<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Earth System Dynamics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Syst. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2190-4987</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/esd-13-879-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Inarticulate past: similarity properties of the ice–climate system and their implications for<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> paleo-record attribution</article-title><alt-title>Inarticulate past: similarity properties of the ice–climate system</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Inarticulate past: similarity properties of the ice--climate system}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Y. Verbitsky}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Verbitsky</surname><given-names>Mikhail Y.</given-names></name>
          <email>verbitskys@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-0284</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Gen5 Group, LLC, Newton, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Earth and Life Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Mikhail Y. Verbitsky (verbitskys@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>May</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>879</fpage><lpage>884</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>30</day><month>August</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Mikhail Y. Verbitsky</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/13/879/2022/esd-13-879-2022.html">This article is available from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/13/879/2022/esd-13-879-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/13/879/2022/esd-13-879-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/13/879/2022/esd-13-879-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e90">Reconstruction and explanation of past climate evolution using
proxy records is the essence of paleoclimatology. In this study, we use
dimensional analysis of a dynamical model on orbital timescales to
recognize theoretical limits of such forensic inquiries. Specifically, we
demonstrate that major past events could have been produced by physically
unsimilar processes   making the task of paleo-record attribution to a
particular phenomenon fundamentally difficult if not impossible. It
also means that any future scenario may not have a unique cause and, in this
sense, the orbital timescale future may be to some extent less sensitive to
specific terrestrial circumstances.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e102">The interpretation of most prominent events of climate history such as the
Middle Pleistocene transition (Ruddiman et al., 1986, Lisiecki and Raymo,
2005, Clark et al., 2021) has been an inspiration for several generations of
climate modelers (see for a review Saltzman, 2002; Tziperman et al., 2006;
Crucifix, 2013; Mitsui and Aihara, 2014; Paillard, 2015; Ashwin and
Ditlevsen, 2015; Verbitsky et al., 2018; Willeit et al., 2019; Riechers et
al., 2022). While specific physical mechanisms invoked to explain changing
glacial rhythmicity vary, they all include slow changes in ocean–atmosphere
governing parameters (e.g., Saltzman and Verbitsky, 1993; Raymo, 1997;
Paillard and Parrenin, 2004) or glaciation parameters (Clark and Pollard,
1998). On a more general level, all these theories in fact assume slow
changes in the intensities of positive (such as long-term
variations in carbon dioxide concentration, e.g., Saltzman and Verbitsky,
1993) or negative (for example, regolith erosion, Clark and Pollard, 1998,
or the diminished role of the geothermal heat flux relative to the vertical
temperature advection in growing ice sheets, Verbitsky and Crucifix, 2021)
system feedbacks. Though all physical phenomena invoked are, indeed, real
and may be plausible, the following question still remains unanswered: is it
possible to disambiguate the past and elevate a single “correct” theory?
Answering this question is the goal of our study.</p>
      <p id="d1e105">Indeed, this is the classical attribution challenge that has been
successfully addressed in the context of another well-known problem of
geophysics: the causality of the observed global warming. For this purpose,
the most comprehensive space-resolving models have been employed to
reproduce observed time series under different conditions and to prove (or
discredit) a candidate physical phenomenon (e.g., Stocker, 2014). Certainly,
these models cannot be employed on extremely long orbital timescales (10–100 kyr) due to computational constraints. In search of an alternative, we
turn here to dimensional analysis. Historically, dimensional analysis and
concepts of similarity have been used for studying physical phenomena,
complementing even the most sophisticated computational tools and providing
physical insight in situations where physical interpretation of the
higher-complexity modeling results may be difficult. Here, on orbital
timescales, when we retreat from physics-abundant space-resolving models to
more conceptual dynamical models, dimensional analysis may be promoted from
a supporting to a more prominent role.</p>
      <p id="d1e108">Several key terms need to be introduced before we outline the structure of
our paper. We will be using the definitions of similarities as they have
been articulated by  Barenblatt (2003). Suppose we have a physical
phenomenon that is governed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> physical parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameters of which
are parameters with independent dimensions. Then, according to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> theorem (Buckingham, 1914), the phenomenon can be described by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
adimensional similarity parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We will consider two
phenomena as being <italic>physically similar</italic> if they are described by identical similarity
parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dimensionless time series of physically similar
processes are also identical. If a similarity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be excluded from the description of a physical process (a phenomenon becomes
independent of it in the limit that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tends to zero or
infinity), we can talk about <italic>complete similarity</italic> of this physical process in this parameter:
regardless of the parameter's specific value, the process does not depend on it.
