and 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in longitude, applied in the 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
tropical band. The model is run using an anomaly coupling strategy. In this strategy, the oceanic and atmospheric components of the
model exchange momentum and heat flux anomalies computed relative to their own model annual mean. The modelled anomalies are then
superimposed on the observed annual mean. Sponge layers of 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> width are introduced at the northern and southern boundaries to
eliminate artificial coastal Kelvin waves.</p>
      <p id="d1e1006">A 70-year control simulation in which the AGCM is coupled to the RGO in the tropics and to the slab ocean model elsewhere is
produced. The last 50 years of the control run are used for averaging and comparison with observational analogues. We use the NOAA
Extended Reconstructed SST V3b (Smith et al., 2008) and the near-surface winds from the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis (Kalnay et al., 2006), for
the period 1979–2013.</p>
      <p id="d1e1010">With the imposed heat flux correction, the annual mean SST in the control simulation strongly resembles the observed pattern (not
shown). In addition, the model reasonably captures the main characteristics of the seasonal cycle in the equatorial (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) Pacific and Atlantic oceans (Fig. 1), although in the equatorial Pacific the de-meaned (annual mean
removed) simulated SST seasonal cycle is weaker than in the observations. Also, the Pacific cold tongue is not well developed during SH
summer.</p>
      <p id="d1e1031">The control simulation also reproduces the main mode of variability in the tropical Pacific Ocean quite realistically both in the
spatial and temporal domains (Fig. 2; please note that in all the latitude–longitude maps in the manuscript the land and sea mask used
by the model is the one depicted).  The first coupled pattern arising from a singular value decomposition (SVD) of the monthly SST and
surface wind characterizes ENSO and explains 81 % (62 %) of the variability in the observations (simulation). The simulated
pattern is weaker than the observed, with the SST anomaly maximum located too far eastward. The phase-locking to the seasonal cycle of
the simulated pattern peaks during the end of the calendar year as it does in the observations, but its distribution is more uniform
throughout the year. Both simulated and observed spectra show statistically significant peaks relative to a red-noise null hypothesis
from 16 to 60 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Experimental design</title>
      <p id="d1e1041">For each model configuration two runs are produced: a control run (in which no forcing is applied) and a forced run (in which
extratropical forcing is imposed). The applied forcing pattern consists of cooling in one hemisphere and warming in the other poleward
of 40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, applied only over ocean grid points, and with a resulting global average forcing equal to zero. This pattern is similar
to the one used in Kang<?pagebreak page291?> et al. (2008) and in Talento and Barreiro (2016), and it is intended to represent the asymmetric temperature
changes associated with glacial–interglacial and millennial-scale climate variability as well as the asymmetric SST pattern
characteristic of the global warming trend. The forcing pattern is superimposed on a background state and is obtained as explained in
Talento and Barreiro (2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e1053">The forcing pattern is shown in Fig. 3, in which sign convention is positive out of sea and, therefore, positive values of the forcing
could be considered to represent a situation where the atmosphere is dry and colder than the ocean below it so that there is a strong
ocean-to-atmosphere net heat flux. This forcing generates a near-surface temperature (NSAT) anomaly response of up to 16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) over the north Atlantic Ocean at 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (over the Ross Sea), as shown in Fig. 4. For comparison, in
a climate simulation of the last 21 000 years (TRACE2k experiment, He, 2011) anomalies of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) are
obtained over the North Atlantic (Antarctica) during Heinrich stadial 1, 18 000 to 15 000 years ago.</p>
      <p id="d1e1116">As mentioned before we use two ocean models. When the AGCM is coupled to
a slab ocean model, the experiments are named <italic>Control_slab</italic> and
<italic>Forced_slab</italic>. If an RGO is used in the tropical band while the slab
ocean model is applied elsewhere, the corresponding experiments are named
<italic>Control_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> and
<italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic>. In all the simulations the model
was run for 70 years and the last 50 are used for averaging. Running the
simulations for 70 years proved to be more than enough to reach the
equilibrium; a timescale of 10 years was estimated to be the time span
necessary for adjustment. In Table 1 we summarize the experiments. All the
data are publicly available in Talento and
