<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Earth System Dynamics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2190-4987</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/esd-7-517-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>A wavelet-based approach to detect climate change on the coherent and turbulent component  of the atmospheric circulation</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{A wavelet-based approach to detect climate change}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D. Faranda and D. Defrance}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Faranda</surname><given-names>Davide</given-names></name>
          <email>davide.faranda@lsce.ipsl.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5001-5698</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Defrance</surname><given-names>Dimitri</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1371-294X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>LSCE-IPSL, CEA Saclay l'Orme des Merisiers, CNRS UMR 8212 CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Davide Faranda (davide.faranda@lsce.ipsl.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>517</fpage><lpage>523</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/7/517/2016/esd-7-517-2016.html">This article is available from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/7/517/2016/esd-7-517-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/7/517/2016/esd-7-517-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/7/517/2016/esd-7-517-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The modifications of atmospheric circulation induced by anthropogenic effects
are difficult to capture because wind fields feature a complex spectrum where
the signal of large-scale coherent structures (planetary, baroclinic waves
and other long-term oscillations) is mixed up with turbulence. Our purpose is
to study the effects of climate changes on these two components separately by
applying a wavelet analysis to the 700 hPa wind fields obtained in climate
simulations for different forcing scenarios. We study the coherent component
of the signal via a correlation analysis to detect the persistence of
large-scale or long-lasting structures, whereas we use the theory of
autoregressive moving-average stochastic processes to measure the spectral
complexity of the turbulent component. Under strong anthropogenic forcing, we
detect a significant climate change signal. The analysis suggests that
coherent structures will play a dominant role in future climate, whereas
turbulent spectra will approach a classical Kolmogorov behaviour.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Scale separation is an essential property for the study of natural systems:
Lagrangian mechanics has been applied to the study of the solar system
because planets appear so small that they can be considered to be material
points with respect to the length of their orbits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.1"/>. In
a less obvious framework, Einstein and Langevin recognized that the behaviour
of heavy particles in a gas can be studied by introducing two different
scales: the inertial (slow) motion of the heavy particles and the
interactions (fast) with the gas particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.2"/>. In
geophysics the same approach has been – sometimes implicitly – applied for
understanding important mechanisms driving the atmospheric and oceanic
circulation: one can model the baroclinic instability because cyclones have a
well-determined size and their structure emerges from the atmospheric
turbulence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.3"/>, El Niño, because of the precise
timescales involved in the phenomenon
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.4"/>. The success of a
scale-separation-based approach is due to the intrinsic properties of
stratified and rotating flows. In homogeneous and isotropic turbulence, the
energy flows towards the small scales and coherent structures are rapidly
destroyed. This is the so-called direct cascade proposed in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.5"/>. By contrast, geophysical flows are stratified
and rotational flows, where an inverse cascade of energy induces the
bidimensionalization of motions and contributes to the formation of large-scale coherent structures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.6"/>. In laboratory
experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.7"/> and geophysical observations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.8"/> one aims at separating
coherent and turbulent components and build theoretical models to describe
the associated motions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.9"/>.
As pointed out by several authors (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.10"/> for a
review), this task is non-trivial because both the inverse and direct
cascades coexist for geophysical motions. The direct cascade is ultimately responsible for the dissipation of energy, the transfer of momentum from the
atmosphere to the ocean and the soil, and the disruption of large-scale
structures in the flow resulting in an unpredictable behaviour
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.11"/>. The inverse cascade contributes to the
formation of cyclonic and anticyclonic structures observed in the atmosphere
and the ocean. Moreover, it generally enhances the predictability of future
states of the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.12"/>.</p>
      <p>In this paper we present two indicators that describe the statistical
properties of large-scale coherent structures as well as turbulent spectra,
investigating their response to climate change. The indicators are defined
after separating the coherent structures from featureless turbulence via the
wavelet filtering technique. For the coherent part, we compute the integral
of the autocorrelation function as a measure of the persistence of the
coherent structures. For the turbulent component, we use an indicator that
measures the complexity of the spectrum with respect to the canonical
behaviour theorized by Kolmogorov.</p>
      <p>We test the technique on the horizontal wind data measured at 700 hPa for
two different anthropogenic emission scenarios (RCP 2.6 and 8.5). We
investigate whether the anthropogenic and natural forcing could cause not
only a change in the intensity of some defined observable (as it is now
evident for the global mean temperature) but also in the direction the
energy is cascading and therefore in the relative importance of large-scale
coherent structure with respect to turbulence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p>The separation between coherent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and turbulent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> components of a
time series <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is done via wavelet filters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.13"/>. With
respect to a simple filtering technique (e.g. moving-average filters), the
wavelet filters are useful when the time series contain multiple timescales
and there is no trivial scale separation. Wavelet analysis has been widely
applied in climate science <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.14"/> and to the analysis
of geophysical time series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.15"/>.</p>
      <p>We give a brief illustration of the wavelet filtering technique by analysing
a time series of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>500</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> taken from the scenario RCP 2.6 at the point 78<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 38<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. The series consists of 512 monthly
observations and it is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a. Its power spectral
density (psd) is visualized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b. The series shows an
evident periodic component (the seasonal cycle) captured by the spectral
peak. The spectrum is compared with a flat one (dotted line), reproducing a
perfect white-noise signal. The results of the wavelet filter are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c–f. The coherent component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its spectrum are
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c and d respectively. The effects of the filter are
not directly visible on the detrended time series but rather on the spectra.