And, finally, we may observe <italic>incomplete similarity</italic> when none of similarity parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be neglected even if they are too small (or too big), but the number of
effective parameters may still be reduced because a phenomenon depends not
on actual values of similarity parameters but on their products in some
power degree (i.e., conglomerate similarity groups):
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Here
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are power degrees of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> involved into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e590">We are now ready to proceed with the structure of our paper. (a) First, we
will introduce our dynamical model and describe the major physical processes
involved. (b) Using dimensional analysis, we will define eight similarity
parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that completely define the model's behavior.
(c) Since our system does not have a property of complete similarity in any
of the individual parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we will attempt to
discover incomplete similarity and find conglomerate similarity groups.
Unfortunately, there are no specific algorithms that can help us to
determine governing conglomerate similarity groups <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if they do indeed exist. Therefore, we will articulate such conglomerate similarity
groups based on observed system behavior. (d) We will then discuss
implications of our findings for the attribution challenge and illustrate
our reasoning with a numerical experiment. (e) We will conclude our study
with some thoughts relating our results to the real-world climate system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Method</title>
      <p id="d1e649">For our experiments we employ the Verbitsky et al. (2018), VCV18 hereafter,
dynamical model of the ice–climate system. It has been derived from the
scaled mass- and heat-balance equations of the non-Newtonian ice flow, i.e.,
Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively, and has been combined with an energy-balance
equation of the global climate temperature (Eq. 3):

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M36" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the area of glaciation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) is the basal
ice-sheet temperature, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) is the global temperature of
the ocean–atmosphere (rest of the climate) system. In deriving Eqs. (1)
and (2) we consider ice sheets in the thin-boundary-layer approximation such
that their inertial forces are negligible relative to stress gradients, and
motion equations with very high accuracy can be written in a quasi-static
form. For such an approximation, a characteristic ice thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is connected
to ice area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a profile factor
assumed to be constant (Verbitsky and Chalikov, 1986, VCV18). Further,
Eq. (1) represents global ice balance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
where, again, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface mass influx. Equation (2) describes vertical ice
temperature advection with a time scale<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and Eq. (3) is the global energy-balance equation. The
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the snow precipitation rate; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is normalized
external forcing, specifically, mid-July insolation at 65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
(Berger and Loutre, 1991), of the amplitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) such
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the ice ablation rate due to
astronomical forcing;   <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ice ablation rate representing
the cumulative effect of the global climate on ice-sheet mass balance;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents ice discharge due to ice-sheet basal sliding; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal temperature response to global climate temperature change, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal temperature reaction to the changes in ice geometry; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the global
temperature response to ice geometry changes (e.g., albedo);   <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (adimensional),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are
sensitivity coefficients; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a reference glaciation area;
and   <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (s) is the timescale for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. When orbitally forced,
the model reproduced events of the last million years reasonably well,
except for the interglacial of 400 kyr ago (Marine Isotopic Stage 11). The
timing of all other interglacials coincides with Past Interglacial Working
Group of PAGES (2016) data (VCV18).</p>
      <p id="d1e1419">We will now focus on the most remarkable feature of the historical records –
a period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of climate response to the astronomical forcing. Indeed, it is the
change in the climate variability from the predominant period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 kyr to
the main periods of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 80–120 kyr that makes the Middle Pleistocene
transition so extraordinary. Though the amplitude increase was considered,
until recently, to be a necessary attribute of this transition, its presence
in the paleo-records is now questioned (Clark et al., 2021). We begin with
the dimensional analysis of the VCV18 Eqs. (1)–(3). Indeed, it has 11
governing parameters (including the amplitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the period
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the external forcing). If we choose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to