Barreiro (2018).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1155">Experiment summary.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ocean model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Forcing pattern H</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Control_slab</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slab ocean model globally</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">no forcing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Forced_slab</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slab ocean model globally</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">extratropical forcing,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">as in Fig. 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Control_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RGO model in 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">no forcing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slab ocean model elsewhere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RGO model in 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">extratropical forcing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slab ocean model elsewhere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">as in Fig. 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1334">First we analyse and compare the annual mean anomalies generated by the extratropical forcing with the two configurations
implemented. Second, we will focus on the tropical Pacific climate and study the changes produced in the seasonal cycle for both
setups. Finally, we will briefly investigate possible changes in ENSO activity when the RGO is coupled in the tropical oceans.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Annual means</title>
      <p id="d1e1342">In this subsection we compare the results obtained with the two implemented configurations in terms of annual means of different
fields. The results are presented in the form of anomalies with respect to the corresponding control case.</p>
      <p id="d1e1345">Figure 4 shows the near-surface air temperature (NSAT) changes with respect
to the corresponding control for the two configurations. In both experiments
there is generalized warming (cooling) in the NH (SH), while in the southern
tropics a strengthening of the zonal gradient is evident. The most pronounced
differences between the two configurations are seen in the tropical region,
in which the slab plus rgo configuration
anomalies tend to be up to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C weaker than the slab configuration
anomalies. In particular, the<?pagebreak page292?> equatorial Pacific cooling seen in the slab
configuration is no longer present in the rgo <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> slab configuration, and
the southeastern ocean basins do not cool as much. This suggests that,
overall, tropical ocean dynamics tend to oppose changes in the annual mean
conditions. In the extratropics the differences between the two
configurations are barely noticeable, although regions of up to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
are noted in the vicinity of the Antarctic Peninsula and Greenland.</p>
      <p id="d1e1373"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>As a consequence, tropical changes in precipitation are weaker when using the RGO: while in both experiments the most pronounced
feature is a northward shift of the ITCZ, anomalies for the slab <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rgo configuration are much weaker (Fig. 5). Also, in the slab
configuration strong changes of tropical precipitation are found equally over the three ocean basins, but for the slab <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rgo setup
the most intense anomalies are seen over the Atlantic Ocean concurrent with a still relatively strong cross-equatorial SST gradient,
suggesting a larger role for continental <?pagebreak page293?>temperatures in controlling the position of the ITCZ (as in Talento and Barreiro, 2016).
Changes in the subtropical convergence zones are also weaker in the slab <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rgo configuration, differently from the southward shift
seen in the slab configuration. In particular for the case of the South Atlantic convergence zone, this result is consistent with
Talento and Barreiro (2016), which showed that during southern summer the weakening of the SACZ is related to the development of
a region of strong rainfall in the tropical north Atlantic.</p>
      <p id="d1e1398">As expected from the above results, both experiments present similar patterns of near-surface (950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) wind anomalies (Fig. 6): anomalous northward winds associated with the ITCZ northward displacement in the tropics, and anomalous westerly winds over
the Southern Ocean. The <italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> response is weaker in the tropics but stronger over the Southern
Ocean, compared to the <italic>Forced_slab</italic> response. Similar pictures of a weaker response in the case of slab <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rgo configuration
can be seen in upper-level winds, mean sea level pressure and mass stream-function (not shown).</p>
      <p id="d1e1433">To summarize, in Fig. 7 we present the northward atmospheric energy transport for the control and forced runs in the two configurations
implemented. As can be seen, while the control runs display almost identical transport, the forced runs significantly disagree in
magnitude in the tropical region, with the slab <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rgo configuration producing the weakest changes with a decrease of the transport
toward the southern high latitudes, representing damping by a factor of 1.9. In the perturbed runs, the energy flux equator is
located around 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) for the slab (slab <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RGO) configuration, equivalent to a damping in the shift by