The psd for the coherent part of the signal presents a significant slope with
the energy concentrated on large timescales. By contrast, the incoherent
component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e has a rather flat psd
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>f), as expected from a successful application of the
technique. Nonetheless, the limits of the wavelet filtering approach appear when one looks at the spectral peak corresponding to the seasonal cycle, which
cannot be completely eliminated, although it represents a coherent component
of the signal.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Example of wavelet filtering. <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>500</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
monthly time series at 78<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 38<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
and <bold>(b)</bold> corresponding power spectral density (psd).
<bold>(c)</bold> Time series of the coherent component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extracted by the
wavelet filter and <bold>(d)</bold> its psd. <bold>(e)</bold> Time series of the
noisy component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extracted by the wavelet filter and <bold>(f)</bold> its
psd.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/7/517/2016/esd-7-517-2016-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Once the separation between coherent and noisy component is done, we study
the property of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> separately. For the coherent component
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we use the memory of the system as an indicator of persistence by measuring the integral
of the autocorrelation function (ACF) defined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ACF</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for expectation value. The ACF measures how long the
system remember an initial condition. For a white-noise signal, it decays to
0 as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For a correlated signal it decays slowly to 0 for large <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
For a perfectly periodic signal, the ACF is periodic itself. The integral
of the ACF in its discrete version is written as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ACF</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where we sum the correlation up to a time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sufficiently large for the ACF
to decay to 0. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measures how long coherent structures persist in
time, and it is therefore linked to predictability: the higher the
correlation, the higher the probability that the structure will be preserved
in future times <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.16"/>. The link between
correlations decay and predictability is well known in dynamical systems
theory and in physics
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.17"/>, and
we now exploit it to study properties of geophysical time series.</p>
      <p>For the noisy component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we use an indicator of the spectral complexity
with respect to the canonical Kolmogorov behaviour. In order to introduce this
indicator we will use the class of autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) stochastic
processes. In general, a stationary time series <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of an observable with
unknown underlying dynamics can be modelled by an ARMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> process such
that for all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> WN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – where WN stands for white noise
– and the polynomials <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Notice that, hereinafter, the noise term <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be assumed to
be white noise, which is a very general condition
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.18"/>.</p>
      <p>The basic model for the noisy component is the ARMA(1,0) or simply AR(1)
model, which is the simplest model compatible with the Kolmogorov spectrum
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.19"/>. When the spectral complexity increases, the best
ARMA model describing the velocity time series will deviate from the basic
one. We can define a normalized distance between the reference
ARMA(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) and any other ARMA(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) by using
the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), which measures the relative
quality of a statistical model, as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BIC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the likelihood function for the
investigated model and in our case <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the length of the sample.