be parameters with independent dimensions, then in accordance with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> theorem a period of the system response can be fully described by eight
dimensionless similarity parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ς</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The numerical experiments with Eqs. (1)–(3) demonstrate that
individual similarity parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cannot be
discarded using simply “too big” or “too small” arguments. It means that
Eqs. (1)–(3) does not have a property of complete similarity in any
of the individual parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the same time, we
observed earlier (Verbitsky and Crucifix, 2020) that the period of Eqs. (1)–(3) response to the obliquity forcing of period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is mostly
governed by two dimensionless parameters:  by the ratio of the
astronomical forcing amplitude to terrestrial ice-sheet snow precipitation
rate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and by the adimensional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number. The physical
meaning of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number in the orbital domain becomes most evident if we take
a closer look at the structure of positive and negative feedbacks as they
appear in Eqs. (1)–(3). The time-dependent negative feedback is
proportional to the ice-sheet area size as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined by thermodynamical properties of an ice
sheet, most importantly by the Péclet number, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Pe</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is a characteristic mass influx, i.e., accumulation minus ablation, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
ice temperature diffusivity (VCV18, Verbitsky and Crucifix, 2021). This
negative feedback acts on ice-sheet mass balance with a vertical-advection
time delay and is amplified by a sensitivity coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that reflects the
intensity of basal sliding. The time-dependent positive feedback is global
temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the orbital domain, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is approximately proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The global temperature acts on the ice-sheet mass balance
“instantly” as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and with the vertical-advection
time delay as a component of basal temperature conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number is emerging in the orbital domain as a ratio
of amplitudes of time-dependent positive and negative feedbacks.
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M116" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        Specifically, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the system exhibits the obliquity-period doubling. When the positive
feedback and the obliquity forcing are less articulated, the system responds
with the 40 kyr period. Thus, slow changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number (for example, from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3000 kyr ago to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) and of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (for example, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 over the same time span) produce a change in the
ice–climate behavior similar to the Middle Pleistocene transition.</p>
      <p id="d1e2111"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>We now notice that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number can be presented in terms of similarity
parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, specifically
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M129" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        We also experimentally established that the period doubling sustains (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) if, under fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the period of the external
forcing changes from let us say <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 kyr to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 kyr. It can only happen if
in this domain similarity parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> make another
conglomerate similarity group that does not depend on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, specifically<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2318">Thus, Eq. (4) can be written as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M139" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        which is the pure case of incomplete similarity as we defined it above: none
of the similarity parameters can be neglected, but instead of eight governing
parameters we have been able to migrate to four governing conglomerate
similarity groups. Finally we may notice that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all large ice sheets. If, we set it
to be constant, we can re-write Eq. (7) in a more simple form as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M141" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        Recognition of governing conglomerate similarity groups is important because
it provides us with a powerful insight: different combinations of similarity
parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may produce the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number, i.e., <italic>physically unsimilar processes </italic>(formed by non-identical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <italic>may cause the same outcome.</italic> This observation is critical for our attribution
challenge. Certainly, precise disambiguation of historical records is always
a difficult task because even two physically similar processes having
identical adimensional similarity parameters and demonstrating the same
behavior may have been produced by different values of the physical parameters
involved, unless these parameters are physical constants or well defined.
