<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Earth System Dynamics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2190-4987</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/esd-2-213-2011</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>The magnitudes and timescales of global mean surface temperature feedbacks in climate models</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jarvis</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>213</fpage>
<lpage>221</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2011 A. Jarvis</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2011</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/2/213/2011/esd-2-213-2011.html">This article is available from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/2/213/2011/esd-2-213-2011.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/2/213/2011/esd-2-213-2011.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/2/213/2011/esd-2-213-2011.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Because of the fundamental role feedbacks play in determining the response
of surface temperature to perturbations in radiative forcing, it is
important we understand the dynamic characteristics of these feedbacks.
Rather than attribute the aggregate surface temperature feedback to
particular physical processes, this paper adopts a linear systems approach
to investigate the partitioning with respect to the timescale of the
feedbacks regulating global mean surface temperature in climate models. The
analysis reveals that there is a dominant net negative feedback realised on
an annual timescale and that this is partially attenuated by a spectrum of
positive feedbacks with characteristic timescales in the range 10 to 1000 yr. This attenuation was composed of two discrete phases which are
attributed to the equilibration of &quot;diffusive &amp;ndash; mixed layer&quot; and
&quot;circulatory &amp;ndash; deep ocean&quot; ocean heat uptake. The diffusive equilibration
was associated with time constants on the decadal timescale and accounted
for approximately 75 to 80 percent of the overall ocean heat feedback,
whilst the circulatory equilibration operated on a centennial timescale and
accounted for the remaining 20 to 25 percent of the response. This suggests
that the dynamics of the transient ocean heat uptake feedback first
discussed by Baker and Roe (2009) tends to be dominated by loss of diffusive
heat uptake in climate models, rather than circulatory deep ocean heat
equilibration.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="9"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1">
<label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aires, F. and Rossow, W. B.: Inferring instantaneous, multivariate and nonlinear sensitivities for the analysis of feedback processes in a dynamical system: Lorenz model case-study, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 239–275, 2003.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baker, M. B.  and Roe, G. H.: The shape of things to come: why is climate change so unpredictable?, J. Climate, 22, 4574–4589, 2009.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bates, J. R.: Some considerations of the concept of climate feedback, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 545–560, 2007.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beer, T. and Young, P. C.: Longitudinal dispersion in natural streams, J. Environ. Eng., 109, 1049–1067, 1983.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bony, S., Colman, R., Kattsov, V. M., Allan, R. P., Bretherton, C. S., Dufresne, J.-L., Hall, A., Hallegatte, S., Holland, M. M., Ingram, W., Randall, D. A., Soden, B. J., Tselioudis, G., and Webb, M. J.: How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes?, J. Climate, 19, 3445–3482, 2006.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bowman, K. P.: Diffusive transport by breaking Waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2146–2427, 1995.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Colman, R. A.: A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models, Clim. Dynam., 20, 865–873, 2003.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Danabasoglu, G. and Gent, P. R.: Equilibrium climate sensitivity: is it accurate to use a slab ocean model?, J. Climate , 22, 2494–2499, 2009.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dickinson, R. E.: Convergence Rate and Stability of Ocean-Atmosphere Coupling Schemes with a Zero-Dimensional Climate Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2112–2120, 1981.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dickinson, R. E. and  Schaudt, K. J.: Analysis of timescales of response of a simple climate model, J. Climate, 11, 97–106, 1998.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eickhout, B., den Elzen, M. G. J., and Kreileman, G. J. J.: The Atmosphere-Ocean System of IMAGE 2.2. A global model approach for atmospheric concentrations, and climate and sea level projections. RIVM report 481508017/2004, RIVM, Bilthoven, 2004.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Forster, P. M. and Taylor, K. E.: Climate Forcings and Climate Sensitivities Diagnosed from Coupled Climate Model Integrations, J. Climate, 19, 6181–6194, 2006.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gregory, J. M. and Forster, P. M.: Transient climate response estimated from radiative forcing and observed temperature change, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D23105, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010405&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010405&lt;/a&gt;, 2008.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gregory, J. M., Ingram, W. J., Palmer, M. A., Jones, G. S., Stott, P. A., Thorpe, R. B., Lowe, J. A., Johns, T. C., and Williams, K. D.: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L03205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018747, 2004.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref15">
<label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grieser, J. and Schönwiese, C.-D.: Process, forcing, and signal analysis of global mean temperature variations by means of a three-box energy balance model, Climatic Change, 48, 617–646, 2001.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref16">
<label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hallegatte, S., Lahellec, A., and Grandpeix, J. Y.: An elicitation of the dynamic nature of water vapor feedback in climate change using a 1D model, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1878–1894, 2006.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref17">
