<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Earth System Dynamics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2190-4987</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/esd-17-1277-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Ensemble simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum marine biogeochemistry and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown due to the soft-tissue biological carbon pump</article-title><alt-title>Model uncertainty in LGM marine biogeochemistry</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Chien</surname><given-names>Chia-Te</given-names></name>
          <email>cchien308@ntu.edu.tw</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-2851</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pahlow</surname><given-names>Markus</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Somes</surname><given-names>Christopher J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2635-7617</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schartau</surname><given-names>Markus</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1114-0415</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Oschlies</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-4013</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Chia-Te Chien (cchien308@ntu.edu.tw)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>1277</fpage><lpage>1297</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>3</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Chia-Te Chien et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026.html">This article is available from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e140">During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximately 90 ppm lower than in the pre-industrial era. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this difference, including changes in nutrient supply, increased iron input to the ocean, reduced air-sea gas exchange due to changes in sea-ice coverage, and variations in overturning circulation strength driven by differences in wind stress and atmospheric moisture diffusivity. Current modeling approaches that simulate LGM marine biogeochemistry typically use parameter sets calibrated under pre-industrial conditions, assuming that these parameter values are generic and independent of environmental conditions. This could introduce uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the values that should be assigned to the parameters for the LGM environment. The extent to which this uncertainty affects the simulated LGM marine biogeochemistry remains unclear. In this study, we employ an optimality-based variable stoichiometry plankton ecosystem model coupled with a 3D Earth system model to simulate LGM conditions. We conduct sensitivity analyses with 24 combinations of marine biogeochemical (reduced benthic denitrification rate, decreased sedimentary iron input, a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory, and increased atmospheric iron deposition) and physical boundary conditions (changes in wind stress pattern and reduced meridional moisture diffusivity over the Southern Ocean). For each of the 24 combinations, we perform 20 simulations using 20 biogeochemical parameter sets selected out of 600 – each calibrated against present-day observations and representing pre-industrial biogeochemistry about equally well – resulting in a total of 480 simulations. We aim to quantify the uncertainty in simulated LGM marine biogeochemistry and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> arising from uncertainties in parameter settings and boundary conditions. Our results show that changes in iron input, including increased aeolian dust deposition and decreased sedimentary input, exert the most profound influence on marine biogeochemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown. Changes in macro-nutrients alone have limited effects, owing to co-limitation effects and the variable stoichiometry in our model. The impact of physical conditions on biogeochemical tracers varies, depending on the specific biogeochemical settings. We found that the changes in carbon to nutrient ratios in particulate organic matter are positively correlated with the changes in Fe supply, and could amplify the effect of Fe availability on changes in the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Compared to pre-industrial reference conditions, atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under full LGM conditions decreases by 36 to 58 ppm across the 20 simulations. The spread between the maximum and minimum decrease in simulated glacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is approximately 50 % of the mean decrease (43 ppm). These findings highlight that although the 20 parameter sets similarly reproduce pre-industrial marine biogeochemistry, significant variance remains in the marine biogeochemical and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> responses to LGM forcings.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Science and Technology Council</funding-source>
<award-id>NSTC 114-2611-M-002-007 -</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e261">The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) was characterised by substantially lower atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, around 90 ppm lower than the pre-industrial <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.1"/>, making it an important case study for understanding the mechanisms influencing changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with implications for future climate projections. A robust quantitative understanding of the reduced atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is still lacking, and several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the lower atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the LGM. Those include lower sea surface temperatures and higher solubility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.2"/>, partly counteracted by reduced ocean volume and increased salinity, changes in orbital parameters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.3"/>, a higher global nitrate inventory due to reduced benthic denitrification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.4"/>, and a higher global phosphate inventory driven by enhanced terrestrial erosion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.5"/>, both associated with sea-level retreat. Other factors include changes in the AMOC (Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.6"/>, atmospheric moisture diffusivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.7"/>, reduced air-sea gas exchange due to changes in Antarctic sea-ice cover <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.8"/>, changes in air-sea disequilibrium of carbon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.9"/>, and enhanced iron (Fe) input to the ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.10"/>. Iron is a critical micro-nutrient for marine phytoplankton, particularly in high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (HNLC) regions, where its scarcity limits productivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.11"/>. Two major sources of Fe to the ocean are atmospheric dust deposition and sedimentary inputs. While atmospheric deposition has long been recognised as a major source of Fe, recent studies have shown that sedimentary inputs could have a much larger impact on the Fe cycle in the global ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.12"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e363">Model simulations are suitable tools for studying the effects of these factors on marine biogeochemistry and their potential contribution to reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the LGM. Models that have been applied to study the LGM range from simple box model approaches <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.13"/> to 3D Earth system models that consider ocean circulation and marine biogeochemical cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.14"/>. The biogeochemical components of these Earth system models contain various representations of marine ecosystems, transport and sinking of particles, and cycling of macro- and micro-nutrients.</p>
      <p id="d2e385">The calibration of poorly known parameters is an important part of setting up reliable biogeochemical models. In principle, calibration efforts look for a set of optimal parameter estimates that minimises a metric that quantifies the data-model misfit, such as the root mean square error. Some challenges exist in the optimisation process, particularly for Earth system models that often have to cope with sparse data availability with uneven spatial and temporal distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.15"/>. Also, the computational cost for spinning up Earth system models is often high, particularly for those with higher functional complexity and higher spatial resolution. In the case of high computational costs, the number of parameter sets for which model solutions can be evaluated is limited and for this reason “optimal” parameters are often chosen pragmatically <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.16"/>. Apart from the number of possible model runs, the choice of an appropriate metric is also crucial. This choice depends objectively on the available data considered, but it is also subjective with regard to the error model employed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.17"/>. Calibration becomes particularly challenging when it comes to simulating the LGM: Data-model misfits are usually evaluated for pre-industrial or present-day conditions. To what extent a parameter set calibrated against pre-industrial or present-day observations could similarly well represent the LGM is as yet unknown.</p>
      <p id="d2e397">Here we employ an optimality-based variable stoichiometry plankton ecosystem model (OPEM) coupled to the University of Victoria (UVic) Earth system model of intermediate complexity (UVic-OPEM) to simulate LGM marine biogeochemistry and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The model has been devised employing with variable stoichiometry of particulate organic matter (POM), and it provides a relatively reliable representation of the most important biogeochemical processes in today’s ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.18"/>. In addition, by resolving elemental stoichiometry in UVic-OPEM, it is possible to investigate how elemental ratios of particulate organic matter may have differed during the LGM, and how those differences affect the changes in the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We conduct sensitivity analyses with 24 combinations of LGM boundary conditions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>), namely biogeochemical (reduced benthic denitrification rate, decreased sedimentary iron input, a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level, and increased atmospheric iron deposition) and physical (changes in wind stress pattern and reduced meridional moisture diffusivity over the Southern Ocean, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx66" id="altparen.19"/>). For each combination, the subset of 20 of the 600 parameter sets was considered that exhibit the best model agreement with the observations, resulting in a total of 480 simulations. The objective of this study is to examine the potential uncertainty in LGM simulations due to the typically employed selection of one specific parameter set calibrated for pre-industrial-climate boundary conditions. We also investigate the effects of variable stoichiometry of particulate organic matter (POM) along with different biogeochemical and physical boundary conditions, on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and marine biogeochemistry during the LGM. We are particularly interested in identifying uncertainties that might play a role in estimating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference between the pre-industrial era and the LGM. The biogeochemical mechanisms driving glacial carbon drawdown serve as critical natural analogs for evaluating ocean-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategies. For instance, uncertainties in how the glacial ocean responded to increased dust deposition mirror uncertainties in assessing the efficacy of ocean iron fertilization. Our results may provide insights not only regarding the interpretation of past <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations, but also into the effectiveness of potential CDR approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>The UVic-OPEM Earth system model</title>
      <p id="d2e506">The Optimality-based Plankton Ecosystem Model was originally implemented in UVic2.9 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.20"/>, which has since been updated to UVic2.10 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.21"/> for this study. In the current version, we also apply the temperature-independent mortality that has been used for ordinary phytoplankton to diazotrophs. This modification reduces nitrogen fixation in the Arctic region, where it was considered too high in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.22"/>, but it has only a marginal effect on the global nitrogen distribution and fluxes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Model calibration and selection of the best 20 parameter sets</title>
      <p id="d2e526">All steps of the experimental design are illustrated in the schematic Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>, with the model calibration and selection of the best parameter sets described in the left hand column. We constructed 600 parameter sets, each representing a unique combination of values assigned to 19 model parameters, including detritus remineralisation rate, the linear increase of sinking velocity with depth, and 17 parameters related to plankton physiology (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). The leakage (implicit remineralisation of organic matter by bacteria) and mortality terms for non-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fixing ordinary phytoplankton and diazotrophs are assumed identical to reduce the number of possible parameter combinations.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e546">Experimental setup and workflow.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e558">Parameter names, variational ranges, the parameter set that yields the lowest cost, the lowest 20 cost parameter sets, units and descriptions. Note that ordinary phytoplankton and diazotrophs share the same temperature dependent leakage rate and temperature independent mortality rate.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Symbol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lowest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Lowest 20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Units</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Definition</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">cost</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">costs range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100–400</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">254.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">113.6–391.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">phytoplankton potential nutrient affinity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50–300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">115.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.4–264.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">diazotroph potential nutrient affinity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3–0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.36–0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">phytoplankton potential light affinity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6–1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.61–1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">diazotroph potential light affinity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.045–0.065</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.061</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.048–0.064</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">phytoplankton subsistence N quota</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.11–0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.112–0.138</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">diazotroph subsistence N quota</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.4–2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.46–2.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">phytoplankton subsistence P quota</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.06–3.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">diazotroph subsistence P quota</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fe, phy</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02–0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.031</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.021–0.076</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">phytoplankton half-saturation constant for Fe</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fe, dia</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10–0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10–0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">diazotroph half-saturation constant for Fe</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1–1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.03–1.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">zooplankton maximum specific ingestion rate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">90–300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">174</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">119–226</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">capture coefficient of phytoplankton</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80–300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">155</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">117–206</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">capture coefficient of diazotrophs</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>det</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20–130</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30–92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">capture coefficient of detritus</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>zoo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45–250</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">175</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80–175</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">capture coefficient of zooplankton</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01–0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.012–0.037</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">temperature-independent mortality</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01–0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.010–0.026</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">temperature-dependent leakage</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>det</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05–0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.072</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.052–0.078</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">remineralisation rate at 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dd</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04–0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.064</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.042–0.066</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">linear increase in sinking speed with depth</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1749">The respective 600 simulations were restarted from a previously-calibrated simulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.23"/> and spun up with a prescribed pre-industrial atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 284.3 ppm for over 10 000 years.</p>
      <p id="d2e1768">We adopt a likelihood-based cost function for evaluating the biogeochemical model performance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">Eqs. 4–9 in</named-content></xref>. Our cost function considers mismatches in means, and spatial and temporal variabilities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, excess nitrate with respect to phosphate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.25"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref>, and modified apparent oxygen utilisation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which eliminates the covariation between AOU and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in 17 biomes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.26"/>. Interestingly, most of the best-20 ranges cover about 80 % of the total ranges, except for the four grazing-related parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>s, where the range is “only” about 40 %–60 %. This indicates that parameter values are relatively poorly constrained by currently available observations. Modern observations may include anthropogenic signals, which could bias parameter selection. Thus, we assume here that these effects are small relative to spatial variability and note this as a source of uncertainty we cannot quantify. The 20 best parameter sets (with the lowest cost function values) are employed for analysing model behaviour under pre-industrial (PI) and last-glacial-maximum (LGM) conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Boundary conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e1924">We set-up a generic LGM configuration with LGM-specific orbital parameters of the Earth. Besides the different orbital parameters, LGM conditions, including the strength of the AMOC, likely also deviated from the pre-industrial era by a lower moisture diffusivity over the Southern Ocean and a different wind pattern <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.27"/>. We adopt these forcings from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.28"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.29"/> to investigate their influence on the marine biogeochemistry and carbon cycle. Specifically, meridional moisture diffusivity over the Southern Ocean was reduced by a factor of 2, and the wind stress patterns are from monthly averages of models which have participated in the PMIP3. Compared to pre-industrial conditions, the LGM wind field features an northward shift and intensification of the Southern Ocean westerlies, as well as enhanced trade winds in the tropics and pronounced wind stress anomalies in the North Atlantic (Fig. S1 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d2e1936">In addition, we configure a 120 m lower sea level compared to PI conditions for the changes in biogeochemical fluxes.  The lower sea level was not implemented through an explicit modification of model bathymetry. Instead, it was represented diagnostically in the parameterizations of benthic processes. Specifically, we excluded benthic denitrification and sedimentary Fe input in regions shallower than 120 m relative to the pre-industrial sea level, thereby mimicking the exposure of continental shelves under LGM conditions.  This results in reduced benthic denitrification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.30"/>, reduced sedimentary input of Fe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.31"/>, and a 15 % increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.32"/>, which is conserved in the model. We also include a higher LGM Fe deposition, which was obtained from the LGM dust deposition estimate of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.33"><named-content content-type="post">their case C4fn-lgm</named-content></xref>. Applying a constant iron content of 3.5 % and 1 % solubility of deposited Fe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.34"/> yields an annual Fe deposition of 6.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is about four times the pre-industrial flux (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). All other physical and biogeochemical processes were computed using the same bathymetry as in the pre-industrial control simulation. This approach allows us to isolate the impact of shelf exposure on benthic fluxes without introducing additional changes to ocean circulation or ecosystem structure that would arise from a fully modified LGM bathymetry.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1998">Fe deposition and sedimentary fluxes, benthic denitrification (benthic N–loss), and surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the PIallbgc and LGM biogeochemical configurations and their differences. PI results are the means of 20 simulations in PIctl_PIallbgc, and LGM Fe deposition, Fe sediment flux, benthic denitrification, and surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are from PIctl_LGMFedep, PIctl_LGMFesed, PIctl_LGMbdeni, and PIctl_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> simulation means. Values on the bottom left of each panel indicate the global annual Fe and N fluxes or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Experiment setup</title>
