<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Earth System Dynamics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2190-4987</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/esd-6-591-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>The impact of oceanic heat transport on the atmospheric circulation</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Impact of oceanic heat transport on the atmospheric
circulation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.-A.~Knietzsch et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Knietzsch</surname><given-names>M.-A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schröder</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Lucarini</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lunkeit</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          <email>frank.lunkeit@uni-hamburg.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Meteorologisches Institut, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">F. Lunkeit (frank.lunkeit@uni-hamburg.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>6</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>591</fpage><lpage>615</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015.html">This article is available from https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>A general circulation model of intermediate complexity with an idealized
Earth-like aquaplanet setup is used to study the impact of changes in the
oceanic heat transport on the global atmospheric circulation. Focus is on the
atmospheric mean meridional circulation and global thermodynamic properties.</p>
    <p>The atmosphere counterbalances to a large extent the imposed changes in the oceanic
heat transport, but, nonetheless, significant modifications to the
atmospheric general circulation are found. Increasing the strength of the
oceanic heat transport up to 2.5 PW leads to an increase in the global mean
near-surface temperature and to a decrease in its equator-to-pole gradient.
For stronger transports, the gradient is reduced further, but the global mean
remains approximately constant. This is linked to a cooling and a reversal of
the temperature gradient in the tropics.</p>
    <p>Additionally, a stronger oceanic heat transport leads to a decline in the
intensity and a poleward shift of the maxima of both the Hadley and Ferrel
cells. Changes in zonal mean diabatic heating and friction impact the
properties of the Hadley cell, while the behavior of the Ferrel cell is
mostly controlled by friction.</p>
    <p>The efficiency of the climate machine, the intensity of the Lorenz energy
cycle and the material entropy production of the system decline with
increased oceanic heat transport. This suggests that the climate system
becomes less efficient and turns into a state of reduced entropy production
as the enhanced oceanic transport performs a stronger large-scale mixing
between geophysical fluids with different temperatures, thus reducing the
available energy in the climate system and bringing it closer to a
state of thermal equilibrium.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The climate is a forced and dissipative nonequilibrium system, which –
neglecting secular trends – can be considered to be in steady state,
i.e., its statistical properties do not depend on time. Astronomical factors
and differences in local albedo cause a difference in net incoming shortwave
radiation between low and high latitudes leading to differential heating and
a surplus of energy in the tropics. Over a global and long-term average, all
supplied energy is emitted to space, so that the incoming shortwave radiation
is balanced by the outgoing longwave radiation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.1"/>. The ocean and atmosphere transport the
excess of energy from the tropics to high latitudes so that the horizontal
divergence of the large-scale transport performed by the geophysical fluids
on the average balances out the radiative imbalances at the top of the
atmosphere.</p>
      <p>The oceanic and atmospheric transports result from the conversion of
available potential energy – due to the inhomogeneous absorption of solar
radiation, with a positive correlation between heating and temperature
patterns – into kinetic energy, through instabilities arising, typically,
from the presence of temperature gradients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.2"/>. Such
instabilities tend to reduce the same temperature gradients they feed upon by
mixing oceanic and atmospheric masses. The kinetic energy is then dissipated
inside the system. The production of available potential energy, its
conversion to kinetic energy, and the dissipation of kinetic energy have the
same average rate, which corresponds to the intensity of the
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx35" id="text.3"/> energy cycle.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Recently, using tools of macroscopic nonequilibrium thermodynamics, a
connection has been drawn between a measure of the efficiency of the climate
system, the spatiotemporal variability in its heating and temperature fields,
the intensity of the Lorenz energy cycle and the material entropy production
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.4"/>. As mentioned above, the
climate can be considered as a (forced and dissipative) nonequilibrium
thermodynamic system where the entropy budget is achieved in such a way that
the sum of the incoming entropy flux due to the solar high-frequency photons,
and the entropy generated by irreversible processes in the atmosphere and
ocean, is balanced out by the radiation to space of low-frequency photons.
Most of the entropy production results from optical processes, while a
smaller portion – referred to as material entropy production – is related
to the irreversible processes related to diffusion and dissipation taking
place in geophysical fluids <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.5"/>. So the Earth is, in contrast
to a system that is isolated and therefore maintained in a state of
equilibrium, a thermodynamic system that exchanges energy and entropy with
space <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.6"/>.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.7"/> argued that the magnitude of the total meridional heat
transport, i.e., the sum of the oceanic and the atmospheric contributions, is
almost insensitive to the structure and the specific dynamical properties of
the atmosphere–ocean system, so that changes in the oceanic heat
transport (OHT) will be balanced out by the atmospheric flow and vice versa.
In particular, he suggested that the peak of the heat transport is
constrained within a narrow range of latitudes regardless of the radiative
forcing. Stone concluded that features of the meridional heat transport can
be related to the solar constant, the radius of the Earth, the tilt of the
Earth's axis and the hemispheric mean albedo. He argued that the
insensitivity to the structure and to the dynamics of the system is due to
the correlation of thermal emissions to space, the albedo and the efficiency
of the transport mechanisms of the atmosphere and the ocean.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.8"/> discussed the limits of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="normal.9"/> hypothesis
by employing a series of coupled atmosphere–ocean–sea-ice model experiments
in which the oceanic circulation on an aquaplanet is constrained by different
meridional barriers. The presence or absence of the barriers results in
significantly different climates, in particular in climates with and without
polar ice caps. Enderton and Marshall concluded that Stone's result is a good
guide for ice-free climates. However, they also noted that the effect of the
related meridional gradients in albedo on the absorption of solar radiation
needs to be taken into account if polar ice caps are present.</p>
      <p>The atmospheric compensation implies a significant impact of changes in OHT
on the atmospheric circulation as a whole. These changes in the atmospheric
circulation concern the zonally symmetric flow, the zonally asymmetric (eddy)
flow and the interplay between both. Thus, changes in OHT have been commonly
used to account for paleoclimatic changes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Moreover, OHT is an
important factor for potential anthropogenic climate change since significant
modifications to it can be expected. Unfortunately, there are large
uncertainties in the changes in the oceanic circulation simulated in climate
change scenarios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.11"/>. These result from, amongst others,
uncertainties in freshwater forcing due to potential melting of inland ice
sheets. To assess the role of the ocean for historical and potential future
climates the impact of the OHT on the atmospheric circulation and the
underlying mechanisms need to be investigated systematically.</p>
      <p>A way of studying the impact of changes in OHT on the atmospheric circulation
is to utilize an atmospheric general circulation model coupled to a
mixed-layer ocean. In such a model the OHT can be prescribed. Using a
present-day setup including continents, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.12"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.13"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.14"/> found that increasing OHT
results in a warmer climate with less sea ice. A reduction in low-level
clouds and an increase in greenhouse trapping due to a moistening of the
atmosphere appeared to be relevant mechanisms. In addition, a weakening of
the Hadley cell with increased OHT was found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.15"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.16"/>.</p>
      <p>Utilizing an idealized aquaplanet setup, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.17"/> systematically
assessed the impact of the OHT on the atmospheric global mean near-surface
temperature and its equator-to-pole gradient. For warm and ice-free climates,
they confirm a near-perfect atmospheric compensation of the imposed changes
in OHT. Like in the above studies including continents,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.18"/> found an increase in global
mean temperature for increasing OHT, accompanied by a decrease in the
equator-to-pole temperature gradient. Tropical SSTs (sea surface
temperatures) were shown to be less affected
than those at higher latitudes. The detailed meridional structure of the
oceanic heat transport turned out to be less important. Changes in deep moist
convection in the midlatitudes, together with an enhanced water vapor
greenhouse effect, appear to be the major
drivers. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.19"/> confirmed the low sensitivity of tropical SSTs to
OHT changes. In their aquaplanet experiments, larger OHT leads to a weakening
of the Hadley cell, which reduces cloud cover and surface winds and thus
counteracts surface cooling resulting from increasing OHT.</p>
      <p>In the present study we extend and supplement the above studies. Based on the
experimental setup of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.20"/>, we focus on the impact of OHT changes
on the atmospheric dynamics and thermodynamics. Our overall goal is to
understand how the atmospheric energy transport and transformations are
affected by modulations in the oceanic transport. We analyze the changes in
the atmospheric heat transport and the mean meridional circulation by
employing, amongst others, the Kuo–Eliassen equation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.21"/> in order to understand the various drivers of
the mean meridional circulation.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, the integrated effect on the global atmospheric energetics is
assessed by changes in the properties of the effective warm and cold
reservoirs constructed according to the theory proposed in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.22"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.23"/>. This allows for defining a
measure of the efficiency of the climate system viewed as an (equivalent
Carnot) engine. Attention is directed to measuring the irreversibility of the
atmosphere and the material entropy production. This point of view is useful for
providing a general physical framework to relevant climatic processes, trying to advance the understanding of the climate as a
nonequilibrium, forced and dissipative macroscopic system. Links between the
climate engine view and the classical Lorenz energy cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.24"/>
provide a consistent picture of the observed changes and document the
relevance of the climate engine approach.</p>
      <p>The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we describe the model and the
experimental design. Section 3 introduces our diagnostics. The results of the
analyses are presented in Sect. 4. A summary and discussion concludes the
paper (Sect. 5). Appendices A–C give comprehensive descriptions of the main
diagnostics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Model and experimental setup</title>
      <p>The Planet Simulator <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.25"><named-content content-type="pre">PlaSim;</named-content></xref> is an open-source
general circulation model (GCM) of intermediate complexity developed at the
University of Hamburg. For the atmosphere, the dynamical core is the Portable
University Model of the Atmosphere (PUMA) based on the primitive-equation
multilevel spectral model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.26"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.27"/>.
Radiation is parameterized by differentiating between shortwave and longwave
radiation and between a clear and a cloudy atmosphere. The respective schemes
follow the works of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.28"/> for the shortwave part and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.29"/> for the longwave part. The radiative properties of
clouds are based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.30"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.31"/>. Cloud
fraction is computed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.32"/>. The representation of
boundary-layer fluxes and of vertical and horizontal diffusion follows
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.33"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.34"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.35"/>, and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.36"/>. The cumulus convection scheme is based on
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx28" id="text.37"/>. The ocean is represented by a thermodynamic
mixed-layer (slab ocean) model including a one-layer thermodynamic sea-ice
component.</p>
      <p>Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.38"/> we used an Earth-like aquaplanet setup with
zonally symmetric forcing utilizing reference present-day conditions for the
solar constant (1365 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (360 ppm).
The solar insolation comprises an annual cycle (with
obliquity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23.4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), but eccentricity is set to 0. Thus, on annual
average the forcing is hemispherically symmetric as well. The mixed-layer
depth is set to 60 m.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Oceanic heat transport (in PW) for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, 1, 2,
3, and 4 PW.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>A temporally constant flux into the ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-flux) is used to prescribe
the oceanic heat transport (OHT) according to the analytic expression given
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.39"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OHT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>OHT</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the latitude. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a positive integer which determines
the latitude of the maximum of the transport and the shape of its meridional
profile, and OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant defining its magnitude. Rose and
Ferreira made sensitivity experiments by varying <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (ranging from 1 to 8)
and by varying the peak transport (ranging from 0 to 4 PW), which is
controlled by OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>For our study we follow Rose and Ferreira but fix the location of the peak by
setting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 (which corresponds to maximum transport at 27<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
We perform nine sensitivity simulations with respect to the magnitude of the
transport by changing OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to obtain peak transports OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
from 0 to 4 PW (with 0.5 PW increment). OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 PW
(i.e., no OHT) serves as the control simulation. The OHT for
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 PW is displayed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.</p>
      <p>All simulations are run for at least 100 years (360 days per year). The last
30 years are subject to the analyses. A horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(96 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48 grid points) with five <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in the vertical is
used. The time step is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 min.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Diagnostics</title>
      <p>The dominant feature of the large-scale ocean and the atmosphere dynamics is
the transport of energy from regions featuring a net positive energy budget
at the top of the atmosphere low latitudes) to regions where such a budget is
negative (high latitudes). This reduces the temperature gradient between the
equator and the poles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.40"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In present
conditions, the partitioning of heat transport between atmosphere and ocean
reflects two limits: the dominance of the atmospheric mass transport in mid-
to high latitudes and the dominance of the oceanic energy transport in the
tropics. The atmospheric transport can be further subdivided in the
sensible-heat, latent-heat and potential-energy components. We will
investigate the response of changes in the imposed OHT for each of these
components and will further focus the analysis by considering both the
zonally symmetric contributions, due to the mean meridional circulation (MMC)
and the zonally asymmetric contributions, due to the atmospheric eddies.</p>
      <p>In the classical view (the Eulerian mean circulation), the mean meridional
circulation consists of three cells: the tropical Hadley cell, the Ferrel
cell in midlatitudes and a weak polar cell. While the Hadley and the polar
cell are thermally direct circulations, i.e., relatively warm air is rising
and cold air is sinking, the Ferrel cell is referred to as a thermally
indirect cell with warm air sinking and cold air rising. Though the mean
meridional circulation can be viewed as a two dimensional circulation in the
meridional-height plane, both zonally symmetric and zonally asymmetric
components contribute to its existence.</p>
      <p>The transformed Eulerian mean (TEM) formalism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.41"/> accounts
for the role of the eddies in the mean meridional transport. In particular,
it provides a closer link to the total atmospheric meridional heat transport.
The TEM residual circulation approximates the (dry) isentropic mean
circulation resulting in a single cell from the equator to the pole.</p>
      <p>Based on work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.42"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.43"/> showed that the
atmospheric heat transport can be represented by the product of a moist TEM
residual circulation and the vertical contrast in moist static energy (or
equivalent potential temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The moist residual circulation
is given by replacing all terms containing dry static energy (or potential
temperature) by their moist analogs.</p>
      <p>Utilizing the Kuo–Eliassen equations allows for identifying individual
drivers of the Eulerian mean meridional circulation (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>).
A similar partitioning is done for TEM residual stream function which
provides a direct link to the atmospheric heat transport. However,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.44"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.45"/> pointed out that there is no
simple way to represent a well-defined moist isentropic circulation in the
latitude–pressure plane. Therefore, in order to assess the effect of moisture, we
additionally investigate the mean circulation on dry and moist isentropes.</p>
      <p>This summarizes the diagnostics tools aimed at capturing a phenomenological
description of the atmospheric circulation.</p>
      <p>A second set of diagnostic tools is based on taking a thermodynamical point
of view on the atmospheric circulation. One finds that on average a net
positive work resulting from the positive correlation between temperature and
heating fields upholds the kinetic energy of the global circulation against
the frictional dissipation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.46"/>.</p>
      <p>The atmospheric energy cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.47"/> is one of the
most important concepts used to understand the global atmospheric circulation
as it provides a comprehensive look at the integrated effects of physical
mechanisms involved, the generation of available potential energy by external
forcing, the dissipation of kinetic energy and the energy conversions by
baroclinic and barotropic processes. If the climate system is in
a statistical steady state, the rate of generation of available potential
energy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, the rate of conversion of potential into kinetic energy
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the dissipation rate of kinetic energy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> are equal
when averaged over a long period of time (e.g., several years). Thus,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0,
where the bar indicates the operation of time averaging. This allows for
characterizing the strength of the energy cycle in several ways.</p>
      <p>Following the work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.48"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.49"/>, we
consider the global energy cycle as resulting from the work of an equivalent
Carnot engine operating between the two (dynamically determined) reservoirs
at temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to this concept, an
efficiency of the climate system (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be defined by

