<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Earth System Dynamics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2190-4987</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/esd-8-627-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Drought identification in the eastern Baltic region <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>using NDVI</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Drought identification in the eastern Baltic region using NDVI}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{E. Rimkus et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rimkus</surname><given-names>Egidijus</given-names></name>
          <email>egidijus.rimkus@gf.vu.lt</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Stonevicius</surname><given-names>Edvinas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kilpys</surname><given-names>Justinas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Maciulyte</surname><given-names>Viktorija</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Valiukas</surname><given-names>Donatas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Hydrology and Climatology, Institute of Geosciences, Vilnius University, Čiurlionio str. 21, Vilnius, 03101, Lithuania</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Division of Climatology, Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service, Rudnios str. 6, Vilnius, 09300, Lithuania</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Egidijus Rimkus (egidijus.rimkus@gf.vu.lt)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>627</fpage><lpage>637</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>31</day><month>May</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017.html">This article is available from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Droughts are
phenomena that affect large areas. Remote sensing data covering large
territories can be used to assess the impact and extent of droughts. Drought
effect on vegetation was determined using the normalized difference
vegetation index (NDVI) and Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) in the eastern
Baltic Sea region located between 53–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 20–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.
The effect of precipitation deficit on vegetation in arable land and
broadleaved and coniferous forest was analysed using the Standardized
Precipitation Index (SPI) calculated for 1- to 9-month timescales. Vegetation
has strong seasonality in the analysed area. The beginning and the end of the
vegetation season depends on the distance from the Baltic Sea, which affects
temperature and precipitation patterns. The vegetation season in the
southeastern part of the region is 5–6 weeks longer than in the northwestern
part. The early spring air temperature, snowmelt water storage in the soil
and precipitation have the largest influence on the NDVI values in the first
half of the active growing season. Precipitation deficit in the first part of
the vegetation season only has a significant impact on the vegetation on
arable land. The vegetation in the forests is less sensitive to the moisture
deficit. Correlation between VCI and the same month SPI1 is usually negative
in the study area. It means that wetter conditions lead to lower VCI values,
while the correlation is usually positive between the VCI and the SPI of the
previous month. With a longer SPI scale the correlation gradually shifts
towards the positive coefficients. The positive correlation between 3- and
6-month SPI and VCI was observed on the arable land and in both types of
forests in the second half of vegetation season. The precipitation deficit is
only one of the vegetation condition drivers and NDVI cannot be used
universally to identify droughts, but it may be applied to better assess the
effect of droughts on vegetation in the eastern Baltic Sea region.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Vegetation indices derived from remote sensing data are very important
for the accurate assessment of plant growing conditions, especially in the
case of extreme weather events, such as droughts. Ground-based
meteorological and agrometeorological drought indices only allow the
evaluation of the risks for agricultural lands, while the satellite information
makes it possible to identify damaged vegetation in various land types
and to assess the magnitude of damage.</p>
      <p>Remote sensing of the vegetation condition is based on the fact that healthy
plants have more chlorophyll and therefore absorb more visible (VIS) radiation and reflect
more near-infrared (NIR) radiation (Myneni et al., 1995). Often vegetation
conditions are determined by calculating the normalized difference
vegetation index (NDVI). Since 1981 this index has been provided on a global scale
using the advanced very-high-resolution radiometer (AVHRR) instruments on-board NOAA
satellites.</p>
      <p>The long-term data set is a big advantage, but problems may arise in
interpreting the index changes. During more than 30 years of measurements,
the land use has been changed in many locations and it is difficult to
determine the climatic signal in the NDVI changes. The accuracy of the
growing conditions evaluation depends on the assessment of environmental and
atmospheric conditions as well as peculiarities of the sensor response
(Jackson and Huete, 1991). During the period without precipitation, NDVI
values can decrease not only due to the deterioration of the plant but also
due to the increase in dust in the air and on the surface of the plant,
which is usually washed out along with the rain. For this reason, the
vegetation index can have lower values than it should (Mirzaei et al.,
2011).</p>
      <p>It is necessary to emphasize that the vegetation (and hence NDVI values)
response to the meteorological conditions in a given year depends on the
geographical region and environmental factors such as vegetation type, soil
type and land use (Usman et al., 2013). NDVI is a good indicator of
vegetation–soil moisture conditions, but seasonality should be taken into
account when using this index for drought monitoring (Ji and Peters, 2003).
Therefore, in most cases NDVI values are complexly analysed with
ground-based meteorological and agrometeorological drought indicators
such as the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) (Ji and Peters, 2003; Bhuiyan
et al., 2006; Quiring and Ganesh, 2010; Gebrehiwot et al., 2011; Gaikwad and
Bhosale, 2014; Stagge et al., 2015), Standardized
Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) (Stagge et al., 2015),
Standardized Water-Level Index (SWI) (Bhuiyan et al., 2006), Palmer drought
severity index (PDSI) and Moisture Anomaly Index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> index) (Quiring and
Ganesh, 2010). Most commonly, the spatial and temporal variability in the
drought is associated with precipitation deficit; thus, the SPI is often used
due to its simplicity (Gebrehiwot et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>Previous studies have shown that the NDVI and SPI values are correlated and
this relation is the strongest in the middle of the active growing season
and the weakest at the beginning and at the end (Ji and Peters, 2003).