a factor of 1.5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Seasonal cycle</title>
      <p id="d1e1474">As the previous subsection showed, the most pronounced differences between the two implemented configurations are found in the tropical
band.  Therefore, for the analysis of variations in the seasonal cycle we will focus on the 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N region.</p>
      <p id="d1e1495">Three-month means of SST and near-surface wind changes for the tropics are shown in Fig. 8. In the Pacific Ocean, for the
<italic>Forced_slab</italic> experiment negative SST anomalies are seen reaching the Equator (or even more to the north) in all four seasons,
September–November (SON) being the period of strongest cooling and June–August (JJA) being the period in which the negative anomalies
have the weakest penetration into the NH. Meanwhile, for the <italic>Forced_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> experiment the negative SST
anomalies barely reach the Equator and, in fact, positive anomalies are the ones penetrating into the SH for the seasons March–May (MAM) and JJA. Consistent with these changes in response, the equatorial anomalous winds in the slab configuration are mainly
easterlies throughout the year, while in the slab <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rgo configuration they have a marked northward component and are eastward during
MAM season. Also, the equatorial Atlantic tends to warm up during most of the year when using the RGO model.</p>
      <p id="d1e1521">Equatorial (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) de-meaned seasonal cycles for near-surface zonal wind and SST anomalies in the Pacific basin
for the two experimental configurations are shown in Figs. 9 and 10 respectively. In <italic>Forced_slab</italic> there are eastward (westward) near-surface wind anomalies from December to May (June to November) distributed along the basin. The positive wind anomalies
in the <italic>Forced_slab</italic> are quite uniform along the basin, although there are maximums in the western and eastern ends during
December–February (DJF). The negative anomalies during the second half of the year are maximal in the central-eastern basin. In the
slab configuration, the equatorial SST response to these wind anomalies is, however, very weak (Fig. 10a). On the other hand, when the
RGO is coupled (and although the annual mean anomalies were even weaker than for the slab configuration; Fig. 4) there are substantial
changes occurring to the seasonal cycle of SST in the central-eastern basin: from April to August (October to December) the forced
run produces warming (cooling) of up to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). The location and timing of these anomalies lead to
a substantial strengthening of the SST seasonal cycle in the eastern Pacific Ocean (overlap Fig. 10b on the
<italic>Control_slab</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rgo</italic> SST seasonal cycle shown in Fig. 1c).</p>
      <p id="d1e1587">The thermocline depth shows consistent changes when the RGO is used (Fig. 11): a deepening in the east of the basin starting around
March and finishing in July, consistent with the warmer SSTs seen in the region (with 1-month lag). Considering the wind anomalies of
the slab setup (Fig. 9a) as the forcing pattern for the ocean dynamics derived from the extratropical signal, this thermocline-deepening
pulse appears to be initiated during the SH summer in the west of the basin (due to a weakening of the trades) and is
propagated eastward as a Kelvin wave, reaching the eastern boundary 2–3 months later. The deepening of the eastern Pacific thermocline
is concurrent with a shallowing in the western<?pagebreak page294?> Pacific particularly from May to July, and vice versa (but less obvious) in other
seasons of the year. In the second half of the year the strengthening of the trades locally shallows the thermocline in the eastern
Pacific and the western Pacific recovers its mean depth.</p>
      <p id="d1e1591">In summary, the equatorial near-surface zonal wind changes caused by the extratropical forcing seen in the slab configuration induce
dynamical ocean–atmosphere coupling that generates seasonal changes in the SST field when the RGO is used. This results in late
austral autumn warming and cooling in spring and summer in the equatorial eastern Pacific, leading to a strengthening of the SST
seasonal cycle with consistent changes in the thermocline depth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>ENSO</title>
      <p id="d1e1600">In this subsection we investigate how the interannual variability in the tropical Pacific is affected by the interhemispheric SST
gradient induced by the imposed forcing.</p>
      <p id="d1e1603">The leading pattern of co-variability of SST and near-surface wind in the tropical Pacific basin when the extratropical forcing is
applied is weaker than that obtained when no forcing is implemented (Figs. 12a and 2a), and it explains a smaller percentage of the total
variability (46 % compared to 62 %). The phase-locking to the seasonal cycle (Figs. 12b and 2c) is also modified, being more
uniformly distributed and with a peak season from July to the end of the calendar<?pagebreak page295?> year. The frequency spectrum of the ENSO
pattern under the effect of the extratropical forcing is characterized by shorter periods than in the absence of the forcing and has
a peak at 24 months (Figs. 12c and 2e).</p>
      <p id="d1e1606">The weakening of the ENSO activity can be understood in relation to the changes produced by the extratropical forcing on the SST