      <p id="d2e2075">We define four sets of physical and six sets of biogeochemical model configurations, two of which represent pre-industrial climate conditions, PIctl (physical) and PIallbgc (biogeochemical), and the others are different combinations of our generic LGM configuration with PI and LGM boundary conditions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>): LGMatmctl and LGMallbgc refer to the full set of physical and biogeochemical LGM boundary conditions, LGMatmws has PI moisture diffusivity and LGM winds, LGMatmpi has PI moisture diffusivity and winds, and LGMFedep, LGMFesed, LGMPO<sub>4</sub> and LGMbdeni combine PI biogeochemical boundary conditions with one of LGM Fe deposition, Fe sedimentary release, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory, and benthic denitrification, respectively. These result in a total of 24 (4 physical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 biogeochemical) combinations of different physical and biogeochemical boundary conditions. For example, PIctl_LGMallbgc stands for simulations with pre-industrial physics and full LGM biogeochemistry (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). The combination of LGM moisture diffusivity and PI wind stress resulted in a shut-down of the AMOC in the UVic_ESCM and hence is not discussed here. From the calibration stage, we selected the 20 parameter sets that best reproduce present-day observations, each corresponding to a fully spun-up pre-industrial simulation. These simulations serve as initial conditions for the 24 combinations of physical and biogeochemical boundary conditions.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2118">Boundary conditions applied in the ensemble simulations for our <bold>(A)</bold> physical and <bold>(B)</bold> biogeochemical configurations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(A)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Physical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Moisture</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wind</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">configuration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">diffusivity<sup>1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">stress<sup>2</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PIctl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMatmctl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMatmws</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMatmpi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup>

          

  <oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(B)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biogeochemical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fe sedimentary</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Benthic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">configuration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">deposition<sup>3</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">release<sup>4</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">inventory<sup>5</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">denitrification<sup>6</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PIallbgc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMallbgc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">LGM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMFedep</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMFesed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMPO<sub>4</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMbdeni</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">LGM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e2127"><sup>1</sup> 50 % lower LGM moisture diffusivity over the Southern Ocean in LGM
<sup>2</sup> LGM wind pattern from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.35"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.36"/>
<sup>3</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times higher during LGM
<sup>4</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times lower during LGM
<sup>5</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % higher during LGM
<sup>6</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % lower during LGM.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2611">For each of the 24 configurations, we restarted simulations using the 20 selected parameter sets, resulting in an ensemble of 480 simulations. During the spin-up, radiative forcing was prescribed according to a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level (284.3 ppm for PI and 190 ppm for LGM), i.e., the feedback between atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and radiative forcing was switched off, while atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was allowed to evolve freely in response to changes in the global carbon cycle.</p>
      <p id="d2e2652">This physically and biogeochemically coupled but radiatively uncoupled configuration allows us to isolate the effects of boundary conditions on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while also accounting for terrestrial carbon responses and ocean–atmosphere carbon exchange. All simulations in the ensemble were spun up for more than 10 000 years under their respective boundary conditions until the marine biogeochemistry approached a steady state. The interannual variability at steady state is negligible because the model simulates a repeating annual cycle (Fig. S2). Therefore, we use the results from the final year of the spin-up simulations for our analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e2668">To evaluate whether different physical, biogeochemical, or both conditions result in ensembles that are significantly different from the 20 simulations in PIctl, PIallbgc, or PIctl_PIallbgc, we calculate their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for each tracer evaluated with Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test in R package “Stats”. To understand if changes in individual parameters significantly influence the changes in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from PIctl_PIallbgc to LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc, we obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values using the lm (Fitting Linear Models function) in R package “Stats”.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Model-data misfit costs of all 600 and the selected 20 parameter sets</title>
      <p id="d2e2721">The 600 parameter sets yield a wide range of model-data misfit costs spanning 2 orders of magnitude (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>). When the initial 600 pre-industrial simulations are ordered according to increasing cost, the 600 cost values overall show an approximately exponential increase from the low to the high end, with around 8 simulations on both ends deviating from the trend. The 20 simulations with the lowest costs comprise 3.3 % of all simulations, and the cost function values amongst these 20 best are no more than 1.3-fold higher than the overall lowest cost value.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2728">Cost values among all 600 simulations used for calibrating UVic-OPEM ordered from low to high. The red part denotes the 20 simulations with the lowest costs.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2737">Globally-averaged vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in the 20 simulations of PIctl_PIallbgc are compared with observational data from the World Ocean Atlas 2013  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.37"><named-content content-type="pre">WOA 2013,</named-content></xref> and GLODAPv2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.38"/>, as well as the original UVic results <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.39"/> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>. Among the 20 best simulations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper 500 m of the model is slightly lower  than in WOA 2013 but higher than in the original UVic standard solution. In the deep ocean (below 2500 m), simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are generally higher than WOA 2013. The globally-averaged concentrations are close to the WOA 2013 average.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are slightly lower in the upper ocean but higher in the deep ocean than WOA 2013. Our 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles scatter around the WOA 2013 profile and are lower and closer to the observations than the original UVic simulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.40"/>. The globally-averaged concentrations are about 1.7 % higher than WOA 2013.  The DIC profiles are higher than in the original UVic and closer to the GLODAPv2 data. The global mean concentrations are 0.1 % higher than GLODAPv2 on average.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2859">Globally-averaged vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and DIC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered in the cost function. Black lines are results from the 20 PIctl_PIallbgc simulations, and green lines indicate model results from the original UVic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">UVic 2.10,</named-content></xref>. Blue and purple lines represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observational data from the World Ocean Atlas 2013 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.42"><named-content content-type="pre">WOA 2013,</named-content></xref> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from GLODAPv2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.43"/>, respectively. Light blue lines in the bottom panels show results from the LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc simulations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3043">Simulated latitudinal patterns of carbon to nitrogen and carbon to phosphorus ratios in particulate organic matter (pC : N and pC : P, respectively) are also compared with observational data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.44"/>. Overall, the modeled ratios show good agreement with observations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>), although both the observational data and model results exhibit substantial variability. Modeled pC : N is slightly underestimated at high latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°), and overestimated at low latitudes, while pC : P in general is well reproduced across latitudes.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3063">Observed and simulated latitudinal patterns of carbon-to-nitrogen (C : N) and carbon-to-phosphorus (C : P) ratios in particulate organic matter (POM). Observations in the left panels refers to the compilation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.45"/>. Model results represent the mean values from the 20 simulations in PIctl_PIallbgc and LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Effects of different physical and biogeochemical conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e3083">We first compare the simulations with LGM and PI physics, each combined with PI biogeochemistry (PIallbgc) to assess the glacial-interglacial changes in global temperature and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). We then evaluate the effects of different biogeochemical conditions across physical conditions, and vice versa, on marine biogeochemical inventories and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Global temperature and ocean circulation</title>
      <p id="d2e3106">The simulated global surface air temperature in LGMatmctl_PIallbgc is 4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than in PIctl_PIallbgc. Although studies based on proxy records indicate a larger cooling of approximately 5–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.46"/>, the discrepancy is consistent with known limitations of intermediate-complexity models and does not affect the relative differences analysed in this study. In the ocean, the different physical boundary conditions result in distinct thermohaline circulation patterns (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). The strength and depth of the maximum value of the AMOC in PIctl_PIallbgc at 26.5° N is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.82</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv at 1100 m, which agrees well with the observational value from the RAPID array of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv at the same depth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.47"/>. The strength of the maximum AMOC at 26.5° N in LGMatmctl_PIallbgc is reduced by 29 % compared to PIctl_PIallbgc (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>), which is close to a multi-proxy constrained weakening by 36 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.48"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3188">Meridional overturning streamfunction in the Global, Atlantic, and Indian-Pacific Oceans for PIctl, LGMatmctl, LGMatmws, and LGMatmpi, all combined with the PIallbgc biogeochemical configuration. Results are ensemble means over the 20 simulations in each of the configurations. Values in white indicate the strength of maximum AMOC at 26.5° N under each condition.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Dissolved iron</title>
      <p id="d2e3205">For the pre-industrial control (PIctl) with PI biogeochemistry (PIctl_PIallbgc), the ensemble average (employing the 20 lowest-cost parameter sets) of globally-averaged dissolved Fe (dFe) concentration is 596 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value is only slightly lower than the observational estimate of 624 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the modern ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.49"/> (Fig. S3a and Table S1 in the Supplement). In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_ stands for all four physical conditions combined with LGMFedep) configurations, the increased Fe input from enhanced dust deposition results in higher dFe concentrations than all other configurations. The average concentration is 15 % higher than in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc simulations. In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations, where sedimentary iron fluxes are reduced due to the lower LGM sea level, average dFe concentration is 35 % lower than in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc simulations, and the lower Fe availability has a strong impact on productivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and export of particulate organic carbon (POC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). The dFe concentrations in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni simulations are all similar to those of the PIctl_PIallbgc baseline, indicating that changes in phosphorus and nitrogen cycling have minimal impact on dFe inventories, with Fe availability remaining relatively stable. In <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc simulations, the increased Fe deposition and reduced sedimentary input result in a 1 % decrease in dFe concentration (Fig. S3a and Table S1). Differences in dFe between physical configurations for the same biogeochemistry are much smaller than between biogeochemical configurations (Figs. S3a and S4a). Interestingly, in all LGM physical configurations, dFe is lower than in the corresponding PIctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> configurations (Fig. S4i). In the model, sedimentary Fe input is associated with the POC flux at the sea floor. Since the POC export declines under LGM conditions due to the lower temperature and lower surface nutrients, sedimentary Fe inputs and consequently the dFe inventories are lower in the LGM than in the PIctl simulations.</p>
      <p id="d2e3371">Surface dFe (sdFe, 0–50 m) shows similar but more accentuated pattern changes compared to globally-averaged dFe, except that the LGMatmctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> configurations have higher sdFe than the other LGM physical configurations for the same biogeochemistry (Fig. S3b and Table S1). The overall variation in sdFe is also similar to that of globally-averaged dFe. In <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep, the sdFe is 54 % higher than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, and this difference is greater than for the globally-averaged dFe (Fig. S4a, b and Table S1). These results highlight the significant role of atmospheric Fe deposition in controlling sdFe concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Nitrate</title>
      <p id="d2e3413">The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations is slightly lower than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc. Nevertheless, it is significantly lower in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Figs. S3c and S4c). This strong reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations is likely due to a lower iron availability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed, which limits <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation. Indeed, the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates are also significantly lower than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Fig. S3k, S5c and Table S2).</p>
      <p id="d2e3524">The enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation due to the greater phosphate availability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> and the reduced benthic denitrification in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni both produce higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Fig. S4c and Table S1, see also Sect. 3.3.2). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc on average is 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  higher than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc across all physical configurations (Fig. S4c and Table S1). Although the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed are substantially reduced due to a lower sedimentary flux of dFe, this negative effect is compensated in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc by the combined contributions of increased atmospheric Fe deposition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep), higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO4), and reduced benthic denitrification (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni).</p>
      <p id="d2e3726">In LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc simulations, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is 6 % higher than in PIctl_PIallbgc (Fig. S4s and Table S1), and an increase in deep-water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is also observed (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from PIctl_PIallbgc to LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc is lower than the estimates based on paleo proxies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,</named-content></xref>. Nevertheless, the increase in 5 out of the 20 individual simulations is larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the maximum increase reaches 16 %.</p>
      <p id="d2e3799">In addition to the counteracting effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and denitrification, surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations are also affected by the strength of the ocean circulation and biological utilisation. Therefore, changes in s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> do not necessarily follow the same pattern as changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory. Across all physical configurations, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations is only about 7 % lower than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, the difference in s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 24 % (Fig. S4c and d). On the other hand, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed is about 30 % lower on average than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, but s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is only 18 % lower. This apparent inconsistency between changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory and the surface concentration reflects different responses to changes in iron supply.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>3.2.4</label><title>Surface phosphate</title>
      <p id="d2e4001">The mean surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in PIctl_PIallbgc is 0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is close to the 0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in WOA2013 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.51"/> (Fig. S3e and Table S1). The average s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations is about 17 % lower than in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc simulations, which can be attributed to a higher biological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> utilisation for elevated dFe supply. The average s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations, where the sedimentary input of Fe is reduced to about one-fifth compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, is about 62 % higher than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, i.e., even higher than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> (Fig. S4e and Table S1, see also Sect. 3.3.3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS5">