However, a negative NDVI anomaly cannot be related with low SPI
values in all cases (Bhuiyan et al., 2006). The strongest relationship between SPI and
NDVI was found in the areas with low soil water-holding capacity (Ji and
Peters, 2003). Also, the relationship between these two indices differs in
various agricultural areas: a positive correlation between SPI and NDVI was
determined in the rain-fed areas, while a negative correlation was determined in the irrigated areas
(Ozelkan et al., 2016). The SPI indicates moisture conditions and the
vegetation reacts to the lack of precipitations with some delay. For this
reason, the strongest link was established between the SPI values in spring
and NDVI values in summer, which means that spring watering is critically
important for the growth of the most plants (Ozelkan et al., 2016).</p>
      <p>NDVI is frequently analysed by calculating Vegetation Condition Index
(VCI), which compares the current NDVI to the observed values of this index
in previous years (Gebrehiwot et al., 2011; Ozelkan et al., 2016) and has a
good correlation with the SPI values (Dutta et al., 2015). In different
regions of the world, the relationship between the 3- (Gebrehiwot et al.,
2011), 6- or 9-month SPI (Quiring and Ganesh, 2010) and VCI values were
established. Some studies showed that the impact of the short-term
precipitation fluctuations on VCI values is weak (Quiring and Ganesh, 2010).</p>
      <p>The eastern coast of the Baltic Sea is in a transitional area from the
maritime to the continental climate, characterized by a strong west–east
gradient in the continentality of climate (Jaagus et al., 2010, 2014). The region can be divided into three geographical zones: the
western coastal areas, the central agricultural zone with fertile soils, and
the eastern region, which contain most lakes, swamps and forest. The spatial
pattern of seasonal temperature and precipitation in the Baltic countries
depends on two main large-scale factors: latitude and the Baltic Sea
(Jaagus et al., 2010, 2014). In the eastern Baltic region
droughts are not very common (Loyd-Hughes and Saunders, 2002), but they
can cause significant losses for economy and wildlife (BACC, 2008). During
the second half of the 20th century the dryness of the region remained similar
or even decreased (Bordi et al., 2009; Rimkus et al., 2012,
2013), but recent studies show that in the 21st century, at least in some
parts of the study area, the water availability is likely to decrease in
summer and autumn (Stonevicius et al., 2017). Dry periods are related to the
atmospheric circulation patterns and can affect large areas (Rimkus et al.,
2014). In temperate and boreal climates the effect of water shortage on
vegetation is not as significant as in arid or semiarid areas, but there is
strong evidence of water deficit effect on various types of vegetation in
the study area (Kulikauskas and Sprainaitiene, 2005; Vitas and Erlickyte,
2008; Ozolincius et al., 2009; Kalbarczyk, 2010; Bijak, 2011).</p>
      <p>The NDVI and VCI have not been used for the drought analysis in the Baltic
Sea region yet. In this region, especially in the southern part, the
agriculture is strongly developed, and development of new methods for
evaluation of drought extension and intensity are very important.</p>
      <p>The main objectives of this study are to determine the impact of the
droughts on the active plant growing conditions in the eastern part of the
Baltic region, to identify other factors that may lead to negative NDVI
anomalies or low VCI values during the active growing season, and to find
links between SPI and VCI values. Areas of arable land and broadleaved and
coniferous forests were analysed separately and differences in precipitation
deficit impact on vegetation in different land use types were determined.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methods</title>
      <p>The analysed area covers the eastern part of the Baltic Sea region and is
located between 53–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 20–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (Fig. 1).
The NDVI was used to analyse the vegetation condition in the land
cells of the study area. CORINE (Coordination of Information on the Environment)
land cover data were used to identify the response of vegetation in different
land use types to precipitation deficit. CORINE land cover data are available
only in part of study area covering Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland
(Fig. 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Study area in the eastern part of the Baltic Sea region. The
dominant type of land use in 0.144<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.144<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cells
was estimated according to the CORINE land use data.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The NDVI data set was obtained from the NOAA STAR-NESDIS system, which generates
global and regional vegetation health data. The NDVI is derived from
the radiance observed by the AVHRR on-board polar orbiting satellites: the NOAA-7, NOAA-9, NOAA-11, NOAA-14, NOAA-16,
NOAA-18 and NOAA-19. NDVI is calculated as the difference between reflectance in
NIR and VIS radiation by following Eq. (1):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M9" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NIR</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIS</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NIR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIS</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The NOAA STAR-NESDIS NDVI product has 16 km spatial and 7-day composite
temporal resolution and covers a period from 1981 to present. In this study, data from
1982 to 2014 were analysed. The NDVI data set is generated using the maximum-value
composite (MVC) method (Holben, 1986). This method reduces the influence on
NDVI from clouds, spectral properties, resolution and residual atmospheric
effects that all act to reduce NDVI (Scheftic et al., 2014). The NOAA
STAR-NESDIS system produces no noise NDVI. The NDVI is filtered in order to
eliminate the high-frequency noise. It is also adjusted for a
non-uniformity of the land surface due to the climate and ecosystem
differences using multi-year NDVI and brightness temperature data. The final
NDVI product is provided in the geographic grid with equal latitude and
longitude intervals (0.144<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.144<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(NOAA-NESDIS, 2013). The data set has several gaps: from week 50 of 1984 to
week 8 of 1985, from week 37 of 1994 to week 3 of 1995, and from weeks 2 to 4,
from weeks 11 to 24 and week 29 of 2004.</p>
      <p>The NDVI values range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1. The negative index value can be
recorded over the water bodies while values are close to 0 over the land
without vegetation. The index value equal to 1 indicates perfect growing
conditions (Lillesand and Kiefer, 1994; Belal et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>The total number of analysed cells is 2184. In the coastal
areas or near the big lakes, 31 cells were unequally recognized as land or sea cells
by different satellites, and in some cases, the information was missing. In
such cases, data derived from these particular cells were excluded from
further analysis. Also, 99 cells near the sea coast and probably partly
covered by the sea, had negative NDVI values during the active growing
season and thus were excluded from analysis. In total, 6 % of the initial
data set was not used in the study.</p>
      <p>The NDVI values are not only influenced by the natural variation in and health
of vegetation. In long-term data sets, variability related to the satellite
orbital drift, sensor degradation and satellite change is also determined
(Kogan, 1997). The initial trend observed in this research was mostly
related to the satellite change and this trend was removed by applying a
systematic correction for each satellite datum separately.</p>
      <p>Active plant vegetation in the eastern Baltic region starts when the daily
mean air temperature exceeds 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In the majority of years this
happens in the first half of May. The end of the active growing season usually
occurs in the second half of September. It is necessary to mention that
there is a difference in growing season of up to several weeks in the study
area (due to the latitude and distance from the sea), as well as quite large
year-to-year variation in such dates.</p>
      <p>Since the drought makes the greatest impact on the plants during the active
growing season, data from weeks 18 to 39 of the year (May–September) were
analysed. Not only absolute NDVI values were evaluated but also their
deviations from the mean. For this reason, VCI
(Kogan, 1995) was calculated. VCI compares the current NDVI with measured
historical NDVI values. It is defined as the following Eq. (2):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M16" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VCI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where NDVI is the measured monthly (weekly) value and NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
are the historical minimum and maximum values of the analysed month (week). Lower VCI
values indicate a bad vegetation state, while higher values show a good vegetation state. The
VCI is expressed as a percentage and varies from 0 to 100. According to Kogan (2002)
low values below &lt; 40 can be described as mild drought,
&lt; 30 as moderate drought, &lt; 20 as severe drought and
&lt; 10 as extreme drought.</p>
      <p>According to Jain et al. (2010), the VCI is a better indicator of the
moisture deficit than NDVI because it allows the separation of the short-term
climate signal from the long-term ecological signal. VCI enables the
comparison of
simultaneously measured NDVI values not only under the different geographic
conditions but also in the different vegetation types.</p>
      <p>CORINE land cover data were used to identify the dominant land use type in
the NDVI cells (0.144<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.144<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). CORINE data
sets with 100 m resolution were used. The CORINE data sets with reference
years 1990 (CLC 1990) and 2012 (CLC 2012) were compared to identify the land
use changes during the study period. It was considered that land use in
a particular NDVI cell was stable if CORINE land use classes coincided in at
least 80 % of the cell area. From the set of cells with stable
land use, the cells with different dominant land use types were identified.