The situation becomes especially challenging when we deal with conglomerate
similarity groups because, as we just stated, the same results may be
produced by non-identical similarity parameters (physically unsimilar
processes). This is the theoretical limit that we aspire to expose.</p>
      <p id="d1e2523">We will now apply our findings to the Middle Pleistocene transition. Since
the physical interpretation of the governing parameters incorporated in the
conglomerate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number is very straightforward, we may observe a similar (in
terms of the period-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> bifurcation) system response to changes of a completely
different physical nature. For example, parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as we have
discussed above, defines the intensity of the negative feedback and is formed as
a result of interplay between vertical ice advection, internal friction, and
geothermal heat flux (VCV18). An increased Péclet number of a growing ice sheet
diminishes the role of the geothermal heat flux and may reduce parameter
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> thus increasing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number. The same period-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> bifurcation can also
be caused, for example, by slow changes in the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that
defines the intensity of the positive feedback and incorporates the effects of
the albedo change or other atmospheric feedbacks. We solve Eqs. (1)–(3) for these two cases. In both cases we invoke a global cooling trend. In
our first experiment (Fig. 1a), this trend is translated into a reduction of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., a weakening of the ice-sheet negative feedback, and a corresponding increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75. The
increased continentality of the climate (reduced intensity of the snowfall
during colder climate) is accounted by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio increase
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7. In the second
experiment (Fig. 1b), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number also evolves from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  0.75,
but this time it is achieved by the increased intensity of the positive feedback
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). In both experiments, we used mid-July insolation at
65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Berger and Loutre, 1991) for the last 3 Myr as an
astronomical forcing. The millennial forcing is added to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
as a single sinusoid of 5 kyr period and doubled   (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) amplitude.
It is important to note that in the first experiment (changing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) only similarity parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are being changed,
but in the second experiment (changing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) the same changes in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number are caused by changing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It means that the processes involved in these two experiments are
not physically similar. Though the time series produced in these two cases
are obviously non-identical (see Fig. 1 inserts), we can observe that
different physical phenomena may produce the same changes in the
conglomerate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number and the same large-scale effect, i.e., the
period-doubling bifurcation at about 1 Myr ago.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2827">Ice–climate system response to a cooling trend presented as an
evolution of wavelet spectra over 3 Myr for calculated ice-sheet glaciation
area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>) and for the Lisiecki and
Raymo (2005) benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O record (<bold>c</bold>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> number evolves from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75 due to weakening of the negative feedback
<bold>(a)</bold> and due to intensified positive feedback <bold>(b)</bold>. The vertical axis is the
period (kyr); the horizontal axis is time (kyr before present). The color
scale shows the continuous Morlet wavelet amplitude, the thick line
indicates the peaks with 95 % confidence, and the shaded area indicates
the cone of influence for wavelet transform. Inserts are corresponding time
series.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/13/879/2022/esd-13-879-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2916">We do not attempt here to fully reproduce paleo-records such as Lisiecki
and Raymo (2005) and a discussion of whether a period doubling should be
accompanied by the amplitude increase is outside of the current paper's
scope. We will just remark that the amplitude of the system response is the
function of not just the period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> but also of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio
(Verbitsky and Crucifix, 2020) and, for example, less articulated
continentality of colder climates may explain diminished amplitude contrasts
as has been recently advocated by Clark et al. (2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e2938">Indeed, as we have already indicated, we used mid-July insolation at
65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N for the last 3 Myr as an astronomical forcing.
Apart from that, these examples may also serve as an illustration of some
future scenarios of the climate system behavior under post-industrial
atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration reduction as implied by Ridgwell
and Hargreaves (2007). Again, regardless of the physical nature of the
underlying dynamical system, it exhibits a 40 kyr rhythmicity in the first 1.5 Myr of its evolution and consequent obliquity-period doubling.
This probable renaissance of ice ages is different from the one envisioned
by Talento and Ganapolski (2021), which is based on the model tuned to the
Late Pleistocene (last 800 kyr) ice-volume data  and thus postulates only
100 kyr period variability for the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>3</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2958">The idea of the current presentation is simple, but its implication may be
important: if the ice–climate system is defined by conglomerate similarity
groups, then we may be limited in our ability to disambiguate historical
records and different physical processes may produce the same future scenarios.