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Furthermore, following the same theoretical point of view, we analyze the
entropy production which leads to a measure of the
irreversibility of the climatic processes. An outline of the theory and the according diagnostics is
given in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>.</p>
      <p>The diagnostics of the Lorenz formulation of the energy cycle reveal
information about the reservoirs partitioned into zonal mean and eddy
components and about the conversions due to different physical processes
(Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>). We gain evidence about the relative importance
of the individual components contributing to the energy cycle and the related
thermodynamic properties. Furthermore, the classical Lorenz energy cycle
helps to provide a link between the phenomenological view (given by the
circulation and transports) and the thermodynamic view (the equivalent Carnot
engine), thus demonstrating the relevance of the latter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Mean climate</title>
      <p>We start with the discussion of the effect of OHT changes on the mean climate in terms of
atmospheric near-surface (2 m) temperature, sea-ice and meridional heat
transport. First, we note that, similarly to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.50"/>, our model
exhibits multiple equilibria, a warm state and a snow-ball Earth depending on
the initial conditions as thoroughly discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.51"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.52"/>. In the present study we investigate the warm states
only. However, in contrast to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.53"/>, sea ice at high latitudes is
present in all of the warm-state simulations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Climatological annual averages for all simulations. Upper panel:
zonal mean near-surface temperature (solid lines) and sea-ice cover (dotted lines).
Lower panel: global mean near-surface temperatures
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) vs. equator-to-pole gradient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Up to about OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW increasing OHT leads to an
increase in the global mean (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a decrease in the
equator-to-pole gradient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the annual and zonal mean
near-surface air temperature (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). For this regime an
approximately linear relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be found. For OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is almost
insensitive to an OHT change, while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is further reduced with
increasing intensity of transport. Here, the equator-to-pole gradient is
defined by the difference between the values at the lowest and highest
latitude of the model's grid which are located at about 0.9 and 85.8<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively.</p>
      <p>When inspecting the meridional profiles of the annual and zonal mean
near-surface temperatures, we observe that high latitudes are more sensitive
to the OHT changes than low latitudes. With increasing OHT, polar
temperatures continuously increase except that for
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 PW slightly colder polar temperatures than for
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 PW are found. It appears that this is a
consequence of the reduced atmospheric heat transport, slightly
overcompensating for the increased but still small oceanic heat transport at
these latitudes (see later discussions). In the tropics, an increase in the
temperatures is only present until OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 PW. For
larger OHT, the equatorial temperatures decrease. In addition, increasing OHT
leads to a flattening of the temperature profile in the tropics until, for
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 and 4 PW, the temperature gradient in the
tropics gets reversed and the maximum of the temperature shifts away from the
equator to approx. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Sea ice gradually decreases with increasing OHT. However, even for
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 PW some sea ice remains in polar latitudes.
However, for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 PW the average sea-ice cover is
smaller than 1, indicating that no latitude is completely covered by sea ice
during the whole year.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Climatological Northern Hemisphere summer (June–August) averages
for all simulations: zonal mean near-surface temperatures (in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C;
solid lines) and sea-ice cover (dotted lines).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Qualitatively, all findings are also true for winter and summer as can be
seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, except that in summer the sensitivity to OHT
changes is small for the sea-ice-covered high latitudes. In addition, we note
that the seasonality and its sensitivity to OHT changes are small for
latitudes without sea ice due to the high thermal inertia of the mixed layer.
In the following we restrict the analysis to the annual mean.</p>
      <p>Despite the difference in sea-ice extent (i.e., planetary albedo), the
atmospheric heat transport compensates for the changes in OHT to a large
extent, as can be inferred from the small differences in total meridional
heat transport diagnosed from the energy budget at the top of the atmosphere
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Thermodynamics</title>
      <p>Now we shift our attention to the global thermodynamical properties of the
system and investigate how the energetics and the entropy budget are impacted
by changes in the imposed meridional oceanic heat transport.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Efficiency</title>
      <p>As thoroughly discussed in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>,
the generation of available potential energy that powers the global
atmospheric circulation results from the presence of a positive spatial and
temporal correlation between the heating and the temperature fields. As a
result, one can introduce two temperatures, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which characterize the warm and cold reservoirs of the system, in such a way
that the total intensity of the Lorenz energy cycle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be expressed as the product of the thermodynamic efficiency
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the climate engine times the net
heating of the warm reservoir. We first look into the sensitivity of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to changes in the OHT.
The relation to the Lorenz energy cycle will be discussed later in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Total heat transport (in PW) diagnosed from energy budget at the top
of the atmosphere for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, 1, 2, 3, and
4 PW.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f04.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Qualitatively, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> behave similarly when
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is changed (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). We can classify three
temperature regimes: (i) OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 PW atmospheric
warming, (ii) 2.0 PW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 PW
atmospheric cooling, and (iii) OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 PW weak
sensitivity. We observe a higher sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for (i) which is generally due to the amplified polar warming.
The difference between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, denoted as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, decreases with increasing OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus implying a
decrease in the atmospheric efficiency of the climate engine
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). Interestingly, the difference between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the average of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 PW,
indicating a reduction in the stability of the atmosphere. This is understood
by considering that larger oceanic transports lead to stronger warming at low
levels in the mid- and high latitudes, which must be balanced out by a weaker
heat transport aloft.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Time average of the global mean near-surface temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and of the temperature of the warm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the cold
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) pool.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Zonally averaged mean heating rates in the atmosphere for oceanic
heat transport ranging from 0.0 PW (top left panel) to 4.0 PW (bottom right
panel), where grey-shaded areas indicate positive and white areas negative
heating rates in K day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Upper panel: scatterplot of time-averaged global mean near-surface
temperature difference between equator and pole (blue) as well as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (green) as a function of maximum energy
transport in the ocean. Lower panel: scatterplot of time-averaged global mean
temperature difference between equator and pole as well as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Time average of efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for steady state obtained for
varying oceanic heat transport. Dotted line represents best linear fit for
(i) 0.0 PW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW (blue) and for
(ii) 2.5 PW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0 PW (red) with
polynomial coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th order, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f08.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The diabatic heating processes constitute the sources and sinks of internal
energy for the atmosphere and play a decisive role in the generation and
destruction of available potential energy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.54"/>. Those
processes are displayed as the time- and zonally averaged diabatic heating
rates d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The heating
rate is calculated as the sum over all diabatic heating effects including
heating or cooling by the response of radiative heat fluxes, sensible and
latent heat fluxes and vertical diffusion. While <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined using the time- and space-dependent heating fields,
inspecting the time and zonal averages of the heating patterns is useful for
understanding how available potential energy is generated
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.55"/>.</p>
      <p>Simulations with 0.5 PW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 PW show
diabatic warming in the deep tropics, in the mid-troposphere and in the
subtropical low troposphere, whereas diabatic cooling occurs in the mid- and
high troposphere of the subtropics and in polar as well as subpolar regions.
Positive heating in the tropical and subtropical regions is dominated by the
contribution of latent heat fluxes, in particular, heating through convective
precipitation (not shown). In the mid- to high-latitude regions large-scale
precipitation contributes towards a positive heating. Diabatic cooling, on
the other hand, is mostly caused by outgoing longwave radiation and, to a
moderate extent, by the conversion process from rain to snow, mostly in the
subtropical regions.</p>
      <p>We see an extension of the area of positive heating in the midlatitudes
towards the poles in the lower troposphere as well as in the equatorial mid-
and upper troposphere for larger values of OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The poleward
migration of the positive heating pattern in midlatitudes is closely related
to the poleward shift of the atmospheric latent heat transport. The area of
positive heating broadens in height at latitudes around 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since the
positive heating patterns (relevant for defining <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
midlatitudes extend in height and are, in addition, stretched poleward, lower
temperatures are considered in evaluating <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which explains the smaller sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 0 PW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 PW in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. By implication, the warming effect at polar latitudes
causes the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be larger than that of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 PW the sensitivity of both
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is negative since large parts of the tropical
high- and mid-troposphere cool down.</p>
      <p>We observe, on average, a decline in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of approximately 0.4 K
for every 0.5 PW increase in OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>; black graph). The temperature
difference <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases from 7.9 to 4.5 K across the considered range of values
of OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The climate system becomes horizontally more
isothermal as OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is reinforced, which is consistent with the
decline for the meridional difference in near-surface temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> blue graph, and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). We
find a linear relation between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: for every
10 K decline in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the reservoir temperature difference
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases by approximately 0.8 K
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). This provides a potentially interesting
indication of how to relate changes in the near-surface temperature gradient
to quantities describing the dynamic processes in the atmosphere.</p>
      <p>As the climate warms and the temperature difference between the warm and the
cold reservoir shrinks with increased OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the efficiency
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> declines (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>). The increase in
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> causes the climatic machine to act less efficiently, in
terms of a decrease in the ratio between mechanical energy output and thermal
energy input.</p>
      <p>We observe a linear behavior for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for
0 PW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW. For every 0.5 PW
increase in OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> the efficiency, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> declines by about
2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> larger than present-day
values (OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases by only
0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per 0.5 PW increase. We observe an abrupt change in
the tendency for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW, at which pronounced
tropical and subtropical atmospheric cooling sets in. This indicates that the
change in the temperature difference between equatorial and tropical regions
cause a drastic change in the dynamical properties of the system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Entropy budget</title>
      <p>We complete our analysis of the thermodynamics of the system by looking into
how changes in the meridional oceanic heat transport impact the entropy budget.</p>
      <p>As introduced in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>, material
entropy production <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by the sum of
the minimum value of entropy production (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>)
compatible with the presence of the average dissipation and the excess of
entropy production (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to such a
minimum, i.e.,