Diverse land use is common in the analysed region. To reduce the number of
CORINE land use classes, the mixed forests and transitional woodland–shrub
areas were joined with broadleaved forests and the broadleaved vegetation
class was formed. On average, the broadleaved vegetation class consisted
of 28 % broadleaved forests, 57 % mixed forests and 15 %
transitional woodland–shrub areas. A land use
class is considered dominant if it covers at least 50 % of the cell area. Only three
types of land use were identified as dominant in more than five cells: arable
land (209 cells), broadleaved forest (80) and coniferous forest (25 cells)
(Fig. 1). These three land use types were used in this study to differentiate the
effect of climatic conditions on vegetation.</p>
      <p>Four cases with strong NDVI anomalies were investigated. Winter 1987 was one
of the coldest winters during the entire study period in the whole eastern Baltic
region. Also, it was the only year when the mean March–April temperature
averaged over the entire area was negative (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), and it
led to a very late beginning of the vegetation season. In 1990, after one of
the warmest winters, a particularly high air temperature in March–April
was recorded (5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), and this led to a very early beginning
of the vegetation season. Years 1992 and 2002 were analysed because the largest
negative precipitation anomalies in May–September were recorded,
37 and 43 % respectively below the long-term average. During these years the
agrometeorological droughts were observed in the substantial part of
the analysed area (Valiukas, 2015).</p>
      <p>In order to assess the impact of precipitation deficit on vegetation
condition, the SPI was used in this
study. The SPI calculation for any location is based on a monthly rainfall
data series, first applying gamma distribution and then transforming it into
a normal distribution (McKee et al., 1993; Edwards and McKee, 1997). Positive
SPI values indicate precipitation amounts that are greater than average while
negative values indicate lower amounts (Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Interpretation of SPI values (McKee et al., 1993).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Interpretation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Extremely wet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1.99–1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Very wet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0.99 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Near normal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Moderately dry</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Severely dry</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Extremely dry</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>High-resolution (0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude–longitude) monthly precipitation data from CRU TS (Climate Research
Unit Time Series) data set (Harris et al., 2013) have been used in this study
to calculate SPI values. The initial analysis indicated that the vegetation
conditions are not strongly affected by the moisture deficit calculated for
timescales above 9 months. The effect of long-term SPI might be
weakened by the conditions of the cold season when water supply depends on
the precipitation type, snowmelt and soil condition. The 1-, 3-, 6- and
9-month SPI values (SPI1, SPI3, SPI6) were used in this study to
investigate the effect of short- and medium-term precipitation deficit.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Spatial and temporal variation in NDVI</title>
      <p>Vegetation has a very strong seasonality in the eastern Baltic region due to
the variation in the day length, insolation and air temperature. During the
cold season NDVI values in most of the cells are below 0.1 and begin to
increase in the second half of March (Fig. 2). The NDVI change from March
until May follows a clear spatial pattern. First, the NDVI increases in the
southern part of the study area and near the Baltic Sea coast. With time,
vegetation index increases towards the northeast. At the end of April NDVI
exceeds 0.2 in the entire study area. The largest NDVI values are reached in June
and July. A peak of vegetation was usually recorded around 18–24 June. Smaller
values (NDVI &lt; 0.50) are more common in the southern part of the
domain (Fig. 2). NDVI begins to decline in August. In September NDVI in the
majority of the study area drops below 0.40. From the beginning of October,
the NDVI values start to decrease from the northeastern part of the study
area, and in the beginning of November NDVI values remain larger than 0.2
only in the several cells located in the southwestern part of the domain
(Fig. 2). The length of the period with NDVI higher than 0.2 in the
southwestern part of the study area is 5–6 weeks longer than in the
northeastern part.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Median of weekly 1982–2014 NDVI in spring (from 22 March to
26 April),
autumn (from 11 October  to 8 November) and during the vegetation peak
(18–24 June) in the eastern part of the Baltic Sea region. Dates are the
midpoints of weekly NDVI data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>NDVI profile for different land uses of multi-annual average
(1982–2014) years with cold (1987), warm (1990), winter and spring seasons,
and during the years with a precipitation deficit (1992, 2002).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>There is a clear difference in the seasonal pattern of NDVI in the different
land uses (Fig. 3). NDVI in the cells with dominant arable land cover and
broadleaved vegetation is below 0.20 until the middle of April. Later it
gradually increases until the first half of June. From the second half of
June, NDVI decreases in the cells with both arable land and broadleaved
vegetation. The rate of NDVI decrease in the cells with arable land is much
sharper than in the cells with broadleaved vegetation. The
difference in the NDVI pattern may be attributed to the difference in
vegetation type and land management practices. The annual plants are
commonly seeded on the arable land and such vegetation has a faster
vegetation cycle. Moreover, the crops in the case study area are
harvested in August and September. NDVI has lower seasonality in the
cells dominated by coniferous vegetation. In this land cover type the
NDVI values remain higher than in other vegetation classes during the cold
season and are more stable during the warm season, but on average the
highest NDVI values do not exceed 0.4 (Fig. 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Vegetation condition index (VCI) during the years with cold winter
and spring (1987) and warm winter and spring (1990).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>During a particular year, the seasonal NDVI pattern may considerably
differ from the multi-annual average. In 1990 and 2002 spring was warmer
than usual and it likely led to the higher NDVI values in the first half
of the active growing season in the cells with all land uses (Fig. 3). The
2002 summer was among the driest during the analysed period. Despite
this the NDVI remained higher than average on the arable land until the end
of July, and in the cells with broadleaved and coniferous vegetation the
NDVI remained above the average until the beginning of October. In 1987
winter and spring were colder than usual. This led to the vegetation season starting 2–3 weeks later. In all land use classes, the NDVI was
considerably smaller than average. The late start of vegetation in 1987 also
led to the late end. However, there is not a close positive
correlation between these dates in all years (Fig. 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Vegetation condition during the years with different hydrothermal
regimes</title>
      <p>NDVI has a strong seasonal pattern. VCI compares the current NDVI to
the range of values observed in the same period in previous years (Eq. 2)
and is more suitable to illustrating the deviation of vegetation condition
from normal (Jain et al., 2010). If the VCI is lower than 50, the vegetation
conditions are worse than normal. VCI values in May and June following the
cold spring (1987) are smaller than 20 in the majority of the study area
(Fig. 4). Within a few months, the vegetation reaches normal conditions
again. The warm spring of 1990 led to better vegetation conditions in May and
June. In a large part of the area, VCI values were higher than 80.