<label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hansen, J. E., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Russell, G., Stone, P., Fung, I., Ruedy, R., and Lerner, J.: Climate sensitivity: analysis of feedback mechanisms, in: Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, edited by: Hansen, J. E. and Takahashi, T., American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, USA, 130–163, 1984.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref18">
<label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hansen, J. E., Russell, G., Lacis, A., Fung, I., Rind, D., and Stone, P.: Climate response times: Dependence on climate sensitivity and ocean mixing, Science, 229, 857–859, 1985.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref19">
<label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hansen, J. E., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Russell, G., Lea, D. W., and Siddall, M.: Climate change and trace gases, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 365, 1925–1954, 2007.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref20">
<label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoffert, M. I., Calligari, A. J., and Hseich, C.-T.: The role of deep sea heat storage in the secular response to climate forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 6667–6679, 1980.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref21">
<label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hooss, G.: Aggregate models of climate change: developments and applications, PhD thesis, Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany, 2001.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref22">
<label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jarvis, A. J. and Li, S.: On the timescale – gain relationship of climate models, Clim. Dynam., 36, 523–531, 2010.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref23">
<label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Knutti, R. and Hegerl, G. C.: The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth&apos;s temperature to radiation change, Nat. Geosci., 1, 735–743, 2008.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref24">
<label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, S. and Jarvis, A. J.: The global mean surface temperature dynamics of an AOGCM: The HadCM3 4×CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; forcing experiment revisited, Clim. Dynam.,  33, 817–825, 2009.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref25">
<label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, S., Jarvis, A. J., and Leedal, D. T.: Are response function representations of the global carbon cycle ever interpretable?, Tellus, 61B, 361–371, 2009.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref26">
<label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lu, J. and Cai, M.: A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part I: formulation, Clim. Dynam., 32, 873–885, 2009.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref27">
<label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manabe, S., Stouffer, R. J., Spelman, M. J., and Bryan, K.: Transient responses of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model to gradual changes of atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Part I. Annual mean response, J. Climate, 4, 785–817, 1991.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref28">
<label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prather, M. J.: Time scales in atmospheric chemistry: Theory, GWPs for CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; and CO, and runaway growth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2597–2600, 1996.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref29">
<label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raper, S. C. B., Gregory, J. M., and Stouffer, R. J.: The role of climate sensitivity and ocean heat uptake on AOGCM transient temperature response, J. Climate, 15, 124–130, 2002.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref30">
<label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roe, G. H.: Feedbacks, timescales and seeing red, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 37, 93–115, 2009.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref31">
<label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roe, G. H. and Baker, M. B.: Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable?, Science, 318, 629–632, 2007.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref32">
<label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soden, B. J. and Held, I. M.: An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean-atmosphere models, J. Climate, 19, 3354–3360, 2006.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref33">
<label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stephens, G. L.: Cloud Feedbacks in the Climate System: A Critical Review, J. Climate, 18, 237–273, 2005.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref34">
<label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stouffer, R. J.: Time scales of climate response, J. Climate, 17, 209–217, 2004.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref35">
<label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watterson, I. G.: Interpretation of simulated global warming using a simple model, J. Climate, 13, 202–215, 2000.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref36">
<label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watts, R. G., Morantine, M. C., and Achutarao, K.: Timescales in energy balance climate models. 1. The limiting case solutions, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 3631–3641, 1994.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref37">
<label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weaver, A. J.: The UVic Earth System Climate Model: Model description, climatology and application to past, present and future climates, Atmosphere Ocean, 39, 361–428, 2001.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref38">
<label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wigley, T. M. L. and Schlesinger, M. E.: Analytical solution for the effect on increasing CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; on global mean temperature, Nature, 315, 649–652, 1985.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref39">
<label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, K. D., Ingram, W. J., and Gregory, J. M.: Time variation of effective climate sensitivity in GCMs, J. Climate, 2119, 5076–5090, 2008.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref40">
<label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, W. Y., Cao, W., Chung, T.-S., and Morris, J.: Applied numerical method using MATLAB$^{\chem{{\textregistered}}}$, Wiley-Interscience, New Jersey, 2005.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>