  <label>3.2.5</label><title>Dissolved oxygen</title>
      <p id="d2e4212">The average dissolved marine oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentration in the PIctl_PIallbgc simulations is 179 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories in the LGM simulations show considerable variability, with some simulations exhibiting significant deviations from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Fig. S4f). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations is 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc simulations. This decrease is primarily driven by higher oxygen consumption due to the increased remineralisation of particulate organic carbon (POC), a shift that is also consistent with increased water column and benthic denitrification. Conversely, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed configurations, which feature reduced iron input, result in a remarkable increase by 62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. S4f).</p>
      <p id="d2e4359">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni simulations produce oxygen concentrations only slightly below those in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc. Hence, changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability alone have limited effects on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory. Overall, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc simulations is about 2 % lower than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc.</p>
      <p id="d2e4475">Among the LGM physical configurations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are higher in the upper ocean due to a higher solubility under colder conditions, but are lower in the deep water due to a more sluggish circulation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c and g), and the globally-averaged concentrations generally are lower than in the respective PIctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations. For example, the average concentration for LGMatmctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> is 2.8 % lower than for PIctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>. Comparing LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc to PIctl_PIallbgc, global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases by 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is due to the depletion in the deep water, while the upper ocean concentrations are typically higher (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). This agrees with estimated LGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels based on paleo proxies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.52"/> and model simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.53"/>. An exception is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are higher than in the PIctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations, which indicates a strong coupling with dFe reduction and changes in physical boundary conditions (Fig. S4n).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS6">
  <label>3.2.6</label><title>Dissolved inorganic carbon and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e4623">In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations, globally-averaged DIC is 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than in the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc simulations (Fig. S4g). In contrast, DIC in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations is 7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc simulations (Fig. S4g). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni simulations yield DIC concentrations similar to those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Fig. S4g). Our physical LGM configurations yield higher DIC concentrations than the PIctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations throughout the different biogeochemical configurations (Fig. S4o). Also, the increase in DIC is mostly observed in the deep water (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). Further, DIC concentrations within each of the LGM physical configurations are similar, despite the different strength of overturning circulation (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> and S4o).</p>
      <p id="d2e4756">The interglacial-glacial changes in the strength of the solubility pump caused by a reduced temperature, for example, can be obtained by comparing simulated results from PIctl_PIallbgc and LGMatmpi_PIallbgc. The latter shows an average increase of 0.6 % in DIC, which is equivalent to 238 Pg of carbon.</p>
      <p id="d2e4759">Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the biogeochemically coupled but radiatively uncoupled 20 PIctl_PIallbgc simulations is 284.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 ppm, consistent with the radiatively prescribed 284.3 ppm that was used for the calibration stage (Fig. S3h and Table S1). This indicates equilibrated carbon fluxes between air, land and ocean carbon pools at the end of the spin-ups.</p>
      <p id="d2e4783">For each of the 4 physical configurations (PIctl, LGMatmctl, LGMatmws, and LGMatmpi, Table 2a), the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of employing the biogeochemical LGM forcing conditions with respect to the biogeochemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc is most pronounced for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases by 60 ppm, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep, showing a decrease by 26 ppm (Fig. S4h and Table S1).</p>
      <p id="d2e4843">The average atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the physical LGM configurations, LGMatmctl, LGMatmws, and LGMatmpi, are all lower than in the respective simulations for PIctl across all biogeochemical configurations (Figs. S3h and S4p). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 20 LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc simulations is 241 ppm on average, which is significantly higher than the LGM atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of approximately 190 ppm recorded in ice cores <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.54"/>. Thus, the specific mechanisms isolated in these configurations can account for only a portion of the full glacial-interglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown.</p>
      <p id="d2e4901">Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows different levels of variability among the 20 simulations within each of the biogeochemical configurations. The spread in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., the difference between the maximum and minimum values across simulations) is largest for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed, ranging from 26 to 31 ppm (Fig. S3h). The atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also influenced by changes in the terrestrial carbon pool. While all LGM physical configurations lead to reduced non-glaciated terrestrial carbon (35 % lower than in PIctl condition) due to changes in radiative forcing, the three LGM atmospheric configurations result in different surface temperature distributions (Fig. S6), which in turn affect the amount of carbon released to the atmosphere and ocean. The combined carbon loss from land and the atmosphere to the ocean in the LGMatmctl, LGMatmws, and LGMatmpi simulations is 251 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15, 234 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13, and 239 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Pg C, respectively, relative to PIctl. Of these, changes in atmospheric carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.123</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) account for approximately 30 %, 18 %, and 17 % in the LGMatmctl, LGMatmws, and LGMatmpi simulations, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Biogeochemical rate estimates and elemental composition of POM</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Marine NPP and POC export</title>
      <p id="d2e5014">Net primary production (NPP) in PIctl_PIallbgc ranges from 44 to 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with mean and standard deviation of 64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3i and Table S2), in line with observational estimates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.55"><named-content content-type="pre">36–77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref>. Increasing Fe deposition enhances NPP by about 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations when compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc. A strong reduction in NPP is associated with the reduced sedimentary Fe flux in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations, where NPP is about 44 % lower on average than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Fig. S5a). The NPP increases by  1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> and 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni (Fig. S5a). With all biogeochemical conditions combined, NPP in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc is 11 % lower than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc. Due to the lower temperature, NPP decreases by 18 % in LGMatmpi_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to PIctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S5i).  Compared with the effect of the lower temperature, switching to LGM moisture diffusivity and wind patterns has only relatively small effects on NPP. Compared with LGMatmpi_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, NPP increases by 3 % and 1 % in LGMatmws_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and LGMatmctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations, respectively. In summary, only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed and LGMatmpi_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> affect NPP in a substantial way.</p>
      <p id="d2e5313">Particulate organic carbon (POC) export shows a similar pattern to that of  NPP. The average flux in the PIctl_PIallbgc simulations is 9.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3j and Table S2). POC export increases by 9 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep and decreases by 39 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed, with only small changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc when compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Fig. S5b). The reduction in POC export due to a cooler climate is 5 % among the LGM physical configurations. This temperature-driven reduction reflects the close coupling between global NPP and export production in the model, while regional changes in iron supply and nutrient utilisation can modulate export production. Proxy-based studies indicate that changes in export production during the LGM relative to the pre-industrial era were spatially heterogeneous with decreases in some low-latitude regions but increases in areas affected by enhanced iron supply, such as the Southern Ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.56"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Marine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and water-column and benthic denitrification</title>
      <p id="d2e5437"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates in PIctl_PIallbgc range from 132 to 281 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3k), agreeing with observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.57"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">223</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref>, and inverse-model estimates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.58"><named-content content-type="pre">126–223 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref>. WC denitrification (water-column N-loss) rates vary strongly among the PIctl_PIallbgc simulations, ranging from 8 to 119 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and benthic denitrification rates range from 116 to 169 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3l and m), also in line with previous estimates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.59"><named-content content-type="pre">39 to 66 and 68 to 122 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for WC and benthic denitrification rates, respectively,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5606">In the model, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation is the counterpart of WC and benthic denitrification, thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation equals the sum of WC and benthic denitrification at equilibrium.  Across our physical configurations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation increases by 37 % (65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on average in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, due to the extra input of Fe relieving iron limitation of diazotrophs (Fig. S5c).  WC denitrification is 197 % (56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) higher (Fig. S5d), compensating for most of the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, and benthic denitrification only increases by 5 % (8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S5e). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation drops by 53 % (93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on average in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations, while benthic denitrification decreases by 43 % (62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and WC denitrification shuts down entirely (Fig. S3l).</p>
      <p id="d2e5796">In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> simulations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and the sum of denitrification increase by 5 % (8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Fig. S5c). Benthic denitrification decreases by 31 % (46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on average in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni simulations, while WC denitrification increases by 52 % (15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation is 18 % (31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) lower than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc. In <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and WC and benthic N denitrification decrease by 31 % (55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 22 % (6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and 33 % (47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively (Fig. S5c–e).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>3.3.3</label><title>Elemental composition of POM</title>
      <p id="d2e6041">The elemental ratios of particulate organic matter (POM) provide insights into nutrient utilisation efficiency and the coupling between carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in marine ecosystems. Here we analyse the particulate carbon to nitrogen (pC : N), carbon to phosphorus  (pC : P), and nitrogen to phosphorus (pN : P) ratios. The ecological elemental ratios do not follow normal distributions, and we calculate medians of the elemental ratios without biomass weighting in the ocean grid cells that are not covered by ice, rather than mean values to avoid unnecessary bias <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.60"/>. The global median of surface (0–50 m) pC : N, pC : P, and pN : P in the PIctl_PIallbgc simulations are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Fig. S3n–p and Table S2). When comparing different biogeochemical conditions to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, the change in globally-averaged pC : N is negatively correlated with the change in s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. S4d and S5f). Nevertheless, the pC : N is lower despite lower s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed (Tables S1 and S2) because of the shrinking area with low s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, caused by low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> utilisation under strong iron limitation, such as the South Pacific Ocean, and hence the area with high pC : N also becomes smaller (Fig. S7). In general, pC : N in the model is mainly affected by two factors. One is the Fe limitation of carbon fixation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> utilisation, and the other is the supply of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the surface ocean.</p>
      <p id="d2e6269">The relation between pC : P and surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is similar to the relation between pC : N and s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3o). Since the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory is constant in the model, s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is largely affected by the supply of dFe. In LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc simulations, s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are higher than in the PIctl_PIallbgc (Fig. S4t and u), and the pC : N and pC : P are generally lower, particularly in low latitude regions where the surface nutrients are higher (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). In <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with lower iron supply. As a result, pC : P in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations decreases by 54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (39 %), while pC : N decreases by only 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (16 %) when compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Fig. S5g and f).</p>
      <p id="d2e6471">Compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, the average s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases by 31 % in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> and by 62 % in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed. Moreover, the effects of Fe limitation on carbon fixation and nitrogen assimilation are weaker in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed. As a result, pC : P and pN : P decrease by 10 % and 6 %, respectively, in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub>, which is substantially smaller than the reductions found in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed.</p>
      <p id="d2e6588">Due to the stronger increase in pC : P relative to pC : N, pN : P decreases by 31 % in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed (Fig. S5h), while other biogeochemical LGM configurations have smaller effects. Physical boundary conditions also contribute to the changes in the elemental ratios of POM via effects on s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The pC : N and pC : P in general are highest for LGMatmctl and lowest for PIctl and LGMatmws, and pN : P is highest in the LGMatmctl configuration (Fig. S5n–p).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Physical boundary conditions and ocean circulation</title>
      <p id="d2e6649">The UVic-ESCM responds to the transition from pre-industrial to LGM wind stress with an increased northward salt transport in the North Atlantic, which enhances surface salinity and density, thereby strengthening North Atlantic Deep Water formation while intensifying and deepening the AMOC. In contrast, reduced atmospheric moisture diffusivity decreases meridional freshwater transport to the Southern Ocean, leading to changes in surface buoyancy and enhanced vertical stratification. This suppresses deep water formation, particularly of Antarctic Bottom Water, which weakens the deep return flow, resulting in a weaker and shallower global overturning circulation, including the AMOC (Sigman et al., 2007; Somes et al., 2017). When all LGM physical boundary conditions are applied simultaneously (LGMatmctl_PIallbgc), the maximum AMOC strength at 26.5° N shows a 29 % reduction, and the depth remains similar to pre-industrial conditions (PIctl_PIallbgc).</p>
      <p id="d2e6660">The model results show only small changes in the MOC of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, with close agreement between LGMatmctl_PIallbgc and PIctl_PIallbgc. This indicates that the effect of the LGM lower surface temperature is almost compensated by the LGM winds and atmospheric moisture diffusivity. As a consequence of the virtual insensitivity of the Indo-Pacific MOC to a switch from pre-industrial to LGM boundary conditions, changes in the global MOC essentially mirror the changes in the AMOC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Effects of biogeochemical boundary conditions on biogeochemistry</title>
      <p id="d2e6673">Among the four interglacial-glacial changes in biogeochemical boundary conditions investigated, iron supply has the strongest impact on the inventories and fluxes. Clearly, it is the changes in Fe availability within the surface layer that alter iron limitation and affect NPP and POC export (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>). The lower dFe inventory during the LGM seems in conflict with the general understanding of Fe fertilisation during the LGM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.61"/>. Interestingly, although NPP and POC export are lower in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc simulations, the corresponding atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in general is lower as well (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> and Table S1). The atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc simulations is lower compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, and is primarily driven by a spatial redistribution of surface DIC and the associated changes in global air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (Fig. S8).</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e6764">Differences in <bold>(a)</bold> NPP and surface dFe and <bold>(b)</bold> POC export and pC : N with respect to default biogeochemical conditions (PIallbgc). Color represents atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and symbols indicate the different biogeochemical configurations. The cluster of points with little deviation from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc simulations is from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO4 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni simulations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6823">Glacial-interglacial changes in sedimentary Fe input were not considered in several earlier studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.62"/>. Nevertheless, the strong sensitivity of the biogeochemical inventories and fluxes to changes in sedimentary influx of Fe demonstrates its importance. In our model, the lower glacial sea level leads to a proportional reduction in sedimentary Fe supply from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, corresponding to a drop of 10.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This reduction is larger than the increase in atmospheric Fe deposition from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep (4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), resulting in smaller dFe inventories in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc.</p>