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The ratio between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
defines the degree of irreversibility <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            and determines the ratio between the contributions to entropy production by
down-gradient turbulent transport and by viscous dissipation of mechanical
energy. Material entropy production <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
degree of irreversibility <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> (upper
panel).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Upper panel: steady-state global mean material entropy production
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue graph) and degree of irreversibility
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Lower panel: most relevant contributions of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> split into
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a
function of increasing oceanic heat transport.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>With increasing values of OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the decrease in the efficiency
(i.e., the intensity of the Lorenz energy cycle) and the increase in the
near-surface temperature imply a reduction in the part in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> linked with frictional dissipation, which
is related to the lower bound of entropy production
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Nonetheless, one needs to investigate the
excess of entropy production <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
linked to the turbulent heat fluxes down the temperature gradient. The
relative decrease in entropy production due to frictional dissipation
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) is stronger than the relative decrease in
entropy production by down-gradient turbulent heat transport
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) as featured by the overall increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). Thus, the entropy production due to the
turbulent heat transport down the gradient of the temperature field becomes
more and more dominant as the oceanic transport increases because
irreversible mixing becomes stronger.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Entropy production from moist processes for
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 PW.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f10.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> (lower panels) the main contributions to the
material entropy production in the model are displayed. This includes latent
and sensible turbulent heat fluxes and frictional dissipation of kinetic
energy. Entropy production due to latent heat processes, including convective
as well as large-scale precipitation, surface latent heat fluxes and
rain–snow conversion processes, makes up by far the largest portion of
material entropy production. For small OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the value of
entropy production by latent heat is 35 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. One would
expect that larger values of OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> would lead to larger values
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, using the argument that a warmer planet
should be able to have a stronger hydrological cycle, but things are in fact
more complicated. For increasing OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> up to 1.5 PW, the value
increases by 2 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while for larger OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
this contribution to entropy production declines by
4 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Entropy production by frictional dissipation
decreases from 8 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 PW
to 3 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 PW. Entropy
production by sensible turbulent heat flux at the surface as well as in the
atmosphere decreases by half (from 2 to 1 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increasing. For low values of OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the hydrological cycle
is overcompensated for by the decrease in the contribution due to the
frictional dissipation.</p>
      <p>In order to further clarify the impact on the material entropy production of
increasing OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we split the material entropy production due
to irreversible latent turbulent heat processes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E6"/>) into the contributions coming from individual
parameterizations (processes) operating in our model, which are convective
precipitation, large-scale precipitation, surface latent heat fluxes, and the
heat release due to rain–snow conversion. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>
displays the time mean of these contributions coming from each latitudinal
belt. Positive contributions correspond to net warming, while negative
contributions are related to cooling.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Atmospheric heat (moist static energy) transport (in PW) assigned to
different processes for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, 1, 2, 3, and
4 PW.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f11.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Convective precipitation gives the largest positive contribution,
particularly in the tropics and subtropics. For increased OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
we observe that the peak at the equator is significantly reduced while
convection processes move into the midlatitudes where the surface is heated
and static stability decreases. The positive contribution from large-scale
precipitation features are shifted out of the midlatitudes towards higher
latitudes with increasing OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. As large-scale precipitation
regimes experience a shift to higher latitudes, their maximum intensity is
almost kept constant. The contribution by the surface latent heat flux is
negative and related to surface cooling. For 0 PW, the largest values are obtained
at latitudes of 20 to 25<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating the region with maximum
evaporation. As the heat transport in the ocean is increased, latent
turbulent heat fluxes are largely reduced in tropical and subtropical
regions, and the maximum of latent heat fluxes move towards midlatitudes. The
region with the largest evaporation at the surface shifts from the subtropics
to the midlatitudes with increasing OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The contribution from
latent heat release by rain–snow conversion is negative (indicating an
overall cooling) and shows qualitatively similar patterns to the meridional
profile of convective processes.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> seems to imply that the tropical latitudinal belt
features a negative material entropy production. This is indeed not the case
because there is a net large-scale transport of energy from those regions to
both the equator and the midlatitudes as a result of a net moisture export
(with the corresponding transport of latent heat; see discussion below). Such
a negative contribution is overcompensated for by the positive material
entropy production associated with the absorption of the transported latent
heat taking place elsewhere. In addition, we note that the way we compute the
entropy production associated with the hydrological cycle relies on focusing
on water phase changes and related latent heat release and/or absorption; see
Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E5"/>)–(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E6"/>). Using a moist entropy
that is mostly conserved in pseudoadiabatic motions would lead to a different
partitioning of the material entropy production between precipitation,
surface latent heat flux and rain–snow conversion.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Atmospheric circulation and transports</title>
      <p>Now we discuss the sensitivity of the atmospheric circulation and transports
to changes in OHT. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> shows the annual mean atmospheric
meridional heat transport for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 PW.
We present the total transport and its components: the transport of sensible
heat, latent heat and potential energy. In addition, we split each transport
into the contribution from the zonally symmetric (zonal mean flow) and the
asymmetric (eddy) part. For the total transport, the compensation for
increasing OHT leads to a decrease in the atmospheric transport and a
poleward shift of its maximum according to the prescribed OHT profile.
Although the OHT is zonally symmetric, both atmospheric zonal mean flow and
atmospheric eddies contribute to the compensation.</p>
      <p>In the tropics (0–30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), both the zonal mean flow and the eddies
account for the atmospheric transport, with the eddy component being dominant
in the outer tropics, where the zonal mean flow contribution decreases to 0.
For the eddy transport in the tropics, only the latent heat transport is of
appreciable magnitude. For the zonal mean flow, the magnitude of all three
components decreases with increasing OHT showing about the same relative
change per 1 PW OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The total mean flow transport is the
result of a large compensation of the equatorward transport of heat (sensible
and latent) and the poleward transport of potential energy.</p>
      <p>In midlatitudes, eddies dominate the poleward heat transport and its
sensitivity to OHT changes, with the contribution from latent heat transport
being concentrated equatorward of the contribution from sensible heat
transport. Transport of potential energy by eddies is almost absent due to
their geostrophic nature (i.e., the meridional velocity is given by the zonal
gradient of the geopotential, and thus the zonal average of the product of
velocity and geopotential vanishes).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Climatological annual mean mass stream function (in
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, 2, 3, and
4 PW.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In summary, the atmospheric compensation for changes in OHT takes place
according to the relative importance of the respective component for the
transport in the reference state where no OHT is present. Even if changes in
OHT are very large, it appears that the role of the different mechanisms in
controlling the total heat transport remains unchanged: in the inner tropics
eddy transport is not important and the poleward energy transport is due to
the transport of potential energy by the zonal mean flow. Here, the transport
of sensible and latent heat by the zonal mean flow is directed towards the
equator, reducing the net transport. Poleward of the outer tropics the eddy
transport becomes dominant. The importance of eddy latent transport increases
for increasing temperatures as the moisture content is broadly controlled by
the Clausius–Clapeyron law, so that the latent heat transport is more
important for lower latitudes. Eddy transport of potential energy is
negligible, while the transport of potential energy by the zonal mean flow in
the midlatitudes is equatorward and counteracts the eddy transport.</p>
      <p>The meridional atmospheric energy transport is closely linked to the mean
meridional circulation, which we will study in the following. We start with
the classical Eulerian mean circulation described by a mass stream
function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> shows the Northern Hemisphere <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, 2, 3 and 4 PW. For
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 PW, a Hadley cell and a Ferrel cell are well
established, with values of about 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The maximum magnitudes
are located at about 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N for the Hadley cell and 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N for
the Ferrel cell and at about 700 hPa for both cells. The Hadley cell extends
to about 33<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. A polar cell is absent in the annual mean but emerges
weakly in the summer months. Considering the idealized setup, both the
position and the strengths of the simulated cells are in reasonable agreement
with observations for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 PW, which is about the
observed OHT strength (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="altparen.56"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p>Climatological annual mean mass stream function (Northern
Hemisphere): strength (in 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and location (in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) of Hadley and Ferrel cell for all simulations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f13.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>With increasing OHT, the strength of both cells decreases
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>). The decrease in strength of the Hadley cell is
virtually linear and amounts to about 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
per PW. The Ferrel cell strength decreases by about
0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per PW, with stronger decreases for
smaller OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The core of the Ferrel cell shifts poleward. For
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 PW, a poleward shift can also be observed for the
Hadley cell's maximum together with a broadening of this cell, i.e., a
poleward shift of its edge. For OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 PW, an additional
(weak) cell can be observed close to the equator with counterclockwise
rotation. However, this (virtual) cell is caused by averaging an almost
vanished Hadley cell in summer and a winter hemisphere Hadley cell which has
its maximum in the summer hemisphere.</p>
      <p>The Kuo–Eliassen equation allows for identifying individual drivers of the
Eulerian mean meridional circulation (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>). The
reconstructions by means of the Kuo–Eliassen equation are in good agreement
with the actual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all simulations. However, the maximum magnitudes
are systematically overestimated. In general, the reconstruction is a better
fit for the Hadley cell than for the Ferrel cell (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>). It is
not clear why the reconstruction overestimates the magnitudes of the cells.
Possible sources of the differences are the numerical procedure to solve the
equation (e.g., the representation of the derivatives) and, in particular,
the quasi-geostrophic assumption.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Climatological annual mean mass stream function (in
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 PW:
<bold>(a)</bold> original (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>); <bold>(b)</bold> computed from
the Kuo–Eliassen equation (all sources); <bold>(c)</bold> source from diabatic
heating; <bold>(d)</bold> source from friction; <bold>(e)</bold> source from eddy
heat transport; <bold>(f)</bold> source from eddy momentum
transport.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f14.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sources (in 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the Hadley (upper panel) and
the Ferrel (lower panel) cell according to the Kuo–Eliassen equation.
Circles indicate the actual strength of the respective cell.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f15.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>As an example, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/> shows the sources and the reconstruction
for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 PW. The individual sources indicate that the
largest contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stem from diabatic heating and from friction.
The heating controls the Hadley cell together with a significant contribution
by friction. For the Ferrel cell, friction is the most important factor. Eddy
transports of heat and momentum add less to the Ferrel circulation. For both
Hadley and Ferrel cell, the maximum contribution by friction is located at
lower levels than for all other sources, which indicates the dominance of
frictional dissipation close to the surface.</p>
      <p>For the Hadley cell both the contributions coming from heating and friction
decrease linearly with increasing OHT (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>). As the decrease
is stronger for heating, friction becomes the major contributors to the
Hadley cell for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 PW. The decrease in the Ferrel
cell with increasing OHT is linked to a decrease in the friction, i.e., a
decrease in the near-surface zonal mean zonal wind. The contributions from
heat and momentum transports decrease less than for the Hadley cell and
remain constant for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 PW. Similar to changes in
magnitude, the shifting of the cells and the broadening of the Hadley cell
can be explained by respective changes in the mean sources.</p>
      <p>The residual mean stream function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting from the TEM
formalism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.57"/> provides a much closer link between the
meridional circulation and the atmospheric transport of dry static energy. In
addition, it clarifies the role of the eddies for the transport.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Climatological annual mean residual stream function (in
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 PW:
<bold>(a)</bold> original; <bold>(b)</bold> reconstructed; <bold>(c)</bold> eddy source;
<bold>(d)</bold> Stokes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f16.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>As given in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>, the TEM formulations results in
a decomposition of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> similar to the Kuo–Eliassen equation.
Here, the residual mean circulation is the part of the mean meridional
circulation that is not balanced by the convergence of the eddy heat
transport. It consists of the Eulerian mean circulation plus a circulation
due to the eddy heat transport. The latter is sometimes referred to as the
Stokes stream function. The TEM residual mean circulation is qualitatively
similar to the dry isentropic circulation with the important difference that
the TEM circulation does not close at the surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.58"/>. The
residual stream function is forced by the combined effect of the eddy
momentum and the eddy heat transport, given by the divergence of the
Eliassen–Palm (E–P) flux. Splitting the Eliassen–Palm flux into its
components shows that the individual contribution of the momentum transport
is the same for both the Eulerian mean and the TEM formulation. Also, the
sources from diabatic heating and friction remain the same.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/> gives the residual mean stream function, its
reconstruction, the eddy source resulting from E–P flux divergence, and the
Stokes stream function for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 PW. As for the
Eulerian mean, the reconstruction is in good agreement with the actual
circulation (this again holds for all OHTs). Compared to the Eulerian mean
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>), the residual stream function displays a single
overturning circulation with rising motion in the tropics and sinking air in
high latitudes. While the maximum of the residual stream function occurs in
midlatitudes near the surface, a secondary maximum in the tropics is present
related to the Eulerian mean Hadley cell. From the reconstruction we see the
dominance of the eddy (E–P flux) forcing for the midlatitudes compared to
the Eulerian mean case. Since the contribution from the eddy momentum
transport is the same in the Eulerian mean and the TEM case, the differences
are due to the heat transport only. We also note that the Stokes stream
function and E–P flux source are very similar, which is explained by the
small contribution of the eddy forcing in the Eulerian mean case (note that
the Stokes stream function is given by the difference between E–P flux
source and Eulerian mean eddy source; cf. Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>).</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/> displays the sensitivity of the E–P flux source
and the Stokes stream function to changes in OHT. A strong decrease (from
about 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to about
9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the maxima can be found for
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increasing from 0 to 2 PW. For
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 PW the decrease is less steep and the maxima
reach values of about 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. We note that, in
the Eulerian mean view (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>), the eddy forcing does not
appear to be very important because it is of small magnitude and has a
limited sensitivity. The huge impact of the eddies on the circulation only
becomes clear when considering the combined effect of the eddies, which sets
up an eddy-related (Stokes) circulation, as visible in the TEM view.</p>
      <p>Concerning the total heat transport, including latent heat,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.59"/>, based on work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.60"/>, showed that the
atmospheric heat transport can be represented by the product of a moist TEM
residual circulation and the vertical contrast in moist static energy (or
equivalent potential temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Here, both the eddy
transport and the vertical gradient of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the TEM formalism are
replaced by the respective values utilizing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Unfortunately, as mentioned in the introduction, there is no simple way to
represent a well-defined moist isentropic circulation in the
latitude–pressure plane <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.61"/>. This prevents a
diagnostic similar to the dry case. To tackle this problem,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.62"/> introduced a statistical generalization of the
transformed Eulerian mean circulation for arbitrary vertical coordinates.
However, here we restrict ourselves by diagnosing and comparing the total
atmospheric circulation on dry and moist isentropes.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/> displays the respective circulations for
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 and 3 PW, as well as the maxima of the respective
stream functions for different OHTs. The circulation on dry isentropes
corresponds well with the residual circulation except that it is closed and
has smaller maxima, mainly due to the misrepresentation of near-surface
values in pressure coordinates. It shows one single overturning cell with
(for small OHT) a tropical and a midlatitude maximum. In contrast to the dry
case, the circulation on moist isentropes shows only one maximum for all
values of OHT, which is located in the midlatitudes. In addition, the moist
isentropic circulation is narrower and exhibits larger mass transport values,
illustrating the impact of the moisture transport.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17"><caption><p>Eddy (E–P flux) source of the residual circulation and Stokes