Intensive vegetation in the first part of the year gradually turned into low
VCI values in the second half of the vegetation season (Fig. 4).</p>
      <p>It seems that the precipitation deficit might not be the decisive factor
determining the vegetation condition in the eastern Baltic Sea region. Years
1992 and 2002 had a precipitation amount that was lower than normal during the
vegetation season, but in 1992 the vegetation was affected much more than in
2002 (Fig. 5). June 1992 was particularly dry. SPI1, representing the 1-month
precipitation deviation from the norm, was lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.0 in a large part
of the study area (Fig. 5a). July was dry only in the southeastern part of
the analysed region. Both SPI3 and SPI6, which represent the dryness for 3
and 6 months respectively, were the lowest in July and August. The vegetation
condition started to decline in some cells in July, but in the majority of
the study area the VCI fell below 20 in August and remained similar in
September.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Vegetation condition index (VCI) and standardized precipitation
index (SPI) during the dry years of 1992 <bold>(a)</bold> and 2002 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The vegetation season of 2002 was also exceptionally dry (Fig. 5b). In July
a precipitation deficit was observed in the eastern part of the region,
while in August extreme meteorological drought (SPI1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.0) was
determined in almost the entire area except the southeastern part. The
precipitation deficit at the beginning of the vegetation season was small, but it
gradually accumulated with time and in August and September SPI3 and SPI6
indicated severely or extremely dry conditions in a large part of the
study area. However, vegetation was affected only in the southern part of
the region (Fig. 5b).</p>
      <p>The most important distinction between the dry 1992 and 2002 years was the
reaction of vegetation in different land use classes to the precipitation
deficit (Fig. 6). In both cases, the vegetation on the arable land was in
good condition in May. From June VCI values for the arable land had decreased,
and in August–September there were a lot of cells with VCI &lt; 20. In
land use classes with broadleaved and coniferous vegetation the
reaction to the precipitation deficit was different during 1992 and 2002.
For example, VCI has decreased more significantly in 1992 than in 2002. Conversely, 1-, 3- and 6-month SPI values calculated for August and
September were lower in 2002 than in 1992.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relationship between SPI6 and VCI for different land use types
during the normal (1982–2014) and dry (1992, 2002) years.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The Pearson correlation coefficient between VCI and SPI
values of the same month <bold>(a)</bold> and between VCI and SPI with 1-month lead <bold>(b)</bold>. Coefficients
larger than 0.34 and smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.34 are statistically significant at
0.95 %.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Pearson correlation coefficient between monthly VCI and SPI was calculated
to identify the effect of precipitation deficit on the vegetation in a
particular cell. The correlation between VCI and the same month SPI1 is
usually negative in the study area (Fig. 7a). The negative correlation
coefficient shows that higher SPI or wetter conditions lead to lower VCI
values. With a longer SPI scale the correlation gradually shifts towards the
positive coefficients (Fig. 7a). There is a weak spatial pattern of
correlation coefficient distribution. The coefficients in the northern part
of the study area tend to be negative, while in the southern part correlation
in most cells is positive (Fig. 7a). The correlation is usually positive
between the VCI and the previous month's SPI (Fig. 7b). There is a cluster of
cells with a statistically positive correlation between VCI in May and SPI
in April in the western part of the study area. In August and September, a
statistically significant positive correlation is common in the southern
part of the region. The pattern of correlation between SPI and VCI implies
the existence of a spatial factor affecting the relationship. This pattern of
VCI and drought indexes has been observed in other studies as well (Quiring
and Ganesh, 2010).</p>
      <p>When vegetation is affected by a certain factor, its condition may remain
distressed for some time. Only the months during which the VCI dropped below 20 for the first
time were used to identify how the SPI values are
distributed when VCI indicates poor vegetation condition (VCI &lt; 20)
(Fig. 8). The distributions of SPI values 1 month before the VCI drops below
20 have weak positive skew. A higher density of SPI values indicating
severely or extremely dry conditions (SPI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5) could be expected if
the decrease in vegetation condition were caused mainly by the
significant precipitation deficit. In the majority of months and all land
use classes the SPI values indicated normal or moderately dry conditions
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.49 &lt; SPI &lt; 1.0) before VCI dropped below 20. However,
according to SPI1 the vegetation condition in June can worsen even after a wet
May (Fig. 8).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The distribution of SPI values for different land uses 1 month
before VCI drops below 20.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/627/2017/esd-8-627-2017-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>NDVI values in the analysed area are determined by a number of climatic
factors. On average, the active growing season in the Baltic states
lasts from the end of April until the beginning of October. The spatial
pattern of the seasonal NDVI variation is closely related to the distance
from the sea, because the Baltic Sea is a major factor, determining the
temperature and precipitation regime in the analysed area (Jaagus et al.,
2010, 2014). The differences in NDVI values in spring and
autumn in the west–east direction are larger than in the south–north direction. The
south–north NDVI gradient would be more noticeable if the determining
factors were the length of day and insolation.</p>
      <p>Many studies show that beginning of the active growing season is determined
by the spring temperature prior to the event (Jeong et al., 2011; Shen et al.,
2014) in the temperate and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere. In
spring the soil is saturated with meltwater and excess moisture can
worsen vegetation condition. Agricultural activity on arable land
usually starts when soil becomes rather dry. For this reason, in the case of
an abnormally wet spring, the negative NDVI anomalies can be recorded in May,
which may be associated with the crop area and not with the crop conditions
(Zhang et al., 2014). Conversely, in June moisture deficit in the
arable soil may lead to vegetation deterioration, while this effect in
conifer and broadleaved forests is almost invisible. Such differences can
be explained by the fact that on the arable land mostly annual crops with
relatively shallow roots are grown. Thus, a lack of moisture may occur even
during the short dry period. The Northern Hemisphere boreal forests usually
grow in areas of excessive moisture and tree roots are deeper, so they
react much slower to the precipitation deficit (such deficit may even lead
to higher VCI values). Also, due to the high initial soil moisture, the
drought impact on forested areas can be minimal (Gao et al., 2016). Only
during the prolonged extreme droughts (e.g. 1992), do the VCI values in the
forests of the study area decrease significantly.</p>
      <p>Many studies indicate that VCI reacts with a delay in the change of moisture
conditions and this reaction is controlled by the previously accumulated
soil water storage (Quiring and Ganesh, 2010). Therefore, the strongest
connection between SPI and VCI was determined in the areas with low soil