      <p id="d2e6932">At first glance, one might expect that the magnitude of sedimentary Fe input in the model is relatively large and that its reduction could therefore be overestimated. However, the simulated sedimentary Fe flux in PIctl_PIallbgc (12.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) falls close to the lower end of estimates from other models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.63"><named-content content-type="pre">0.6–194 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref>. A recent sensitivity study also shows that a much higher present-day sedimentary Fe release (117 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) yields a better model-data fit in global and surface dFe distributions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.64"/>. Assuming that the glacial loss of sedimentary Fe input scales proportionally with the PI baseline due to shelf exposure, our low PI baseline implies that the absolute drop in sedimentary Fe supply (10.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a conservative estimate; a higher PI baseline would yield an even larger net Fe deficit relative to the atmospheric supply. On the other hand, a higher PI baseline would also leave a larger absolute amount of sedimentary Fe available during the LGM, which would mitigate the severe ocean-wide iron limitation observed in our simulations. This highlights the critical need to better constrain both the baseline magnitude and bathymetric scaling of sedimentary Fe release when evaluating glacial-interglacial biogeochemical cycles.</p>
      <p id="d2e7023">While dFe availability affects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, simulations with higher dFe supply and concentrations do not necessarily result in higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories. For example, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep is 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc. This is because changes in Fe supply in our simulations do not only affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, but can induce changes in denitrification, which in turn depends on the level and consumption of oxygen, in association with the attenuation of the exported particulate organic matter (POM). Two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks can occur in the model solutions. One sink is due to the water-column (WC) denitrification, which is affected by WC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply and consumption via POM remineralisation. The other is benthic denitrification, which is sensitive to the amount of POC reaching the sea floor. Thus, both water column and benthic denitrification are affected by the POM export. The higher Fe supply in the surface ocean increases not only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation but also NPP and POM export, thereby promoting both WC and benthic denitrification. The net effect on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  inventory depends on the balance of these counteracting fluxes. Whenever <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are lower in a simulation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep than in  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, the increase in denitrification is higher than the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation at the beginning of the spin-up, because the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation due to a higher Fe supply is hampered by the supply of the other limiting macronutrient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Under such conditions, the model yields results with a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory once the simulation reaches equilibrium despite an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation. This explains that while global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations is higher than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (Fig. S5c and Table S2), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep show a mixed response (Fig. S4c and Table S1).</p>
      <p id="d2e7321">Since the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory is fixed in the model, the higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in the LGMPO<sub>4</sub> configuration directly translate into higher surface concentrations. In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> simulations, s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on average is about 31 % higher than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, which is more than the 15 % increase in the inventory, indicating a non-linear relationship between s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its global distribution (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, S4e and Table S1). Changes in ocean circulation also affect s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, for all the biogeochemical configurations, s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for LGMatmws, LGMatmpi and particularly LGMatmctl are lower than for PIctl (Fig. S4m).</p>
      <p id="d2e7467">While earlier works have hypothesised that increased s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the LGM could have benefited NPP and decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.65"/>, the changes of s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMPO<sub>4</sub> and s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMbdeni have only limited effects on the NPP and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in our simulations.  The relatively weak effects of the increases in the two major nutrients can be ascribed to (1) co-limitation effects and (2) the variable stoichiometry in UVic-OPEM. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Fe are the three limiting nutrients for phytoplankton growth in the model, and nutrient co-limitation is observed in many regions of the ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.66"/>. An increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone would trigger or aggravate limitation by the other two nutrients. The flexibility in the carbon to nitrogen (C : N) and carbon to phosphorous (C : P) ratios of phytoplankton in UVic-OPEM further complicates the relationship between NPP and nutrient limitation. When s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase, pC : P and pC : N decrease in response (Fig. S3 and Table S2), and this partly offsets the effect of increasing major nutrients on NPP, POC export, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e7703">As a consequence, macronutrient availability alone exerts only a limited control on export production and associated oxygen consumption in our simulations. Instead, iron availability emerges as the more influential limiting factor, in particular in regions where Fe supply limits productivity. Changes in Fe supply therefore have a strong impact on POC export, remineralisation, and ultimately the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory.</p>
      <p id="d2e7717">A stronger Fe supply from atmospheric deposition, such as in the LGMFedep condition, could have enhanced the utilisation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to an expansion of ocean regions depleted in those major nutrients. This “nutrient robbing” effect, whereby stimulated productivity in one area depletes macronutrients in downstream regions, is a primary criticism of Ocean Iron Fertilisation as a marine CDR strategy, as it could limit long-term global net carbon sequestration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.67"/>. Nevertheless, our results suggest that the variable stoichiometry may partially mitigate this effect. By increasing pC : P and pC : N in response to nutrient stress, the variable stoichiometry formulation in our model sustains NPP even when macronutrient concentrations decline. This negative feedback mechanism does not exist in models that assume fixed stoichiometry, and warrants further investigation to determine its global significance in CDR scenarios.</p>
      <p id="d2e7755">The higher DIC in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations can be attributed to increased primary production and carbon export driven by the Fe fertilisation effect, leading to greater uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the atmosphere and increased carbon storage in the ocean. In contrast, the lower DIC in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations is likely linked to reduced primary production and carbon export, as Fe availability is a critical limiting factor for these processes. While global average DIC concentrations appear similar across the LGM physical configurations, the vertical distribution tells a more complex story (Fig. S9). Specifically, deep-water DIC concentrations vary with the circulation state; the LGMatmctl configuration, which exhibits the most sluggish AMOC in our ensemble, shows the highest deep-water DIC inventory. This suggests that the relationship between circulation strength and DIC storage is not straightforward and likely involves additional factors such as circulation geometry and deep ocean residence time.</p>
      <p id="d2e7789">Our results emphasise the importance of iron as a limiting nutrient, especially during the LGM, when changes in dust deposition and sea level had significant impacts on Fe availability. We also demonstrate that the lower temperatures during the LGM should have reduced NPP and POC export and thus the sedimentary flux of Fe, which also affects the oceanic dFe inventory.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Interactions between physical and biogeochemical boundary conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e7800">Lower temperatures, different wind patterns, and reduced moisture diffusivity over the Southern Ocean in the three LGM physical configurations result in different general circulation patterns, which affect biogeochemical cycles, as demonstrated in previous modelling studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.68"/>. The LGM boundary conditions affect inventories and fluxes differently. For example, DIC is higher for LGMatmpi_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> than for PIctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>,  while the differences between LGMatmws_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and LGMatmpi_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, and between LGMatmctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and LGMatmpi_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> are small (Fig. S4o). On the other hand, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation shows contrasting responses across the simulations. It decreases relative to PIctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, but increases in LGMatmws_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and LGMatmctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>. This indicates that, in our experiments, the glacial-interglacial changes in the DIC inventory are dominated by the lower temperature, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation is also sensitive to the changes in the physical conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e7921">Across all biogeochemical conditions, our LGM configurations have lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in LGMatmctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, LGMatmws_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, and LGMatmpi_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>. The LGM wind pattern and moisture diffusivity over the Southern Ocean contribute about 16 ppm, similar to the 19 ppm drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> owing to the lower temperature.</p>
      <p id="d2e7981">We also notice that the effects of the biogeochemical configurations depend on which physical configuration they are combined with and vice versa. For example, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deviations from PIctl_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> are more strongly expressed in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations than in the other biogeochemical configurations (Fig. S4k and Table S1). This highlights how an increase in dFe supply enhances the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and denitrification to changes in physical boundary conditions. The results underscore the importance of the interplay between the biogeochemical and physical boundary conditions in controlling the balance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gains and losses in the ocean. Furthermore, atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases to varying degrees depending on the specific combination of physical and biogeochemical boundary conditions applied. This non-linear interaction between physical circulation and biogeochemical processes is consistent with previous studies showing that the glacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown arises from the combined and often synergistic effects of ocean circulation changes and biological processes such as Fe fertilisation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.69"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels as constraints for simulating LGM conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e8106">During the LGM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels and distributions in the ocean were different from the pre-industrial era. According to paleo proxy data, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower during the LGM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.70"/>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.71"/>. Globally-averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc simulations are 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower and 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher on average than in PIctl_PIallbgc (Table S1).  In some of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep simulations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels both become lower than in PIctl_PIallbgc (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>).  In these simulations, high iron input from the atmosphere increases POM production and export, and the ensuing consumption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> causes more widespread oxygen deficient zones, where denitrification occurs.</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e8276">Globally-averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 480 simulations. Color represents atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and symbols indicate the different biogeochemical configurations. The black open circle and asterisk indicate mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PIctl_PIallbgc and LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc simulations, respectively. The cluster of points with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e8386">Such a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as simulated by some of the experiments is in conflict with the observational records.  Thus, a low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory indicates that a strong decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might be due to the wrong reasons in the model, e.g.,  overestimation of the marine biological carbon pump. On the other hand, the strong Fe limitation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations results in a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to suppressed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to reduced primary production, and higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations as a result of lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption from POM export (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>). This increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also inconsistent with proxy-based reconstructions. Those different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values highlight the critical role of Fe supply for the LGM model experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Changes in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and elemental ratio shifts in POM</title>
      <p id="d2e8576">In the LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc configuration, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 43.5 ppm lower than in PIctl_PIallbgc (Fig. S4x and Table S1). The biogeochemical boundary conditions combined contribute less than the physical boundary conditions. The changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc (biogeochemical) with PIctl and LGMatmctl configurations are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, respectively, while the changes from PIctl to LGMatmctl (physical) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc conditions are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, respectively (Table S1). The decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the LGM physical configuration with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, PIctl_PIallbgc to LGMatmctl_PIallbgc) agrees with a 33 ppm decrease in a previous model experiment considering changes in physical boundary conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.72"/>. Nevertheless, the contribution from the LGM biogeochemical boundary conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc) to the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is small, and the 43.5 ppm decrease from PIctl_PIallbgc to LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc are only about 50 % of the observed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.73"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm;</named-content></xref>. The main goal of our experiments is to evaluate changes in some biogeochemical and physical aspects that could affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and not all processes, such as brine-induced stratification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.74"/> and air-sea disequilibrium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.75"/>, are considered. These missing processes might also contribute to the ocean receiving less carbon from terrestrial sources than suggested by observational estimates. In our simulations, terrestrial carbon input into the ocean-atmosphere system ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">177</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in LGMatmctl to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">198</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  in LGMatmpi simulations. These simulated values are slightly lower than the lower bound of the observational estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">511</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">289</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements from benthic foraminifera <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.76"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e8908">Some earlier experiments using Earth system models were able to generate a larger decline in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.77"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm;</named-content></xref>. However, these model experiments only consider the increase in atmospheric Fe deposition but not the decline in the supply from the sediment, which was included in our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMallbgc conditions. When considering only the effects of Fe deposition, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the LGMatmctl_LGMFedep simulations is 63 ppm lower than in PIctl_PIallbgc, i.e., 20 ppm more than for LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc. Further, different parameter combinations also affect the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, e.g., the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown in LGMatmctl_LGMFedep is 75 ppm (Fig. S4x), which is close to the observations. It is worthwhile to mention that increased Fe deposition alone reduces atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 22.7 ppm from PIctl_PIallbgc to PIctl_LGMFedep, which is close to the changes in other model experiments considering only LGM dust deposition under pre-industrial climate conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.78"><named-content content-type="pre">14–22.8 ppm;</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e9016">The effects of variable stoichiometry on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes during the LGM have been examined in several previous studies. These include an empirical relationship between pC : P and ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and between pC : N and ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.79"/>, as well as a power law formulation for pC : P and pC : N that considers the influences of ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, temperature, and light intensity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.80"/>. For models that adopt the empirical relationship between pC : P and ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the magnitude of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline increases by 13–16 ppm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.81"/>. When the relationship between pC : N and ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also considered, the increase reaches 11 ppm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.82"/>. The power-law formulation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.83"/> leads to an additional drawdown of 20 ppm compared to a fixed stoichiometry scheme using the Redfield ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e9187">To facilitate comparison with studies neglecting the changes in sedimentary Fe flux, benthic N-loss, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory, we calculate the changes in pC : N (26 %) and pC : P (28 %) from PIctl_PIallbgc to LGMatmctl_LGMFedep, which isolates the effect of enhanced atmospheric Fe deposition in our simulations. Multiplying the relative changes by the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline yields an estimated additional drawdown of approximately 16–17 ppm attributable to variable stoichiometry.</p>
      <p id="d2e9220">While this simple calculation neglects spatial variations, it provides a first-order estimate of the impact of stoichiometric flexibility on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown, showing that the effects of changes in elemental ratios on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in our simulations agree with previous studies considering the effects of Fe deposition.</p>