The variance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is computed from the sample and is a
series-specific quantity.</p>
      <p>Our indicator is a normalized difference between the BIC(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the ARMA(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>)
BIC(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BIC</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BIC</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; it goes to 0 if the dataset is well
described by an ARMA(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) model and tends to 1 in the opposite case.</p>
      <p>We have checked that such indicators perform well in different physical
systems and generally provide more information than the ones based on
correlations analysis only. Such results can been found in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.20"/>, where indicators similar to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> have
been used to model different physical systems: Ising and Langevin models and
turbulence. A large <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a complex spectrum with
non-trivial scale interactions and non-constant energy transfers; a small
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a spectrum compatible with the Kolmogorov spectrum
with constant energy fluxes between scales. The predictability will decrease
with a higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> because more structures on different scales will
have to be taken into account to describe the behaviour of the system. In other words,
for high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cannot just be modelled as simple
noise.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Analysis</title>
      <p>We illustrate the potential of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicators on a
climate change experiment used in the CMIP5 framework for the IPCC AR5 report
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.21"/>. To explore climate change in the next
century, the IPCC has developed four different scenarios, defined in terms of
radiative evolution and corresponding to a concentration of greenhouse gases
year by year between 2006 and 2100, extended until 2300. Here we consider
two scenarios: (i) the low-emission scenario (RCP 2.6), leading to a radiative
balance of 2.6 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2100 with a peak at 3 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a decreasing trend; (ii)
the higher-emission scenario (RCP 8.5), predicting an increase up to 8.5 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
2100. The effect of such greenhouse gas perturbations are well known for
some observables, e.g. the global temperature increase ranges from 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4
to 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the last part of the period 2081–2100
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.22"/>.</p>
      <p>We focus on the daily horizontal winds at 700 hPa <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
obtained from the IPSLCM5-LR model, where LR stands for low resolution. This
model is developed by the Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace with several
laboratories. It consists of several components: atmosphere (LMDZ), ocean (NEMO),
continent (ORCHIDEE), and sea ice (LIM). For LMDZ and ORCHIDEE, the
spatial resolution is 3.75<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.875<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(longitude <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude) with 39 vertical levels. For NEMO, the resolution is of about
2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a higher latitudinal resolution of 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
equatorial ocean and 31 vertical levels. ORCHIDEE takes into account the
evolution of the lands (urbanization, forests, agriculture)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.23"/>. We chose 700 hPa (about 3km) because it has
been recognized as the best level for tracking the coherent atmospheric
structures as shortwaves, extratropical cyclones, and convective storms,
since they are all advected, in first approximation, by 700 hPa horizontal
winds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.24"/>. We have also performed robustness tests by
considering the medium-resolution (MR) version of the IPSLCM5 model
(2.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in longitude and latitude for LMDZ and
ORCHIDEE, while the resolution of other models is the same as LR). These tests are
reported and explained in the Supplement.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Integral of the autocorrelation function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for
the period 2005–2055 for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<bold>(c)</bold> daily time series. Spectral complexity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the period
2005–2055 for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  <bold>(b)</bold> and for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<bold>(d)</bold> daily time series.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/7/517/2016/esd-7-517-2016-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Differences in the integral of the autocorrelation
function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 2055–2105 and the 2005–2055 period for the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the RCP 2.6 <bold>(a)</bold> and in the RCP 8.5 <bold>(b)</bold>.
Differences in the spectral complexity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 2055–2105
and the 2005–2055 period for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the RCP 2.6 <bold>(c)</bold> and
RCP 8.5 <bold>(d)</bold> scenario. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the RCP 2.6
<bold>(e)</bold> and the RCP 8.5 <bold>(f)</bold> scenarios. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the RCP 2.6 <bold>(g)</bold> and RCP 8.5 <bold>(h)</bold> scenario.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/7/517/2016/esd-7-517-2016-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>We begin the analysis by showing typical maps of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for
the scenario RCP 2.6 and the two components: the zonal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
meridional <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shows, for the zonal
component, a rich structure with several areas where persistent coherent
structures are well identified (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a). Because we are using
daily time series, the values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be directly interpreted as the
number of days of persistence of these structures. At the midlatitudes, the
signature of stationary planetary waves is visible. In correspondence to the
location of such waves, we find <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>16 days, a value compatible with
the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.25"/>, who studied planetary waves using
other indicators based on the wavelet approach. In the tropics, the high
values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be linked to the easterly jets
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.26"/>. The core of the African easterly jet is
located at about this level <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.27"/>, as are the
Choco and Caribbean low-level jets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.28"/>. The results
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> computed on the meridional component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c. Here the largest values are found in correspondence to
the regions affected by monsoons. The strongest signal is for the African
monsoon because the IPSL model localizes it better than the Indian one
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.29"/>. At the midlatitudes the patches visible near
the Pacific coast and over the USA correspond to areas where the zonal flow is
blocked by the Rocky Mountains and meridional winds blow to allow the flows
go round the mountains.</p>
      <p>For the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis, there is not much difference in the structure of
the zonal component (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b) and the meridional component (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d).