water-holding capacity (Ji and Peters, 2003). Other studies also showed
that forests respond to the drought on long-term scales, while arable
land does so on short-term scales (Li and Zhou, 2015).</p>
      <p>In the second half of the active growing season, the positive correlation
between SPI3, SPI6 and VCI has been determined in a large part of the
territory. A positive and in many places statistically significant
correlation was found in the first half of the season if SPI with a 1-month
lead was used. However, the moisture deficit has a significant impact on
vegetation condition only in the second half of the active growing season in
the analysed part of the Baltic Sea region. Meanwhile, in the drier areas,
SPI6 and SPI9 have a strong positive correlation with VCI throughout the year
(Quiring and Ganesh, 2010).</p>
      <p>It should be mentioned that due to the early start of the active growing
season the peak of vegetation is usually reached earlier, and an early
vegetation start does not always lead to an increase in aboveground production
(Livensperger et al., 2016). Therefore, the low VCI values in August and
September are not always related to the precipitation deficit. However, the
time when the NDVI values fall close to the typical winter values (end of
October to beginning of November) in arable soils and broadleaved forests
is very similar during the years with different hydrothermal regimes
(Fig. 3). This is related to the routine agricultural practices on the
arable lands (when the land is plowed in autumn) while the fall of tree
leaves is associated with the occurrence of the first intense frosts, which
are usually in October. Meanwhile, in the coniferous forests, the
differences in NDVI values that form in the summer months remain until the
end of the calendar year (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>In the arid and semiarid areas, the spatial and temporal patterns of
vegetation are primarily related to precipitation (Wang et al., 2001). The
analysed region has a surplus precipitation during most of the years;
thus, the air temperature anomalies might be the limiting factor for
vegetation condition, especially in the transitional seasons (spring and
autumn). The comparison of 1987 (cold spring) and 1990 (warm spring) also
indicates that the interpretation of VCI values as indicators of drought
severity (Kogan, 2002) may not be universal in the eastern part of the
Baltic Sea region. Dabrowska-Zielinska et al. (2002) also found that in
nearby Poland the VCI plays a minor role in defining vegetation
condition and crop yield.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The early spring air temperature, snowmelt water storage in the soil and
precipitation have the largest influence on NDVI values in the first half of
the active growing season. Negative correlation between SPI1 and VCI shows
that the short-term precipitation deficit leads to a better vegetation
condition. With a longer SPI scale, the correlation coefficients become
positive, which shows that longer periods of moisture deficit reduce
vegetation condition. The correlation is usually positive between the VCI
and the previous month's SPI because vegetation responds to the external forcing
with a delay.</p>
      <p>The precipitation deficit in the first part of the vegetation season has a
significant impact only on the vegetation on arable land, while
vegetation in forests is less sensitive to the moisture deficit in the
first half of the active growing season. The positive correlation between
3- and 6-month SPI and VCI was observed on the arable land and both
types of forests in the second half of the vegetation season.</p>
      <p>The precipitation deficit is only one of the vegetation condition drivers in
the eastern Baltic region and NDVI or VCI cannot be universally used to
identify droughts. However, NDVI and VCI may be applied to better assess the effect of
droughts on vegetation and the crop damage.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>NDVI data were obtained from the NOAA STAR-NESDIS system
<uri>ftp://ftp.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/pub/corp/scsb/wguo/data/VHP_16km/VH/</uri>.</p>

      <p>Precipitation data were obtained from the CRU TS database
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5285/D0E1585D-3417-485F-87AE-4FCECF10A992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5285/D0E1585D-3417-485F-87AE-4FCECF10A992</ext-link>.</p>

      <p>CORINE land cover data were obtained from the EEA database
<uri>http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover</uri>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p>This article is part of the special issue “Multiple drivers for
Earth system changes in the Baltic Sea region”. It is a result of the 1st
Baltic Earth Conference, Nida, Lithuania, 13–17 June 2016.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Anna Rutgersson<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
BACC: Assessment of climate change for Baltic Sea region (regional climate
studies), edited by: Bolle, H.-J., Menenti, M., and Rasool, I.,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Belal, A. A., El-Ramady, H. R., Mohamed, E. S., and Saleh, A. M.: Drought
risk assessment using remote sensing and GIS techniques, Arab. J. Geosci.,
7, 35–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0707-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12517-012-0707-2</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bhuiyan, C., Singh, R. P., and Kogan, F. N.: Monitoring drought dynamics in
the Aravalli region (India) using different indices based on ground and
remote sensing data, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 8, 289–302,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.03.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jag.2006.03.002</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bijak, S.: Influence of drought on radial growth of Norway spruce in
north-eastern Poland, in: Proceedings of the DENDROSYMPOSIUM 2010: April
22nd–25th, 2010 in Freiburg, Germany, (Scientific Technical Report; 11/07),
9th TRACE (Tree Rings in Archaeology, Climatology and Ecology) conference
(Freiburg 2010), Potsdam: Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, edited by: van
der Maaten-Theunissen, M., Spiecker, H., Gärtner, H., Heinrich, I., and
Helle, G., 9, 28–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-11074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2312/GFZ.b103-11074</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bordi, I., Fraedrich, K., and Sutera, A.: Observed drought and wetness trends
in Europe: an update, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1519–1530,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1519-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-13-1519-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Dabrowska–Zielinska, K., Kogan, F. N., Ciolkosz, A., Gruszczynska, M., and
Kowalik, W.: Modelling of crop growth conditions and crop yield in Poland
using AVHRR–based indices, Int. J. Remote Sens., 23, 1109–1123,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110070744" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431160110070744</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Dutta, D., Kundu, A., Patel, N. R., Saha, S. K., and Siddiqui, A. R.:
Assessment of agricultural drought in Rajasthan (India) using remote sensing
derived Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) and Standardized Precipitation Index
(SPI), The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 18, 53–63,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.03.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.03.006</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Edwards, D. C. and McKee, T. B.: Characteristics of 20th century drought in
the United States at multiple time scales, Atmospheric Science Paper No.
634, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Gaikwad, Y. and Bhosale, R.: Survey on predictive analysis of drought in
India using AVHRR–NOAA remote sensing data, Int. J. Adv. Found. Res.