stream function (in 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f17.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Upper panels: climatological annual mean mass stream function (in
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 PW on
<bold>(a)</bold> dry isentropes and <bold>(b)</bold> moist isentropes. Middle panels:
climatological annual mean mass stream function (in 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 PW on <bold>(c)</bold> dry isentropes and
<bold>(d)</bold> moist isentropes. Lower panels: maximum of stream function (in
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) on <bold>(e)</bold> dry isentropes and
<bold>(f)</bold> moist isentropes for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, 1, 2, 3, and
4 PW.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f18.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>For increasing OHT, both the dry and the moist isentropic circulation slow
down, and the maxima shift poleward. In accordance with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.63"/>,
this agrees well with changes in the transport of dry and moist static energy
(cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>). However, the relative decreases in the transports
are smaller than those in the circulations. This is explained by a narrowing
of the isentropic circulation for larger OHT (cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/> for
0 and 3 PW) corresponding to a decrease in static stability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Lorenz energy cycle</title>
      <p>Finally, we give a synopsis of the above results in terms of the global
energetics provided by the classical Lorenz energy cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.64"/>.
In particular, this will confirm the relevance of the climate engine perspective.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F19"/> shows reservoirs, conversions and sources of the
energy cycle where the atmospheric flow has been partitioned into the zonal
mean and the eddy component. We already noted
(cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) the close (linear) relation between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the meridional near-surface temperature gradient) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the temperature difference between the warm and the cold
thermodynamic reservoirs of the climate engine). Consistent with the changes
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Lorenz available potential energies of
the mean flow (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and of the eddies (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decrease.
In addition, we notice that the relative decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is of the same size, while the absolute values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are substantially larger.</p>
      <p>As pointed out in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>, a direct
link between the efficiency of the climate system (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the strength
of the Lorenz energy cycle is given by the work output <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
of the climate engine, which gives the rate of generation of available
potential energy. Indeed, for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F20"/>) we observe a similar behavior as for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>). For
0 PW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreases linearly by about 0.2 Wm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for every 0.5 PW increase in
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For (OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> declines by 0.1 Wm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per 0.5 PW increase.</p>
      <p>From energy conservation we know that the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
also implies that the total dissipation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases in
a steady-state climate, as the climatic engine has a smaller rate of
transformation of available into kinetic energy. The decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> implies that surface winds are weaker because this is
where most of the dissipation takes place. Though diagnosed as residuals from
the conversions, the total source of available potential energy and the total
sink of kinetic energy are in good agreement with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating a change in sensitivity at
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW. In addition, we notice that only the
zonally symmetric heating generates available potential energy, while the
zonally asymmetric heating extracts <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., it acts to
homogenize the zonal temperature profiles. For the dissipation of kinetic
energy, the eddy component is larger than the contribution of the zonal mean
flow. For increasing OHT, the magnitude of all sources and/or sinks decrease
and both the (negative) eddy source of available potential energy and the
zonal mean sink of kinetic energy go to 0.</p>
      <p>We conclude that assigning the overall strength of the Lorenz energy cycle to
either the zonal mean or the eddy flow would lead to different results
depending on whether we choose the generation of available potential energy
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> or the dissipation of kinetic energy
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> as a measure. Dominant processes of the generation of
available energy (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) are related to the zonal mean
circulation, while the dissipation of kinetic energy (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>)
acts on the eddies resulting from baroclinic instability. In addition, one
may use the conversion from potential to kinetic energy to define the energy
cycle strengths. Here, the baroclinic eddies accomplish such a
transformation, while the zonal mean flow generates <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the
expense of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., by favoring a thermally indirect
circulation. Thus, only considering both components together (eddy and mean
flow) allows for assessing the strength of the energy cycle. In this respect,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from the
(Carnot) climate engine perspective provide consistent and physically based
measures.</p>
      <p>Consistent with the sensitivity of the transports and the meridional
circulation, the overall decline in the reservoirs and sources with
increasing OHT is also present for conversion terms related to the baroclinic
conversion, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The conversion
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is relevant for defining the zonal
mean Eulerian circulation, shows little change, as there is a cancellation
between the changes occurring in the Hadley and Ferrel cells. In addition, we
note that the sensitivity of the eddy-related conversions appears to decrease
following the temporal sequence of a baroclinic life cycle: the conversion
from zonal mean available potential energy to eddy potential energy
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) shows the largest sensitivity
(approx. 65 % reduction for 4 PW increase in OHT). The sensitivity of the
transformation into eddy kinetic energy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
amounts to approx. 57 %, and the change of the conversion into zonal mean
kinetic energy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the smallest
(approx. 53 %). However, to verify whether these changes are due to changes
in the baroclinic life cycles or just a coincidence, further analysis is
necessary, which is beyond the scope of the present paper.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and discussion</title>
      <p>We have studied the impact of the oceanic heat transport (OHT) on the
atmospheric circulation focusing on two important aspects: changes in the
atmospheric meridional heat transport and circulation and changes in global
thermodynamic properties of the atmosphere including efficiency,
irreversibility and the Lorenz energy cycle.</p>
      <p>Using a general circulation model of intermediate complexity (PlaSim)
including an oceanic mixed layer, we have adopted an experimental design from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.65"/>. Here, an imposed oceanic heat transport of simple analytic
form and with varying strengths allows for systematic analyses.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F19"><caption><p>Climatological mean Lorenz energy cycle: reservoirs (upper panel, in
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> J m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), conversions (middle panel, in W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
sources (lower panel, in W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for all simulations.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f19.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>We found a compensation of the changes in oceanic heat transport by the
atmosphere consistent with Stone's (1978) conclusions. The presence of sea
ice may explain the deviations from a perfect compensation as discussed in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.66"/>. While all components of the atmospheric heat transport
are affected by the compensation, their relative importance for the total
transport remains almost unchanged. While the atmosphere counterbalances the
changes in the OHT very effectively, so that the total meridional heat
transport is weakly altered, the climate as a whole strongly depends on the
OHT value chosen. The basic reason for this is that the atmosphere and the
ocean transport heat at different heights and across different temperature
gradients.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In agreement with Rose and Ferreira, we have found an increase in the global
mean near-surface temperature and a decrease in the equator-to-pole
temperature gradient, with increasing OHT for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 PW.
For larger OHT, the temperature gradient still decreases but the global
average remains constant. For the tropics, there is a significant decrease in
both temperature and its gradient for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 PW, with a
reversal of the gradient for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 PW. For smaller OHT,
we observed a slight warming and a reduction in the gradient with increasing
OHT. The latter is consistent with results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.67"/>. However, on
their aquaplanet the tropical temperature showed little sensitivity, with
small increases for all imposed (positive) OHTs (up to 3 PW).</p>
      <p>A tropical cooling for imposed oceanic heat transports somewhat larger than
present-day values has also been found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.68"/> in a more
complex coupled atmosphere–slab ocean model with a present-day land–sea
distribution. They argue that this suggests that present-day climate is close
to a state where the warming effect of OHT is maximized. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.69"/>
related the tropical cooling to a strong cloud–SST feedback and showed that
the results are sensitive to the particular parameterizations. Though our
simulations are highly idealized and do not represent all the complexities of
the real climate system, it is interesting to note that we find almost no
further increase in the global near-surface temperature for
OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW and maxima in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at about the same value of OHT.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F20"><caption><p>Time average of the intensity of the Lorenz energy cycle
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (lower) for steady state obtained for varying oceanic
heat transport. Dotted line represents best linear fit for
(i) 0.0 PW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW (blue) and for
(ii) 2.5 PW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0 PW (red) with
polynomial coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th order, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/591/2015/esd-6-591-2015-f20.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Confirming the results of previous studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.70"/>, we have found a decrease in the
Hadley cell for increasing OHT. In addition, the Hadley cell broadens and the
maxima of the Hadley and the Ferrel cell shift poleward when OHT obtains
large values (OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW).</p>
      <p>Sea ice gradually decreases with increasing OHT. Though in annual averages
sea ice is present for all simulations, for OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 PW
areas of open water are present for all latitudes during summer. This may
suggest that sea ice plays an important role in controlling the global mean
temperature and/or the position of the Ferrel cell. However, we did not find
sufficient evidence to support this hypothesis.</p>
      <p>Separating individual sources by applying the Kuo–Eliassen equation showed
that the characteristics of the Hadley cell can be explained by the mean
meridional circulations related to the diabatic heating and, to a smaller
extent, to the friction. In our simulations, the meridional circulation
induced by friction also controls the behavior of the Ferrel cell. Eddy
transports of heat and momentum appear to be less important for the Eulerian
mean circulation. This is different from results by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.71"/>, where
the mean meridional circulation related to eddy fluxes accounts for about
50 % of the Ferrel cell's strength. The coarse vertical resolution may be
responsible for a reduced eddy activity.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The importance of the eddies for the circulation becomes clear when
considering the combined effect of the eddies by applying the TEM formalism.
Here, the eddies set up an eddy-related (Stokes) circulation dominating the
midlatitudes with strong sensitivity to changes in OHT.</p>
      <p>In agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.72"/> the total atmospheric meridional heat
transport is related to the strength and vertical extent of the circulation
on isentropes both for the dry and the moist case. As obtained by scale
analysis by Czaja and Marshall, the residual mean stream function in the
midlatitudes is dominated by the so-called eddy stress which is given by the
meridional transport of static energy.</p>
      <p>We utilized an alternative approach to assess the sensitivity of the climate
system by studying the response of global thermodynamical properties of the
climate system following a theoretical framework introduced by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.73"/>. Here, the climate system is viewed as an (equivalent
Carnot) engine with a certain efficiency. Linking the climate engine view and
the classical Lorenz energy cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.74"/> provided a consistent
picture of the observed changes and, thus, demonstrated the relevance of the
climate engine approach.</p>
      <p>Increasing OHT leads to a reduction in the difference between the warm pool
temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the cold pool temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
latter implies that the atmospheric system becomes more isothermal in the
horizontal. The temperature difference between the warm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
the cold (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) heat reservoir decreases for increasing oceanic heat
transport. This is basically caused by enhanced warming in the extratropics
and by tropical cooling for increasing OHT. One of the main drivers for this
is the poleward relocation of latent heat release patterns (not shown). This
may lead to further warming due to the water vapor feedback
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.75"/>.</p>
      <p>The effect of thermalization leading to the reduction in the efficiency of
the system with increasing intensity of the ocean heat transport can be
related to the decrease in the reservoir of the potential energy available
for conversion in the Lorenz energy cycle. The strength of the Lorenz energy
cycle linearly decreases with increasing OHT. A change to smaller sensitivity
is observed at OHT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 PW.</p>
      <p>Consistent with the changes in heat transport and meridional circulation, the
magnitude of all reservoirs and conversions of the Lorenz energy cycle
decreases with increasing OHT. However, the sensitivities differ.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the conversion from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
exhibit the largest changes. Eddy kinetic energy, the barotropic conversion
from eddy kinetic energy to zonal mean kinetic energy, and the conversion
from zonal mean kinetic energy to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are least affected.</p>
      <p>When considering stronger oceanic transport, the climate system is
characterized by a declining total material entropy production, while the
degree of irreversibility <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, since the decrease in entropy
production by frictional dissipation is more intense than the decrease in
entropy generation due to sensible and, in particular, latent heat flux. The
increase in the index of irreversibility is a direct consequence of the
decrease in the efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, due to the reduction in temperature
gradients inside the system, in agreement with what is found in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx45" id="text.76"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.77"/>.
The flux of latent heat contributes most to the material entropy production
in the climate system. When increasing the heat transport in the ocean from
0.0 to 1.5 PW, material entropy production due to latent heat flux
increases, which can be explained by an outspread of convection from the deep
tropics into the midlatitudes, while the maximum latent release is still
located in the central tropics. When increasing the heat transport further,
convective processes collapse in the deep tropics and, thus, affecting
evaporation intensities at tropical sea surface by reducing it. As a result,
a decrease in material entropy production by latent heat fluxes can be noted
from the increase in the oceanic heat transport larger than 2.0 PW.</p>
      <p>Recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.78"/> proposed a different thermodynamic point of
view from the one taken here, indeed confirming the relevance of looking at
the climate system as a heat engine. They studied using models and reanalyzed
the work output of the climate engine. In doing so, they showed that it is constrained by the power necessary to
maintain the hydrological cycle, which accounts for the moisture inefficiency
related to the addition of water vapor to unsaturated air. For a warmer
climate they found a reduction in the work output consistent with our results
for increasing OHT. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.79"/> attributed most of the response to
an increase in the moistening inefficiency. There is a strong indication that
this is also true in our case due to a large increase in near-surface
specific humidity and evaporation with only moderate changes in near-surface
relative humidity. However, further diagnostics are necessary to quantify the
impact of moistening inefficiency.</p>
      <p>Overall, our study demonstrates the large impact of the oceanic heat
transport on the atmospheric circulation affecting the zonally
symmetric flow, the zonally asymmetric flow and the interaction between both.
By reducing the meridional temperature gradient, an increased oceanic heat
transport slows down the atmospheric mean meridional circulation and shifts
the Hadley and the Ferrel cell. In addition, changes in OHT substantially
modify global thermodynamic properties such as the strength of the Lorenz
energy cycle, the efficiency, the entropy production and the irreversibility.</p>
      <p>The reduction in the meridional gradient of the near-surface temperature is
one of the major features of global warming. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.80"/> showed a
consistent weakening and poleward expansion of the Hadley cell in IPCC AR4
simulations. Hence, changes in the oceanic heat transport may significantly
modify the response of the atmospheric circulation to greenhouse warming. A
weakening of the oceanic meridional overturning circulation, as predicted by
the majority of coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models (though
with large uncertainties; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="altparen.81"/>), would therefore act as a
negative feedback mechanism. This negative feedback might become even more
important when strong melting of inland ice sheets, due to global warming, is
taken into account. The associated input of large amounts of freshwater has a
huge potential to slow down the oceanic circulation.</p>
      <p>Apart from the meridional overturning circulation in the Atlantic,
significant modifications to the oceanic circulation in a warmer climate can
also be found in the equatorial Pacific, and they are strongly linked to El
Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variability
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.82"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. This gives rise to an additional
potential feedback mechanism related to oceanic dynamics which is not
captured by slab ocean models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.83"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>Complementing the investigation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.84"/> and helping to understand
the properties of warm equable climates, a subsequent study may focus on the
role of latitudinal location of the peak OHT. In the present set of
experiments, the peak oceanic transport was fixed at the latitude of
27<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Due to the local atmospheric compensation, this preferentially
affects the atmospheric eddy transport of latent heat, which is dominant in this region.
The overall response may be different if
the OHT peak is located in regions where other components of the atmospheric
heat transport are more important.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Another possible future line of investigation may deal with studying planets
with different astrophysical parameters, such as rotation rate, eccentricity,
and obliquity, with the goal of contributing to the rapidly growing field of
the investigation of the atmospheres of exoplanets along the lines of some
recent investigations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.85"/>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>The mean meridional circulation</title>
      <p>To analyze the mean meridional circulation we make use of the so-called
Kuo–Eliassen equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.86"/>. This is a diagnostic
equation which relates the mean meridional circulation (i.e., Hadley, Ferrel
and Polar cell) to different sources.</p>
      <p>Applying the quasi-geostrophic approximation and defining a stream
function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          the Kuo–Eliassen equation may be derived as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.87"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">Chap. 14.5.5</named-content></xref>