The spatial pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be explained in light of
the tropical atmospheric dynamics. Higher values are located in the tropics,
where turbulence is associated with the convective activity in the area. We
note that, as the resolution is increased, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases
(see  Fig. 7 in the Supplement). This means that turbulent contribution becomes
more relevant when finer scales are included in the analysis, although the
scale of the analysis remains, even in the MR simulation, much larger than
the scales of convective structures (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km).</p>
      <p>We now investigate whether <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can detect changes in the
coherent or noisy components of the 700 hPa horizontal winds under the
climate change RCP 2.6 and RCP 8.5 scenarios. We divide the daily time series
into two periods (2005–2055 and 2055–2105) and compute the quantities <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2055</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2005</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2055</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2055</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2005</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2055</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3). For both the indicators, the RCP 8.5 scenario shows considerable impacts, whereas the changes for the RCP 2.6
are appreciable only for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component. In the Supplement, we report the results also for time windows of 30 and 40 years. By
decreasing the time window considered, we observe that the spatial structure
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not change
(Figs. 1–6 in the Supplement). However, the changes in the indicator become locally sharper as
shorter time windows are considered, as one would expect by taking
differences of periods with a larger time separation (Fig. 7 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fields for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> components
present interesting structures: the strongest signals are located over the
Pacific Ocean in correspondence to the El Niño Region 3 (for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
Region 3.4 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.30"/>. At
the midlatitudes, dipolar structures appear both for the zonal and for the
meridional flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.31"/>. This is the signature of
the jet stream shift observed by several studies. For the Northern Hemisphere, changes in the pattern of meridional winds are highlighted by an
alternation of negative and positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: we can link these
changes to the modification in stationary planetary waves associated with the
change in the jet stream intensity and positions. Several studies have
recently appeared on this issue, although is not clear whether the cause can
be linked to the so-called Arctic amplification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.32"/> rather than to changes in El Niño–Southern Oscillation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.33"/> or even to the stratospheric dynamics
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.34"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also suggests that some
regions will experience an increase in persistence of meridional winds, i.e. an
increasing of blocking conditions (e.g. central USA, western Europe), whereas
some other areas will have an increase in the persistence of the zonal winds
(e.g. eastern Europe, Alberta (CA)).</p>
      <p>The results for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate that the spectral complexity in
the tropical regions tends to reduce by about 10 % (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the RCP 8.5 scenario. Although the model does not
resolve the convective scales, a possible explanation for this result relies
on the enhanced convective activity resulting from the sea surface warming
and resulting in an increase in precipitation in the area, as we have
verified for the IPSL model and as reported by other studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.35"/>. This consideration is valid only if convective
parametrization transfers energy from the convective scales to the scale of
the analysis. In other words, at the actual resolution of climate models, we
can only observe the footprints of these phenomena. If turbulence becomes
stronger and anisotropic, then it should approach the Kolmogorov behaviour and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> should tend to 0.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We have devised two indicators to study the changes in the atmospheric
circulation by separating the coherent structures from the turbulent part of
the signals analysed, i.e the velocity fields at 700 hPa. The indicator
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a measure of the total persistence of the coherent
structures, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a measure of the residual complexity of the turbulent spectrum,
once the coherent component has been removed.</p>
      <p>The indicators show significant changes when the climate system is subject to
greenhouse gas forcing. The difference in the indicators for the RCP 8.5
scenario between the second half and the first half of the 21st century
suggests that El Niño–Southern Oscillation will play a major role and
blocking conditions will change the trajectory of coherent structures observed at
the midlatitudes.</p>
      <p>Besides the regional patterns, we believe that the most important message is
contained in the global average of our indicators. For the RCP 8.5 scenario,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases by 0.5 days in the second half of the century for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and by 0.2 days for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn>700</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the other hand, the spectral
complexity decreases by about 10 % in the tropical regions. This suggests
that the coherent structures will play a major role in the atmospheric
dynamics. This will probably result in an enhanced predictability of the atmosphere
on weekly to monthly timescales. The contrast between these two effects
could be one of the causes of the difficulty in finding significant traces of
climate change in the circulation dynamics, a problem recently highlighted by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.36"/>.</p>
      <p>Our indicators have been here illustrated for a single model at two different
spatial resolutions and in two climate change scenarios. They could be useful
to evaluate the response of atmospheric circulation to changes in the forcing
for several models. Moreover, the technique does not require the variables to
be velocity fields and it could be extended to any physical time series in
which a non-trivial scale separation is present.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-517-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/esd-7-517-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Davide Faranda acknowledges Berengere Dubrulle, Pascal Yiou, and Mathieu Vrac