The latter is intriguing because since Saltzman (1962) and  Lorenz (1963) discovered a hydrodynamic system's sensitivity to initial
conditions, the concept of deterministic chaos has become a dominant concept of
weather and climate theory. Our findings suggest that if we consider orbital
time scales and, instead of time series, focus on their more generalized
attributes such as the period of the system response to the astronomical
forcing, we may observe that the behavior of these attributes may be, to
some extent, less sensitive to the physical nature of the terrestrial
governing processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e2961">But do conglomerate similarity groups indeed govern the dynamics of the real
orbital-scale climate system? So far, these groups have been found only in
our VCV18 low-order dynamical model, and although this model has been
explicitly derived from the conservation laws, our concept will remain
hypothetical until it is supported by empirical data. We speculate, though,
that existing historical records may perhaps provide some support to our
theory. To evaluate the feasibility of a diagnostic approach, we entertain
here a simple scaling exercise. Suppose that an empirical time series, such
as a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O record, is created by a parent system (other than the
VCV18) which is controlled by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> physical parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of them having
independent dimensions). If we choose the period of the astronomical forcing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be among parameters with independent dimensions, then in accordance with
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> theorem we have
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M193" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The wavelet spectrum of the Late Pleistocene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O variability
in response to the precession (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 kyr period) and obliquity
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 kyr period) forcing shows the dominance of 40 kyr and
80 kyr periods (Fig. 1c). If we are willing to accept it as a hint of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 kyr and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 kyr, then, since some of the similarity
parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
depend on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the period-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> independence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> may only happen when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> make conglomerate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-independent groups. In other words, <italic>period independence of the</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>function may be a fingerprint of conglomerate similarity groups</italic>. Indeed, the diagnostics of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
function may require much more sophisticated instruments than our ad hoc
reasoning, and the records will likely not explicitly reveal what the
conglomerate similarity groups look like; nevertheless, their mere existence
would corroborate the idea of this paper.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3248">The MATLAB R2015b code and data to reproduce the results of the numerical experiment as they are presented in Fig. 1 are available at
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6525434" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6525434</ext-link>
(Verbitsky, 2022).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3258">This paper refers exclusively to published research articles and their data. We refer the reader to the cited literature for access to data.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3264">The author has declared that there are no competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3270">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3276">The author is grateful to Michel Crucifix for multiple
discussions related to this topic and to Jeremy Bassis and anonymous
reviewer for their helpful comments.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3281">This paper was edited by Anders Levermann and reviewed by Jeremy Bassis and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ashwin, P. and Ditlevsen, P.: The middle Pleistocene transition as a generic
bifurcation on a slow manifold, Clim. Dynam., 45, 2683–2695,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2501-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-015-2501-9</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Barenblatt, G. I.: Scaling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 0 521 53394 5, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Berger, A. and Loutre, M. F.: Insolation values for the climate of the last
10 million years, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 10, 297–317, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Buckingham, E.: On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of
dimensional equations, Phys. Rev., 4, 345–376, 1914.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Clark, P. U. and Pollard, D.: Origin of the middle Pleistocene transition by
ice sheet erosion of regolith, Paleoceanography, 13, 1–9, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clark, P. U., Shakun, J., Rosenthal, Y., Köhler, P., Schrag, D., Pollard, D., Liu, Z., and Bartlein, P.: Requiem for the Regolith Hypothesis: Sea-Level and Temperature Reconstructions Provide a New Template for the Middle Pleistocene Transition, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-13981, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13981</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crucifix, M.: Why could ice ages be unpredictable?, Clim. Past, 9, 2253–2267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2253-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-2253-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lisiecki, L. E. and Raymo, M. E.: A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57
globally distributed benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O records, Paleoceanography,
20, PA1003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004PA001071</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E. N.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos.
Sci., 20,   130–141, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mitsui, T. and Aihara, K.: Dynamics between order and chaos in conceptual
models of glacial cycles, Clim. Dynam., 42, 3087–3099, 2014.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paillard, D.: Quaternary glaciations: from observations to theories,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 107, 11–24,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.10.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.10.002</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Paillard, D. and Parrenin, F.: The Antarctic ice sheet and the triggering of
deglaciations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 227, 263–271, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Past Interglacial Working Group of PAGES: Interglacials of the last 800,000
years, Rev. Geophys., 54, 162–219, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Raymo, M.: The timing of major climate terminations, Paleoceanography, 12,
577–585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97PA01169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97PA01169</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ridgwell, A., and Hargreaves, J. C.: Regulation of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by
deep-sea sediments in an Earth system model, Global Biogeochem. Cy.