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where, in addition to the symbols defined above, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Coriolis
parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> density, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> potential temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diabatic
heating and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the tendency of the zonal wind due to friction.</p>
      <p>We solve the Kuo–Eliassen equation for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by applying an iterative
method (Gauss–Seidel method) to its finite difference approximation. Thus,
we are able to diagnose the contributions from the different sources to the
mean meridional circulation, which are diabatic heating (1st term, right-hand
side), friction (2nd term, right-hand side), meridional eddy heat transport
(3rd term, right-hand side) and eddy momentum transport (4th term, right-hand
side). We note that, though the
equation, in the present form, involves the quasi-geostrophic approximation,
it has been shown to be reasonably applicable even in the deep tropics
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.88"/>. In addition, as pointed out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx22" id="text.89"/>, it should
be noted that this diagnostics will only yield the direct effect of the
particular source. Since all processes are strongly interlinked, changes in
one source will lead to changes in other terms. For example, according to the
equations of motion changes in the meridional eddy momentum transport will
affect the frictional dissipation of zonal mean
momentum. These
indirect effects cannot be identified with our (linear) methodology.</p>
      <p>While the Kuo–Eliassen equation gives us the classical three-cell picture of
the mean meridional circulation, the TEM formalism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.90"/>
provides a closer link to the total atmospheric meridional heat transport.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Defining the residual stream function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          an equation similar to the Kuo–Eliassen equation can be obtained for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>div</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denoting the constant, global mean potential temperature at
a given pressure level according to quasi-geostrophic scaling.</p>
      <p>Here, the total effect of the eddies on the meridional circulation (viewed
from a Lagrangian perspective) is given by the divergence of the
Eliassen–Palm flux (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The TEM residual mean circulation represents the part of the mean meridional
circulation which is not balanced by the convergence of the eddy heat
transport. It is qualitatively similar to the dry isentropic circulation with
the important difference that the TEM circulation does not close at the
surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.91"/>.</p>
      <p>Though representing a different view of the circulation, and, in particular
of the role of the eddies, the Kuo–Eliassen equation and the TEM equation
represent the same physics. This can be seen by rearranging the terms of the
Kuo–Eliassen or the TEM equation (and neglecting differences between
globally and zonally averaged stability) to give
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-8mm}}?>