for useful comments and discussion. Davide Faranda was supported by ERC grant
No. 338965-A2C2. Dimitri Defrance was supported by the French Atomic
Commission (CEA) within the framework of the VACCIN project (Variations
Abruptes du Climat: Conséquences et Impacts éNergétiques) funded by the
DSM-Energie Program. It benefited from the HPC resources made available by
GENCI (Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif), CEA, and CNRS (Centre
National de la Recherche Scientifique). <?xmltex \hack{\\\\}?>Edited by: B. Kravitz</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Barnston et al.(1997)Barnston, Chelliah, and
Goldenberg</label><mixed-citation>
Barnston, A. G., Chelliah, M., and Goldenberg, S. B.: Documentation of a
highly ENSO-related SST region in the equatorial Pacific, Atmos.-Ocean., 35,
367–383, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Box and Jenkins(1970)</label><mixed-citation>
Box, G. E. and Jenkins, G. M.: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control,
Holden-D. iv, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Cane and Zebiak(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Cane, M. A. and Zebiak, S. E.: A theory for El Nino and the Southern
Oscillation, Science, 228, 1085–1087, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Charney(1947)</label><mixed-citation>
Charney, J. G.: The dynamics of long waves in a baroclinic westerly current,
J. Meteorol., 4, 136–162, 1947.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Charney(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
Charney, J. G.: Geostrophic turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 1087–1095, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Collins et al.(2013)Collins, Knutti, Arblaster, Dufresne, Fichefet,
Friedlingstein, Gao, Gutowski, Johns, Krinner et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J., Fichefet, T.,
Friedlingstein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski, W., Johns, T., Krinner, G., Shongwe,
M., Tebaldi, C., Weaver, A. J., and Wehner, M.: Climate change 2013: the
physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Long-term
Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility, Cambridge Univ.
Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, 1029–1136, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Craig and Banner(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Craig, P. D. and Banner, M. L.: Modeling wave-enhanced turbulence in the
ocean surface layer, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 2546–2559, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Crisanti et al.(1993)Crisanti, Jensen, Vulpiani, and
Paladin</label><mixed-citation> Crisanti, A., Jensen, M., Vulpiani, A.,
and Paladin, G.: Intermittency and predictability in turbulence, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 70, 166–169, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Dufresne et al.(2013)Dufresne, Foujols, Denvil, Caubel, Marti,
Aumont, Balkanski, Bekki, Bellenger, Benshila et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Dufresne, J.-L., Foujols, M.-A., Denvil, S., Caubel, A., Marti, O., Aumont,
O., Balkanski, Y., Bekki, S., Bellenger, H., Benshila, R., et al.: Climate
change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to
CMIP5, Climate Dynamics, 40, 2123–2165, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Faranda et al.(2014)Faranda, Pons et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Faranda, D., Pons, F. M. E., et al: Statistical early-warning indicators
based on autoregressive moving-average models, J. Phys. A, 47, 252001, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Farge(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Farge, M.: Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence, Ann.
Rev. Fluid Mech., 24, 395–458, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Ghil et al.(2002)Ghil, Allen, Dettinger, Ide, Kondrashov, Mann,
Robertson, Saunders, Tian, Varadi et al.</label><mixed-citation>Ghil, M., Allen, M., Dettinger, M., Ide, K., Kondrashov, D., Mann, M.,
Robertson, A. W., Saunders, A., Tian, Y., Varadi, F., and P. Yiou : Advanced
spectral methods for climatic time series, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1003,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000RG000092</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Govindan et al.(1998)Govindan, Narayanan, and
Gopinathan</label><mixed-citation>
Govindan, R., Narayanan, K., and Gopinathan, M.: On the evidence of
deterministic chaos in ECG: Surrogate and predictability analysis, Chaos: An
Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 8, 495–502, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Grinsted et al.(2004)Grinsted, Moore, and
Jevrejeva</label><mixed-citation>Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., and Jevrejeva, S.: Application of the cross wavelet
transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series,
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 11, 561–566, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-11-561-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Holmes et al.(1998)Holmes, Lumley, and
Berkooz</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L., and Berkooz, G.: Turbulence, coherent structures,
dynamical systems and symmetry, Cambridge University Press, 1–420, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Huang et al.(2013)Huang, Xie, Hu, Huang, and
Huang</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, P., Xie, S.-P., Hu, K., Huang, G., and Huang, R.: Patterns of the
seasonal response of tropical rainfall to global warming, Nature Geosci.,
6, 357–361, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Jiang et al.(1995)Jiang, Jin, and Ghil</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, S., Jin, F.-F., and Ghil, M.: Multiple equilibria, periodic, and
aperiodic solutions in a wind-driven, double-gyre, shallow-water model, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 25, 764–786, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Kolmogorov(1941)</label><mixed-citation>
Kolmogorov, A. N.: Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence, :
Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 32, 16–18, 1941.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Koteswaram(1958)</label><mixed-citation>
Koteswaram, P.: The easterly jet stream in the tropics, Tellus, 10, 43–57,
1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Lamriben et al.(2011)Lamriben, Cortet, and
Moisy</label><mixed-citation>Lamriben, C., Cortet, P.-P., and Moisy, F.: Direct measurements of
anisotropic energy transfers in a rotating turbulence experiment, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 107, 024503, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.024503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.024503</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Langevin(1908)</label><mixed-citation>
Langevin, P.: Sur la théorie du mouvement brownien, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris,
146, 530–533, 1908.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Leith(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
Leith, C.: Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence, J.