Comput., 1, ISSN 2348–4853, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Markkanen, T., Thum, T., Aurela, M., Lohila, A., Mammarella, I.,
Kämäräinen, M., Hagemann, S., and Aalto, T.: Assessing various
drought indicators in representing summer drought in boreal forests in
Finland, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 175–191,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-175-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-175-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Gebrehiwot, T., van der Veen, A., and Maathuis, B.: Spatial and temporal
assessment of drought in the Northern highlands of Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl.
Earth Obs., 13, 309–321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2010.12.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jag.2010.12.002</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., and Lister, D. H.: Updated
high–resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10
Dataset, Int. J. Climatol, 34, 623–642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3711</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Holben, B. N.: Characteristics of maximum–value composite images from
temporal AVHRR data, Int. J. Remote. Sens., 7, 1417–1434,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168608948945" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431168608948945</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Jaagus, J., Briede, A., Rimkus, E., and Remm, K.: Precipitation pattern in
the Baltic countries under the influence of large–scale atmospheric
circulation and local landscape factors, Int. J. Climatol., 30, 705–720,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1929" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.1929</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Jaagus, J., Briede, A., Rimkus, E., and Remm, K.: Variability and trends in
daily minimum and maximum temperatures and in the diurnal temperature range
in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia in 1951–2010, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 118,
57–68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-1041-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00704-013-1041-7</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Jackson, R. D. and Huete, A. R.: Interpreting vegetation indices, Prev. Vet.
Med., 11, 185–200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(05)80004-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0167-5877(05)80004-2</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Jain, S. K., Keshri, R., Goswami, A., and Sarkar, A.: Application of
meteorological and vegetation indices for evaluation of drought impact: a
case study for Rajasthan, India, Nat. Hazards, 54, 643–656,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9493-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-009-9493-x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Jeong, S.-J., Ho, C.-H., Gim, H.-J., and Brown, M. E.: Phenology shifts at
start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern
Hemisphere for the period 1982–2008, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 2385–2399,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02397.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02397.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Ji, L. and Peters, A. J.: Assessing vegetation response to drought in the
northern Great Plains using vegetation and drought indices, Remote Sens.
Environ., 87, 85–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00174-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00174-3</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Kalbarczyk, R.: Temporal and spatial diversity of the occurrence of
atmospheric drought in Poland (1966–2005) and its effect of yield of
pickling cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), Span. J. Agric. Res., 8, 1147–1162,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2010084-1405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5424/sjar/2010084-1405</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Kogan, F. N.: Application of vegetation index and brightness temperature for
drought detection, Adv. Space. Res., 15, 91–100,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(95)00079-T" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0273-1177(95)00079-T</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Kogan, F. N.: Global drought watch from space, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78,
621–636, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Kogan, F. N.: World droughts in the new millennium from AVHRR–based
Vegetation Health Indices, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 83, 557–563,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002EO000382" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002EO000382</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kulikauskas, A. and Sprainaitiene, J.: Productivity of oats varieties and
lines in relation to the air temperature and precipitation distribution
within the growing season, Agric. Sci. Articles, 89, 93–102, 2005 (in
Lithuanian).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z. and Zhou, T.: Responses of vegetation growth to climate change in
china, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL-7/W3,
225–229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W3-225-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W3-225-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lillesand, T. M. and Kiefer, R. W.: Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation,
3rd Edn., Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Livensperger, C., Steltzer, H., Darrouzet-Nardi, A., Sullivan, P. F.,
Wallenstein, M., and Weintraub, M. N.: Earlier snowmelt and warming lead to
earlier but not necessarily more plant growth, AoB PLANTS, 8, plw021,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/aobpla/plw021</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Loyd-Hughes, B. and Saunders, M. A.: A drought climatology for Europe, Int.
J. Climatol., 22, 1571–1592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.846" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.846</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., and Kleist, J.: The relationship of drought
frequency and duration to time scales, in: Proceedings of the 8th Conference
on Applied Climatology, Am. Meteor. Soc., 17–22 January, Anaheim, USA,
179–184, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Mirzaei, F. T., Tajamolian, M., Sarkargar A. A., and Azimzadeh, H.: Study of
the vegetation effect on dust reduction using satellite images (case study:
Yazd city), International Geoinformatics Research and Development Journal, 2,
11–16, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Myneni, R. B., Hall, F. G., Sellers, P. J., and Marshak A. L.: The
interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 33,
481–486, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>NOAA-NESDIS: AVHRR Vegetation Health Product (AVHRR–VHP) User Guide,
available at: <uri>http://star.nesdis.noaa.gov/</uri> (last access: 5 January
2017, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Ozelkan, E., Chen, G., and Ustundag, B. B.: Multiscale object–based drought
monitoring and comparison in rainfed and irrigated agriculture from Landsat 8
OLI imagery, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 44, 159–170,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.08.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jag.2015.08.003</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Ozolincius, R., Stakenas, V., Varnagiryte-Kabasinskiene, I., and Buozyte, R.:
Artificial drought in Scots pine stands: effects on soil, ground vegetation
and tree condition, Ann. Bot. Fenn., 46, 299–307, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Quiring, S. M. and Ganesh, S.: Evaluating the utility of the Vegetation
Condition Index (VCI) for monitoring meteorological drought in Texas, Agr.
Forest Meteorol., 150, 330–339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.015</ext-link>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Rimkus, E., Valiukas, D., Kazys, J., Gecaite, I., and Stonevicius, E.:
Dryness dynamics of the Baltic Sea region, Baltica, 25, 129–142,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5200/baltica.2012.25.13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5200/baltica.2012.25.13</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Rimkus, E., Stonevicius, E., Korneev, V., Kazys, J., Valiuskevicius, G., and
Pakhomau, A.: Dynamics of meteorological and hydrological droughts in the
Neman river basin, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 045014,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045014</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Rimkus, E., Kazys, J., Valiukas, D., and Stankunavicius, G.: The atmospheric
circulation patterns during dry periods in Lithuania, Oceanologia, 56,
223–239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5697/oc.56-2.223" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5697/oc.56-2.223</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Scheftic, W., Zeng, X., Broxton, P., and Brunke, M.: Intercomparison of seven
NDVI products over the United States and Mexico, Remote Sens., 6, 1057–1084,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs6021057</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Shen, M., Tang, Y., Chen, J., Yang, X., Wang, C., Cui, X., Yang, Y., Han, L.,
Li, L., Du, J., Zhang, G., and Cong, N.: Earlier–season vegetation has
greater temperature sensitivity of spring phenology in Northern hemisphere,
PLoS ONE 9, e88178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088178" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0088178</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Stagge, J. H., Kohn, I., Tallaksen, L. M., and Stahl, K.: Modeling drought
impact occurrence based on meteorological drought indices in Europe, J.