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>div</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          We see that considering the combined effect of eddy heat and momentum
transport leads to a second circulation defined by the eddy heat transport:

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex20"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is sometimes referred to as the Stokes stream
function.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.92"/> showed that the atmospheric heat transport can be
represented by the product of a moist TEM residual circulation and the
vertical contrast in moist static energy (or equivalent potential temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) if both the eddy transport and the vertical gradient of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are replaced by the respective values utilizing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Unfortunately, as pointed out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.93"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.94"/>, there is no simple way to represent a well-defined
moist isentropic circulation in the latitude–pressure plane. Therefore, we
additionally investigate the mean circulation on dry and moist isentropes by
interpolating the mass transport to levels of constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <title>Nonequilibrium thermodynamics</title>
      <p>Let <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> be the volume domain of the climate system and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> be the
local heating rate due to frictional dissipation and convergence of heat
fluxes including radiative, sensible and latent heat components. At each
instant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> we divide <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into two subsections, so that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> defining <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We wish to remark that
the domains <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are time dependent. Integrating the
two heating components results in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.95"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.96"/> show that the time average
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> gives the rate
of generation of available potential energy, so that

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where the efficiency of the climate machine can be expressed as

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>This expression represents the ratio for the work output
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> to the heat
input <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. At each instant one defines the quantities
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which are the instantaneous entropy sources and sinks in the system. As
explained in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.97"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.98"/>, we have
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0. We
can then introduce the scale temperatures
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mfrac><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:math></inline-formula>
and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mfrac><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:math></inline-formula>,
so that Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E2"/>) can be rewritten as