Atmos. Sci., 28, 145–161, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Lucarini et al.(2007)Lucarini, Speranza, and
Vitolo</label><mixed-citation>
Lucarini, V., Speranza, A., and Vitolo, R.: Self-scaling of the statistical
properties of a minimal model of the atmospheric circulation, in: Nonlinear
Dynamics in Geosciences, 197–219, Springer, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Mölders and Kramm(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Mölders, N. and Kramm, G.: Lectures in Meteorology, Springer, 1–591,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Moritz et al.(2002)Moritz, Bitz, and Steig</label><mixed-citation>
Moritz, R. E., Bitz, C. M., and Steig, E. J.: Dynamics of recent climate
change in the Arctic, Science, 297, 1497–1502, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Murray and Dermott(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, C. D. and Dermott, S. F.: Solar system dynamics, Cambridge University
Press, 1–608, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Nicholson(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Nicholson, S. E.: A revised picture of the structure of the “monsoon” and
land ITCZ over West Africa, Climate Dynamics, 32, 1155–1171, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Osborne and Provenzale(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Osborne, A. R. and Provenzale, A.: Finite correlation dimension for
stochastic systems with power-law spectra, Physica D,
35, 357–381, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Paladin and Vulpiani(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Paladin, G. and Vulpiani, A.: Predictability in spatially extended systems,
J. Phys. A, 27, 4911, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/27/14/018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0305-4470/27/14/018</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Penland and Magorian(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Penland, C. and Magorian, T.: Prediction of Nino 3 sea surface temperatures
using linear inverse modeling, J. Climate, 6, 1067–1076, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Pitcher(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Pitcher, E. J.: Application of stochastic dynamic prediction to real data, J.
Atmos. Sci., 34, 3–21, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Pouquet and Marino(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Pouquet, A. and Marino, R.: Geophysical turbulence and the duality of the
energy flow across scales, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 234501, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.234501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.234501</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Schertzer and Lovejoy(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Schertzer, D. and Lovejoy, S.: Nonlinear variability in geophysics,
Springer, 1–318, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2147-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-009-2147-4</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Schubert et al.(1992)Schubert, Suarez, and
Schemm</label><mixed-citation>
Schubert, S. D., Suarez, M. J., and Schemm, J.-K.: Persistence and
predictability in a perfect model, J. Atmos. Sci., 49,
256–269, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Serreze and Barry(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Serreze, M. C. and Barry, R. G.: Processes and impacts of Arctic
amplification: A research synthesis, Global Planet. Change, 77, 85–96,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Serreze and Francis(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Serreze, M. C. and Francis, J. A.: The Arctic amplification debate, Clim.
Change, 76, 241–264, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Shepherd(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Shepherd, T. G.: Atmospheric circulation as a source of uncertainty in
climate change projections, Nature Geosci., 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Thomson(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomson, D.: Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle
trajectories in turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech., 180, 529–556,
1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Torrence and Compo(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Torrence, C. and Compo, G. P.: A practical guide to wavelet analysis,
B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 79, 61–78, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Trenberth(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Trenberth, K. E.: The definition of el nino, B. Am.