      <p id="d2e9249">In our experiments, pC : N and pC : P are lower under full LGM conditions (LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc) by 8 % and 10 %, respectively, than in PIctl_PIallbgc. In LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc, the higher surface nutrient concentrations, resulting from the weaker biological utilisation due to a lower global temperature and reduced Fe supply from the sediment, largely influence the elemental ratios of POM, as shown in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed simulations. Nevertheless, the lower pC : N and pC : P could be simply linked to extra N and P incorporated into the POM, and do not necessarily indicate that the effects of variable stoichiometry of POM on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are reversed in LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc. We note, however, that regional variations, particularly in regions such as the Southern Ocean, may differ from the global mean response and could play a more important role locally.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Effects of parameter variations</title>
      <p id="d2e9283">The ranges of variation in the model’s parameter values, which generally reflect ranges of uncertainty, contribute  significantly to the variability of the simulated carbon cycle responses during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and form a central motivation for this study. This variability arises because the response of biogeochemical tracers and fluxes to changes in boundary conditions depends strongly on the choice of the combination of parameter values.</p>
      <p id="d2e9286">The changes in Fe supply greatly affect the mean changes in the tracers and fluxes when compared with the pre-industrial simulations, and also contribute to higher variability among the 20 simulations with different parameter settings for each model configuration (Figs. S4 and S5). It is not surprising that the variations among the 20 ensemble members are often stronger when the median values deviate more from the pre-industrial simulations, but that is not always the case. For example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a different behaviour. When compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_PIallbgc, the deviation of the median is highest in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed but the variation is much larger in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFedep (Fig. S4c). That is because the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level is affected by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, WC and benthic denitrification, and the shut-down of WC denitrification in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>_LGMFesed subdues the variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e9384">Compared to the pre-industrial reference condition (PIctl_PIallbgc), atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under full LGM conditions (LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc) decreases by 36 to 58 ppm among the 20 simulations. The difference between the minimum and maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes amounts to 50 % of the 43.5 ppm average decrease. We apply the lm (fitting linear model) function in R package “stats” to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the correlations between changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from PIctl_PIallbgc to LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in the perturbed parameters to better understand how individual parameters contribute to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S10). Among the 19 parameters, the nitrogen subsistence quota (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), temperature-dependent mortality (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and zooplankton maximum specific ingestion rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are significantly associated with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S10b, e, and m). Thus, not only phytoplankton- but also zooplankton (top-down)-related parameters affect the variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in our simulations.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e9553">Effects of parameter pairs on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between PIctl_PIallbgc and LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc. <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>det</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dd</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the most positively and negatively correlated pairs in the 19 parameters, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1277/2026/esd-17-1277-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e9636">Overall, the selected 20 parameter sets yield strongly different biogeochemical fluxes, inventories, and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in our various LGM model configurations. The spread in simulated changes relative to pre-industrial conditions (PIctl, PIallbgc, and PIctl_PIallbgc) across the 20 ensemble members arises from differences in how the selected parameter sets control model sensitivity to LGM boundary conditions in each configuration. Interestingly, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appears unrelated to cost values based on the likelihood-based cost function we employed for the parameter selection (Fig. S10t). Indeed, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not necessarily correlated with cost values, which may be explained by different correlations (a) among parameters within the best 20 parameter sets, (b) between parameters and cost values, and (c) between parameters and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is easiest to see when the best selection of values of a pair of parameters is highly correlated. It means that collinearities exist, with effects on the cost function that are strongly interconnected. For example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>det</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dd</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the strongest positively-correlated pair among the 19 parameters (Fig. S11), and because changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>det</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dd</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have opposite effects on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S10), they tend to compensate each other's effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the LGMatmctl_LGMallbgc simulations. Thus, the pairs in the best 20 parameter sets yield limited changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a strong deviation in the  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can only occur when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>det</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dd</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change in opposite directions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>a). The other case would be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the strongest negatively-correlated pair among the 19 parameters (Fig. S11). Since changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also have opposite effects on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, opposing changes in  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dia</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>phy</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could result in a larger deviation in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but the effects on the cost values remains limited (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>b), owing to a weak correlation of either parameter with the cost value among the best 20 simulations. The weak relationship between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and cost values demonstrates the complexity of LGM model simulations with respect to the parameter settings, and emphasises the importance of perturbed parameter ensemble simulations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion and Future Directions</title>
      <p id="d2e9983">We investigate the role of several physical and biogeochemical boundary conditions in the face of parameter uncertainty in an Earth system model for simulating marine biogeochemistry and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under pre-industrial and LGM conditions.  We find that persistent changes in Fe supply are the most critical factor, while changes in major nutrients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) alone have limited effects, at least partly due to co-limitation effects and the variable stoichiometry of POM in the model. The results from simulations with different combinations of physical and biogeochemical boundary conditions show that physical boundary conditions also affect marine biogeochemical cycles and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the variable pP : C and pN : C can contribute about 16–17 ppm additional drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when considering LGM Fe deposition alone.</p>
      <p id="d2e10056">Due to the decline in sedimentary Fe input, productivity decreases and leads to higher surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the LGM than the pre-industrial simulations. This mechanism is often ignored in LGM modelling studies. Nevertheless, we show that it could have strong impact on marine biogeochemical cycles, elemental ratios of POM, and the changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This Fe source to the ocean thus requires further understanding and examination.</p>
      <p id="d2e10103">The variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes among the 20 LGM simulations highlights the uncertainty when applying parameter sets calibrated using pre-industrial conditions. We argue that understanding the uncertainty introduced by different boundary conditions and parameter sets is critical for accurately simulating LGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics and the interactions between physical and biogeochemical factors in Earth system models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e10136">All model codes and data used for the analyses are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20816740" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20816740</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.84"/>. All observational data in the study are publicly available, including the World Ocean Atlas 2013 (<uri>https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/ocean-climate-laboratory</uri>, last access: 16 September 2026), GLODAPv2 (<uri>https://glodap.info/</uri>, last access: 16 September 2026) and POM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.85"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e10154">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1277-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1277-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e10163">CTC designed the study, performed the model simulations, conducted the analyses, and wrote the original draft. MP contributed to the development and implementation of the optimality-based plankton ecosystem model (OPEM) and provided guidance on model configuration and interpretation. CJS assisted in the design of the glacial boundary conditions. MS contributed to the parameter calibration framework and uncertainty analysis. AO contributed to the interpretation of the results, and assisted in manuscript revision. All authors discussed the results and contributed to improving the final manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e10169">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e10175">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e10181">The authors want to acknowledge use of the Ferret program of NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory for analysis and graphics featured in this paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e10186">This research has been supported by the National Science and Technology Council (grant no. NSTC 114-2611-M-002-007).The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre  for Ocean Research Kiel.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e10199">This paper was edited by Gabriele Messori and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Albani et al.(2014)Albani, Mahowald, Perry, Scanza, Zender, Heavens, Maggi, Kok, and Otto-Bliesner</label><mixed-citation>Albani, S., Mahowald, N. M., Perry, A. T., Scanza, R. A., Zender, C. S., Heavens, N. G., Maggi, V., Kok, J. F., and Otto-Bliesner, B. L.: Improved dust representation in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 541–570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013MS000279</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Anderson et al.(2019)Anderson, Sachs, Fleisher, Allen, Yu, Koutavas, and Jaccard</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, R. F., Sachs, J. P., Fleisher, M. Q., Allen, K. A., Yu, J., Koutavas, A., and Jaccard, S. L.: Deep-Sea Oxygen Depletion and Ocean Carbon Sequestration During the Last Ice Age, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 33, 301–317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GB006049</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bopp et al.(2003)Bopp, Kohfeld, Le Quéré, and Aumont</label><mixed-citation>Bopp, L., Kohfeld, K. E., Le Quéré, C., and Aumont, O.: Dust impact on marine biota and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during glacial periods, Paleoceanography, 18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002PA000810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002PA000810</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bopp et al.(2017)Bopp, Resplandy, Untersee, Le Mezo, and Kageyama</label><mixed-citation>Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Untersee, A., Le Mezo, P., and Kageyama, M.: Ocean (de)oxygenation from the Last Glacial Maximum to the twenty-first century: insights from Earth System models, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 375, 20160323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0323" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2016.0323</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bouttes et al.(2011)Bouttes, Paillard, Roche, Brovkin, and Bopp</label><mixed-citation>Bouttes, N., Paillard, D., Roche, D. M., Brovkin, V., and Bopp, L.: Last Glacial Maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> successfully reconciled, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL044499</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Broecker(1982)</label><mixed-citation>Broecker, W. S.: Glacial to interglacial changes in ocean chemistry, Prog. Oceanogr., 11, 151–197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Brovkin et al.(2007)Brovkin, Ganopolski, Archer, and Rahmstorf</label><mixed-citation>Brovkin, V., Ganopolski, A., Archer, D., and Rahmstorf, S.: Lowering of glacial atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in response to changes in oceanic circulation and marine biogeochemistry, Paleoceanography, 22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001380" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006PA001380</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Browning and Moore(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Browning, T. J. and Moore, C. M.: Global analysis of ocean phytoplankton nutrient limitation reveals high prevalence of co-limitation, Nat. Commun., 14, 5014, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40774-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-40774-0</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Browning et al.(2017)Browning, Achterberg, Rapp, Engel, Bertrand, Tagliabue, and Moore</label><mixed-citation>Browning, T. J., Achterberg, E. P., Rapp, I., Engel, A., Bertrand, E. M., Tagliabue, A., and Moore, C. M.: Nutrient co-limitation at the boundary of an oceanic gyre, Nature, 551, 242–246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature24063</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Buchanan et al.(2016)Buchanan, Matear, Lenton, Phipps, Chase, and Etheridge</label><mixed-citation>Buchanan, P. J., Matear, R. J., Lenton, A., Phipps, S. J., Chase, Z., and Etheridge, D. M.: The simulated climate of the Last Glacial Maximum and insights into the global marine carbon cycle, Clim. Past, 12, 2271–2295, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2271-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-2271-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Buitenhuis et al.(2013)Buitenhuis, Hashioka, and Quéré</label><mixed-citation>Buitenhuis, E. T., Hashioka, T., and Quéré, C. L.: Combined constraints on global ocean primary production using observations and models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 847–858, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/gbc.20074</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Carr et al.(2006)Carr, Friedrichs, Schmeltz, Aita, Antoine, Arrigo, Asanuma, Aumont, Barber, Behrenfeld, Bidigare, Buitenhuis, Campbell, Ciotti, Dierssen, Dowell, Dunne, Esaias, Gentili, Gregg, Groom, Hoepffner, Ishizaka, Kameda, Quere, Lohrenz, Marra, Melin, Moore, Morel, Reddy, Ryan, Scardi, Smyth, Turpie, Tilstone, Waters, and Yamanaka</label><mixed-citation>Carr, M.-E., Friedrichs, M. A., Schmeltz, M., Aita, M. N., Antoine, D., Arrigo, K. R., Asanuma, I., Aumont, O., Barber, R., Behrenfeld, M., Bidigare, R., Buitenhuis, E. T., Campbell, J., Ciotti, A., Dierssen, H., Dowell, M., Dunne, J., Esaias, W., Gentili, B., Gregg, W., Groom, S., Hoepffner, N., Ishizaka, J., Kameda, T., Quere, C. L., Lohrenz, S., Marra, J., Melin, F., Moore, K., Morel, A., Reddy, T. E., Ryan, J., Scardi, M., Smyth, T., Turpie, K., Tilstone, G., Waters, K., and Yamanaka, Y.: A comparison of global estimates of marine primary production from ocean color, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 53, 741–770, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.01.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.01.028</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Cartapanis et al.(2018)Cartapanis, Galbraith, Bianchi, and Jaccard</label><mixed-citation>Cartapanis, O., Galbraith, E. D., Bianchi, D., and Jaccard, S. L.: Carbon burial in deep-sea sediment and implications for oceanic inventories of carbon and alkalinity over the last glacial cycle, Clim. Past, 14, 1819–1850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1819-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-14-1819-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chien(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Chien, C.-T.: Code and data for: Chien et al., Ensemble simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum marine biogeochemistry and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown due to the soft-tissue biological carbon pump (Version 2.0), Zenodo [code and data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20816740" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20816740</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Chien et al.(2020)Chien, Pahlow, Schartau, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>Chien, C.-T., Pahlow, M., Schartau, M., and Oschlies, A.: Optimality-based non-Redfield plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM v1.1) in UVic-ESCM 2.9 – Part 2: Sensitivity analysis and model calibration, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4691–4712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Chien et al.(2023)Chien, Pahlow, Schartau, Li, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>Chien, C.-T., Pahlow, M., Schartau, M., Li, N., and Oschlies, A.: Effects of phytoplankton physiology on global ocean biogeochemistry and climate, Science Advances, 9, eadg1725, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg1725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.adg1725</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Deutsch et al.(2004)Deutsch, Sigman, Thunell, Meckler, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>Deutsch, C., Sigman, D. M., Thunell, R. C., Meckler, A. N., and Haug, G. H.: Isotopic constraints on glacial/interglacial changes in the oceanic nitrogen budget, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GB002189</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Eugster et al.(2013)Eugster, Gruber, Deutsch, Jaccard, and Payne</label><mixed-citation>Eugster, O., Gruber, N., Deutsch, C., Jaccard, S. L., and Payne, M. R.: The dynamics of the marine nitrogen cycle across the last deglaciation, Paleoceanography, 28, 116–129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/palo.20020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/palo.20020</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Fay and McKinley(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Fay, A. R. and McKinley, G. A.: Global open-ocean biomes: mean and temporal variability, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 273–284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-273-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-6-273-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Fillman et al.(2023)Fillman, Schmittner, and Kvale</label><mixed-citation>Fillman, N., Schmittner, A., and Kvale, K. F.: Variable Stoichiometry Effects on Glacial/Interglacial Ocean Model Biogeochemical Cycles and Carbon Storage, ESS Open Archive [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.169049091.16856096/v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.22541/essoar.169049091.16856096/v1</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Galbraith and Martiny(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Galbraith, E. D. and Martiny, A. C.: A simple nutrient-dependence mechanism for predicting the stoichiometry of marine ecosystems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 8199–8204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423917112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1423917112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Garcia et al.(2013a)Garcia, Locarnini, Boyer, Antonov, Mishonov, Baranova, Zweng, Reagan, and Johnson</label><mixed-citation>Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Johnson, D. R.: Dissolved Oxygen, Apparent Oxygen Utilization, and Oxygen Saturation, in: World Ocean Atlas 2013, edited by: Levitus, S., vol. 3, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 75, <uri>http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/indprod.html</uri> (last access: 16 September 2026), 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Garcia et al.(2013b)Garcia, Locarnini, Boyer, Antonov, Mishonov, Baranova, Zweng, Reagan, and Johnson</label><mixed-citation>Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Johnson, D. R.: Dissolved Inorganic Nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate), in: World Ocean Atlas 2013, edited by: Levitus, S., vol. 4, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 76, <uri>http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/indprod.html</uri> (last access: 16 September 2026), 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Glock et al.