seasonal cycle in the eastern Pacific Ocean. According to the nonlinear frequency entrainment mechanism (Chang et al., 1994) ENSO
amplitude is anticorrelated with the strength of the SST seasonal cycle. The frequency entrainment implies that a self-exciting
oscillator (like ENSO) will give up its intrinsic mode of oscillation in the presence of strong external forcing (like a strong
seasonal SST cycle) and acquire the frequency of the applied oscillating forcing. Therefore, in our case, as the extratropical forcing
generates significant strengthening of the eastern Pacific SST seasonal cycle, a weakening of ENSO is expected according to this
mechanism.</p>
      <p id="d1e1609">Assuming linear behaviour holds, our result of ENSO weakening is also in agreement with Timmermann et al. (2007). These authors
analyse fully coupled GCMs in the context of an Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) slowdown, producing generalized
cooling of the NH and warming in the SH, and find that most of the models predict a ENSO intensification attributed to a seasonal cycle
weakening. The weakening of ENSO activity in the presence of a northward ITG is also consistent with the work of Chiang
et al. (2008),
who use an AGCM coupled to an RGO model, a model configuration similar to ours. Although they do not attempt to explain the causes, they
find that ENSO is sensitive to ITG with maximal activity when the ITG is close to zero and a weakened performance as the gradient
increases in any direction.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1619">We investigated and compared the response of the tropical climate to extratropical thermal forcing in a hierarchy of models in which
an AGCM was coupled either to a simple slab ocean model (just thermodynamic coupling) globally or with a combination of an RGO model in
the tropical oceans and a slab ocean model elsewhere.</p>
      <p id="d1e1622">First, we found that the two model configurations lead to considerably different climate responses. In particular, in tropical regions
the signal produced in the RGO coupling case is weaker in terms of annual means, indicating that regional dynamical air–sea
interaction opposes the remote signal. This result is in agreement with the quantitative framework proposed by Schneider (2017), who
calculates an expression for the damping of the ITCZ shift in the case of atmosphere–ocean mechanical coupling. In addition, our result
also agrees with the simulation experiments performed by Kay et al. (2016) and Green and Marshall (2017), who also obtained a weaker
tropical response when using a fully coupled model than when the AGCM is only coupled to a slab model, therefore indicating that the
ITCZ shift damping is also seen when an intermediate-complexity ocean model is coupled only in the tropics. In our experiments the
energy flux equator (which can be regarded as an approximation for the ITCZ latitude) shift dampens by a factor of 1.5 in the case when
tropical ocean dynamics are included, while the southward atmospheric energy transport experiences a damping by a factor of 1.9. In the
simulations by Green and Marshall (2017) and in the quantitative work of Schneider (2017) the damping factors for the ITCZ shift were 4
and 3 respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e1625">However, although the annual mean anomalies produced by the RGO setup are weaker, we find that the changes in the SST seasonal cycle
are larger. In particular, over the equatorial Pacific Ocean, while the slab configuration produces no changes to the SST seasonal
cycle, the RGO addition generates profound warming in the central-eastern basin from April to August balanced by cooling in the
rest of the year, yielding almost null integration in the annual mean but also implying a significant strengthening of the seasonal
cycle in the eastern Pacific. The response of the seasonal cycle to the imposed extratropical forcing is qualitatively similar to the
one obtained by Chiang et al. (2008) in similar experiments, although in our case positive SST anomalies reach the eastern boundary of
the basin preventing earlier onset of the seasonal cold tongue as found by these authors in their simulations. We hypothesize that
the changes in the SST seasonal cycle are possible via the effect that the zonal wind stress has on the thermocline depth: the remote
forcing produces positive anomalies of zonal wind stress to be exerted in the first half of the calendar year; in particular, the
significant weakening of the trades over the western portion of the basin around February and March induces a thermocline-deepening
pulse that propagates eastward in the form of a Kelvin wave, reaching the eastern boundary 2 months later, and generating warming of
the SST over that region as a result. In the second half of the year stronger trades in the central-eastern basin shallow the
thermocline producing local cooling of the SST. Since these mechanisms are not available under the slab configuration, the wind
stress seasonal cycle changes are not able to produce any SST changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e1628">Finally, within the RGO setup, we briefly analysed possible changes in ENSO
activity and found that under the effect of the extratropical forcing,
considerable changes are produced in both the spatial and temporal domains
with a weaker SST pattern and a time series that lacks low-frequency
variability. We hypothesized that the weakening of the ENSO activity
concurrent with the intensification of the SST seasonal cycle in the eastern
equatorial Pacific Ocean could be due to the frequency entrainment mechanism.