Hydrol., 530, 37–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.039</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Stonevicius, E., Rimkus, E., Staras, A., Kazys, J., and Valiuskevicius, G.:
Climate change impact on the Nemunas River basin hydrology in the 21st
century, Boreal Environ. Res., 22, 49–65, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Usman, U., Yelwa, S. A., Gulumbe, S. U., and Danbaba A.: Modelling
Relationship between NDVI and Climatic Variables Using Geographically
Weighted Regression, Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Applications, 1,
24–28, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Valiukas, D.: Analysis of droughts and dry periods in Lithuania, Summary of
Doctoral Dissertation, Vilnius university, Vilnius, Lithuania, 1–49, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Vitas, A. and Erlickyte, R.: Influence of droughts to the radial growth of
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Ekológia (Bratislava), 27, 367–378,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Price, K. P., and Rich, P. M.: Spatial patterns of NDVI in response
to precipitation and temperature in the central Great Plains, Int. J. Remote
Sens., 22, 3827–3844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160010007033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431160010007033</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, M., Wu, B., Yu, M., Zou, W., and Zheng, Y.: Crop condition assessment
with adjusted NDVI using the uncropped arable land ratio, Remote Sens., 6,
5774–5794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6065774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs6065774</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Drought identification in the eastern Baltic region using NDVI</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Droughts are
phenomena that affect large areas. Remote sensing data covering large
territories can be used to assess the impact and extent of droughts. Drought
effect on vegetation was determined using the normalized difference
vegetation index (NDVI) and Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) in the eastern
Baltic Sea region located between 53–60° N and 20–30° E.
The effect of precipitation deficit on vegetation in arable land and
broadleaved and coniferous forest was analysed using the Standardized
Precipitation Index (SPI) calculated for 1- to 9-month timescales. Vegetation
has strong seasonality in the analysed area. The beginning and the end of the
vegetation season depends on the distance from the Baltic Sea, which affects
temperature and precipitation patterns. The vegetation season in the
southeastern part of the region is 5–6 weeks longer than in the northwestern
part. The early spring air temperature, snowmelt water storage in the soil
and precipitation have the largest influence on the NDVI values in the first
half of the active growing season. Precipitation deficit in the first part of
the vegetation season only has a significant impact on the vegetation on
arable land. The vegetation in the forests is less sensitive to the moisture
deficit. Correlation between VCI and the same month SPI1 is usually negative
in the study area. It means that wetter conditions lead to lower VCI values,
while the correlation is usually positive between the VCI and the SPI of the
previous month. With a longer SPI scale the correlation gradually shifts
towards the positive coefficients. The positive correlation between 3- and
6-month SPI and VCI was observed on the arable land and in both types of
forests in the second half of vegetation season. The precipitation deficit is
only one of the vegetation condition drivers and NDVI cannot be used
universally to identify droughts, but it may be applied to better assess the
effect of droughts on vegetation in the eastern Baltic Sea region.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
BACC: Assessment of climate change for Baltic Sea region (regional climate
studies), edited by: Bolle, H.-J., Menenti, M., and Rasool, I.,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Belal, A. A., El-Ramady, H. R., Mohamed, E. S., and Saleh, A. M.: Drought
risk assessment using remote sensing and GIS techniques, Arab. J. Geosci.,
7, 35–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0707-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0707-2</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bhuiyan, C., Singh, R. P., and Kogan, F. N.: Monitoring drought dynamics in
the Aravalli region (India) using different indices based on ground and
remote sensing data, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 8, 289–302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.03.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.03.002</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bijak, S.: Influence of drought on radial growth of Norway spruce in
north-eastern Poland, in: Proceedings of the DENDROSYMPOSIUM 2010: April
22nd–25th, 2010 in Freiburg, Germany, (Scientific Technical Report; 11/07),
9th TRACE (Tree Rings in Archaeology, Climatology and Ecology) conference
(Freiburg 2010), Potsdam: Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, edited by: van
der Maaten-Theunissen, M., Spiecker, H., Gärtner, H., Heinrich, I., and
Helle, G., 9, 28–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-11074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-11074</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bordi, I., Fraedrich, K., and Sutera, A.: Observed drought and wetness trends
in Europe: an update, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1519–1530,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1519-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1519-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Dabrowska–Zielinska, K., Kogan, F. N., Ciolkosz, A., Gruszczynska, M., and
Kowalik, W.: Modelling of crop growth conditions and crop yield in Poland
using AVHRR–based indices, Int. J. Remote Sens., 23, 1109–1123,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110070744" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110070744</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dutta, D., Kundu, A., Patel, N. R., Saha, S. K., and Siddiqui, A. R.:
Assessment of agricultural drought in Rajasthan (India) using remote sensing
derived Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) and Standardized Precipitation Index
(SPI), The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 18, 53–63,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.03.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.03.006</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Edwards, D. C. and McKee, T. B.: Characteristics of 20th century drought in
the United States at multiple time scales, Atmospheric Science Paper No.
634, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Gaikwad, Y. and Bhosale, R.: Survey on predictive analysis of drought in
India using AVHRR–NOAA remote sensing data, Int. J. Adv. Found. Res.
Comput., 1, ISSN 2348–4853, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, Y., Markkanen, T., Thum, T., Aurela, M., Lohila, A., Mammarella, I.,
Kämäräinen, M., Hagemann, S., and Aalto, T.: Assessing various
drought indicators in representing summer drought in boreal forests in
Finland, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 175–191,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-175-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-175-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Gebrehiwot, T., van der Veen, A., and Maathuis, B.: Spatial and temporal
assessment of drought in the Northern highlands of Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl.
Earth Obs., 13, 309–321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2010.12.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2010.12.002</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., and Lister, D. H.: Updated
high–resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10
Dataset, Int. J. Climatol, 34, 623–642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N.: Characteristics of maximum–value composite images from
temporal AVHRR data, Int. J. Remote. Sens., 7, 1417–1434,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168608948945" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168608948945</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Jaagus, J., Briede, A., Rimkus, E., and Remm, K.: Precipitation pattern in
the Baltic countries under the influence of large–scale atmospheric
circulation and local landscape factors, Int. J. Climatol., 30, 705–720,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1929" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1929</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Jaagus, J., Briede, A., Rimkus, E., and Remm, K.: Variability and trends in
daily minimum and maximum temperatures and in the diurnal temperature range
in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia in 1951–2010, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 118,
57–68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-1041-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-1041-7</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, R. D. and Huete, A. R.: Interpreting vegetation indices, Prev. Vet.