Meteor. Soc., 78, 2771–2777, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Tribbia and Baumhefner(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Tribbia, J. and Baumhefner, D.: Scale interactions and atmospheric
predictability: An updated perspective, Mon. Weather Rev., 132,
703–713, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Wang(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C.: Variability of the Caribbean low-level jet and its relations to
climate, Clim. Dynam., 29, 411–422, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>A wavelet-based approach to detect climate change on the coherent and turbulent component  of the atmospheric circulation</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The modifications of atmospheric circulation induced by anthropogenic effects
are difficult to capture because wind fields feature a complex spectrum where
the signal of large-scale coherent structures (planetary, baroclinic waves
and other long-term oscillations) is mixed up with turbulence. Our purpose is
to study the effects of climate changes on these two components separately by
applying a wavelet analysis to the 700 hPa wind fields obtained in climate
simulations for different forcing scenarios. We study the coherent component
of the signal via a correlation analysis to detect the persistence of
large-scale or long-lasting structures, whereas we use the theory of
autoregressive moving-average stochastic processes to measure the spectral
complexity of the turbulent component. Under strong anthropogenic forcing, we
detect a significant climate change signal. The analysis suggests that
coherent structures will play a dominant role in future climate, whereas
turbulent spectra will approach a classical Kolmogorov behaviour.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Barnston et al.(1997)Barnston, Chelliah, and
Goldenberg</label><mixed-citation>
Barnston, A. G., Chelliah, M., and Goldenberg, S. B.: Documentation of a
highly ENSO-related SST region in the equatorial Pacific, Atmos.-Ocean., 35,
367–383, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Box and Jenkins(1970)</label><mixed-citation>
Box, G. E. and Jenkins, G. M.: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control,
Holden-D. iv, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Cane and Zebiak(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Cane, M. A. and Zebiak, S. E.: A theory for El Nino and the Southern
Oscillation, Science, 228, 1085–1087, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Charney(1947)</label><mixed-citation>
Charney, J. G.: The dynamics of long waves in a baroclinic westerly current,
J. Meteorol., 4, 136–162, 1947.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Charney(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
Charney, J. G.: Geostrophic turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 1087–1095, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Collins et al.(2013)Collins, Knutti, Arblaster, Dufresne, Fichefet,
Friedlingstein, Gao, Gutowski, Johns, Krinner et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J., Fichefet, T.,
Friedlingstein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski, W., Johns, T., Krinner, G., Shongwe,
M., Tebaldi, C., Weaver, A. J., and Wehner, M.: Climate change 2013: the
physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Long-term
Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility, Cambridge Univ.
Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, 1029–1136, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Craig and Banner(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Craig, P. D. and Banner, M. L.: Modeling wave-enhanced turbulence in the
ocean surface layer, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 2546–2559, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Crisanti et al.(1993)Crisanti, Jensen, Vulpiani, and
Paladin</label><mixed-citation> Crisanti, A., Jensen, M., Vulpiani, A.,
and Paladin, G.: Intermittency and predictability in turbulence, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 70, 166–169, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Dufresne et al.(2013)Dufresne, Foujols, Denvil, Caubel, Marti,
Aumont, Balkanski, Bekki, Bellenger, Benshila et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Dufresne, J.-L., Foujols, M.-A., Denvil, S., Caubel, A., Marti, O., Aumont,
O., Balkanski, Y., Bekki, S., Bellenger, H., Benshila, R., et al.: Climate
change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to
CMIP5, Climate Dynamics, 40, 2123–2165, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Faranda et al.(2014)Faranda, Pons et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Faranda, D., Pons, F. M. E., et al: Statistical early-warning indicators
based on autoregressive moving-average models, J. Phys. A, 47, 252001, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Farge(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Farge, M.: Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence, Ann.
Rev. Fluid Mech., 24, 395–458, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Ghil et al.(2002)Ghil, Allen, Dettinger, Ide, Kondrashov, Mann,
Robertson, Saunders, Tian, Varadi et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Ghil, M., Allen, M., Dettinger, M., Ide, K., Kondrashov, D., Mann, M.,
Robertson, A. W., Saunders, A., Tian, Y., Varadi, F., and P. Yiou : Advanced
spectral methods for climatic time series, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1003,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000092" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2000RG000092</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Govindan et al.(1998)Govindan, Narayanan, and
Gopinathan</label><mixed-citation>
Govindan, R., Narayanan, K., and Gopinathan, M.: On the evidence of
deterministic chaos in ECG: Surrogate and predictability analysis, Chaos: An
Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 8, 495–502, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Grinsted et al.(2004)Grinsted, Moore, and
Jevrejeva</label><mixed-citation>
Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., and Jevrejeva, S.: Application of the cross wavelet
transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series,
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 11, 561–566, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/npg-11-561-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Holmes et al.(1998)Holmes, Lumley, and
Berkooz</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L., and Berkooz, G.: Turbulence, coherent structures,
dynamical systems and symmetry, Cambridge University Press, 1–420, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Huang et al.(2013)Huang, Xie, Hu, Huang, and
Huang</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, P., Xie, S.-P., Hu, K., Huang, G., and Huang, R.: Patterns of the
seasonal response of tropical rainfall to global warming, Nature Geosci.,
6, 357–361, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Jiang et al.(1995)Jiang, Jin, and Ghil</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, S., Jin, F.-F., and Ghil, M.: Multiple equilibria, periodic, and
aperiodic solutions in a wind-driven, double-gyre, shallow-water model, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 25, 764–786, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Kolmogorov(1941)</label><mixed-citation>
Kolmogorov, A. N.: Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence, :
Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 32, 16–18, 1941.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Koteswaram(1958)</label><mixed-citation>
Koteswaram, P.: The easterly jet stream in the tropics, Tellus, 10, 43–57,
1958.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Lamriben et al.(2011)Lamriben, Cortet, and
Moisy</label><mixed-citation>
Lamriben, C., Cortet, P.-P., and Moisy, F.: Direct measurements of
anisotropic energy transfers in a rotating turbulence experiment, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 107, 024503, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.024503" target="_blank">doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.024503</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Langevin(1908)</label><mixed-citation>
Langevin, P.: Sur la théorie du mouvement brownien, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris,
146, 530–533, 1908.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Leith(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
Leith, C.: Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence, J.