As future climate projections tend to agree on the fact that global warming
will have an important northward ITG component (NH warming faster than the
SH; Friedman et al., 2013), the possible sensitivity of ENSO to ITG is of
utmost relevance. However,<?pagebreak page296?> current state-of-the-art fully coupled climate
models do not seem to agree on the projected future changes in ENSO
characteristics, and no clear evidence for a correlation with ITG has been
detected in future climate projections (Stevenson, 2012; Taschetto et al.,
2014).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1636">Data sets, codes and analysis scripts
used in this study can be obtained from <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ABRY8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17605/OSF.IO/ABRY8</ext-link> (Talento
and Barreiro, 2018).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1645">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1651">Part of this work was performed while the first author was supported by Universidad de la República, Agencia Nacional de
Investigación e Innovación (ANII, Uruguay) and the Belmont Forum and JPI-Climate Collaborative Research Action “INTEGRATE,
An integrated data-model study of interactions between tropical monsoons and extratropical climate variability and
extremes”. Comments by two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Ben Kravitz<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Broccoli, A. J., Dahl, K. A., and Stouffer, R. J.: Response of the ITCZ to Northern Hemisphere cooling,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L01702, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024546" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL024546</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Cane, M. A.: The response of an equatorial ocean to simple wind stress patterns. I-Model formulation and analytic
results. II – Numerical results, J. Mar. Res., 37, 233–299, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Chang, P.: A study of the seasonal cycle of sea surface temperature in the tropical Pacific Ocean using reduced gravity
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 99, 7725–7741, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Chang, P., Wang, B., Li, T., and Ji, L.: Interactions between the seasonal cycle and the Southern Oscillation-Frequency
entrainment and chaos in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2817–2820, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chiang, J. C. and Bitz, C. M.: Influence of high latitude ice cover on the marine Intertropical Convergence Zone,
Clim. Dynam., 25, 477–496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0040-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-005-0040-5</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chiang, J. C., Fang, Y., and Chang, P.: Interhemispheric thermal gradient and tropical Pacific climate,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L14704, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034166" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034166</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Cvijanovic, I. and Chiang, J. C.: Global energy budget changes to high latitude North Atlantic cooling and the tropical
ITCZ response, Clim. Dynam., 40, 1435–1452, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Folland, C. K., Palmer, T. N., and Parker, D. E.: Sahel rainfall and worldwide sea temperatures, 1901–85, Nature, 320,
602–607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/320602a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/320602a0</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Friedman, A. R., Hwang, Y. T., Chiang, J. C., and Frierson, D. M.:
Interhemispheric temperature asymmetry over the twentieth century and in
future projections, J. Climate, 26, 5419–5433,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00525.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00525.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Green, B. and Marshall, J.: Coupling of trade winds with ocean circulation damps ITCZ shifts, J. Climate, 30, 4395–4411,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0818.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0818.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Hawcroft, M., Haywood, J. M., Collins, M., Jones, A., Jones, A. C., and Stephens, G.: Southern Ocean albedo,
inter-hemispheric energy transports and the double ITCZ: global impacts of biases in a coupled model, Clim. Dynam., 48, 2279–2295,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>He, F.: Simulating Transient Climate Evolution of the Last Deglaciation with CCSM3, PhD Thesis, University of
Wisconsin-Madison, <uri>http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/paleo/Notes/TRACE/he_phd_092010-1.pdf</uri> (last access: 16 March 2018), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project. B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Kang, S. M., Held, I. M., Frierson, D. M., and Zhao, M.: The response of the ITCZ to extratropical thermal forcing:
idealized slab-ocean experiments with a GCM, J. Climate, 21, 3521–3532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2146.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JCLI2146.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Kang, S. M., Frierson, D. M., and Held, I. M.: The tropical response to extratropical thermal forcing in an idealized GCM:
the importance of radiative feedbacks and convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2812–2827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS2924.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JAS2924.1</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Kay, J. E., Wall, C., Yettella, V., Medeiros, B., Hannay, C., Caldwell, P., and Bitz, C.: Global climate impacts of fixing
the Southern Ocean shortwave radiation bias in the Community Earth System Model (CESM), J. Climate, 29, 4617–4636, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Kucharski, F., Molteni, F., and Bracco, A.: Decadal interactions between the western tropical Pacific and the North
Atlantic Oscillation, Clim. Dynam., 26, 79–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0085-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-005-0085-5</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Lee, S. Y., Chiang, J. C., and Chang, P.: Tropical Pacific response to continental ice sheet topography, Clim. Dynam., 44,
2429–2446, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Levitus, S.: Climatological atlas of the world ocean, NOAA Prof. Pap. 13, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC,
1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Molteni, F.: Atmospheric simulations using a GCM with simplified physical parametrizations. I: Model climatology and
variability in multi-decadal experiments, Clim. Dynam., 20, 175–191, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, T.: Feedback of atmospheric ocean coupling on shifts of the intertropical convergence zone,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 11644–11653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL075817</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Schneider, T., Bischoff, T., and Haug, G. H.: Migrations and dynamics of the intertropical convergence zone, Nature, 513,
45–53, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, T. M., Reynolds, R. W., Peterson, T. C., and Lawrimore, J.:
Improvements to NOAA's historical merged land-ocean surface temperature
analysis (1880–2006), J. Climate, 21, 2283–2296, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page297?><ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Stevenson, S. L.: Significant changes to ENSO strength and impacts in the twenty-first century: results from CMIP5,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L17703, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052759" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052759</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Talento, S. and Barreiro, M.: Simulated sensitivity of the tropical climate to extratropical thermal forcing: tropical
SSTs and African land surface, Clim. Dynam., 47, 1091–1110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2890-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-015-2890-9</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Talento, S. and Barreiro, M.: Control of the South Atlantic Convergence Zone by extratropical thermal forcing,
Clim. Dynam., 50, 885–900, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3647-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-017-3647-4</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Talento, S. and Barreiro, M.: Data: Sensitivity of the tropical climate to an
interhemispheric thermal gradient: the role of tropical ocean dynamics,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ABRY8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17605/OSF.IO/ABRY8</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Taschetto, A. S., Gupta, A. S., Jourdain, N. C., Santoso, A., Ummenhofer, C. C., and England, M. H.: Cold tongue and warm
pool ENSO events in CMIP5: mean state and future projections, J. Climate, 27, 2861–2885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00437.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00437.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Timmermann, A., Okumura, Y., An, S.-I., Clement, A., Dong, B., Guilyardi, E., Hu, A., Jungclaus, J. H., Renold, M.,
Stocker, T. F., Stouffer, R. J., Sutton, R., Xie, S.-P., and Yin, J.: The influence of a weakening of the Atlantic meridional
overturning circulation on ENSO, J. Climate, 20, 4899–4919, 2007.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Tomas, R. A., Deser, C., and Sun, L.: The role of ocean heat transport in the global climate response to projected Arctic
sea ice loss, J. Climate, 29, 6841–6859, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0651.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0651.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Auler, A. S., Edwards, R. L., Cheng, H., Cristalli, P. S., Smart, P. L., Richards, D. A., and Shen, C. C.: Wet
periods in northeastern Brazil over the past 210 kyr linked to distant climate anomalies, Nature, 432, 740–743,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature03067</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Zebiak, S. E.: Tropical atmosphere-ocean interaction and the El
Niño/Southern Oscillation Phenomenon, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Sensitivity of the tropical climate to an interhemispheric thermal gradient: the role of tropical ocean dynamics</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>This study aims to determine the role of the tropical ocean dynamics in the