Med., 11, 185–200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(05)80004-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(05)80004-2</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Jain, S. K., Keshri, R., Goswami, A., and Sarkar, A.: Application of
meteorological and vegetation indices for evaluation of drought impact: a
case study for Rajasthan, India, Nat. Hazards, 54, 643–656,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9493-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9493-x</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, S.-J., Ho, C.-H., Gim, H.-J., and Brown, M. E.: Phenology shifts at
start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern
Hemisphere for the period 1982–2008, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 2385–2399,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02397.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02397.x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Ji, L. and Peters, A. J.: Assessing vegetation response to drought in the
northern Great Plains using vegetation and drought indices, Remote Sens.
Environ., 87, 85–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00174-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00174-3</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Kalbarczyk, R.: Temporal and spatial diversity of the occurrence of
atmospheric drought in Poland (1966–2005) and its effect of yield of
pickling cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), Span. J. Agric. Res., 8, 1147–1162,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2010084-1405" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2010084-1405</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Kogan, F. N.: Application of vegetation index and brightness temperature for
drought detection, Adv. Space. Res., 15, 91–100,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(95)00079-T" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(95)00079-T</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Kogan, F. N.: Global drought watch from space, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78,
621–636, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Kogan, F. N.: World droughts in the new millennium from AVHRR–based
Vegetation Health Indices, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 83, 557–563,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002EO000382" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002EO000382</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kulikauskas, A. and Sprainaitiene, J.: Productivity of oats varieties and
lines in relation to the air temperature and precipitation distribution
within the growing season, Agric. Sci. Articles, 89, 93–102, 2005 (in
Lithuanian).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z. and Zhou, T.: Responses of vegetation growth to climate change in
china, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL-7/W3,
225–229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W3-225-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W3-225-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lillesand, T. M. and Kiefer, R. W.: Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation,
3rd Edn., Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Livensperger, C., Steltzer, H., Darrouzet-Nardi, A., Sullivan, P. F.,
Wallenstein, M., and Weintraub, M. N.: Earlier snowmelt and warming lead to
earlier but not necessarily more plant growth, AoB PLANTS, 8, plw021,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw021</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Loyd-Hughes, B. and Saunders, M. A.: A drought climatology for Europe, Int.
J. Climatol., 22, 1571–1592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.846" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.846</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., and Kleist, J.: The relationship of drought
frequency and duration to time scales, in: Proceedings of the 8th Conference
on Applied Climatology, Am. Meteor. Soc., 17–22 January, Anaheim, USA,
179–184, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Mirzaei, F. T., Tajamolian, M., Sarkargar A. A., and Azimzadeh, H.: Study of
the vegetation effect on dust reduction using satellite images (case study:
Yazd city), International Geoinformatics Research and Development Journal, 2,
11–16, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Myneni, R. B., Hall, F. G., Sellers, P. J., and Marshak A. L.: The
interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 33,
481–486, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
NOAA-NESDIS: AVHRR Vegetation Health Product (AVHRR–VHP) User Guide,
available at: <a href="http://star.nesdis.noaa.gov/" target="_blank">http://star.nesdis.noaa.gov/</a> (last access: 5 January
2017, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ozelkan, E., Chen, G., and Ustundag, B. B.: Multiscale object–based drought
monitoring and comparison in rainfed and irrigated agriculture from Landsat 8
OLI imagery, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 44, 159–170,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.08.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.08.003</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Ozolincius, R., Stakenas, V., Varnagiryte-Kabasinskiene, I., and Buozyte, R.:
Artificial drought in Scots pine stands: effects on soil, ground vegetation
and tree condition, Ann. Bot. Fenn., 46, 299–307, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Quiring, S. M. and Ganesh, S.: Evaluating the utility of the Vegetation
Condition Index (VCI) for monitoring meteorological drought in Texas, Agr.
Forest Meteorol., 150, 330–339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.015</a>, 2010.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Rimkus, E., Valiukas, D., Kazys, J., Gecaite, I., and Stonevicius, E.:
Dryness dynamics of the Baltic Sea region, Baltica, 25, 129–142,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5200/baltica.2012.25.13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5200/baltica.2012.25.13</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Rimkus, E., Stonevicius, E., Korneev, V., Kazys, J., Valiuskevicius, G., and
Pakhomau, A.: Dynamics of meteorological and hydrological droughts in the
Neman river basin, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 045014,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045014</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Rimkus, E., Kazys, J., Valiukas, D., and Stankunavicius, G.: The atmospheric
circulation patterns during dry periods in Lithuania, Oceanologia, 56,
223–239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5697/oc.56-2.223" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5697/oc.56-2.223</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Scheftic, W., Zeng, X., Broxton, P., and Brunke, M.: Intercomparison of seven
NDVI products over the United States and Mexico, Remote Sens., 6, 1057–1084,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021057</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, M., Tang, Y., Chen, J., Yang, X., Wang, C., Cui, X., Yang, Y., Han, L.,
Li, L., Du, J., Zhang, G., and Cong, N.: Earlier–season vegetation has
greater temperature sensitivity of spring phenology in Northern hemisphere,
PLoS ONE 9, e88178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088178" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088178</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Stagge, J. H., Kohn, I., Tallaksen, L. M., and Stahl, K.: Modeling drought
impact occurrence based on meteorological drought indices in Europe, J.
Hydrol., 530, 37–50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.039</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Stonevicius, E., Rimkus, E., Staras, A., Kazys, J., and Valiuskevicius, G.:
Climate change impact on the Nemunas River basin hydrology in the 21st
century, Boreal Environ. Res., 22, 49–65, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Usman, U., Yelwa, S. A., Gulumbe, S. U., and Danbaba A.: Modelling
Relationship between NDVI and Climatic Variables Using Geographically
Weighted Regression, Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Applications, 1,
24–28, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Valiukas, D.: Analysis of droughts and dry periods in Lithuania, Summary of
Doctoral Dissertation, Vilnius university, Vilnius, Lithuania, 1–49, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Vitas, A. and Erlickyte, R.: Influence of droughts to the radial growth of
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Ekológia (Bratislava), 27, 367–378,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Price, K. P., and Rich, P. M.: Spatial patterns of NDVI in response
to precipitation and temperature in the central Great Plains, Int. J. Remote
Sens., 22, 3827–3844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160010007033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160010007033</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, M., Wu, B., Yu, M., Zou, W., and Zheng, Y.: Crop condition assessment
with adjusted NDVI using the uncropped arable land ratio, Remote Sens., 6,
5774–5794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6065774" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6065774</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