Atmos. Sci., 28, 145–161, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Lucarini et al.(2007)Lucarini, Speranza, and
Vitolo</label><mixed-citation>
Lucarini, V., Speranza, A., and Vitolo, R.: Self-scaling of the statistical
properties of a minimal model of the atmospheric circulation, in: Nonlinear
Dynamics in Geosciences, 197–219, Springer, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Mölders and Kramm(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Mölders, N. and Kramm, G.: Lectures in Meteorology, Springer, 1–591,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Moritz et al.(2002)Moritz, Bitz, and Steig</label><mixed-citation>
Moritz, R. E., Bitz, C. M., and Steig, E. J.: Dynamics of recent climate
change in the Arctic, Science, 297, 1497–1502, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Murray and Dermott(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, C. D. and Dermott, S. F.: Solar system dynamics, Cambridge University
Press, 1–608, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Nicholson(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Nicholson, S. E.: A revised picture of the structure of the “monsoon” and
land ITCZ over West Africa, Climate Dynamics, 32, 1155–1171, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Osborne and Provenzale(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Osborne, A. R. and Provenzale, A.: Finite correlation dimension for
stochastic systems with power-law spectra, Physica D,
35, 357–381, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Paladin and Vulpiani(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Paladin, G. and Vulpiani, A.: Predictability in spatially extended systems,
J. Phys. A, 27, 4911, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/27/14/018" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/0305-4470/27/14/018</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Penland and Magorian(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Penland, C. and Magorian, T.: Prediction of Nino 3 sea surface temperatures
using linear inverse modeling, J. Climate, 6, 1067–1076, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Pitcher(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Pitcher, E. J.: Application of stochastic dynamic prediction to real data, J.
Atmos. Sci., 34, 3–21, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Pouquet and Marino(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Pouquet, A. and Marino, R.: Geophysical turbulence and the duality of the
energy flow across scales, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 234501, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.234501" target="_blank">doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.234501</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Schertzer and Lovejoy(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Schertzer, D. and Lovejoy, S.: Nonlinear variability in geophysics,
Springer, 1–318, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2147-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2147-4</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Schubert et al.(1992)Schubert, Suarez, and
Schemm</label><mixed-citation>
Schubert, S. D., Suarez, M. J., and Schemm, J.-K.: Persistence and
predictability in a perfect model, J. Atmos. Sci., 49,
256–269, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Serreze and Barry(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Serreze, M. C. and Barry, R. G.: Processes and impacts of Arctic
amplification: A research synthesis, Global Planet. Change, 77, 85–96,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Serreze and Francis(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Serreze, M. C. and Francis, J. A.: The Arctic amplification debate, Clim.
Change, 76, 241–264, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Shepherd(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Shepherd, T. G.: Atmospheric circulation as a source of uncertainty in
climate change projections, Nature Geosci., 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Thomson(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomson, D.: Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle
trajectories in turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech., 180, 529–556,
1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Torrence and Compo(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Torrence, C. and Compo, G. P.: A practical guide to wavelet analysis,
B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 79, 61–78, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Trenberth(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Trenberth, K. E.: The definition of el nino, B. Am.
Meteor. Soc., 78, 2771–2777, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Tribbia and Baumhefner(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Tribbia, J. and Baumhefner, D.: Scale interactions and atmospheric
predictability: An updated perspective, Mon. Weather Rev., 132,
703–713, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Wang(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C.: Variability of the Caribbean low-level jet and its relations to
climate, Clim. Dynam., 29, 411–422, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