21, GB2008,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002764" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002764</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Riechers, K., Mitsui, T., Boers, N., and Ghil, M.: Orbital insolation variations, intrinsic climate variability, and Quaternary glaciations, Clim. Past, 18, 863–893, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-863-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-18-863-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ruddiman, W. F., Raymo, M., and McIntyre, A.: Matuyama 41,000-year cycles:
North Atlantic Ocean and northern hemisphere ice sheets, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 80, 117–129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90024-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(86)90024-5</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Saltzman, B.: Finite amplitude free convection as an initial value
problem – I, J. Atmos. Sci., 19,  329–341, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Saltzman, B.: Dynamical paleoclimatology: generalized theory of global
climate change, in: Vol. 80, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, ISBN 0 12 617331 1, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Saltzman, B. and Verbitsky, M. Y.: Multiple instabilities and modes of
glacial rhythmicity in the Plio-Pleistocene: a general theory of late
Cenozoic climatic change, Clim. Dynam., 9, 1–15, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stocker, T. (Ed.): Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working
Group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, chap. 10: Detection
and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional, 867–952, ISBN 978-1-107-05799-1,
ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0  2014.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Talento, S. and Ganopolski, A.: Reduced-complexity model for the impact of anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions on future glacial cycles, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1275–1293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1275-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-12-1275-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tziperman, E., Raymo, M. E., Huybers, P., and Wunsch, C.: Consequences of
pacing the Pleistocene 100 kyr ice ages by nonlinear phase locking to
Milankovitch forcing, Paleoceanography, 21, PA4206,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005PA001241" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005PA001241</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Verbitsky, M.:   Supplementary code and data to ESD paper “Inarticulate past: similarity properties of the ice–climate system and their implications for paleo-record attribution” by M. Y. Verbitsky, Zenodo  [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6525434" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6525434</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Verbitsky, M. Y. and Chalikov, D. V.: Modelling of the
Glaciers-Ocean-Atmosphere System, Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad,  edited by:   Monin, A. S., 135 pp., 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Verbitsky, M. Y. and Crucifix, M.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-theorem generalization of the ice-age theory, Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 281–289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-281-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-11-281-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Verbitsky, M. Y. and Crucifix, M.: ESD Ideas: The Peclet number is a cornerstone of the orbital and millennial Pleistocene variability, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 63–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-63-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-12-63-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Verbitsky, M. Y., Crucifix, M., and Volobuev, D. M.: A theory of Pleistocene glacial rhythmicity, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1025–1043, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1025-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-9-1025-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Willeit, M., Ganopolski, A., Calov, A., and Brovkin, V.: Mid-Pleistocene
transition in glacial cycles explained by declining CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and regolith
removal, Science Advances 5,  eaav7337,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aav7337</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Inarticulate past: similarity properties of the ice–climate system and their implications for paleo-record attribution</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ashwin, P. and Ditlevsen, P.: The middle Pleistocene transition as a generic
bifurcation on a slow manifold, Clim. Dynam., 45, 2683–2695,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2501-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2501-9</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Barenblatt, G. I.: Scaling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 0 521 53394 5, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Berger, A. and Loutre, M. F.: Insolation values for the climate of the last
10 million years, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 10, 297–317, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Buckingham, E.: On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of
dimensional equations, Phys. Rev., 4, 345–376, 1914.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, P. U. and Pollard, D.: Origin of the middle Pleistocene transition by
ice sheet erosion of regolith, Paleoceanography, 13, 1–9, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, P. U., Shakun, J., Rosenthal, Y., Köhler, P., Schrag, D., Pollard, D., Liu, Z., and Bartlein, P.: Requiem for the Regolith Hypothesis: Sea-Level and Temperature Reconstructions Provide a New Template for the Middle Pleistocene Transition, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-13981, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13981</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Crucifix, M.: Why could ice ages be unpredictable?, Clim. Past, 9, 2253–2267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2253-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2253-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Lisiecki, L. E. and Raymo, M. E.: A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57
globally distributed benthic <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O records, Paleoceanography,
20, PA1003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E. N.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos.