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Hence, the motion of the general circulation of the system can be sustained
against friction because zones being already relatively warm absorb heat,
whereas the relatively low-temperature zones are cooled.</p>
      <p>The Lorenz energy cycle can thus be seen as resulting from the work of an
equivalent Carnot engine operating between the two (dynamically determined)
reservoirs at temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the
climate is far from being a perfect engine, as many irreversible processes
take place; nonetheless, a Carnot-equivalent picture can be drawn as
described.</p>
      <p>Let us now delve into such irreversible processes. In the climate system two
rather different sets of processes contribute to the total entropy production
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.99"/>. The first set of processes is
responsible for the irreversible thermalization of photons emitted near the
Sun's corona at roughly 5800 K, absorbed and then re-emitted at much lower
temperatures, typical of the Earth's climate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 255 K). This gives the
largest contribution to the total average rate of entropy production for the
Earth system of about 900 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.100"/>. The remaining contribution is due to the
processes responsible for mixing and diffusion inside the fluid component of
the Earth system and for the dissipation of kinetic energy due to viscous
processes. This constitutes the so-called material entropy production and is
considered to be the entropy-related quantity of main interest as far as the
properties of the climate system are concerned. Further relevant research on
entropy production in the climate system treating also the geochemical and
radiative contribution to entropy production can be found in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.101"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.102"/>, respectively.</p>
      <p>The entropy budget of geophysical fluids at steady state, following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.103"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.104"/>, is given by

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>rad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>rad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the heating rate by the convergence of
radiative fluxes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the local temperature at which the energy is gained
or lost, while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the density of entropy
production associated with the irreversibility of processes involving the
fluid medium. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E4"/>) represents the entropy budget and
states that in a steady state the radiative entropy source must be balanced
by the rate of material entropy production <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to
material irreversible processes. A detailed discussion of this aspect is
found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.105"/>, where the contributions to the material
entropy production on various spatial and temporal scales are discussed.</p>
      <p>In a steady-state climate the material entropy production
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed in general terms as

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sens</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>rad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time-averaged density of
entropy production due to the following irreversible processes inside the
medium: dissipation of kinetic energy (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the specific
dissipation rate) and turbulent transport of heat down the temperature
gradient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sens</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the
sensible and latent turbulent heat fluxes, respectively).</p>
      <p>One needs to underline that a more refined treatment of the entropy
production related to the hydrological cycle has been proposed by, e.g.,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx50" id="text.106"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.107"/>. Nonetheless, as
discussed in detail in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.108"/>, the overall contribution of the
entropy production due to the hydrological cycle can be reconstructed in a
fundamentally correct way also in the simplified method proposed here, where
one needs not to follow all the complicated irreversible processes related to
the hydrological cycle evaporation of liquid water in unsaturated air,
condensation of water vapor in supersaturated air, and molecular diffusion of
water vapor.</p>
      <p>Note that one can compute the entropy production as

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sens</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sens</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the first term is unchanged, the second terms describes the entropy
gain and loss due to heating and cooling by convergence of sensible and
latent turbulent heat fluxes, and the last term is the net entropy flux
across the boundaries of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. If one considers the atmospheric domain as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, such a term becomes equal to the integral at the surface of the
ratio between the sum of the sensible and of the latent heat flux divided by
the surface temperature. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E6"/>) represents the way
entropy production is typically computed in numerical models. If one
considers the whole climate system as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the boundary terms disappear.
Nonetheless, another term proportional to a Dirac's delta at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 appears, resulting from the divergence of
the turbulent flux due to the net evaporation at the surface. If we integrate
over <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to the whole climate system, the contribution of
this term is exactly the same as in the case where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to
the atmosphere only. In other terms, our simplified, non-dynamical
representation of the ocean is such that all the entropy is produced in the
atmosphere.</p>
      <p>We can now separate in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E5"/>) – or, equivalently, in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E6"/>) the first term from the rest, so that, following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.109"/>, the material entropy production can be expressed as

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>mat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the minimum value of
entropy production compatible with the presence of the average dissipation
rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the excess of entropy production
with respect to such a minimum. One can associate
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> exactly with the term in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E5"/>) related to the dissipation of kinetic energy,
while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> can be identified with the sum of the
other two terms.</p>
      <p>If we take the ratio of the two terms on the right-hand side in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E7"/>), we have

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>exc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sens</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the degree of irreversibility <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.110"/> and
determines the ratio between the contributions to entropy production by
down-gradient turbulent transport and by viscous dissipation of mechanical
energy. If this ratio is close to 0 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0), all the
production of entropy is exclusively caused by unavoidable viscous
dissipation. If the turbulent heat transport in the system from high- to
low-temperature regions is enhanced, then entropy production also increases.
However, if the turbulent heat transport down the temperature gradient is
maximized, the efficiency declines, since the temperature difference between
the warm and cold reservoirs tends to become 0. The characterization of the
maximum entropy production principle (MEPP) suggests that the climate system
adjusts in such a way as to maximize the entropy production
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.111"/>.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <title>The Lorenz energy cycle</title>
      <p>The atmospheric energy cycle proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.112"/> is one of the
most important concepts for understanding the global atmospheric circulation
by means of energy conservation and by considering the integrated effects of
physical mechanisms involved, e.g., the generation of available potential
energy by external forcing, the dissipation of kinetic energy and the energy
conversions by baroclinic and barotropic processes. At the same time
the Lorenz energy cycle gives information
about the relative importance of the zonal mean circulation, the eddies and
the interaction between both.</p>
      <p>Referring to the reservoirs of zonal available potential energy, eddy
available potential energy, zonal kinetic energy and eddy kinetic energy as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, the Lorenz energy cycle (i.e., the budget equations) may be
written as

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>K</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>K</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>K</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>K</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are external sources and/or sinks of the respective
quantities and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) denotes the conversion from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>To compute the individual contributions, we follow the work of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.113"/>. In pressure coordinates, the reservoirs are given by

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="〉" open="〈"><mml:mfrac><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="〉" open="〈"><mml:mfrac><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="〈" close="〉"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="〉" open="〈"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and the conversion terms are <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-8mm}}?>