(2018)Glock, Erdem, Wallmann, Somes, Liebetrau, Schönfeld, Gorb, and Eisenhauer</label><mixed-citation>Glock, N., Erdem, Z., Wallmann, K., Somes, C. J., Liebetrau, V., Schönfeld, J., Gorb, S., and Eisenhauer, A.: Coupling of oceanic carbon and nitrogen facilitates spatially resolved quantitative reconstruction of nitrate inventories, Nat. Commun., 9, 1217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03647-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-03647-5</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Gruber and Sarmiento(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Gruber, N. and Sarmiento, J. L.: Global patterns of marine nitrogen fixation and denitrification, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 235–266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB00077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97GB00077</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Honjo et al.(2008)Honjo, Manganini, Krishfield, and Francois</label><mixed-citation>Honjo, S., Manganini, S. J., Krishfield, R. A., and Francois, R.: Particulate organic carbon fluxes to the ocean interior and factors controlling the biological pump: A synthesis of global sediment trap programs since 1983, Prog. Oceanogr., 76, 217–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2007.11.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2007.11.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Huang et al.(2022)Huang, Tagliabue, and Cassar</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Tagliabue, A., and Cassar, N.: Data-Driven Modeling of Dissolved Iron in the Global Ocean, Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.837183" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2022.837183</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Isles(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Isles, P. D. F.: The misuse of ratios in ecological stoichiometry, Ecology, 101, e03153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ecy.3153</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Jaccard and Galbraith(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Jaccard, S. L. and Galbraith, E. D.: Large climate-driven changes of oceanic oxygen concentrations during the last deglaciation, Nat. Geosci., 5, 151–156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1352" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1352</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Jacobel et al.(2020)Jacobel, Anderson, Jaccard, McManus, Pavia, and Winckler</label><mixed-citation>Jacobel, A., Anderson, R., Jaccard, S., McManus, J., Pavia, F., and Winckler, G.: Deep Pacific storage of respired carbon during the last ice age: Perspectives from bottom water oxygen reconstructions, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 230, 106065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106065</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Jolliff et al.(2009)Jolliff, Kindle, Shulman, Penta, Friedrichs, Helber, and Arnone</label><mixed-citation>Jolliff, J. K., Kindle, J. C., Shulman, I., Penta, B., Friedrichs, M. A., Helber, R., and Arnone, R. A.: Summary diagrams for coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem model skill assessment, J. Marine Syst., 76, 64–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.05.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.05.014</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Kageyama et al.(2021)Kageyama, Harrison, Kapsch, Lofverstrom, Lora, Mikolajewicz, Sherriff-Tadano, Vadsaria, Abe-Ouchi, Bouttes, Chandan, Gregoire, Ivanovic, Izumi, LeGrande, Lhardy, Lohmann, Morozova, Ohgaito, Paul, Peltier, Poulsen, Quiquet, Roche, Shi, Tierney, Valdes, Volodin, and Zhu</label><mixed-citation>Kageyama, M., Harrison, S. P., Kapsch, M.-L., Lofverstrom, M., Lora, J. M., Mikolajewicz, U., Sherriff-Tadano, S., Vadsaria, T., Abe-Ouchi, A., Bouttes, N., Chandan, D., Gregoire, L. J., Ivanovic, R. F., Izumi, K., LeGrande, A. N., Lhardy, F., Lohmann, G., Morozova, P. A., Ohgaito, R., Paul, A., Peltier, W. R., Poulsen, C. J., Quiquet, A., Roche, D. M., Shi, X., Tierney, J. E., Valdes, P. J., Volodin, E., and Zhu, J.: The PMIP4 Last Glacial Maximum experiments: preliminary results and comparison with the PMIP3 simulations, Clim. Past, 17, 1065–1089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1065-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-17-1065-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Kemppinen et al.(2019)Kemppinen, Holden, Edwards, Ridgwell, and Friend</label><mixed-citation>Kemppinen, K. M. S., Holden, P. B., Edwards, N. R., Ridgwell, A., and Friend, A. D.: Coupled climate–carbon cycle simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease using a large ensemble of modern plausible parameter sets, Clim. Past, 15, 1039–1062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1039-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-15-1039-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Key et al.(2015)Key, Olsen, van Heuven, Lauvset, Velo, Lin, Schirnick, Kozyr, Tanhua, Hoppema, Jutterström, Steinfeldt, Jeansson, Ishii, Perez, and Suzuki</label><mixed-citation>Key, R. M., Olsen, A., van Heuven, S., Lauvset, S. K., Velo, A., Lin, X., Schirnick, C., Kozyr, A., Tanhua, T., Hoppema, M., Jutterström, S., Steinfeldt, R., Jeansson, E., Ishii, M., Perez, F. F., and Suzuki, T.: Global Ocean Data Analysis Project, Version 2 (GLODAPv2), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP093_GLODAPv2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP093_GLODAPv2</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Khatiwala et al.(2019)Khatiwala, Schmittner, and Muglia</label><mixed-citation>Khatiwala, S., Schmittner, A., and Muglia, J.: Air-sea disequilibrium enhances ocean carbon storage during glacial periods, Science Advances, 5, eaaw4981, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw4981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aaw4981</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Kobayashi et al.(2021)Kobayashi, Oka, Yamamoto, and Abe-Ouchi</label><mixed-citation>Kobayashi, H., Oka, A., Yamamoto, A., and Abe-Ouchi, A.: Glacial carbon cycle changes by Southern Ocean processes with sedimentary amplification, Science Advances, 7, eabg7723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg7723" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abg7723</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Kohfeld et al.(2005)Kohfeld, Quéré, Harrison, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>Kohfeld, K. E., Quéré, C. L., Harrison, S. P., and Anderson, R. F.: Role of Marine Biology in Glacial-Interglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Cycles, Science, 308, 74–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1105375" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1105375</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Kriest et al.(2020)Kriest, Kähler, Koeve, Kvale, Sauerland, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>Kriest, I., Kähler, P., Koeve, W., Kvale, K., Sauerland, V., and Oschlies, A.: One size fits all? Calibrating an ocean biogeochemistry model for different circulations, Biogeosciences, 17, 3057–3082, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3057-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-3057-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lauvset et al.(2016)Lauvset, Key, Olsen, van Heuven, Velo, Lin, Schirnick, Kozyr, Tanhua, Hoppema, Jutterström, Steinfeldt, Jeansson, Ishii, Perez, Suzuki, and Watelet</label><mixed-citation>Lauvset, S. K., Key, R. M., Olsen, A., van Heuven, S., Velo, A., Lin, X., Schirnick, C., Kozyr, A., Tanhua, T., Hoppema, M., Jutterström, S., Steinfeldt, R., Jeansson, E., Ishii, M., Perez, F. F., Suzuki, T., and Watelet, S.: A new global interior ocean mapped climatology: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal"> </mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal"> </mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GLODAP version 2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 325–340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-325-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-325-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Li et al.(2024)Li, Somes, Landolfi, Chien, Pahlow, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>Li, N., Somes, C. J., Landolfi, A., Chien, C.-T., Pahlow, M., and Oschlies, A.: Global impact of benthic denitrification on marine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and primary production simulated by a variable-stoichiometry Earth system model, Biogeosciences, 21, 4361–4380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4361-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-21-4361-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Martin(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Martin, J. H.: Glacial-interglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change: The Iron Hypothesis, Paleoceanography, 5, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/PA005i001p00001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/PA005i001p00001</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Martin et al.(1987)Martin, Knauer, Karl, and Broenkow</label><mixed-citation>Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.: VERTEX: carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res., 34, 267–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Martínez-García et al.(2014)Martínez-García, Sigman, Ren, Anderson, Straub, Hodell, Jaccard, Eglinton, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>Martínez-García, A., Sigman, D. M., Ren, H., Anderson, R. F., Straub, M., Hodell, D. A., Jaccard, S. L., Eglinton, T. I., and Haug, G. H.: Iron Fertilization of the Subantarctic Ocean During the Last Ice Age, Science, 343, 1347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1246848</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Matsumoto et al.(2020a)Matsumoto, Rickaby, and Tanioka</label><mixed-citation>Matsumoto, K., Rickaby, R., and Tanioka, T.: Carbon Export Buffering and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Drawdown by Flexible Phytoplankton C : N : P Under Glacial Conditions, Paleoceanogeogr. Paleocl., 35, e2019PA003823, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003823" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019PA003823</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Matsumoto et al.(2020b)Matsumoto, Tanioka, and Rickaby</label><mixed-citation>Matsumoto, K., Tanioka, T., and Rickaby, R.: Linkages Between Dynamic Phytoplankton C : N : P and the Ocean Carbon Cycle Under Climate Change, Oceanography, 33, 44–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5670/oceanog.2020.203</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>McCarthy et al.(2015)McCarthy, Smeed, Johns, Frajka-Williams, Moat, Rayner, Baringer, Meinen, Collins, and Bryden</label><mixed-citation>McCarthy, G., Smeed, D., Johns, W., Frajka-Williams, E., Moat, B., Rayner, D., Baringer, M., Meinen, C., Collins, J., and Bryden, H.: Measuring the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation at 26° N, Prog. Oceanogr., 130, 91–111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>McElroy(1983)</label><mixed-citation>McElroy, M. B.: Marine biological controls on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and climate, Nature, 302, 328–329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/302328a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/302328a0</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Mengis et al.(2020)Mengis, Keller, MacDougall, Eby, Wright, Meissner, Oschlies, Schmittner, MacIsaac, Matthews, and Zickfeld</label><mixed-citation>Mengis, N., Keller, D. P., MacDougall, A. H., Eby, M., Wright, N., Meissner, K. J., Oschlies, A., Schmittner, A., MacIsaac, A. J., Matthews, H. D., and Zickfeld, K.: Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4183–4204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Mills et al.(2015)Mills, Brown, Lowry, van Dijken, Becker, Pal, Benitez-Nelson, Downer, Strong, Swift, Pickart, and Arrigo</label><mixed-citation>Mills, M. M., Brown, Z. W., Lowry, K. E., van Dijken, G. L., Becker, S., Pal, S., Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Downer, M. M., Strong, A. L., Swift, J. H., Pickart, R. S., and Arrigo, K. R.: Impacts of low phytoplankton <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> utilization ratios over the Chukchi Shelf, Arctic Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 118, 105–121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.02.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.02.007</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Monnin et al.(2001)Monnin, Indermühle, Dällenbach, Flückiger, Stauffer, Stocker, Raynaud, and Barnola</label><mixed-citation>Monnin, E., Indermühle, A., Dällenbach, A., Flückiger, J., Stauffer, B., Stocker, T. F., Raynaud, D., and Barnola, J.-M.: Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Concentrations over the Last Glacial Termination, Science, 291, 112–114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.291.5501.112</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Muglia and Schmittner(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Muglia, J. and Schmittner, A.: Glacial Atlantic overturning increased by wind stress in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 9862–9868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL064583</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Muglia et al.(2017)Muglia, Somes, Nickelsen, and Schmittner</label><mixed-citation>Muglia, J., Somes, C. J., Nickelsen, L., and Schmittner, A.: Combined Effects of Atmospheric and Seafloor Iron Fluxes to the Glacial Ocean, Paleoceanography, 32, 1204–1218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016PA003077</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Muglia et al.(2018)Muglia, Skinner, and Schmittner</label><mixed-citation>Muglia, J., Skinner, L. C., and Schmittner, A.: Weak overturning circulation and high Southern Ocean nutrient utilization maximized glacial ocean carbon, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 496, 47–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.05.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2018.05.038</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Nickelsen and Oschlies(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Nickelsen, L. and Oschlies, A.: Enhanced sensitivity of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake to dust deposition by iron-light colimitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 492–499, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062969" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062969</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Ödalen et al.(2020)Ödalen, Nycander, Ridgwell, Oliver, Peterson, and Nilsson</label><mixed-citation>Ödalen, M., Nycander, J., Ridgwell, A., Oliver, K. I. C., Peterson, C. D., and Nilsson, J.: Variable C∕P composition of organic production and its effect on ocean carbon storage in glacial-like model simulations, Biogeosciences, 17, 2219–2244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2219-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-2219-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Pahlow et al.(2020)Pahlow, Chien, Arteaga, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>Pahlow, M., Chien, C.-T., Arteaga, L. A., and Oschlies, A.: Optimality-based non-Redfield plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM v1.1) in UVic-ESCM 2.9 – Part 1: Implementation and model behaviour, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4663–4690, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4663-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-4663-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Peterson et al.(2014)Peterson, Lisiecki, and Stern</label><mixed-citation>Peterson, C. D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Stern, J. V.: Deglacial whole-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change estimated from 480 benthic foraminiferal records, Paleoceanography, 29, 549–563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013PA002552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013PA002552</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Pöppelmeier et al.(2023)Pöppelmeier, Jeltsch-Thömmes, Lippold, Joos, and Stocker</label><mixed-citation>Pöppelmeier, F., Jeltsch-Thömmes, A., Lippold, J., Joos, F., and Stocker, T. F.: Multi-proxy constraints on Atlantic circulation dynamics since the last ice age, Nat. Geosci., 16, 349–356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01140-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-023-01140-3</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Saini et al.(2023)Saini, Meissner, Menviel, and Kvale</label><mixed-citation>Saini, H., Meissner, K. J., Menviel, L., and Kvale, K.: Impact of iron fertilisation on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the last glaciation, Clim. Past, 19, 1559–1584, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1559-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-19-1559-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Sarmiento and Toggweiler(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Sarmiento, J. L. and Toggweiler, J. R.: A new model for the role of the oceans in determining atmospheric P <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nature, 308, 621–624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/308621a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/308621a0</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Schartau et al.(2017)Schartau, Wallhead, Hemmings, Löptien, Kriest, Krishna, Ward, Slawig, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>Schartau, M., Wallhead, P., Hemmings, J., Löptien, U., Kriest, I., Krishna, S., Ward, B. A., Slawig, T., and Oschlies, A.: Reviews and syntheses: parameter identification in marine planktonic ecosystem modelling, Biogeosciences, 14, 1647–1701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1647-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-1647-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Séférian et al.(2016)Séférian, Gehlen, Bopp, Resplandy, Orr, Marti, Dunne, Christian, Doney, Ilyina, Lindsay, Halloran, Heinze, Segschneider, Tjiputra, Aumont, and Romanou</label><mixed-citation>Séférian, R., Gehlen, M., Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Marti, O., Dunne, J. P., Christian, J. R., Doney, S. C., Ilyina, T., Lindsay, K., Halloran, P. R., Heinze, C., Segschneider, J., Tjiputra, J., Aumont, O., and Romanou, A.: Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1827–1851, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Seltzer et al.(2021)Seltzer, Ng, Aeschbach, Kipfer, Kulongoski, Severinghaus, and Stute</label><mixed-citation>Seltzer, A. M., Ng, J., Aeschbach, W., Kipfer, R., Kulongoski, J. T., Severinghaus, J. P., and Stute, M.: Widespread six degrees Celsius cooling on land during the Last Glacial Maximum, Nature, 593, 228–232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03467-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-021-03467-6</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Shao et al.(2023)Shao, Xu, Wang, Luo, Wang, Huang, Agawin, Ahmed, Benavides, Bentzon-Tilia, Berman-Frank, Berthelot, Biegala, Bif, Bode, Bonnet, Bronk, Brown, Campbell, Capone, Carpenter, Cassar, Chang, Chappell, Chen, Church, Cornejo-Castillo, Detoni, Doney, Dupouy, Estrada, Fernandez, Fernández-Castro, Fonseca-Batista, Foster, Furuya, Garcia, Goto, Gago, Gradoville, Hamersley, Henke, Hörstmann, Jayakumar, Jiang, Kao, Karl, Kittu, Knapp, Kumar, LaRoche, Liu, Liu, Lory, Löscher, Marañón, Messer, Mills, Mohr, Moisander, Mahaffey, Moore, Mouriño Carballido, Mulholland, Nakaoka, Needoba, Raes, Rahav, Ramírez-Cárdenas, Reeder, Riemann, Riou, Robidart, Sarma, Sato, Saxena, Selden, Seymour, Shi, Shiozaki, Singh, Sipler, Sun, Suzuki, Takahashi, Tan, Tang, Tremblay, Turk-Kubo, Wen, White, Wilson, Yoshida, Zehr, Zhang, Zhang, and Luo</label><mixed-citation>Shao, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, H., Luo, W., Wang, L., Huang, Y., Agawin, N. S. R., Ahmed, A., Benavides, M., Bentzon-Tilia, M., Berman-Frank, I., Berthelot, H., Biegala, I. C., Bif, M. B., Bode, A., Bonnet, S., Bronk, D. A., Brown, M. V., Campbell, L., Capone, D. G., Carpenter, E. J., Cassar, N., Chang, B. X., Chappell, D., Chen, Y.-L., Church, M. J., Cornejo-Castillo, F. M., Detoni, A. M. S., Doney, S. C., Dupouy, C., Estrada, M., Fernandez, C., Fernández-Castro, B., Fonseca-Batista, D., Foster, R. A., Furuya, K., Garcia, N., Goto, K., Gago, J., Gradoville, M. R., Hamersley, M. R., Henke, B. A., Hörstmann, C., Jayakumar, A., Jiang, Z., Kao, S.-J., Karl, D. M., Kittu, L. R., Knapp, A. N., Kumar, S., LaRoche, J., Liu, H., Liu, J., Lory, C., Löscher, C. R., Marañón, E., Messer, L. F., Mills, M. M., Mohr, W., Moisander, P. H., Mahaffey, C., Moore, R., Mouriño-Carballido, B., Mulholland, M. R., Nakaoka, S., Needoba, J. A., Raes, E. J., Rahav, E., Ramírez-Cárdenas, T., Reeder, C. F., Riemann, L., Riou, V., Robidart, J. C., Sarma, V. V. S. S., Sato, T., Saxena, H., Selden, C., Seymour, J. R., Shi, D., Shiozaki, T., Singh, A., Sipler, R. E., Sun, J., Suzuki, K., Takahashi, K., Tan, Y., Tang, W., Tremblay, J.-É., Turk-Kubo, K., Wen, Z., White, A. E., Wilson, S. T., Yoshida, T., Zehr, J. P., Zhang, R., Zhang, Y., and Luo, Y.-W.: Global oceanic diazotroph database version 2 and elevated estimate of global oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3673–3709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3673-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-15-3673-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Shepherd(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Shepherd, J. G. (Ed.): Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty, The Royal Society, London, ISBN 978-0-85403-773-5, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Sigman et al.(2007)Sigman, De Boer, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>Sigman, D. M., De Boer, A. M., and Haug, G. H.: Antarctic Stratification, Atmospheric Water Vapor, and Heinrich Events: a Hypothesis for Late Pleistocene Deglaciations, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 335–349, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/173GM21" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/173GM21</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Somes et al.(2017)Somes, Schmittner, Muglia, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>Somes, C. J., Schmittner, A., Muglia, J., and Oschlies, A.: A Three-Dimensional Model of the Marine Nitrogen Cycle during the Last Glacial Maximum Constrained by Sedimentary Isotopes, Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2017.00108</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Somes et al.(2021)Somes, Dale, Wallmann, Scholz, Yao, Oschlies, Muglia, Schmittner, and Achterberg</label><mixed-citation>Somes, C. J., Dale, A. W., Wallmann, K., Scholz, F., Yao, W., Oschlies, A., Muglia, J., Schmittner, A., and Achterberg, E. P.: Constraining Global Marine Iron Sources and Ligand-Mediated Scavenging Fluxes With GEOTRACES Dissolved Iron Measurements in an Ocean Biogeochemical Model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 35, e2021GB006948, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB006948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GB006948</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Stephens and Keeling(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Stephens, B. B. and Keeling, R. F.: The influence of Antarctic sea ice on glacial–interglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations, Nature, 404, 171–174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35004556" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35004556</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Tagliabue et al.