response of the climate to extratropical thermal forcing. We analyse and
compare the outcomes of coupling an atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) with two ocean models of different complexity. In the first
configuration the AGCM is coupled with a slab ocean model while in the second
a reduced gravity ocean (RGO) model is additionally coupled in the tropical
region. We find that the imposition of extratropical thermal forcing (warming in the Northern Hemisphere and cooling in the Southern Hemisphere
with zero global mean) produces, in terms of annual means, a weaker response
when the RGO is coupled, thus indicating that the tropical ocean dynamics
oppose the incoming remote signal. On the other hand, while the slab ocean
coupling does not produce significant changes to the equatorial Pacific sea
surface temperature (SST) seasonal cycle, the RGO configuration generates
strong warming in the central-eastern basin from April to August
balanced by cooling during the rest of the year, strengthening the seasonal
cycle in the eastern portion of the basin. We hypothesize that such changes
are possible via the dynamical effect that zonal wind stress has on the
thermocline depth. We also find that the imposed extratropical pattern
affects El Niño–Southern Oscillation, weakening its amplitude and
low-frequency behaviour.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Broccoli, A. J., Dahl, K. A., and Stouffer, R. J.: Response of the ITCZ to Northern Hemisphere cooling,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L01702, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024546" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024546</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Cane, M. A.: The response of an equatorial ocean to simple wind stress patterns. I-Model formulation and analytic
results. II – Numerical results, J. Mar. Res., 37, 233–299, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Chang, P.: A study of the seasonal cycle of sea surface temperature in the tropical Pacific Ocean using reduced gravity
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 99, 7725–7741, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Chang, P., Wang, B., Li, T., and Ji, L.: Interactions between the seasonal cycle and the Southern Oscillation-Frequency
entrainment and chaos in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2817–2820, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation> Chiang, J. C. and Bitz, C. M.: Influence of high latitude ice cover on the marine Intertropical Convergence Zone,
Clim. Dynam., 25, 477–496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0040-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0040-5</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation> Chiang, J. C., Fang, Y., and Chang, P.: Interhemispheric thermal gradient and tropical Pacific climate,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L14704, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034166" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034166</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Cvijanovic, I. and Chiang, J. C.: Global energy budget changes to high latitude North Atlantic cooling and the tropical
ITCZ response, Clim. Dynam., 40, 1435–1452, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Folland, C. K., Palmer, T. N., and Parker, D. E.: Sahel rainfall and worldwide sea temperatures, 1901–85, Nature, 320,
602–607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/320602a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/320602a0</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Friedman, A. R., Hwang, Y. T., Chiang, J. C., and Frierson, D. M.:
Interhemispheric temperature asymmetry over the twentieth century and in
future projections, J. Climate, 26, 5419–5433,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00525.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00525.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Green, B. and Marshall, J.: Coupling of trade winds with ocean circulation damps ITCZ shifts, J. Climate, 30, 4395–4411,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0818.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0818.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Hawcroft, M., Haywood, J. M., Collins, M., Jones, A., Jones, A. C., and Stephens, G.: Southern Ocean albedo,
inter-hemispheric energy transports and the double ITCZ: global impacts of biases in a coupled model, Clim. Dynam., 48, 2279–2295,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> He, F.: Simulating Transient Climate Evolution of the Last Deglaciation with CCSM3, PhD Thesis, University of
Wisconsin-Madison, <a href="http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/paleo/Notes/TRACE/he_phd_092010-1.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/paleo/Notes/TRACE/he_phd_092010-1.pdf</a> (last access: 16 March 2018), 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project. B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation> Kang, S. M., Held, I. M., Frierson, D. M., and Zhao, M.: The response of the ITCZ to extratropical thermal forcing:
idealized slab-ocean experiments with a GCM, J. Climate, 21, 3521–3532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2146.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2146.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Kang, S. M., Frierson, D. M., and Held, I. M.: The tropical response to extratropical thermal forcing in an idealized GCM:
the importance of radiative feedbacks and convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2812–2827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS2924.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS2924.1</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Kay, J. E., Wall, C., Yettella, V., Medeiros, B., Hannay, C., Caldwell, P., and Bitz, C.: Global climate impacts of fixing
the Southern Ocean shortwave radiation bias in the Community Earth System Model (CESM), J. Climate, 29, 4617–4636, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Kucharski, F., Molteni, F., and Bracco, A.: Decadal interactions between the western tropical Pacific and the North
Atlantic Oscillation, Clim. Dynam., 26, 79–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0085-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0085-5</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Lee, S. Y., Chiang, J. C., and Chang, P.: Tropical Pacific response to continental ice sheet topography, Clim. Dynam., 44,
2429–2446, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Levitus, S.: Climatological atlas of the world ocean, NOAA Prof. Pap. 13, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC,
1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Molteni, F.: Atmospheric simulations using a GCM with simplified physical parametrizations. I: Model climatology and
variability in multi-decadal experiments, Clim. Dynam., 20, 175–191, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> Schneider, T.: Feedback of atmospheric ocean coupling on shifts of the intertropical convergence zone,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 11644–11653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075817</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Schneider, T., Bischoff, T., and Haug, G. H.: Migrations and dynamics of the intertropical convergence zone, Nature, 513,
45–53, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, T. M., Reynolds, R. W., Peterson, T. C., and Lawrimore, J.:
Improvements to NOAA's historical merged land-ocean surface temperature
analysis (1880–2006), J. Climate, 21, 2283–2296, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> Stevenson, S. L.: Significant changes to ENSO strength and impacts in the twenty-first century: results from CMIP5,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L17703, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052759" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052759</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> Talento, S. and Barreiro, M.: Simulated sensitivity of the tropical climate to extratropical thermal forcing: tropical
SSTs and African land surface, Clim. Dynam., 47, 1091–1110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2890-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2890-9</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Talento, S. and Barreiro, M.: Control of the South Atlantic Convergence Zone by extratropical thermal forcing,
Clim. Dynam., 50, 885–900, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3647-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3647-4</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Talento, S. and Barreiro, M.: Data: Sensitivity of the tropical climate to an
interhemispheric thermal gradient: the role of tropical ocean dynamics,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ABRY8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ABRY8</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation> Taschetto, A. S., Gupta, A. S., Jourdain, N. C., Santoso, A., Ummenhofer, C. C., and England, M. H.: Cold tongue and warm
pool ENSO events in CMIP5: mean state and future projections, J. Climate, 27, 2861–2885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00437.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00437.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Timmermann, A., Okumura, Y., An, S.-I., Clement, A., Dong, B., Guilyardi, E., Hu, A., Jungclaus, J. H., Renold, M.,
Stocker, T. F., Stouffer, R. J., Sutton, R., Xie, S.-P., and Yin, J.: The influence of a weakening of the Atlantic meridional
overturning circulation on ENSO, J. Climate, 20, 4899–4919, 2007.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation> Tomas, R. A., Deser, C., and Sun, L.: The role of ocean heat transport in the global climate response to projected Arctic
sea ice loss, J. Climate, 29, 6841–6859, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0651.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0651.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation> Wang, X., Auler, A. S., Edwards, R. L., Cheng, H., Cristalli, P. S., Smart, P. L., Richards, D. A., and Shen, C. C.: Wet
periods in northeastern Brazil over the past 210 kyr linked to distant climate anomalies, Nature, 432, 740–743,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03067</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Zebiak, S. E.: Tropical atmosphere-ocean interaction and the El
Niño/Southern Oscillation Phenomenon, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