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="〈" close=""><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="〈" close="〉"><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>v</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>v</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="〉" open="〈"><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>v</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="" open="〈"><mml:mfenced open="(" close=""><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="." close="〉"><mml:mfenced open="." close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>] is the zonal mean; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the deviation from zonal mean;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the global horizontal mean;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the horizontal area; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the specific heat at
constant pressure; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is gravity; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is pressure; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the radius of the
Earth; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a gas constant; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>v</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is virtual
temperature; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is zonal wind; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is meridional wind; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is vertical
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) velocity; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is latitude; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the stability
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The external sources and/or sinks are diagnosed from the respective
residuals. We note that in Ulbrich and Speth (1991) these energetics were formulated for a mixed space–time domain. In
our case, however, the contributions by stationary eddies are 0 because of
the zonally symmetric forcing.</p>
      <p>We also note that by using above equations the computed annual averaged
values include contributions from the annual cycle. It turns out, however,
that only the reservoirs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the conversion
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are affected.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors wish to acknowledge support by the Cluster of Excellence CliSAP.
V. Lucarini wishes to acknowledge the financial support provided by the FP7
ERC-Starting Investigator Grant NAMASTE – Thermodynamics of the Climate
System (Grant no. 257106). We thank the anonymous reviewers for constructive
criticism and, in particular, F. Laliberté for his thorough evaluation and
his valuable suggestions. The preparation of this work greatly benefitted
from interactions with D. Battisti, J. Marshall, O. Pauluis, T. Schneider, and P. Stone.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: D. Kirk-Davidoff</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Ambaum(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Ambaum, M. H. P. M.: Thermal physics of the atmosphere, vol. 1,
J. Wiley &amp; Sons, Chichester, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Andrews and McIntyre(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, D. G. and McIntyre, M. E.: Planetary waves in horizontal and
vertical shear: The generalized Eliassen–Palm relation and the mean
zonal acceleration, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 2031–2048, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Barreiro et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Barreiro, M., Cherchi, A., and Masina, S.: Climate sensitivity to changes in
ocean heat transport, J. Climate, 24, 5015–5030, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Boer and Yu(2003)</label><mixed-citation> Boer, G. J. and Yu, B.: Dynamical
aspects of climate sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1135–1139, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Boschi et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Boschi, R., Lucarini, V., and
Pascale, S.: Bistability of the climate around the habitable zone: a thermodynamic investigation,
Icarus, 226, 1724–1742, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Collins et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Collins, M., An, S.-I.,
Cai, W., Ganachaud, A., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F.-F., Jochum, M., Lengaigne, M.,
Power, S., Timmermann, A., Vecchi, G., and Wittenberg, A.: The impact of global
warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Niño, Nat. Geosci., 3, 391–397, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Czaja and Marshall(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Czaja, A. and Marshall, J.: The partitioning of poleward heat transport
between the atmosphere and ocean, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1498–1511, 2006</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Eliassen(1951)</label><mixed-citation> Eliassen, A.: Slow frictionally
controlled meridional circulation in a circular vortex, Astro. Norv., 5, 19–60, 1951.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Enderton and Marshall(2008)</label><mixed-citation> Enderton, D. and
Marshall, J.: Explorations of atmosphere–ocean–ice climates on an
aquaplanet and their meridional energy transports, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 1593–1610, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Fedorov et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Fedorov, A. V.,
Dekens, P. S., McCarthy, M., Ravelo, A. C., deMenocal, P. B.,
Barreiro, M., Pacanowski, R. C., and Philander, S. G.: The Pliocene Paradox
(Mechanisms for a permanent El Niño), Science, 312, 1485–1489, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Fraedrich et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Fraedrich, K., Jansen, H., Kirk, E., Luksch, U., and Lunkeit, F.: The Planet
Simulator: Towards a user friendly model, Meteorol. Z., 14, 299–304, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Goody(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Goody, R.: Sources and sinks of climate entropy, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol.
Soc., 126, 1953–1970, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Grassl(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Grassl, H.: The climate at maximum entropy production by meridional
atmospheric and oceanic heat fluxes, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 107, 153–166, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Held(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Held, I. M.: The partitioning of the poleward energy transport between
the tropical ocean and atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 943–948, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Held and Schneider(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Held, I. M. and Schneider, T.: The surface branch of the zonally averaged
mass transport circulation in the troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1688–1697, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Herweijer et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Herweijer, C.,
Seager, R., Winton, M., and Clement, A.: Why ocean heat transport warms
the global mean climate, Tellus A, 57, 662–675, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Hoskins and Simmons(1975)</label><mixed-citation> Hoskins, B. J. and
Simmons, A. J.: A multi–layer spectral method and the semi-implicit
method, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 101, 637–655, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>IPCC(2013)</label><mixed-citation> IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical
Science Basis, in: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M.,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>James and Gray(1986)</label><mixed-citation> James, I. N. and Gray, L. J.:
Concerning the effect of surface drag on the circulation of a planetary atmosphere, Q. J. Roy.
Meteorol. Soc., 112, 1231–1250, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Johnson(2000)</label><mixed-citation> Johnson, D. R.: Entropy, the Lorenz
energy cycle and climate, in: General Circulation Model Development: Past,
Present and Future, chapter 22, Academic Press, San Diego, London, 659–720, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Kim and Lee(2001a)</label><mixed-citation> Kim, H.-K. and Lee, S.: Hadley
cell dynamics in a primitive equation model, Part I: Axisymmetric flow,
J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2845–2858, 2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Kim and Lee(2001b)</label><mixed-citation> Kim, H.-K. and Lee, S.: Hadley
cell dynamics in a primitive equation model, Part II: Nonaxisymmetric flow,
J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2859–2871, 2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Kleidon(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Kleidon, A.: Nonequilibrium
thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in the Earth system,
Naturwissenschaften, 96, 653–677, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Kleidon and Lorenz(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Kleidon, A. and Lorenz, R.: Entropy production by Earth system processes,
in: thermodynamics and the production of entropy, Springer, Heidelberg, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Koll and Abbot(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Koll, D. D. B. and Abbot, D. S.:
Why tropical sea surface temperature is insensitive to ocean heat transport changes,
J. Climate, 26, 6742–6749, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Kuo(1956)</label><mixed-citation> Kuo, H.-L.: Forced and free meridional
circulations in the atmosphere, J. Meteorol., 13, 561–568, 1956.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Kuo(1965)</label><mixed-citation> Kuo, H.-L.: On formation and intensification
of tropical cyclones through latent heat release by cumulus convection,
J. Atmos. Sci., 22, 40–63, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Kuo(1974)</label><mixed-citation> Kuo, H.-L.: Further studies of the
parameterization of the influence of cumulus convection on large-scale flow,
J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1232–1240, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Lacis and Hansen(1974)</label><mixed-citation> Lacis, A. A. and
Hansen, J. E.: A parameterization for the absorption of solar radiation on the
Earth's atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 118–133, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Laliberté and Pauluis(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Laliberté, F. and Pauluis, O.: Winter intensivication of the moist branch
of the circulation of the 21st century climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
L20707, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL045007</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Laliberté et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Laliberté, F., Shaw, T. A., and Pauluis, O.: Moist recirculation and water vapor
transport on dry isentropes, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 875–890, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Laliberté et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Laliberté, F., Zika, J., Mudryk, L., Kushner, P. J., Kjellsson, J., and Döös, K.:
Constrained work output of the moist atmospheric heat engine in a warming climate,
Science, 347, 540–543, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Laursen and Eliasen(1989)</label><mixed-citation> Laursen, L. and
Eliasen, E.: On the effects of the damping mechanisms in an atmospheric general
circulation model, Tellus A, 41, 385–400, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Lorenz(1955)</label><mixed-citation> Lorenz, E. N.: Available potential
energy and the maintenance of the general circulation, Tellus, 7, 157–167, 1955.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Lorenz(1967)</label><mixed-citation> Lorenz, E. N.: The nature and theory
of the general circulation of the atmosphere, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Louis(1979)</label><mixed-citation> Louis, J. F.: A parametric model of
vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 17, 187–202, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Louis et al.(1982)</label><mixed-citation> Louis, J. F., Tiedtke, M., and
Geleyn, M.: A short history of the PBL parameterisation at ECMWF, in: Proceedings, ECMWF Workshop
on Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization, 25–27 November 1981, Reading, 59–80, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Lu et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Lu, J., Vecchi, G. A., and
Reichler, T.: Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
34, L06805, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL028443</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lucarini(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Lucarini, V.: Thermodynamic
efficiency and entropy production in the climate system, Phys. Rev. E, 80, 021118,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021118</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Lucarini and Pascale(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Lucarini, V. and Pascale, S.: Entropy production and coarse graining of the
climate fields in a general circulation model, Clim. Dynam., 43, 981–1000, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Lucarini and Ragone(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Lucarini, V. and
Ragone, F.: Energetics of climate models: net energy balance and meridional enthalpy transport,
Rev. Geophys., 49, RG1001, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000323" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009RG000323</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Lucarini et al.(2010a)</label><mixed-citation>Lucarini, V.,
Fraedrich, K., and Lunkeit, F.: Thermodynamics of climate change: generalized
sensitivities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9729–9737, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9729-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9729-2010</ext-link>, 2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Lucarini et al.(2010b)</label><mixed-citation>
Lucarini, V., Fraedrich, K., and Lunkeit, F.: Thermodynamic analysis of
snowball earth hysteresis experiment: efficiency, entropy production, and
irreversibility, Q. J. Roy. Meterol. Soc., 136, 2–11, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Lucarini et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation> Lucarini, V.,
Fraedrich, K., and Ragone, F.: New results on the thermodynamical
properties of the climate system, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 2438–2458, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Lucarini et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Lucarini, V., Pascale, S., Boschi, R., Kirk, E., and Iro, N.:
Habitability and multistablility in earth–like planets, Astron. Nachr.,
334, 576–588, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Lucarini et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Lucarini, V., Blender, R., Pascale, S., Ragone, F., Wouters, J., and
Herbert, C.: Mathematical and Physical Ideas for Climate Science, Rev.
Geophys., 52, 809–859, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Paltridge(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Paltridge, G.: Global dynamics and climate – a system of minimum entropy
exchange, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 101, 475–484, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Pascale et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Pascale, S., Ragone, F., Lucarini, V., Wang, Y., and Boschi, R.: Nonequilibrium
thermodynamics of circulation regimes in optically-thin, dry atmospheres,
Planet. Space Sci., 84, 48–65, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Pauluis and Held(2002a)</label><mixed-citation>
Pauluis, O. and Held, I.: Entropy budget of an atmosphere in
radiative convective equilibrium, Part I: Maximum work and frictional
dissipation, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 125–139, 2002a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Pauluis and Held(2002b)</label><mixed-citation>Pauluis, O. and Held, I.: Entropy budget of an atmosphere in
radiative convective equilibrium, Part II: Latent heat transport and moist
processes, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 140–149, 2002b.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Pauluis et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Pauluis, O., Shaw, T., and Laliberté, F.: A statistical generalization
of the transformed Eulerian–mean circulation far an arbitrary vertical
coordinate system, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1766–1783, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Peixoto and Oort(1992)</label><mixed-citation> Peixoto, J. P. and
Oort, A. H.: Physics of Climate, American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Rind et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation> Rind, D. and Chandler, M.:
Increased ocean heat transports and warmer climate, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 7437–7461, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Roeckner et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation> Roeckner, E., Arpe, K.,
Bengtsson, L., Brinkop, S., Dümenil, L., Esch, M., Kirk, E., Lunkeit, F., Ponater, M.,
Rockel, B., Sausen, R., Schlese, U., Schubert, S., and Windelband, M.: Simulation of the present–day
climate with the ECHAM-3 model: impact of model physics and resolution, Meteorologie, Report No. 93,
Max-Planck Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, 171 pp., 1992</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Romanova et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Romanova, V., Lohmann, G.,
Grosfeld, K., and Butzin, M.: The relative roles of oceanic heat transport and orography
on glacial climate, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 25, 832–845, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Romps(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Romps, D. M.: The dry-entropy budget of a moist atmosphere, J. Atmos.
Sci., 65, 3779–3799, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Rose and Ferreira(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Rose, B. and Ferreira, D.:
Ocean heat transport and water vapor greenhouse in a warm equable climate: a new look at the low
gradient paradox, J. Climate, 26, 2117–2136, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00547.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00547.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Sasamori(1968)</label><mixed-citation> Sasamori, T.: The radiative
cooling calculation for application to general circulation experiments,
J. Appl. Meteorol., 7, 721–729, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Slingo and Slingo(1991)</label><mixed-citation> Slingo, A. and
Slingo, J. M.: Response of the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model to
improvements in the representation of clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 341–357, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Sloan et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation> Sloan, L. C., Walker, J. C. G.,
and Moore Jr., T. C.: Possible role of oceanic heat transport in early Eocene
climate, Paleoceanography, 10, 347–356, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Stephens(1978)</label><mixed-citation> Stephens, G. L.: Radiation
profiles in extended water clouds, II: Parameterization schemes, J. Atmos. Sci.,
34, 2123–2132, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Stephens et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation> Stephens, G. L.,
Ackermann, S., and Smith, E. A.: A shortwave parameterization revised to improve
cloud absorption, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 687–690, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Stone(1978)</label><mixed-citation> Stone, P. H.: Constraints on dynamical
transports of energy on a spherical planet, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 2, 123–139, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Ulbrich and Speth(1991)</label><mixed-citation> Ulbrich, U. and Speth, P.:
The global energy cycle of stationary and transient atmospheric waves: results from ECMWF
analyses, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 45, 125–138, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Winton(2003)</label><mixed-citation> Winton, M.: On the climate impact on
ocean circulation, J. Climate, 16, 2875–2889, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Wu and Liu(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, W. and Liu, Y.: Radiation entropy flux and entropy production of the
Earth system, Rev. Geophys., 48, 1–27, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