Sci., 20,   130–141, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Mitsui, T. and Aihara, K.: Dynamics between order and chaos in conceptual
models of glacial cycles, Clim. Dynam., 42, 3087–3099, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Paillard, D.: Quaternary glaciations: from observations to theories,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 107, 11–24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.10.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.10.002</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Paillard, D. and Parrenin, F.: The Antarctic ice sheet and the triggering of
deglaciations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 227, 263–271, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Past Interglacial Working Group of PAGES: Interglacials of the last 800,000
years, Rev. Geophys., 54, 162–219, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Raymo, M.: The timing of major climate terminations, Paleoceanography, 12,
577–585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97PA01169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97PA01169</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Ridgwell, A., and Hargreaves, J. C.: Regulation of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> by
deep-sea sediments in an Earth system model, Global Biogeochem. Cy.
21, GB2008,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002764" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002764</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Riechers, K., Mitsui, T., Boers, N., and Ghil, M.: Orbital insolation variations, intrinsic climate variability, and Quaternary glaciations, Clim. Past, 18, 863–893, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-863-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-863-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Ruddiman, W. F., Raymo, M., and McIntyre, A.: Matuyama 41,000-year cycles:
North Atlantic Ocean and northern hemisphere ice sheets, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 80, 117–129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90024-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90024-5</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Saltzman, B.: Finite amplitude free convection as an initial value
problem – I, J. Atmos. Sci., 19,  329–341, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Saltzman, B.: Dynamical paleoclimatology: generalized theory of global
climate change, in: Vol. 80, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, ISBN 0 12 617331 1, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Saltzman, B. and Verbitsky, M. Y.: Multiple instabilities and modes of
glacial rhythmicity in the Plio-Pleistocene: a general theory of late
Cenozoic climatic change, Clim. Dynam., 9, 1–15, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. (Ed.): Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working
Group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, chap. 10: Detection
and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional, 867–952, ISBN 978-1-107-05799-1,
ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0  2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Talento, S. and Ganopolski, A.: Reduced-complexity model for the impact of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions on future glacial cycles, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1275–1293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1275-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1275-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Tziperman, E., Raymo, M. E., Huybers, P., and Wunsch, C.: Consequences of
pacing the Pleistocene 100&thinsp;kyr ice ages by nonlinear phase locking to
Milankovitch forcing, Paleoceanography, 21, PA4206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005PA001241" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005PA001241</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Verbitsky, M.:   Supplementary code and data to ESD paper “Inarticulate past: similarity properties of the ice–climate system and their implications for paleo-record attribution” by M. Y. Verbitsky, Zenodo  [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6525434" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6525434</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Verbitsky, M. Y. and Chalikov, D. V.: Modelling of the
Glaciers-Ocean-Atmosphere System, Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad,  edited by:   Monin, A. S., 135 pp., 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Verbitsky, M. Y. and Crucifix, M.: <i>π</i>-theorem generalization of the ice-age theory, Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 281–289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-281-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-281-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Verbitsky, M. Y. and Crucifix, M.: ESD Ideas: The Peclet number is a cornerstone of the orbital and millennial Pleistocene variability, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 63–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-63-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-63-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Verbitsky, M. Y., Crucifix, M., and Volobuev, D. M.: A theory of Pleistocene glacial rhythmicity, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1025–1043, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1025-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1025-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Willeit, M., Ganopolski, A., Calov, A., and Brovkin, V.: Mid-Pleistocene
transition in glacial cycles explained by declining CO<sub>2</sub> and regolith
removal, Science Advances 5,  eaav7337,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7337" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7337</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