(2009)Tagliabue, Bopp, Roche, Bouttes, Dutay, Alkama, Kageyama, Michel, and Paillard</label><mixed-citation>Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., Roche, D. M., Bouttes, N., Dutay, J.-C., Alkama, R., Kageyama, M., Michel, E., and Paillard, D.: Quantifying the roles of ocean circulation and biogeochemistry in governing ocean carbon-13 and atmospheric carbon dioxide at the last glacial maximum, Clim. Past, 5, 695–706, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-695-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-5-695-2009</ext-link>, 2009. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Tagliabue et al.(2010)Tagliabue, Bopp, Dutay, Bowie, Chever, Jean-Baptiste, Bucciarelli, Lannuzel, Remenyi, Sarthou, Aumont, Gehlen, and Jeandel</label><mixed-citation>Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., Dutay, J.-C., Bowie, A. R., Chever, F., Jean-Baptiste, P., Bucciarelli, E., Lannuzel, D., Remenyi, T., Sarthou, G., Aumont, O., Gehlen, M., and Jeandel, C.: Hydrothermal contribution to the oceanic dissolved iron inventory, Nat. Geosci., 3, 252–256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo818" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo818</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Tagliabue et al.(2016)Tagliabue, Aumont, DeAth, Dunne, Dutkiewicz, Galbraith, Misumi, Moore, Ridgwell, Sherman, Stock, Vichi, Völker, and Yool</label><mixed-citation>Tagliabue, A., Aumont, O., DeAth, R., Dunne, J. P., Dutkiewicz, S., Galbraith, E., Misumi, K., Moore, J. K., Ridgwell, A., Sherman, E., Stock, C., Vichi, M., Völker, C., and Yool, A.: How well do global ocean biogeochemistry models simulate dissolved iron distributions?, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 149–174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005289" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GB005289</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Tanioka et al.(2022)Tanioka, Garcia, Larkin, Garcia, Fagan, and Martiny</label><mixed-citation>Tanioka, T., Garcia, C. A., Larkin, A. A., Garcia, N. S., Fagan, A. J., and Martiny, A. C.: Global patterns and predictors of C : N : P in marine ecosystems, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00603-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-022-00603-6</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Tierney et al.(2020)Tierney, Zhu, King, Malevich, Hakim, and Poulsen</label><mixed-citation>Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., King, J., Malevich, S. B., Hakim, G. J., and Poulsen, C. J.: Glacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited, Nature, 584, 569–573, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Toyos et al.(2022)Toyos, Winckler, Arz, Lembke-Jene, Lange, Kuhn, and Lamy</label><mixed-citation>Toyos, M. H., Winckler, G., Arz, H. W., Lembke-Jene, L., Lange, C. B., Kuhn, G., and Lamy, F.: Variations in export production, lithogenic sediment transport and iron fertilization in the Pacific sector of the Drake Passage over the past 400 kyr, Clim. Past, 18, 147–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-147-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-18-147-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Vollmer et al.(2022)Vollmer, Ito, and Lynch-Stieglitz</label><mixed-citation>Vollmer, T. D., Ito, T., and Lynch-Stieglitz, J.: Proxy-Based Preformed Phosphate Estimates Point to Increased Biological Pump Efficiency as Primary Cause of Last Glacial Maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Drawdown, Paleoceanogeogr. Paleocl., 37, e2021PA004339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021PA004339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021PA004339</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Wallmann(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Wallmann, K.: Phosphorus imbalance in the global ocean?, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003643</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Wallmann et al.(2016)Wallmann, Schneider, and Sarnthein</label><mixed-citation>Wallmann, K., Schneider, B., and Sarnthein, M.: Effects of eustatic sea-level change, ocean dynamics, and nutrient utilization on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and seawater composition over the last 130 000 years: a model study, Clim. Past, 12, 339–375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-339-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-339-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Wang et al.(2019)Wang, Moore, Martiny, and Primeau</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W.-L., Moore, J. K., Martiny, A. C., and Primeau, F. W.: Convergent estimates of marine nitrogen fixation, Nature, 566, 205–211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0911-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-019-0911-2</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Weaver et al.(1998)Weaver, Eby, Fanning, and Wiebe</label><mixed-citation>Weaver, A. J., Eby, M., Fanning, A. F., and Wiebe, E. C.: Simulated influence of carbon dioxide, orbital forcing and ice sheets on the climate of the Last Glacial Maximum, Nature, 394, 847–853, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/29695" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/29695</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Ensemble simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum marine biogeochemistry and atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown due to the soft-tissue biological carbon pump</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Albani et al.(2014)Albani, Mahowald, Perry, Scanza, Zender, Heavens, Maggi, Kok, and Otto-Bliesner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Albani, S., Mahowald, N. M., Perry, A. T., Scanza, R. A., Zender, C. S., Heavens, N. G., Maggi, V., Kok, J. F., and Otto-Bliesner, B. L.:
Improved dust representation in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 541–570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000279" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000279</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Anderson et al.(2019)Anderson, Sachs, Fleisher, Allen, Yu, Koutavas, and Jaccard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, R. F., Sachs, J. P., Fleisher, M. Q., Allen, K. A., Yu, J., Koutavas, A., and Jaccard, S. L.:
Deep-Sea Oxygen Depletion and Ocean Carbon Sequestration During the Last Ice Age, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 33, 301–317, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006049</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bopp et al.(2003)Bopp, Kohfeld, Le Quéré, and Aumont</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bopp, L., Kohfeld, K. E., Le Quéré, C., and Aumont, O.:
Dust impact on marine biota and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during glacial periods, Paleoceanography, 18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002PA000810" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002PA000810</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bopp et al.(2017)Bopp, Resplandy, Untersee, Le Mezo, and Kageyama</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Untersee, A., Le Mezo, P., and Kageyama, M.:
Ocean (de)oxygenation from the Last Glacial Maximum to the twenty-first century: insights from Earth System models, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 375, 20160323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0323" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0323</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bouttes et al.(2011)Bouttes, Paillard, Roche, Brovkin, and Bopp</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bouttes, N., Paillard, D., Roche, D. M., Brovkin, V., and Bopp, L.:
Last Glacial Maximum CO<sub>2</sub> and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C successfully reconciled, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044499</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Broecker(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Broecker, W. S.:
Glacial to interglacial changes in ocean chemistry, Prog. Oceanogr., 11, 151–197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Brovkin et al.(2007)Brovkin, Ganopolski, Archer, and Rahmstorf</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brovkin, V., Ganopolski, A., Archer, D., and Rahmstorf, S.:
Lowering of glacial atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in response to changes in oceanic circulation and marine biogeochemistry, Paleoceanography, 22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001380" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001380</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Browning and Moore(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Browning, T. J. and Moore, C. M.:
Global analysis of ocean phytoplankton nutrient limitation reveals high prevalence of co-limitation, Nat. Commun., 14, 5014, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40774-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40774-0</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Browning et al.(2017)Browning, Achterberg, Rapp, Engel, Bertrand, Tagliabue, and Moore</label><mixed-citation>
      
Browning, T. J., Achterberg, E. P., Rapp, I., Engel, A., Bertrand, E. M., Tagliabue, A., and Moore, C. M.:
Nutrient co-limitation at the boundary of an oceanic gyre, Nature, 551, 242–246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24063</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Buchanan et al.(2016)Buchanan, Matear, Lenton, Phipps, Chase, and Etheridge</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buchanan, P. J., Matear, R. J., Lenton, A., Phipps, S. J., Chase, Z., and Etheridge, D. M.:
The simulated climate of the Last Glacial Maximum and insights into the global marine carbon cycle, Clim. Past, 12, 2271–2295, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2271-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2271-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Buitenhuis et al.(2013)Buitenhuis, Hashioka, and Quéré</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buitenhuis, E. T., Hashioka, T., and Quéré, C. L.:
Combined constraints on global ocean primary production using observations and models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 847–858, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20074</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Carr et al.(2006)Carr, Friedrichs, Schmeltz, Aita, Antoine, Arrigo, Asanuma, Aumont, Barber, Behrenfeld, Bidigare, Buitenhuis, Campbell, Ciotti, Dierssen, Dowell, Dunne, Esaias, Gentili, Gregg, Groom, Hoepffner, Ishizaka, Kameda, Quere, Lohrenz, Marra, Melin, Moore, Morel, Reddy, Ryan, Scardi, Smyth, Turpie, Tilstone, Waters, and Yamanaka</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carr, M.-E., Friedrichs, M. A., Schmeltz, M., Aita, M. N., Antoine, D., Arrigo, K. R., Asanuma, I., Aumont, O., Barber, R., Behrenfeld, M., Bidigare, R., Buitenhuis, E. T., Campbell, J., Ciotti, A., Dierssen, H., Dowell, M., Dunne, J., Esaias, W., Gentili, B., Gregg, W., Groom, S., Hoepffner, N., Ishizaka, J., Kameda, T., Quere, C. L., Lohrenz, S., Marra, J., Melin, F., Moore, K., Morel, A., Reddy, T. E., Ryan, J., Scardi, M., Smyth, T., Turpie, K., Tilstone, G., Waters, K., and Yamanaka, Y.:
A comparison of global estimates of marine primary production from ocean color, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 53, 741–770, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.01.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.01.028</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Cartapanis et al.(2018)Cartapanis, Galbraith, Bianchi, and Jaccard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cartapanis, O., Galbraith, E. D., Bianchi, D., and Jaccard, S. L.:
Carbon burial in deep-sea sediment and implications for oceanic inventories of carbon and alkalinity over the last glacial cycle, Clim. Past, 14, 1819–1850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1819-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1819-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chien(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chien, C.-T.: Code and data for: Chien et al., Ensemble simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum marine biogeochemistry and atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown due to the soft-tissue biological carbon pump (Version 2.0), Zenodo [code and data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20816740" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20816740</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Chien et al.(2020)Chien, Pahlow, Schartau, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chien, C.-T., Pahlow, M., Schartau, M., and Oschlies, A.:
Optimality-based non-Redfield plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM v1.1) in UVic-ESCM 2.9 – Part 2: Sensitivity analysis and model calibration, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4691–4712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Chien et al.(2023)Chien, Pahlow, Schartau, Li, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chien, C.-T., Pahlow, M., Schartau, M., Li, N., and Oschlies, A.:
Effects of phytoplankton physiology on global ocean biogeochemistry and climate, Science Advances, 9, eadg1725, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg1725" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg1725</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Deutsch et al.(2004)Deutsch, Sigman, Thunell, Meckler, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deutsch, C., Sigman, D. M., Thunell, R. C., Meckler, A. N., and Haug, G. H.:
Isotopic constraints on glacial/interglacial changes in the oceanic nitrogen budget, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002189" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002189</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Eugster et al.(2013)Eugster, Gruber, Deutsch, Jaccard, and Payne</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eugster, O., Gruber, N., Deutsch, C., Jaccard, S. L., and Payne, M. R.:
The dynamics of the marine nitrogen cycle across the last deglaciation, Paleoceanography, 28, 116–129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/palo.20020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/palo.20020</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fay and McKinley(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fay, A. R. and McKinley, G. A.:
Global open-ocean biomes: mean and temporal variability, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 273–284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-273-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-273-2014</a>, 2014. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Fillman et al.(2023)Fillman, Schmittner, and Kvale</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fillman, N., Schmittner, A., and Kvale, K. F.:
Variable Stoichiometry Effects on Glacial/Interglacial Ocean Model Biogeochemical Cycles and Carbon Storage, ESS Open Archive [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.169049091.16856096/v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.169049091.16856096/v1</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Galbraith and Martiny(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Galbraith, E. D. and Martiny, A. C.:
A simple nutrient-dependence mechanism for predicting the stoichiometry of marine ecosystems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 8199–8204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423917112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423917112</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Garcia et al.(2013a)Garcia, Locarnini, Boyer, Antonov, Mishonov, Baranova, Zweng, Reagan, and Johnson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Johnson, D. R.:
Dissolved Oxygen, Apparent Oxygen Utilization, and Oxygen Saturation, in: World Ocean Atlas 2013, edited by: Levitus, S., vol. 3, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 75, <a href="http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/indprod.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 September 2026), 2013a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Garcia et al.(2013b)Garcia, Locarnini, Boyer, Antonov, Mishonov, Baranova, Zweng, Reagan, and Johnson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Johnson, D. R.:
Dissolved Inorganic Nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate), in: World Ocean Atlas 2013, edited by: Levitus, S., vol. 4, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 76, <a href="http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/indprod.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 September 2026), 2013b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Glock et al.(2018)Glock, Erdem, Wallmann, Somes, Liebetrau, Schönfeld, Gorb, and Eisenhauer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Glock, N., Erdem, Z., Wallmann, K., Somes, C. J., Liebetrau, V., Schönfeld, J., Gorb, S., and Eisenhauer, A.:
Coupling of oceanic carbon and nitrogen facilitates spatially resolved quantitative reconstruction of nitrate inventories, Nat. Commun., 9, 1217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03647-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03647-5</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Gruber and Sarmiento(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gruber, N. and Sarmiento, J. L.:
Global patterns of marine nitrogen fixation and denitrification, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 235–266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB00077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB00077</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Honjo et al.(2008)Honjo, Manganini, Krishfield, and Francois</label><mixed-citation>
      
Honjo, S., Manganini, S. J., Krishfield, R. A., and Francois, R.:
Particulate organic carbon fluxes to the ocean interior and factors controlling the biological pump: A synthesis of global sediment trap programs since 1983, Prog. Oceanogr., 76, 217–285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2007.11.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2007.11.003</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Huang et al.(2022)Huang, Tagliabue, and Cassar</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, Y., Tagliabue, A., and Cassar, N.:
Data-Driven Modeling of Dissolved Iron in the Global Ocean, Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.837183" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.837183</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Isles(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Isles, P. D. F.:
The misuse of ratios in ecological stoichiometry, Ecology, 101, e03153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3153</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Jaccard and Galbraith(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jaccard, S. L. and Galbraith, E. D.:
Large climate-driven changes of oceanic oxygen concentrations during the last deglaciation, Nat. Geosci., 5, 151–156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1352" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1352</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Jacobel et al.(2020)Jacobel, Anderson, Jaccard, McManus, Pavia, and Winckler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jacobel, A., Anderson, R., Jaccard, S., McManus, J., Pavia, F., and Winckler, G.:
Deep Pacific storage of respired carbon during the last ice age: Perspectives from bottom water oxygen reconstructions, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 230, 106065, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106065</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Jolliff et al.(2009)Jolliff, Kindle, Shulman, Penta, Friedrichs, Helber, and Arnone</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jolliff, J. K., Kindle, J. C., Shulman, I., Penta, B., Friedrichs, M. A., Helber, R., and Arnone, R. A.:
Summary diagrams for coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem model skill assessment, J. Marine Syst., 76, 64–82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.05.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.05.014</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kageyama et al.(2021)Kageyama, Harrison, Kapsch, Lofverstrom, Lora, Mikolajewicz, Sherriff-Tadano, Vadsaria, Abe-Ouchi, Bouttes, Chandan, Gregoire, Ivanovic, Izumi, LeGrande, Lhardy, Lohmann, Morozova, Ohgaito, Paul, Peltier, Poulsen, Quiquet, Roche, Shi, Tierney, Valdes, Volodin, and Zhu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kageyama, M., Harrison, S. P., Kapsch, M.-L., Lofverstrom, M., Lora, J. M., Mikolajewicz, U., Sherriff-Tadano, S., Vadsaria, T., Abe-Ouchi, A., Bouttes, N., Chandan, D., Gregoire, L. J., Ivanovic, R. F., Izumi, K., LeGrande, A. N., Lhardy, F., Lohmann, G., Morozova, P. A., Ohgaito, R., Paul, A., Peltier, W. R., Poulsen, C. J., Quiquet, A., Roche, D. M., Shi, X., Tierney, J. E., Valdes, P. J., Volodin, E., and Zhu, J.:
The PMIP4 Last Glacial Maximum experiments: preliminary results and comparison with the PMIP3 simulations, Clim. Past, 17, 1065–1089, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1065-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1065-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kemppinen et al.(2019)Kemppinen, Holden, Edwards, Ridgwell, and Friend</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kemppinen, K. M. S., Holden, P. B., Edwards, N. R., Ridgwell, A., and Friend, A. D.:
Coupled climate–carbon cycle simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> decrease using a large ensemble of modern plausible parameter sets, Clim. Past, 15, 1039–1062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1039-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1039-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Key et al.(2015)Key, Olsen, van Heuven, Lauvset, Velo, Lin, Schirnick, Kozyr, Tanhua, Hoppema, Jutterström, Steinfeldt, Jeansson, Ishii, Perez, and Suzuki</label><mixed-citation>
      
Key, R. M., Olsen, A., van Heuven, S., Lauvset, S. K., Velo, A., Lin, X., Schirnick, C., Kozyr, A., Tanhua, T., Hoppema, M., Jutterström, S., Steinfeldt, R., Jeansson, E., Ishii, M., Perez, F. F., and Suzuki, T.:
Global Ocean Data Analysis Project, Version 2 (GLODAPv2), <a href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP093_GLODAPv2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP093_GLODAPv2</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Khatiwala et al.(2019)Khatiwala, Schmittner, and Muglia</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khatiwala, S., Schmittner, A., and Muglia, J.:
Air-sea disequilibrium enhances ocean carbon storage during glacial periods, Science Advances, 5, eaaw4981, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw4981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw4981</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Kobayashi et al.(2021)Kobayashi, Oka, Yamamoto, and Abe-Ouchi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kobayashi, H., Oka, A., Yamamoto, A., and Abe-Ouchi, A.:
Glacial carbon cycle changes by Southern Ocean processes with sedimentary amplification, Science Advances, 7, eabg7723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg7723" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg7723</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Kohfeld et al.(2005)Kohfeld, Quéré, Harrison, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kohfeld, K. E., Quéré, C. L., Harrison, S. P., and Anderson, R. F.:
Role of Marine Biology in Glacial-Interglacial CO<sub>2</sub> Cycles, Science, 308, 74–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1105375" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1105375</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Kriest et al.(2020)Kriest, Kähler, Koeve, Kvale, Sauerland, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kriest, I., Kähler, P., Koeve, W., Kvale, K., Sauerland, V., and Oschlies, A.:
One size fits all? Calibrating an ocean biogeochemistry model for different circulations, Biogeosciences, 17, 3057–3082, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3057-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3057-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lauvset et al.(2016)Lauvset, Key, Olsen, van Heuven, Velo, Lin, Schirnick, Kozyr, Tanhua, Hoppema, Jutterström, Steinfeldt, Jeansson, Ishii, Perez, Suzuki, and Watelet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lauvset, S. K., Key, R. M., Olsen, A., van Heuven, S., Velo, A., Lin, X., Schirnick, C., Kozyr, A., Tanhua, T., Hoppema, M., Jutterström, S., Steinfeldt, R., Jeansson, E., Ishii, M., Perez, F. F., Suzuki, T., and Watelet, S.:
A new global interior ocean mapped climatology: the 1<i>°</i>&thinsp; × &thinsp;1<i>°</i> GLODAP version 2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 325–340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-325-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-325-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Li et al.(2024)Li, Somes, Landolfi, Chien, Pahlow, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, N., Somes, C. J., Landolfi, A., Chien, C.-T., Pahlow, M., and Oschlies, A.:
Global impact of benthic denitrification on marine N<sub>2</sub> fixation and primary production simulated by a variable-stoichiometry Earth system model, Biogeosciences, 21, 4361–4380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4361-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4361-2024</a>, 2024. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Martin(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martin, J. H.:
Glacial-interglacial CO<sub>2</sub> change: The Iron Hypothesis, Paleoceanography, 5, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/PA005i001p00001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/PA005i001p00001</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Martin et al.(1987)Martin, Knauer, Karl, and Broenkow</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.:
VERTEX: carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res., 34, 267–285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Martínez-García et al.(2014)Martínez-García, Sigman, Ren, Anderson, Straub, Hodell, Jaccard, Eglinton, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martínez-García, A., Sigman, D. M., Ren, H., Anderson, R. F., Straub, M., Hodell, D. A., Jaccard, S. L., Eglinton, T. I., and Haug, G. H.:
Iron Fertilization of the Subantarctic Ocean During the Last Ice Age, Science, 343, 1347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246848</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Matsumoto et al.(2020a)Matsumoto, Rickaby, and Tanioka</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matsumoto, K., Rickaby, R., and Tanioka, T.:
Carbon Export Buffering and CO<sub>2</sub>
Drawdown by Flexible Phytoplankton C&thinsp;:&thinsp;N&thinsp;:&thinsp;P Under Glacial Conditions, Paleoceanogeogr. Paleocl., 35, e2019PA003823, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003823" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003823</a>, 2020a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Matsumoto et al.(2020b)Matsumoto, Tanioka, and Rickaby</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matsumoto, K., Tanioka, T., and Rickaby, R.:
Linkages Between Dynamic Phytoplankton C&thinsp;:&thinsp;N&thinsp;:&thinsp;P and the Ocean Carbon Cycle Under Climate Change, Oceanography, 33, 44–52, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.203</a>, 2020b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>McCarthy et al.(2015)McCarthy, Smeed, Johns, Frajka-Williams, Moat, Rayner, Baringer, Meinen, Collins, and Bryden</label><mixed-citation>
      
McCarthy, G., Smeed, D., Johns, W., Frajka-Williams, E., Moat, B., Rayner, D., Baringer, M., Meinen, C., Collins, J., and Bryden, H.:
Measuring the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation at 26°&thinsp;N, Prog. Oceanogr., 130, 91–111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>McElroy(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
      
McElroy, M. B.:
Marine biological controls on atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and climate, Nature, 302, 328–329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/302328a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/302328a0</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Mengis et al.(2020)Mengis, Keller, MacDougall, Eby, Wright, Meissner, Oschlies, Schmittner, MacIsaac, Matthews, and Zickfeld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mengis, N., Keller, D. P., MacDougall, A. H., Eby, M., Wright, N., Meissner, K. J., Oschlies, A., Schmittner, A., MacIsaac, A. J., Matthews, H. D., and Zickfeld, K.:
Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4183–4204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Mills et al.(2015)Mills, Brown, Lowry, van Dijken, Becker, Pal, Benitez-Nelson, Downer, Strong, Swift, Pickart, and Arrigo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mills, M. M., Brown, Z. W., Lowry, K. E., van Dijken, G. L., Becker, S., Pal, S., Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Downer, M. M., Strong, A. L., Swift, J. H., Pickart, R. S., and Arrigo, K. R.:
Impacts of low phytoplankton NO<sub>3</sub> : PO<sub>4</sub> utilization ratios over the Chukchi Shelf, Arctic Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 118, 105–121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.02.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.02.007</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Monnin et al.(2001)Monnin, Indermühle, Dällenbach, Flückiger, Stauffer, Stocker, Raynaud, and Barnola</label><mixed-citation>
      
Monnin, E., Indermühle, A., Dällenbach, A., Flückiger, J., Stauffer, B., Stocker, T. F., Raynaud, D., and Barnola, J.-M.:
Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Concentrations over the Last Glacial Termination, Science, 291, 112–114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.112</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Muglia and Schmittner(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Muglia, J. and Schmittner, A.:
Glacial Atlantic overturning increased by wind stress in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 9862–9868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064583" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064583</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Muglia et al.(2017)Muglia, Somes, Nickelsen, and Schmittner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Muglia, J., Somes, C. J., Nickelsen, L., and Schmittner, A.:
Combined Effects of Atmospheric and Seafloor Iron Fluxes to the Glacial Ocean, Paleoceanography, 32, 1204–1218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003077</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Muglia et al.(2018)Muglia, Skinner, and Schmittner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Muglia, J., Skinner, L. C., and Schmittner, A.:
Weak overturning circulation and high Southern Ocean nutrient utilization maximized glacial ocean carbon, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 496, 47–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.05.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.05.038</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Nickelsen and Oschlies(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nickelsen, L. and Oschlies, A.:
Enhanced sensitivity of oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake to dust deposition by iron-light colimitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 492–499, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062969" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062969</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Ödalen et al.(2020)Ödalen, Nycander, Ridgwell, Oliver, Peterson, and Nilsson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ödalen, M., Nycander, J., Ridgwell, A., Oliver, K. I. C., Peterson, C. D., and Nilsson, J.:
Variable C∕P composition of organic production and its effect on ocean carbon storage in glacial-like model simulations, Biogeosciences, 17, 2219–2244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2219-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2219-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Pahlow et al.(2020)Pahlow, Chien, Arteaga, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pahlow, M., Chien, C.-T., Arteaga, L. A., and Oschlies, A.:
Optimality-based non-Redfield plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM v1.1) in UVic-ESCM 2.9 – Part 1: Implementation and model behaviour, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4663–4690, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4663-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4663-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Peterson et al.(2014)Peterson, Lisiecki, and Stern</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peterson, C. D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Stern, J. V.:
Deglacial whole-ocean <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C change estimated from 480 benthic foraminiferal records, Paleoceanography, 29, 549–563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013PA002552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013PA002552</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Pöppelmeier et al.(2023)Pöppelmeier, Jeltsch-Thömmes, Lippold, Joos, and Stocker</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pöppelmeier, F., Jeltsch-Thömmes, A., Lippold, J., Joos, F., and Stocker, T. F.:
Multi-proxy constraints on Atlantic circulation dynamics since the last ice age, Nat. Geosci., 16, 349–356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01140-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01140-3</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Saini et al.(2023)Saini, Meissner, Menviel, and Kvale</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saini, H., Meissner, K. J., Menviel, L., and Kvale, K.:
Impact of iron fertilisation on atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during the last glaciation, Clim. Past, 19, 1559–1584, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1559-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1559-2023</a>, 2023. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Sarmiento and Toggweiler(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sarmiento, J. L. and Toggweiler, J. R.:
A new model for the role of the oceans in determining atmospheric P CO<sub>2</sub>, Nature, 308, 621–624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/308621a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/308621a0</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Schartau et al.(2017)Schartau, Wallhead, Hemmings, Löptien, Kriest, Krishna, Ward, Slawig, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schartau, M., Wallhead, P., Hemmings, J., Löptien, U., Kriest, I., Krishna, S., Ward, B. A., Slawig, T., and Oschlies, A.:
Reviews and syntheses: parameter identification in marine planktonic ecosystem modelling, Biogeosciences, 14, 1647–1701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1647-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1647-2017</a>, 2017. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Séférian et al.(2016)Séférian, Gehlen, Bopp, Resplandy, Orr, Marti, Dunne, Christian, Doney, Ilyina, Lindsay, Halloran, Heinze, Segschneider, Tjiputra, Aumont, and Romanou</label><mixed-citation>
      
Séférian, R., Gehlen, M., Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Marti, O., Dunne, J. P., Christian, J. R., Doney, S. C., Ilyina, T., Lindsay, K., Halloran, P. R., Heinze, C., Segschneider, J., Tjiputra, J., Aumont, O., and Romanou, A.:
Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1827–1851, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Seltzer et al.(2021)Seltzer, Ng, Aeschbach, Kipfer, Kulongoski, Severinghaus, and Stute</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seltzer, A. M., Ng, J., Aeschbach, W., Kipfer, R., Kulongoski, J. T., Severinghaus, J. P., and Stute, M.:
Widespread six degrees Celsius cooling on land during the Last Glacial Maximum, Nature, 593, 228–232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03467-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03467-6</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Shao et al.(2023)Shao, Xu, Wang, Luo, Wang, Huang, Agawin, Ahmed, Benavides, Bentzon-Tilia, Berman-Frank, Berthelot, Biegala, Bif, Bode, Bonnet, Bronk, Brown, Campbell, Capone, Carpenter, Cassar, Chang, Chappell, Chen, Church, Cornejo-Castillo, Detoni, Doney, Dupouy, Estrada, Fernandez, Fernández-Castro, Fonseca-Batista, Foster, Furuya, Garcia, Goto, Gago, Gradoville, Hamersley, Henke, Hörstmann, Jayakumar, Jiang, Kao, Karl, Kittu, Knapp, Kumar, LaRoche, Liu, Liu, Lory, Löscher, Marañón, Messer, Mills, Mohr, Moisander, Mahaffey, Moore, Mouriño Carballido, Mulholland, Nakaoka, Needoba, Raes, Rahav, Ramírez-Cárdenas, Reeder, Riemann, Riou, Robidart, Sarma, Sato, Saxena, Selden, Seymour, Shi, Shiozaki, Singh, Sipler, Sun, Suzuki, Takahashi, Tan, Tang, Tremblay, Turk-Kubo, Wen, White, Wilson, Yoshida, Zehr, Zhang, Zhang, and Luo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shao, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, H., Luo, W., Wang, L., Huang, Y., Agawin, N. S. R., Ahmed, A., Benavides, M., Bentzon-Tilia, M., Berman-Frank, I., Berthelot, H., Biegala, I. C., Bif, M. B., Bode, A., Bonnet, S., Bronk, D. A., Brown, M. V., Campbell, L., Capone, D. G., Carpenter, E. J., Cassar, N., Chang, B. X., Chappell, D., Chen, Y.-L., Church, M. J., Cornejo-Castillo, F. M., Detoni, A. M. S., Doney, S. C., Dupouy, C., Estrada, M., Fernandez, C., Fernández-Castro, B., Fonseca-Batista, D., Foster, R. A., Furuya, K., Garcia, N., Goto, K., Gago, J., Gradoville, M. R., Hamersley, M. R., Henke, B. A., Hörstmann, C., Jayakumar, A., Jiang, Z., Kao, S.-J., Karl, D. M., Kittu, L. R., Knapp, A. N., Kumar, S., LaRoche, J., Liu, H., Liu, J., Lory, C., Löscher, C. R., Marañón, E., Messer, L. F., Mills, M. M., Mohr, W., Moisander, P. H., Mahaffey, C., Moore, R., Mouriño-Carballido, B., Mulholland, M. R., Nakaoka, S., Needoba, J. A., Raes, E. J., Rahav, E., Ramírez-Cárdenas, T., Reeder, C. F., Riemann, L., Riou, V., Robidart, J. C., Sarma, V. V. S. S., Sato, T., Saxena, H., Selden, C., Seymour, J. R., Shi, D., Shiozaki, T., Singh, A., Sipler, R. E., Sun, J., Suzuki, K., Takahashi, K., Tan, Y., Tang, W., Tremblay, J.-É., Turk-Kubo, K., Wen, Z., White, A. E., Wilson, S. T., Yoshida, T., Zehr, J. P., Zhang, R., Zhang, Y., and Luo, Y.-W.:
Global oceanic diazotroph database version 2 and elevated estimate of global oceanic N<sub>2</sub> fixation, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3673–3709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3673-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3673-2023</a>, 2023. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Shepherd(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shepherd, J. G. (Ed.):
Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty, The Royal Society, London, ISBN 978-0-85403-773-5, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Sigman et al.(2007)Sigman, De Boer, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sigman, D. M., De Boer, A. M., and Haug, G. H.:
Antarctic Stratification, Atmospheric Water Vapor, and Heinrich Events: a Hypothesis for Late Pleistocene Deglaciations, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 335–349, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/173GM21" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/173GM21</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Somes et al.(2017)Somes, Schmittner, Muglia, and Oschlies</label><mixed-citation>
      
Somes, C. J., Schmittner, A., Muglia, J., and Oschlies, A.:
A Three-Dimensional Model of the Marine Nitrogen Cycle during the Last Glacial Maximum Constrained by Sedimentary Isotopes, Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00108</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Somes et al.(2021)Somes, Dale, Wallmann, Scholz, Yao, Oschlies, Muglia, Schmittner, and Achterberg</label><mixed-citation>
      
Somes, C. J., Dale, A. W., Wallmann, K., Scholz, F., Yao, W., Oschlies, A., Muglia, J., Schmittner, A., and Achterberg, E. P.:
Constraining Global Marine Iron Sources and Ligand-Mediated Scavenging Fluxes With GEOTRACES Dissolved Iron Measurements in an Ocean Biogeochemical Model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 35, e2021GB006948, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB006948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB006948</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Stephens and Keeling(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stephens, B. B. and Keeling, R. F.:
The influence of Antarctic sea ice on glacial–interglacial CO<sub>2</sub> variations, Nature, 404, 171–174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35004556" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/35004556</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Tagliabue et al.(2009)Tagliabue, Bopp, Roche, Bouttes, Dutay, Alkama, Kageyama, Michel, and Paillard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., Roche, D. M., Bouttes, N., Dutay, J.-C., Alkama, R., Kageyama, M., Michel, E., and Paillard, D.:
Quantifying the roles of ocean circulation and biogeochemistry in governing ocean carbon-13 and atmospheric carbon dioxide at the last glacial maximum, Clim. Past, 5, 695–706, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-695-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-695-2009</a>, 2009. 

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Tagliabue et al.(2010)Tagliabue, Bopp, Dutay, Bowie, Chever, Jean-Baptiste, Bucciarelli, Lannuzel, Remenyi, Sarthou, Aumont, Gehlen, and Jeandel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., Dutay, J.-C., Bowie, A. R., Chever, F., Jean-Baptiste, P., Bucciarelli, E., Lannuzel, D., Remenyi, T., Sarthou, G., Aumont, O., Gehlen, M., and Jeandel, C.:
Hydrothermal contribution to the oceanic dissolved iron inventory, Nat. Geosci., 3, 252–256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo818" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo818</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Tagliabue et al.(2016)Tagliabue, Aumont, DeAth, Dunne, Dutkiewicz, Galbraith, Misumi, Moore, Ridgwell, Sherman, Stock, Vichi, Völker, and Yool</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tagliabue, A., Aumont, O., DeAth, R., Dunne, J. P., Dutkiewicz, S., Galbraith, E., Misumi, K., Moore, J. K., Ridgwell, A., Sherman, E., Stock, C., Vichi, M., Völker, C., and Yool, A.:
How well do global ocean biogeochemistry models simulate dissolved iron distributions?, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 149–174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005289" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005289</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Tanioka et al.(2022)Tanioka, Garcia, Larkin, Garcia, Fagan, and Martiny</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tanioka, T., Garcia, C. A., Larkin, A. A., Garcia, N. S., Fagan, A. J., and Martiny, A. C.:
Global patterns and predictors of C&thinsp;:&thinsp;N&thinsp;:&thinsp;P in marine ecosystems, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00603-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00603-6</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Tierney et al.(2020)Tierney, Zhu, King, Malevich, Hakim, and Poulsen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., King, J., Malevich, S. B., Hakim, G. J., and Poulsen, C. J.:
Glacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited, Nature, 584, 569–573, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Toyos et al.(2022)Toyos, Winckler, Arz, Lembke-Jene, Lange, Kuhn, and Lamy</label><mixed-citation>
      
Toyos, M. H., Winckler, G., Arz, H. W., Lembke-Jene, L., Lange, C. B., Kuhn, G., and Lamy, F.:
Variations in export production, lithogenic sediment transport and iron fertilization in the Pacific sector of the Drake Passage over the past 400&thinsp;kyr, Clim. Past, 18, 147–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-147-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-147-2022</a>, 2022. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Vollmer et al.(2022)Vollmer, Ito, and Lynch-Stieglitz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vollmer, T. D., Ito, T., and Lynch-Stieglitz, J.:
Proxy-Based Preformed Phosphate Estimates Point to Increased Biological Pump Efficiency as Primary Cause of Last Glacial Maximum CO<sub>2</sub> Drawdown, Paleoceanogeogr. Paleocl., 37, e2021PA004339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021PA004339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021PA004339</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Wallmann(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wallmann, K.:
Phosphorus imbalance in the global ocean?, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003643</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Wallmann et al.(2016)Wallmann, Schneider, and Sarnthein</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wallmann, K., Schneider, B., and Sarnthein, M.:
Effects of eustatic sea-level change, ocean dynamics, and nutrient utilization on atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and seawater composition over the last 130&thinsp;000 years: a model study, Clim. Past, 12, 339–375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-339-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-339-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Wang et al.(2019)Wang, Moore, Martiny, and Primeau</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, W.-L., Moore, J. K., Martiny, A. C., and Primeau, F. W.:
Convergent estimates of marine nitrogen fixation, Nature, 566, 205–211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0911-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0911-2</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Weaver et al.(1998)Weaver, Eby, Fanning, and Wiebe</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weaver, A. J., Eby, M., Fanning, A. F., and Wiebe, E. C.:
Simulated influence of carbon dioxide, orbital forcing and ice sheets on the climate of the Last Glacial Maximum, Nature, 394, 847–853, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/29695" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/29695</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
